ECS HazMatReport.pdf

ASBESTOS AND LEAD BASED PAINT SURVEY -

PROJECT # TMM2019 ADDENDUM 1

HAMPTON VAMC BUILDING 148

100 EMANCIPATION DRIVE

HAMPTON, VIRGINIA 23667

ECS PROJECT NO. 47:11164

FOR: TOLAND MIZELL MOLNAR, LLC

JANUARY 19, 2021

January 19, 2021

Mr. Thomas Steele Toland Mizell Molnar, LLC 590 Means Street NW Suite 200 Atlanta, Georgia 30318 tsteele@toland-mizell-molnar.com

ECS Project No. 47:11164

Reference: Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey - Project # TMM2019 Addendum 1, Hampton VAMC Building 148, 100 Emancipation Drive, Hampton, Virginia

Dear Mr. Steele:

ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC (ECS) is pleased to provide Toland Mizell Molnar, LLC with the results of the above referenced Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey - Project # TMM2019 Addendum 1 asbestos sampling performed at Hampton VAMC Building 148 located at 100 Emancipation Drive in Hampton, Virginia. This report summarizes our observations, analytical results, findings, and recommendations related to the work performed. The work described in this report was performed by ECS in general accordance with the Scope of Services described in ECS Proposal Number 47:16553-EP and the terms and conditions of the agreement authorizing those services.

ECS appreciates this opportunity to provide Toland Mizell Molnar, LLC with our services. If we can be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely, ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC

Robert Curran Christopher J. Chapman, CIH Environmental Scientist Director of Industrial Hygiene rcurran@ecslimited.com cchapman@ecslimited.com 804-353-6333 804-353-6333

2119-D North Hamilton Street, Suite D, Richmond, Virginia 23230 • T: 804-353-6333 • F: 703-834-5527 • ecslimited.com

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The subject property is improved with a 66,465 square foot, hospital building reportedly originally constructed in 1980. At the time of the sampling the subject building was vacant and is currently scheduled for the aesthetic finishes to be renovated.

The purpose of the additional asbestos sampling was to determine if the spray-on fireproofing in the building contains trace <1% asbestos. The sampling was limited to the spray-on fireproofing material located throughout Building 148. In our original survey report for this building dated 12/ 2/2020, ECS had detected < 1 % asbestos in one of five samples collected. Due to the age of the building, ECS did not believe that the result was accurate as US EPA banned the use of asbestos spray applied fire proofing materials in 1973. ECS believed the positive result reported was laboratory error or sample contamination. ECS collected nine additional fire proofing samples from the building including one sample collected at or near where the original sample was reported to contain trace levels of asbestos.

Based on the laboratory analysis of the bulk samples collected during the survey, none of the materials sampled were determined to contain asbestos.

The executive summary is an integral portion of this report, however, ECS recommends the report be read in its entirety.

ECS Project # 47:11164

PAGETABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.0 PURPOSE

3.0 METHODOLOGY

3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

4.0 RESULTS

4.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

6.0 LIMITATIONS

TABLE OF APPENDICES

Appendix I: Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

Appendix II: Certifications/Licenses

1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

constructed in 1980. At the time of the sampling the subject building was vacant and is currently scheduled for the aesthetic finishes to be renovated.

2.0 PURPOSE

The purpose of the additional asbestos sampling was to determine if the spray-on fireproofing in the building contains trace <1% asbestos. The sampling was limited to the spray-on fireproofing material located throughout Building 148. In our original survey report, ECS had detected <1 % asbestos in one of five samples collected. Due to the age of the building, ECS did not believe that the result was accurate as US EPA banned the use of asbestos spray applied fire proofing materials in 1973. ECS believed the positive result reported was laboratory error or sample contamination. ECS collected nine additional fire proofing samples from the building including one sample collected at or near where the original sample was reported to contain trace levels of asbestos.

3.0 METHODOLOGY

ECS performed the authorized Scope of Services in general accordance with our proposal, standard industry practice(s) and methods specified by regulation(s) for the identification of asbestos containing materials (ACMs).

3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

The non-invasive/non-destructive asbestos survey was performed by an asbestos inspector who has received EPA accredited training and is appropriately licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Samples of suspect ACMs were collected utilizing hand tools and placed into individual, labeled plastic bags. Unique bulk suspect ACM samples were submitted to Environmental Hazards Services in Richmond, Virginia for analysis via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in accordance with current EPA-600 methodology. Materials consisting of additional layers were analyzed separately.

Environmental Hazards Services is listed as an accredited laboratory by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Plan (NVLAP) managed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for bulk sample analysis by currently approved EPA methodology by PLM.

During the survey, ECS attempted to identify suspect ACMs in readily accessible areas. However, due to the destructive means required to identify some materials, certain areas were deemed inaccessible (i.e. behind walls or sub grade materials) and were not surveyed for suspect ACMs.

Unidentified suspect ACMs may be located in these and/or other inaccessible areas. The scope of this sampling was limited to the spray-on fireproofing in the building. Suspect asbestos containing materials outside the scope of this sampling and not previously sampled in the initial survey for the building should be assumed to be asbestos containing or sampled by a Virginia licensed Asbestos Inspector for their asbestos content.

Samples were collected in general accordance with EPA Standard 40 CFR 763 Subpart E, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.1101 Inspection Protocol.

Multiple samples of each unique material were submitted. Samples were analyzed using “Positive

January 19, 2021

Stop” methodology. If one sample of a homogeneous material is reported to contain asbestos, the remaining samples of that material are not analyzed. EPA regulations stipulate that if one sample contains asbestos the entire quantity of that material contains asbestos, regardless of additional analysis.

4.0 RESULTS

The following is a summary of laboratory results, findings and observations.

4.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

In total, nine bulk samples from one homogeneous areas were submitted to the laboratory of which nine layers were analyzed.

None of the bulk samples submitted to Environmental Hazards Services were reported to contain detectable concentrations of asbestos. If additional suspect asbestos-containing materials are uncovered which were not accessible during this sampling event, it is recommended that these materials be sampled or tested immediately upon discovery for asbestos content by an asbestos inspector in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101.

The scope of the asbestos sampling was limited to sampling of the spray on fireproofing material.

During the initial asbestos survey one bulk sample of five samples of this material was reported to contain trace <1% asbestos. During this sampling event ECS attempted to duplicate the sample location that was reported to contain trace <1% asbestos in Room B100. ECS additionally collected eight samples in random locations throughout the building. All nine samples collected were determined to not be asbestos containing. ECS believes that the initial sample result was the result of laboratory error or inadvertent contamination of the sample during the initial survey. Based on the construction history of the building and subsequent sampling of the spray-on fireproofing, ECS recommends that this material be considered non-asbestos containing.

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

Based on our understanding of the purpose of the Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey - Project # TMM2019 Addendum 1, the results of laboratory analysis, and our findings and observations, ECS presents the following recommendations.

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

No asbestos was detected in the nine fire proofing samples collected. ECS believes that the initial sample result was the result of laboratory error or inadvertent contamination of the sample during the initial survey. Based on the construction history of the building and subsequent sampling of the spray-on fireproofing, ECS recommends that this material be considered non-asbestos containing.

6.0 LIMITATIONS

The conclusions and recommendations presented within this report are based upon a reasonable level of assessment within normal bounds and standards of professional practice for a site in this particular geographic setting. ECS is not responsible or liable for the discovery and elimination of hazards that may potentially cause damage, accidents, or injuries.

January 19, 2021

The observations, conclusions, and recommendations pertaining to environmental conditions at the subject site are necessarily limited to conditions observed, and/or materials reviewed at the time this study was undertaken. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made with regard to the conclusions and recommendations presented within this report. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client. This report is not intended to be used or relied upon in connection with other projects or by other unidentified third parties without the written consent of ECS and the client.

During this study, samples were submitted for analysis at an accredited laboratory via polarized light microscopy. As with any similar survey of this nature, actual conditions exist only at the precise locations from which samples were collected. Certain inferences are based on the results of this sampling and related testing to form a professional opinion of conditions in areas beyond those from which the samples were collected. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made.

Our recommendations are in part based on federal, state, and local regulations and guidelines. ECS does not assume the responsibility of the person(s) in charge of the site, or otherwise undertake responsibility for reporting to any local, state, or federal public agencies, any conditions at the site that may present a potential danger to public health, safety, or the environment. Under this scope of services, ECS assumes no responsibility regarding any response actions initiated as a result of these findings. General compliance with regulations and response actions are the sole responsibility of the Client and should be conducted in accordance with local, state, and/or federal requirements.

January 19, 2021

Appendix I: Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

Asbestos Bulk Analysis Report

Client:

Report Number:

Project/Test Address:

Client Number:

Reported Date:

Received Date:

Analyzed Date:

ECS Mid-Atlantic - Richmond 01/06/2021

200625

01/07/2021

21-01-00461

7469 Whitepine Rd

Telephone: 800.347.4010

Richmond, VA 23237

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C.

Hampton VAMC Building 148; Hampton, Virginia

Laboratory Results Fax Number:

804-353-9478

2119 D North Hamilton St Richmond, VA 23230

01/06/2021

Layer Type Asbestos Client Sample Number

Other Materials

Lab Gross DescriptionLab Sample Number Client Sample Description

Pale Gray Fibrous; Homogeneous21-01-00461-001

1-1

3% Cellulose 55% Fibrous Glass 4% Talc 38% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Spray-on Fireproofing

Pale Gray Fibrous; Homogeneous21-01-00461-002

1-2

3% Cellulose 55% Fibrous Glass 2% Talc 40% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Spray-on Fireproofing

Pale Gray Fibrous; Homogeneous21-01-00461-003

1-3

4% Cellulose 55% Fibrous Glass 1% Talc 40% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Spray-on Fireproofing

Pale Gray Fibrous; Homogeneous21-01-00461-004

1-4

3% Cellulose 55% Fibrous Glass 2% Talc 40% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Spray-on Fireproofing

1 of 3Page

Pale Gray Fibrous; Homogeneous21-01-00461-005

1-5

2% Cellulose 55% Fibrous Glass 1% Talc 42% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Spray-on Fireproofing

Pale Gray Fibrous; Homogeneous21-01-00461-006

1-6

3% Cellulose 55% Fibrous Glass 2% Talc 40% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Spray-on Fireproofing

Pale Gray Fibrous; Homogeneous21-01-00461-007

1-7

2% Cellulose 60% Fibrous Glass 1% Talc 37% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Spray-on Fireproofing

Pale Gray Fibrous; Homogeneous21-01-00461-008

1-8

2% Cellulose 55% Fibrous Glass 1% Talc 42% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Spray-on Fireproofing

Pale Gray Fibrous; Homogeneous21-01-00461-009

1-9

4% Cellulose 55% Fibrous Glass 1% Talc 40% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Spray-on Fireproofing

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:200625 21-01-00461

Hampton VAMC Building 148; Hampton, Virginia

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Gross Description Client Sample Number Client Sample Description Lab Sample Number Layer Type

2 of 3Page

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:200625 21-01-00461

Hampton VAMC Building 148; Hampton, Virginia

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Gross Description Client Sample Number Client Sample Description Lab Sample Number Layer Type

Tasha Eaddy

1% Asbestos

Analyst:

Reporting Limit:

Method:

QC Blank:

QC Sample:

Mark Case

EPA Method 600/R-93/116, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020

QA/QC Clerk

Reviewed By Authorized Signatory:

42-M22011-2

SRM 1866 Fiberglass condition of the samples analyzed was acceptable upon receipt per laboratory protocol unless otherwise noted on this report. Each distinct component in an inhomogeneous sample was analyzed separately and reported as a composite. Results represent the analysis of samples submitted by the client. Sample location, description, area, volume, etc., was provided by the client. This report cannot be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of the Environmental Hazards Service, L.L.C. California Certification #2319 NY ELAP #11714 NVLAP #101882-0 VELAP 460172. All information concerning sampling location, date, and time can be found on Chain-of-Custody. Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. does not perform any sample collection.

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. recommends reanalysis by point count (for more accurate quantification) or Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), (for enhanced detection capabilities) for materials regulated by EPA NESHAP (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) and found to contain less than ten percent (<10%) asbestos by polarized light microscopy (PLM). Both services are available for an additional fee.

400 Point Count Analysis, where noted, performed per EPA Method 600/R-93/116 with a Reporting Limit of 0.25%.

* All California samples analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020, Dec. 1982.

3 of 3Page

Appendix II: Certifications/ Licenses

Name CURRAN, ROBERT WILLIAM License Number 3303003809

License Description Asbestos Inspector License Rank Asbestos Inspector

Address RICHMOND, VA 23220-0000 Initial Certification Date 2012-11-30

Expiration Date 2021-11-30

The data located on this website are not the public records of the Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation (DPOR). All public records are physically located at DPOR's Public Records Section: 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 400, Richmond, VA 23233. While DPOR works to ensure the accuracy of the data provided online, the data available on these pages are updated routinely but may not be up to date at all times (due to document processing delays, technical maintenance, etc.).

DPOR assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the information provided or for any reliance on data provided online. While DPOR has attempted to ensure that the data contained herein are accurate and reflect the status of its regulants, DPOR makes no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of this data. If discrepancies or errors are discovered, please inform DPOR so that appropriate action may be taken.

DPOR License Lookup build 1,426 (built 2020-10-01 09:09:15).

License Lookup: License Search Results http://dporweb.dpor.virginia.gov/LicenseLookup/LicenseDetail

1 of 1 1/19/2021, 9:05 AM

This is a blank page.

ASBESTOS AND LEAD BASED PAINT SURVEY -

PROJECT # TMM2019

BUILDING 148

100 EMANCIPATION DRIVE

HAMPTON, VIRGINIA 23667

ECS PROJECT NO. 47:11164

FOR: TOLAND MIZELL MOLNAR, LLC

DECEMBER 2, 2020

December 2, 2020

Mr. Thomas Steele Toland Mizell Molnar, LLC 590 Means Street NW Suite 200 Atlanta, Georgia 30318 tsteele@toland-mizell-molnar.com

ECS Project No. 47:11164

Reference: Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey - Project # TMM2019, Building 148, 100 Emancipation Drive, Hampton, Virginia

Dear Mr. Steele:

ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC (ECS) is pleased to provide Toland Mizell Molnar, LLC with the results of the above referenced asbestos and lead based paint survey performed at Building 148 located on the campus of the Hampton VAMC at 100 Emancipation Drive in Hampton, Virginia. This report summarizes our observations, analytical results, findings, and recommendations related to the work performed. The work described in this report was performed by ECS in general accordance with the Scope of Services described in ECS Proposal Number 47:16553-EP and the terms and conditions of the agreement authorizing those services.

ECS appreciates this opportunity to provide Toland Mizell Molnar, LLC with our services. If we can be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely, ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC

Robert Curran Christopher J. Chapman, CIH Environmental Scientist Director of Industrial Hygiene rcurran@ecslimied.com cchapman@eclimited.com 804-353-6333 804-353-6333

2119-D North Hamilton Street, Suite D, Richmond, Virginia 23230 • T: 804-353-6333 • F: 703-834-5527 • ecslimited.com

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

constructed in 1980. At the time of our survey the subject building was vacant and is currently scheduled for the aesthetic finishes to be renovated.

The purpose of the survey was to determine if asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paints (LBPs) are present in the subject building. The survey was performed within interior areas of the subject building only, excluding the exterior and roof.

Based on the laboratory analysis of the suspect bulk samples collected during the survey, none of the materials sampled contained asbestos. One sample of spray-on fire-proofing was reported to contain trace <1% asbestos. The remaining two samples collected of the same material were negative for asbestos. Based on site conditions and construction history, ECS believes this material may not contain trace (<1%) asbestos and the sample contamination could be the result of laboratory error or extraneous contamination not directly related to the subject material. However, ECS recommends additional supplemental sampling as soon as possible to determine if the material in fact contains trace asbestos.

The lead-based paint survey was performed by a Commonwealth of Virginia licensed Lead Inspector.

Painted and/or glazed surfaces were assessed for lead content using a Direct-Read X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrometer. Lead-Based Glaze was identified on the following building materials/components:

• White Porcelain Sinks

• White Porcelain Urinals

• White Metal Janitor Slop Sinks

• White Porcelain Bathtubs

• Tan Ceramic Wall Tiles

• Beige Ceramic Wall Tiles

The executive summary is an integral portion of this report, however, ECS recommends the report be read in its entirety.

PAGETABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.0 PURPOSE

3.0 METHODOLOGY

3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

3.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

4.0 RESULTS

4.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

4.2 Suspect or Assumed Asbestos-Containing Materials

4.3 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

5.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

6.0 LIMITATIONS

TABLE OF APPENDICES

Appendix I: Asbestos Sample Locations

Appendix II: Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

Appendix III: XRF Lead-Based Paint Readings

Appendix IV: Laboratory Report(s)

Appendix V: Certifications/Licenses

1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

The subject building is located on the campus the Hampton VAMC located at 100 Emancipation Drive in Hampton, Virginia. Building 148, referred to as the "Domicillary", contains 66,455 square feet of space and was reportedly originally constructed in 1980. During the survey the building was mostly un-occupied and ECS understands that the building is scheduled for extensive interior aesthetic renovations. The scope of the survey in Building 148 included surveying the accessible interior finishes from the ceiling materials down to the flooring materials. The survey did not include assessment of the mechanical systems. ECS was informed by the on-site contact during the survey that only the visible aesthetic finishes would be disturbed as part of the project. The client confirmed this and instructed ECS to survey only the materials that will reportedly be impacted by this project.

Note: As part of the original scope of this project, the interior of Building 146 was also to be surveyed for asbestos and LBP. ECS was informed by the on-site Hampton VAMC engineer for the project that the interior of Building 146 was no longer included in the scope because access was restricted to the building as a result of the COVID 19 Pandemic. ECS surveyed the exterior windows of building 146 as part of project TMM2015 but did not survey any other areas of the building as part of project TMM2019.

2.0 PURPOSE

The purpose of the asbestos and LBP survey was to identify ACMs and LBPs, which may require special handling and/or disposal if removed during construction activities. The identification of ACMs may require trained labor, regulated work practices, and special disposal. The identification of LBP or other lead hazards may require disclosure to contractors and monitoring of lead exposure.

3.0 METHODOLOGY

ECS performed the authorized Scope of Services in general accordance with our proposal, standard industry practice(s) and methods specified by regulation(s) for the identification of ACMs and LBPs.

3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

The non-invasive/non-destructive asbestos survey was performed by an asbestos inspector who has received EPA accredited training and is appropriately licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Samples of suspect ACMs were collected utilizing hand tools and placed into individual, labeled plastic bags. Unique bulk suspect ACM samples were submitted to Environmental Hazards Services in Richmond, Virginia for analysis via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in accordance with current EPA-600 methodology. Materials consisting of additional layers were analyzed separately.

Environmental Hazards Services is listed as an accredited laboratory by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Plan (NVLAP) managed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for bulk sample analysis by currently approved EPA methodology by PLM.

During the survey, ECS attempted to identify suspect ACMs in readily accessible areas. However, due to the destructive means required to identify some materials, certain areas were deemed inaccessible (i.e. behind walls or sub grade materials) and were not surveyed for suspect ACMs. ECS was informed by the on-site Hampton VAMC contact that room 142 which includes the fitness room

December 2, 2020 and Kinesiotherapy room is not included in the scope of the renovation so ECS did not survey these areas. ECS did not survey the ceiling cavity areas of the building because ECS was informed that the mechanical systems are not included in the scope of the renovation. The exterior and roof were excluded from the scope of the survey so these areas were not surveyed. Unidentified suspect ACMs may be located in these and/or other inaccessible areas.

Samples were collected in general accordance with EPA Standard 40 CFR 763 Subpart E, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.1101 Inspection Protocol.

Multiple samples of each unique material were submitted. Samples were analyzed using “Positive Stop” methodology. If one sample of a homogeneous material is reported to contain asbestos, the remaining samples of that material are not analyzed. EPA regulations stipulate that if one sample contains asbestos the entire quantity of that material contains asbestos, regardless of additional analysis.

3.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

The Lead-Based Paint (LBP) survey was performed by a Virginia licensed Lead Risk Assessor using a X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrometer to identify lead concentrations in painted and glazed surfaces.

The survey was conducted utilizing the U.S. EPA definition of LBP. Under this definition, painted surfaces which contain lead in concentrations equal to or greater than 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (≥ 1.0 mg/cm2) are classified as coated with LBP. Paints with concentrations of lead detectable by the XRF are considered lead-containing paints. Additionally, fixtures or components that are manufactured with a factory applied glazing (i.e., sinks, toilets, ceramic tiles, etc.) are tested as these factory-applied finishes often contain lead. Activities which disturb lead-containing paints and glazing (while not lead-based paints by the U.S. EPA definition) are regulated by OSHA (29 CFR 1926.62).

Because the current or proposed use of the building is not residential or child-occupied, the scope of the LBP survey was not conducted in accordance with HUD Chapter 7 requirements. This representative screening survey included taking readings from walls, windows, doors, and miscellaneous components. Walls are listed by letter with wall “A” being the entrance of the subject building, proceeding clockwise to “B, C, D”, etc.

4.0 RESULTS

The following is a summary of laboratory results, findings and observations.

4.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

In total, 67 bulk samples from 29 homogeneous areas were submitted to the laboratory of which 100 layers were analyzed.

A list of the materials sampled during the survey and the analytical results are provided in the Asbestos Bulk Sample Results appendix of this report. None of the materials sampled during this survey were determined to be asbestos containing.

December 2, 2020

The analytical results indicate that one sample (23-2) of the gray spray-on fireproofing collected above the ceiling in Room B100 contained trace (<1%) asbestos. Based on site conditions and construction history, ECS believes this material may not contain trace asbestos and the sample contamination could be the result of laboratory error or extraneous contamination not directly related to the subject material. ECS requested the analytical laboratory re-analyze sample 23-2 to try to help determine if the material is in fact asbestos containing. The laboratory informed ECS that a few asbestos fibers were observed during analysis and that asbestos did not appear to be present throughout the matrix of the material, (indicating potential outside contamination). However, ECS recommends additional confirmatory bulk sampling be performed as soon as possible to determine if the material contains trace <1% asbestos.

A trace amount of asbestos (≤1%) was detected in a bulk sample(s) of spray-on fireproofing analyzed by the laboratory. Although materials that contain trace amounts of asbestos are not subject to U.S. EPA or Virginia regulations for the handling and disposal of asbestos, OSHA still regulates any work which will disturb materials identified with trace amounts of asbestos (reference the November 24, 2003 OSHA Interpretation document - Compliance Requirements For Renovation Work Involving Materials Containing Less Than 1% Asbestos). Therefore, any Contractors disturbing these materials will need to comply with components of 29 CFR 1926.1101, as detailed in the 2003 OSHA Interpretation document.

4.2 Suspect or Assumed Asbestos-Containing Materials

Due to the inaccessibility or the destructive means that asbestos sampling requires, additional suspect ACMs may remain within the building hidden behind inaccessible areas that include, but are not limited to, sub-grade walls, structural members, topping slabs, sub-grade sealants, flooring located below underlayments, areas behind exterior walls, pipe trenches, and subsurface utilities, etc.

These areas were deemed inaccessible and were not assessed.

If these materials are discovered during construction activities, they should be presumed to contain asbestos and be treated as ACMs or be sampled immediately upon discovery and prior to disturbance for asbestos content by a certified asbestos inspector in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101.

