36C25521Q0097 - D.3 - Past Performance.pdf
PDF 141 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 36C25521Q0097_1 STLHCS IONM Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C25521Q0097_1
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25521Q0097 - D.7 - WAGE DETERMINATIONS.pdf | ||
| 36C25521Q0097 - D.1 - QASP Revised.pdf | ||
| 36C25521Q0097 - D.2 - Conflict of Interest.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25521Q0097 - D.6 - Subcontractor Questionaire Revised.pdf | ||
| 36C25521Q0097_1 Final.pdf | ||
| 36C25521Q0097 - D.4 - Contractor Rules of Behavior.pdf | ||
| 36C25521Q0097 - D.5 - Immigration Certification.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment D.3 - Past Performance Survey Solicitation Number 36C25521Q0097
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
Offeror’s Name: ___________________________________________________
Contract Number: __________________________________________________
Contract Type and Dollar Value: _______________________________________
Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________________________________________
“O” =Outstanding = Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements “A” =Above Average = Performance exceeded the contract requirements “S” = Satisfactory = Performance met the contract requirements “M” = Marginal = Performance met the minimum contract requirements, but some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory “U” = Unacceptable = Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements Please rate and provide information and detailed comments for the following:
Circle one
1. To what extent did the contractor comply with contract requirements? O A S M U
2. If reports were required, were they accurate in meeting contract requirements?
O A S M U
3. To what extent did the contractor use appropriate personnel for contract requirements?
O A S M U
4. To what extent did the contractor display technical expertise? O A S M U
5. To what extent was contractor able to meet the performance schedule? O A S M U
6. To what extent was contractor flexible in responding to changing needs? O A S M U
7. To what extent was the contractor reliable? O A S M U
8. To what extent was the contractor responsive to technical directions? O A S M U
Attachment D.3 - Past Performance Survey Solicitation Number 36C25521Q0097
Additional Comments:
Name of Evaluator: ____________________________
Signature of Evaluator: _________________________
Title: _______________________________________
Company: ___________________________________
Telephone No.: _______________________________
Date: ________________
Your assistance is requested by the Department of Veterans Affairs to assist with establishing the performance history for the Company (Offeror) named above. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, please email the complete past performance questionnaire(s) to: Jason.Condiff@va.gov
9. To what extent did contractor notify you of problems or potential problems?
O A S M U
10. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain.
O A S M U
11. Would you award another contract to the party being evaluated? If no, please explain:
O A S M U
12. Was the customer satisfied with the end product? If no, please explain: O A S M U mailto:Jason.Condiff@va.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .