36C24521Q0514 Attachment- Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Radiation Oncology Services Reaccreditation Surveys
Solicitation number
36C24521Q0514
Issued by

About this file

This document is a past performance questionnaire for a solicitation seeking offers to provide re-accreditation survey services for 40 radiation oncology centers within the Veterans Health Administration. The incumbent contractor is seeking references from previous clients to demonstrate relevant past performance conducting at least three radiology accreditations for facilities of equal size within the last five years, as well as experience surveying both new facilities and those undergoing renewal of accreditation. Respondents are asked to provide a performance rating and comments assessing the incumbent's quality of performance, management performance, and any other relevant details. The completed questionnaires should be returned to the Department of Veterans Affairs contact listed for consideration in evaluating offers submitted in response to solicitation number 36C24521Q0514 for radiation oncology services reaccreditation surveys issued by the Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 5 agency.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C24521Q0514.docx DOCX document
36C24521Q0514 Attachment- Evaluation Factors.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire RFQ No. 36C24521Q0514 The Department of Veterans Affairs is evaluating an offer from ___________________ [Offeror’s name], hereafter referred to as “Offeror,” to provide re-accreditation services for 40 VHA Radiation Oncology centers. Offeror has provided this questionnaire to you so that we may ask you questions regarding Offeror’s past performance on a similar contract between your company and Offeror. Past performance must be able to show:

· Three radiology accreditations for a facility of equal size within the last five years.

· The number of new facilities surveyed for accreditation per year.

· The number of facilities surveyed for the renewal of accreditation per year.

· The number of facilities surveyed for radiology accreditation to date.

Any information you provide in this questionnaire is considered Source Selection Information and is prohibited from disclosure and exempt from release under the Freedom of Information Act; as such, the Department of Veterans affairs will not release your name or the names of other individuals providing reference information about Offeror’s past performance.

Instructions: Be honest. Provide an assessment of Offeror’s past performance by checking the box of one the following rating options. You are encouraged to write comments as often as you’d like.

Rating Options:

Satisfactory - Offeror’s performance meets (or met) all contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with minor issues or concerns, for which Offeror’s corrective actions were effective.

Unsatisfactory - Offeror’s performance does not meet (or did not meet) contractual requirements and performance was accomplished with significant problems, issues or concerns, for which Offeror’s corrective actions were ineffective.

Neutral - Unable to provide a meaningful assessment.

When you are finished, please email your completed questionnaire to Rachael.Hallock@va.gov.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND PARTICIPATION!

Performance Assessment

1. Reference Information Your Company’s Name: _________________________________________________________________ Your Name: __________________________________________________________________________ Contract Number (if Government): ________________________________________________________ Period of Performance: Start Date: _______________________ End Date: ________________________ Scope of Services (e.g., types of services provided, types of sterilization equipment serviced, contract dollar value, etc.):

2. Performance Rating

a. Quality of performance

Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Conformance to contract specifications

Quality of workmanship (technical, professional, safety, and the like)

Timely submittal of all reports and documentation

b. Management performance

Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Management responsiveness (timeliness, reliability, cooperation, etc.)

Management of personnel (hiring, training, retaining, replacing, etc.)

Management of conflicts or issues (reactive, provides good solutions, flexible to changing needs, etc.)

3. General comments

Assessor’s Signature: _____________________________________ Date: _____________________

Source Selection Information—See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .