36C24521Q0514 Attachment- Evaluation Factors.docx

Evaluation Sheet for Mobile Office Units RFQ No. 36C24521Q0514 Award Methodology: The Government will perform a comparative evaluation of offers in accordance with FAR 13.106- 2(b)(3) to determine which offer provides the best benefit to the Government. The Government reserves the right to select a response that provides benefit to the Government that exceeds the minimum but is not required to select a response that exceeds the minimum if it provides no value or benefit to the Government. The Government will evaluate quotes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that a quote is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Company Name:

DUNS:

SAM-Registered as a ________ Business Under NAICS Code ________

Evaluation Findings

1. TOT AL QUOTED PRICE:

2. TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

Instructions: Evaluator is to review the information provided and indicate his/her rating for the Offeror's technical capability by circling one of the following rating options:

Acceptable or Unacceptable Technical Capability Consideration Criteria:

· Must have national BAA at time of award.

· Qualification and experience requirements of radiation oncologist and medical physicist surveyors

· Selection criteria for the surveyors.

· Training of the surveyors in the accreditation process

· Specialized skills, expertise, knowledge of the surveyors and review committee. Please provide capability statement.

Findings/Remarks pertaining to capabilities:

2. PAST PERFORMANCE

Instructions: Evaluator is to review the information provided and indicate his/her rating for the Offeror’s past performance by circling one of the following rating options:

Evaluation Sheet for Mobile Office Units RFQ No. 36C24521Q0514

Instructions: Evaluator is to review the information provided and indicate his/her rating for the Offeror's past performance by circling one of the following rating options:

Acceptable, Neutral or Unacceptable Findings/Remarks pe1taining to past performance:

3. SOCIOECONOMIC BUSINESS STATUS

Instructions: VA shall evaluate offerors based on their service-disabled veteran-owned or veteran-owned small business status and their proposed use of eligible service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses and veteran-owned small businesses as subcontractors. To receive credit, a SDVOSBNOSB must be registered and verified in the Vendor Information Pages (VIP) database at time of offer submittal. An eligible service-disabled veteran-owned small business offeror will receive full credit. An eligible Veteran-owned small business will receive pa1tial credit. A non-veteran offeror proposing to use an eligible service-disabled veteran-owned small busines or veteran-owned small business as a subcontractor will receive some consideration. Offeror is a: · ·

________Eligible SDVOSB (full credit) ________Eligible VOSB (partial credit) ________Non-veteran offeror proposing to use an eligible SDVOSB or VOSB subcontractor (some consideration) ________Non-veteran offeror (Note: offeror is still eligible to compete and be considered for award) STOP. Evaluate all other offers submitted for this procurement and then come back here and answer question number 4.

4. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION RATIONALE

Based on your findings and compared to all other offers received for this procurement, does this Offeror provide the best benefit to the Government? Please be specific and explain why or why not:

Evaluator's Name: ________________________