Based upon our past experience in the identification of ACMs in similarly constructed buildings, the following additional suspect ACMs may also be located in inaccessible areas of the structure:

• Cloth Movable Partition Wall (Activity Room)

• Concealed Wall System (Behind Drywall Walls)

• Vermiculite CMU Block Wall Insulation (CMU Block Cells)

• Vapor Barrier/Waterproofing (Beneath Concrete Slab, Perimeter Walls)

• Materials Associated with Mechanical Systems (Pipe Insulations/Mastics, Duct Insulations/

Mastics, Mudded Pipe Elbows

• Suspect Exterior Materials

• Suspect Roofing Materials

• Fire Doors (Throughout Corridors, Approximately 40 Fire Doors Observed)

December 2, 2020

4.3 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

Paint and surface coatings which contain detectable concentrations of lead considered “lead-containing paints”. Since OSHA has no specific action level for lead in paint, all paint on the site found to have a measurable concentration of lead should be assumed to be lead containing. Work performed which may disturb lead-containing paint is regulated under OSHA as referenced under 29 CFR 1926.62. A total of 215 readings were collected during the survey, including calibration readings.

Paint and other surface coatings which are defined by applicable regulation as lead-based paints or glazes are summarized in the table below and photographs of lead-based glaze identified are located in the Appendix.

Summary of XRF Lead-Based Paint Results

Location Color Substrate Component

Throughout Bathrooms White Porcelain Sink

Throughout Bathrooms White Porcelain Urinals

Janitor Closets Throughout White Metal Slop SInks

Throughout Bathrooms White Porcelain Bathtubs

Water Fountain Tile Surrounds Tan Ceramic Wall Tile

Throughout Bathrooms Beige Ceramic Wall Tile

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

Based on our understanding of the purpose of the Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey - Project # TMM2019, the results of laboratory analysis, and our findings and observations, ECS presents the following recommendations.

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

The analytical results indicate that one sample (23-2) of the gray spray-on fireproofing collected above the ceiling in Room B100 contained trace (<1%) asbestos. Based on site conditions and construction history, ECS believes this material may not contain trace asbestos and the sample contamination could be the result of laboratory error or extraneous contamination not directly related to the subject material. However, ECS recommends additional confirmatory bulk sampling be performed as soon as possible to determine if the material contains trace asbestos.

A trace amount of asbestos (≤1%) was detected in a bulk sample(s) of spray-on fireproofing analyzed by the laboratory. Although materials that contain trace amounts of asbestos are not subject to U.S. EPA or Virginia regulations for the handling and disposal of asbestos, OSHA still regulates any work which will disturb materials identified with trace amounts of asbestos (reference the November 24, 2003 OSHA Interpretation document - Compliance Requirements For Renovation Work

December 2, 2020

Involving Materials Containing Less Than 1% Asbestos). Therefore, any Contractors disturbing these materials will need to comply with components of 29 CFR 1926.1101, as detailed in the 2003 OSHA Interpretation document.

Asbestos was not detected in the remaining materials sampled during this survey.

5.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

Based on the findings of the lead survey, detectable concentrations of lead were identified in some of the glazed finishes sampled during the survey.

The presence of lead is a concern primarily when conditions exist where it may inhaled or ingested.

Regardless of the analytical results of a material, all painted and/or glazed surfaces may still contain concentrations of lead in the paint, which when disturbed, may generate lead dust greater than the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) as an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) established by the OSHA “Lead Exposure in Construction Rule (29 CFR 1926.62).”

The OSHA standard gives no guidance on acceptable levels of lead in paint at which no exposure to airborne lead (above the action level) would be expected. Rather, OSHA defines airborne concentrations, and references specific types of work practices and operations from which a lead hazard may be generated (reference 29 CFR 1926.62, section d). Environmental and personnel monitoring should be conducted during any removal/demolition process (as appropriate) to verify that actual personal exposures are below the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) as an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA). Under OSHA requirements, the contractor performing renovation work will be required to conduct this monitoring and follow applicable requirements under 29 CFR 1926.62 if disturbing lead-containing paint.

6.0 LIMITATIONS

The conclusions and recommendations presented within this report are based upon a reasonable level of assessment within normal bounds and standards of professional practice for a site in this particular geographic setting. ECS is not responsible or liable for the discovery and elimination of hazards that may potentially cause damage, accidents, or injuries.

The observations, conclusions, and recommendations pertaining to environmental conditions at the subject site are necessarily limited to conditions observed, and/or materials reviewed at the time this study was undertaken. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made with regard to the conclusions and recommendations presented within this report. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client. This report is not intended to be used or relied upon in connection with other projects or by other unidentified third parties without the written consent of ECS and the client.

During this study, samples were submitted for analysis at an accredited laboratory via polarized light microscopy. As with any similar survey of this nature, actual conditions exist only at the precise locations from which samples were collected. Certain inferences are based on the results of this sampling and related testing to form a professional opinion of conditions in areas beyond those from which the samples were collected. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made.

December 2, 2020

Our recommendations are in part based on federal, state, and local regulations and guidelines. ECS does not assume the responsibility of the person(s) in charge of the site, or otherwise undertake responsibility for reporting to any local, state, or federal public agencies, any conditions at the site that may present a potential danger to public health, safety, or the environment. Under this scope of services, ECS assumes no responsibility regarding any response actions initiated as a result of these findings. General compliance with regulations and response actions are the sole responsibility of the Client and should be conducted in accordance with local, state, and/or federal requirements.

December 2, 2020

Appendix I: Asbestos Sample Locations

Appendix II: Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

Hampton VAMC TMM2019 - ACM Survey ECS Project No. 47:11164

November, 2020

Sample # Sampling Location Material/Description Analytical Results

1-1 S 134 Clear Mastic NAD

1-1 S 134 White & Gray Mottled 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

1-1 S 134 Black Mastic Associated with White/Gray Tile NAD

1-2 D 182 Clear Mastic NAD

1-2 D 182 White & Gray Mottled 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

1-2 D 182 Black Mastic Associated with White/Gray Tile NAD

2-1 S 111 4" Gray Vinyl Cove Baseboard NAD

2-1 S 111 Cream Mastic Associated with VCB NAD

2-2 B 183 4" Gray Vinyl Cove Baseboard NAD

2-2 B 183 Brown Mastic Associated with VCB NAD

3-1 CORRIDOR AT B 163 Divot/Pinhole Ceiling Tile NAD

3-2 C178 Divot/Pinhole Ceiling Tile NAD

3-3 CORRIDOR @ S 104 Divot/Pinhole Ceiling Tile NAD

4-1 A 118 Drywall and Joint Compound (Composite) NAD

4-2 S 126 Drywall and Joint Compound (Composite) NAD

4-3 B 152 Drywall and Joint Compound (Composite) NAD

4-4 C 169 Drywall and Joint Compound (Composite) NAD

4-5 D 173 Drywall and Joint Compound (Composite) NAD

5-1 A 129 Green Floor Coating NAD

5-2 S102 Green Floor Coating NAD

TABLE 1

BULK SAMPLING OF SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

Table Notes:

NAD = No Asbestos Detected N/A = Sample Not Analyzed; Positive Stop Bold - Asbestos Containing Materials

November, 2020

Sample # Sampling Location Material/Description Analytical Results

6-1 A 141 Interior Door Frame Caulk NAD

6-2 C 100 Interior Door Frame Caulk NAD

7-1 C 152 Fissure/Pinhole Ceiling Tile NAD

7-2 D 103 Fissure/Pinhole Ceiling Tile NAD

7-3 A 182 Fissure/Pinhole Ceiling Tile NAD

8-1 S POD CORRIDOR LEADING

TO A POD Corridor Aluminum Casement Window Frame Caulk NAD

8-2 S POD CORRIDOR LEADING

TO C POD Corridor Aluminum Casement Window Frame Caulk NAD

9-1 A POD EAST COMMON

AREA Light Blue Mottled 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

9-1 A POD EAST COMMON

AREA Tan Mastic Associated with Light Blue Floor Tile NAD

9-2 COMMON AREA @ A 108 Light Blue Mottled 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

9-2 COMMON AREA @ A 108 Tan Mastic Associated with Light Blue Floor Tile NAD

10-1 C 164 Red Penetration Caulk NAD

10-2 S 131 Red Penetration Caulk NAD

11-1 S 134 Blue 4" Vinyl Cove Baseboard NAD

11-1 S 134 Brown Mastic Associated with VCB NAD

11-1 S 134 Cream Mastic Associated with VCB NAD

11-2 S 134 Blue 4" Vinyl Cove Baseboard NAD

11-2 S 134 Brown Mastic Associated with VCB NAD

11-2 S 134 Cream Mastic Associated with VCB NAD

12-1 D 183 Black Sink Undercoating NAD

12-2 C 183 Black Sink Undercoating NAD

13-1 B 178 Pink Mottled 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

Table Notes:

NAD = No Asbestos Detected N/A = Sample Not Analyzed; Positive Stop

November, 2020

Sample # Sampling Location Material/Description Analytical Results

13-1 B 178 Tan Mastic Associated with Pink Floor Tile NAD

13-2 B 107 Pink Mottled 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

13-2 B 107 Tan Mastic Associated with Pink Floor Tile NAD

13-2 B 107 Black Mastic Associated with Pink Floor Tile NAD

14-1 A 112 Room Aluminum Casement Window Frame Caulk (Caulk I) NAD

14-1 A 112 Room Aluminum Casement Window Frame Caulk (Caulk II) NAD

14-2 D 108 Room Aluminum Casement Window Frame Caulk NAD

15-1 A 112 Interior Window Stool Caulk (Caulk I) NAD

15-1 A 112 Interior Window Stool Caulk (Caulk II) NAD

15-2 B100 Interior Window Stool Caulk NAD

16-1 COMMON AREA @ A 108 Dark Blue 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

16-1 COMMON AREA @ A 108 Tan Mastic Associated with Dark Blue Tile NAD

17-1 COMMON AREA @ B 125 Dark Red 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

17-1 COMMON AREA @ B 125 Black Mastic Associated with Dark Red Tile NAD

18-1 C 182 Dark Green 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

18-1 C 182 Black Mastic Associated with Dark Green Tile NAD

19-1 C 178 Light Green Mottled 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

19-1 C 178 Tan Mastic Associated with Light Green Tile NAD

19-2 C 153 Light Green Mottled 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

19-2 C 153 Tan Mastic Associated with Light Green Tile NAD

20-1 D 153 Light Purple Mottled 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

20-1 D 153 Black Mastic Associated with Light Purple Floor Tile NAD

Table Notes:

NAD = No Asbestos Detected N/A = Sample Not Analyzed; Positive Stop

November, 2020

Sample # Sampling Location Material/Description Analytical Results

20-2 D 107 Light Purple Mottled 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

20-2 D 107 Black Mastic Associated with Light Purple Floor Tile NAD

21-1 D 107 Dark Purple 12"x12" Floor Tile NAD

21-1 D 107 Black Mastic Associated with Dark Purple Floor Tile NAD

22-1 A 116 Plaster Wall Skim Coat NAD

22-1 A 116 Plaster Wall Base Coat NAD

22-2 B 100 Plaster Wall Skim Coat NAD

22-2 B 100 Plaster Wall Base Coat NAD

22-3 C 164 Plaster Wall Skim Coat NAD

22-3 C 164 Plaster Wall Base Coat NAD

22-4 D 173 Plaster Wall Skim Coat NAD

22-4 D 173 Plaster Wall Base Coat NAD

22-5 D 173 Plaster Wall Skim Coat NAD

22-5 D 173 Plaster Wall Base Coat NAD

23-1 A 116 Fireproofing NAD

23-2 B 100 Fireproofing Trace <1% Chrysotile

23-3 C 164 Fireproofing NAD

23-4 S 131 Fireproofing NAD

23-5 S 132 Fireproofing NAD

24-1 B 100 Plaster Ceiling Basecoat NAD

24-2 C 164 Plaster Ceiling Basecoat NAD

24-3 D 173 Plaster Ceiling Basecoat NAD

Table Notes:

NAD = No Asbestos Detected N/A = Sample Not Analyzed; Positive Stop

November, 2020

Sample # Sampling Location Material/Description Analytical Results

25-1 S 132 Plaster Ceiling Texture Coat NAD

25-1 S 132 Plaster Base Coat NAD

25-2 S 132 Plaster Ceiling Texture Coat NAD

25-2 S 132 Plaster Base Coat NAD

25-3 S 132 Plaster Ceiling Texture Coat NAD

25-3 S 132 Plaster Base Coat NAD

26-1 S 134 CMU Block Wall Coating NAD

26-2 S 131 CMU Block Wall Coating NAD

27-1 S POD NORTH WATER

FOUNTAIN Water Fountain Surround Tile Adhesive NAD

27-2 S POD EAST WATER

FOUNTAIN Water Fountain Surround Tile Adhesive NAD

28-1 S POD NORTH CORRIDOR HVAC Duct Insulation Wrap Mastic NAD

28-2 S POD EAST CORRIDOR HVAC Duct Insulation Wrap Mastic NAD

29-1 S 104 Interior Window Pane Glazing NAD

29-2 HALLWAY OUTSIDE S 104 Interior Window Pane Glazing NAD

Table Notes:

NAD = No Asbestos Detected N/A = Sample Not Analyzed; Positive Stop

Appendix III: XRF Lead-Based Paint Readings

Reading Pass Fail Standard Pb Pb +/- Side Component Substrate Color Room

1 PASS

2 Positive 1.15 0.08 Calibrate

3 Positive 1.06 0.05 Calibrate

4 Positive 1.18 0.09 Calibrate

5 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall White S Pod Lobby

6 Negative 0.03 0.03 B Columns Plastic Beige S Pod Lobby

7 Negative 0 0 A Wall Drywall Blue S Pod Lobby

8 Negative 0 0 D Wall Drywall White S Pod Lobby

9 Positive 1 0 D Wall Ceramic Tan S Pod Lobby

10 Negative 0 0 C door frame Metal Brown S Pod Lobby

11 Negative 0 0 C Door Metal Black S Pod Lobby

12 Negative 0.02 0.01 A door frame Metal Gray S Pod Lobby Fitnesss Room

13 Negative 0.05 0.02 A door frame Metal Gray S127

14 Negative 0 0 D Wall Drywall White S127

15 Negative 0 0 A Wall Drywall White S128

16 Negative 0.05 0.02 A door frame Metal Off White S128

17 Negative 0.01 0.02 C Radiator Metal Brown S134

18 Negative 0 0 C Window Metal Black S134

19 Negative 0 0 D Wall Drywall White S134

20 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall White S125

21 Negative 0 0 A Door Metal Gray S125

22 Negative 0.07 0.03 A Door Metal Gray S102

23 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall White S102

24 Negative 0.13 0.05 B Wall Ceramic Beige S102

25 Negative 0 0 B Floor Concrete Green S102

26 Negative 0 0 A Door Wood Clearcoat S102

27 Negative 0 0 A Door Wood Clearcoat S122

28 Negative 0.14 0.06 A Wall Ceramic White S122

29 Positive 1 0.02 D Sink porcelain White S122

30 Positive 1 0.02 D urinal porcelain White S122

31 Negative 0 0 B Bathroom Stall Metal Tan S122

32 Negative 0 0.01 B Wall Ceramic Gray S122 Shower

33 Negative 0 0 C Wall Drywall White S129

34 Negative 0 0 A Wall Drywall White S129

35 Negative 0 0 A Stair Riser Metal yellow Roof Access

36 Negative 0.01 0.01 A Stair Stringer Metal Gray Roof Access

37 Negative 0.05 0.03 A Stair Handrail Metal Gray Roof Access

38 Negative 0.18 0.06 A Wall Ceramic Gray Loading Dock Corridor

39 Negative 0 0 A Door Metal Gray Loading Dock Corridor

40 Negative 0.04 0.03 A door frame Metal Gray Loading Dock Corridor

41 Negative 0.07 0.04 A door frame Metal Gray A182

42 Negative 0 0 D Pipes Metal White A182

43 Negative 0 0 C Radiator Metal White A182

44 Negative 0 0 C Wall Drywall White A182

45 Negative 0 0 D Wall Drywall White A163

46 Negative 0 0 C Window Sash Metal Black A163

47 Negative 0 0 B Wall Ceramic Tan A163 Bathroom

48 Negative 0 0 B Radiator Metal Gray A163 Bathroom

49 Negative 0 0 Floor Ceramic Gray A163 Bathroom

50 Negative 0 0.01 A Toilet porcelain White A163 Bathroom

51 Negative 0.14 0.22 C diffuser porcelain Gray A163

52 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall White A Pod S Corridor

53 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall Blue A-149 Common Area

54 Negative 0 0 Door Metal Gray A-Pod Door 24

55 Negative 0.1 0.05 Door Jamb Metal Gray A-Pod Door 24

56 Negative 0.01 0.01 A Door Jamb Metal Gray A-183

XRF Data

ECS Project No. 47:11164 tsteele Highlight tsteele Highlight

57 Negative 0 0 C Wall Drywall Beige A-183

58 Negative 0 0 C Window Sash Metal Black A-183

59 Negative 0 0 D Cabinet Metal Gray A-183

60 Negative 0 0 C Radiator Metal White A-184

61 Negative 0 0 C Sprinkler Pipes Metal Red A-184

62 Negative 0.02 0.02 C Sprinkler Pipes Metal Red A-184

63 Negative 0 0 C Wall Drywall White A Pod N Corridor

64 Negative 0 0 C Door Metal Black A Pod N Corridor

65 Negative 0 0 D Window Metal Black A Pod N Corridor

66 Negative 0 0 A Wall Drywall White A126

67 Negative 0 0.01 A Wall Ceramic Beige A126

68 Positive 5 0.44 C Sink Metal White A126

69 Negative 0 0 Floor Ceramic Red A126

70 Negative 0 0 Wall Ceramic Tan Corridor at A131

71 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall White A116

72 Negative 0 0 C Wall Drywall White A116

73 Negative 0 0 C Window Sash Metal Black A116

74 Negative 0.01 0.02 C diffuser Metal Beige A116

75 Negative 0 0 C Bathroom Stall particle board Gray A138

76 Negative 0 0 C Wall Drywall White A138

77 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall White Pod B Corridor

78 Negative 0 0 B Window Metal Black Pod B Corridor

79 Negative 0 0 B Radiator Metal Gray Pod B Corridor

80 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall White B179

81 Negative 0 0 C Window Stool particle board Brown B179

82 Negative 0 0 C Window Metal Black B179

83 Negative 0.03 0.04 C diffuser Metal Gray B179

84 Negative 0.01 0.01 A Door Jamb Metal Gray B179

85 Negative 0 0 B Door Jamb Metal Black B Pod

86 Negative 0 0 B Door Metal Black B Pod

87 Negative 0.17 0.1 A Door Jamb Metal Gray B106

88 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall White B106

89 Negative 0 0 B Cabinet Outside Metal Tan B106

90 Negative 0 0 D Wall Drywall White B111

91 Negative 0.02 0.01 B Door Jamb Metal Gray B111

92 Negative 0 0 C Window Metal Black B111

93 Negative 0 0 C Window Stool particle board Brown B111

94 Negative 0.17 0.24 C Window Stool particle board Brown B111

95 Negative 0.1 0.16 C diffuser Metal Brown B111

96 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall White B111 Bathroom

97 Negative 0.09 0.03 B Wall Ceramic Off White B111 Bathroom

98 Negative 0.25 0.29 B Wall Ceramic Brown B111 Bathroom

99 Positive 5 0.82 C bathtub porcelain White B111 Bathroom

100 Negative 0 0 Ceiling Plaster White B111 Bathroom

101 Negative 0 0 D Radiator Plaster Gray B111 Bathroom

102 Negative 0 0 Floor Ceramic Brown B111 Bathroom

103 Negative 0 0 B Wall Ceramic Tan B Pod Corridor Water Fountain

104 Positive 1 0 B Wall Ceramic Tan B Pod Corridor Water Fountain

105 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall White B176

106 Negative 0.04 0.03 A Door Jamb Metal Gray B176

107 Negative 0 0 A Ceiling Metal White B175 Access Panel

108 Negative 0.01 0.01 A Door Metal Gray B Pod Door 32

109 Negative 0.07 0.04 A Door Jamb Metal Gray B119

110 Negative 0 0 D Wall Drywall White B119

111 Negative 0 0 C Window Metal Black B119

ECS Project No. 47:11164 tsteele Highlight

112 Negative 0 0 C window frame Metal Black B119

113 Negative 0 0 C Window Stool particle board Brown B119

114 Negative 0 0 C diffuser Metal Brown B119

115 Negative 0.01 0.01 C diffuser Metal Gray B119

116 Negative 0 0 D Wall Drywall White B119 Bathroom

117 Negative 0.07 0.01 C Wall Ceramic Off White B119 Bathroom

118 Negative 0.12 0.06 C Wall Ceramic Brown B119 Bathroom

119 Negative 0 0 C Ceiling Plaster White B119 Bathroom

120 Negative 0 0 Floor Ceramic Brown B119 Bathroom

121 Negative 0 0 A Toilet porcelain White B119 Bathroom

122 Negative 0 0 Floor Concrete Green S137

123 Negative 0 0 D Radiator Metal Gray S137

124 Negative 0 0 D Window Sash Metal Black S137

125 Negative 0 0 A Wall Drywall White S137

126 Negative 0 0 C Wall Drywall Green C178

127 Negative 0 0 C diffuser Metal Beige C178

128 Negative 0.08 0.03 C Window Stool particle board Beige C178

129 Negative 0.01 0 C diffuser Metal Gray C178

130 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall Off White C183

131 Negative 0.03 0.02 B Door Jamb Metal Gray C183

132 Negative 0 0 D Cabinet Metal Gray C183

133 Negative 0 0 A Wall Drywall White C185

134 Negative 0 0 C Window Stool particle board Blue C185

135 Negative 0 0 C Wall Drywall Blue C185

136 Negative 0 0 B Door Metal Black C Pod Corridor

137 Negative 0 0 B Door Jamb Metal Black C Pod Corridor

138 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall White C Pod Corridor

139 Negative 0 0 C Radiator Drywall Gray C Pod Corridor

140 Negative 0 0 C Window Metal Brown C Pod Corridor

141 Negative 0 0 C Window Metal Black C112

142 Negative 0 0 C diffuser Metal Beige C112

143 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall White C112

144 Negative 0 0 B Wall Chair Rail Wood White C112

145 Negative 0.06 0.02 A Door Jamb Metal Gray C112 Bathroom

146 Negative 0 0 A Door Wood Clearcoat C112 Bathroom

147 Negative 0 0 D Wall Plaster White C112 Bathroom

148 Negative 0 0 Ceiling Plaster White C112 Bathroom

149 Negative 0.08 0.04 Wall Ceramic Gray C112 Bathroom

150 Negative 0.04 0.02 Wall Ceramic Blue C112 Bathroom

151 Negative 0 0 Floor Ceramic Brown C112 Bathroom

152 Positive 5 0.71 C bathtub porcelain White C112 Bathroom

153 Negative 0 0 C Toilet porcelain White C112 Bathroom

154 Negative 0 0 C Sink porcelain White C112 Bathroom

155 Positive 1 0.01 C Sink porcelain White C112 Bathroom

156 Negative 0 0 C Wall Drywall White C Pod W Corridor

157 Negative 0.05 0.03 C Door Jamb Metal Gray C Pod W Corridor

158 Negative 0 0 B Wall Drywall White C121

159 Negative 0.04 0.02 B Door Jamb Metal Gray C121

160…