36C24520R0072_1.docx
DOCX document 186 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24520R0072
About this file
This is a request for proposal for a two-phase design-build project to renovate space at the Loch Raven Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Baltimore, Maryland to create a new pharmacy compounding area and hazardous materials storage area. The Department of Veterans Affairs will award a single contract for design and construction valued between $1-2 million, with work to be completed within 365 calendar days of the notice to proceed. The solicitation is set aside exclusively for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses. Phase I proposals will be evaluated to determine the most qualified offerors to participate in Phase II. Shortlisted firms will receive the Phase II RFP and submit separate technical and price proposals by August 13, 2020. Site visits will be held and questions must be submitted in writing.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24520R0072 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Answered RFIs.pdf | ||
| RFI.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
36C24520R0072
1. SOLICITATION NUMBER
2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
3.
DATE ISSUED
PAGE OF PAGES
4. CONTRACT NUMBER
5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER
6. PROJECT NUMBER
7. ISSUED BY
CODE
8. ADDRESS OFFER TO
a. NAME
b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)
10. THE
GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date) 12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)
12b. CALENDAR DAYS
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 8/2
014)
STANDARD FORM 1442
Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 52.236-1(d)
SOLICITATION, OFFER,
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
SOLICITATION
SOLICITATION
IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
9. FOR INFORMATION
CALL:
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
SEALED BID (IFB)
NEGOTIATED (RFP)
11. The Contractor shall begin performance within ____________ calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory negotiable. (See __________
YES
NO
a.
Sealed offers in original and ___________ 2 hard _copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by _________________________ (hour) local time _____________________ (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, the date and time offe rs are due.
b.
An offer guarantee is, is not required.
c.
All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
d.
Offers providing less than _______________________ calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.
36C24520R0072 X 07-06-2020 512A5-20-0002 Department of Veterans Affairs Louis A Johnson, VAMC Contracting Office (90C) 1 Med Center DR Clarksburg WV 26301-4199
Alison Klein 304-623-3461 x 4143 This is a Design-Build project for renovation of several rooms within First Floor of Bldg 1 (CLC) at the Loch Raven VA Medical Center to create a new USP 979/800 Compliant Pharmacy Compounding Area (~800SF) and conference room (~250SF), and creation of a new hazardous material storage area (~100SF) within the basement of Building 4. Renovation work for pharmacy will include complete demolition of existing office/conference room spaces, upgrading interior utilities which include complete replacement of existing HVAC with a new dedicated air handling unit (100% OA and 12 ACPH), installation of biological safety cabinets, electrical and communication system modifications, security camera and card reader systems, chilled/heating water system integration, clean room procedures and products, and other specific tasks.
Hazardous material storage area scope will include construction of new rated room/enclosure and ventilation/fire protection system modifications a s required by applicable life safety codes.
D/B contractor shall also account for VA Infection Control and Interim Life Safety Measures as required by work scope.
A schematic architectural layout and proposed pharmacy equipment product data developed during pre-design charettes with VA Pharmacy staff will be provided to the Phase II offerors as a basis for further design development.
x x 52.211-10 X 3pm 08-13-2020 X
14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR
15. TELEPHONE
NUMBER
16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS
CODE
FACILITY CODE
17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of the solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writin g within __________ calendar days after the date offers are due.
AMOUNTS
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
AMENDMENT
NUMBER
DATE.
20a. NAME AND TITLE OF
PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER
20b. SIGNATURE 20c. OFFER DATE
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT
23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN
ITEM
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
PURSUANT TO
10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( 41 U.S.C. 3304(a) (
26. ADMINISTERED BY
27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY
PHONE:
FAX:
28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT
29. AWARD
Your Contractor agrees offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further cont-this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract ractual document is necessary.
shall be g overned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.
30a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON
AUTHORIZED
31a. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
TO SIGN
30b. SIGNATURE 30c. DATE 31b. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31c. AWARD DATE
BY
OFFER
AWARD
STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 8/2014) BACK
(Include ZIP Code) (Include area code) (Include only if different than Item 14.)
(Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement stated in Item 13d. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13d.)
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each) (Type or print) (4 copies unless otherwise specified) (Type or print) (Type or print) (Contractor is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to issuing office.)
(Contractor is not required to sign this document.)
(Must be fully completed by offeror) (To be completed by Government)
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
Design Build BID Item No.1 (Base Bid): _______________________
512-3610162-150-854200-3220-23NRNR000
Department of Veterans Affairs Louis A Johnson, VAMC Contracting Office (90C) 1 Med Center DR Clarksburg WV 26301-4199
PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY
FSC
e-Invoice Payment Invoice must be submitted electronically http://www.fsc.va.gov/einvoice.asp Invoice Setup Information 1-877-489-6135 Alison Klein Contracting Officer
Table of Contents
| PART I - THE SCHEDULE | 1 | |
| SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM | 1 | |
| A.1 SF 1442 SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Construction, Alteration, or Repair) | 1 | |
| A.2 SF 1442 SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR REPAIR)– BACK | 2 | |
| INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS TO BIDDERS/OFFERORS | 6 | |
| Project 512A5-20-002 | Loch Raven VAMC, Baltimore MD | 6 |
| INFORMATION REGARDING BIDDING MATERIAL, BID GUARANTEE AND BONDS | 31 | |
| 1.1 52.204-24 REPRESENTATION REGARDING CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (DEC 2019) | 31 | |
| 1.2 52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984) | 32 | |
| 1.3 52.222-5 CONSTRUCTION WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS—SECONDARY SITE OF THE WORK (MAY 2014) | 32 | |
| 1.4 52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999) | 32 | |
| 1.5 52.225-10 NOTICE OF BUY AMERICAN REQUIREMENT—CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS (MAY 2014) | 34 | |
| 1.6 52.228-1 BID GUARANTEE (SEP 1996) | 35 | |
| 1.7 52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006) | 35 | |
| 1.8 52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995) | 36 | |
| 1.9 52.246-26 REPORTING NONCONFORMING ITEMS (DEC 2019) | 36 | |
| 1.10 52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998) | 39 | |
| 1.11 VAAR 852.228-72 ASSISTING SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN-OWNED AND VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESSES IN OBTAINING BONDS (DEC 2009) | 39 | |
| 1.12 VAAR 852.233-70 PROTEST CONTENT/ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (OCT 2018) | 39 | |
| 1.13 VAAR 852.233-71 ALTERNATE PROTEST PROCEDURE (OCT 2018) | 40 | |
| 1.14 PARTNERING | 40 | |
| REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS | 42 | |
| 3.1 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (MAR 2020) | 42 | |
| 3.2 52.204-26 COVERED TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES—REPRESENTATION (DEC 2019) | 46 | |
| 3.3 52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (OCT 2018) | 46 | |
| 3.4 52.209-13 VIOLATION OF ARMS CONTROLS TREATIES OR AGREEMENTS—CERTIFICATION (JUN 2018) | 47 | |
| GENERAL CONDITIONS | 50 | |
| 4.1 52.204-23 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING FOR HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, AND SERVICES DEVELOPED OR PROVIDED BY KASPERSKY LAB AND OTHER COVERED ENTITIES (JUL 2018) | 50 | |
| 4.2 52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984) ALTERNATE I (APR 1984) | 51 | |
| 4.3 52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES-CONSTRUCTION (SEPT 2000) | 51 | |
| 4.4 52.211-13 TIME EXTENSIONS (SEPT 2000) | 52 | |
| 4.5 52.219-28 POST-AWARD SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM REREPRESENTATION (MAR 2020) | 52 | |
| 4.6 52.222-42 STATEMENT OF EQUIVALENT RATES FOR FEDERAL HIRES (MAY 2014) | 55 | |
| 4.7 52.223-20 AEROSOLS (JUN 2016) | 55 | |
| 4.8 52.223-21 FOAMS (JUN 2016) | 56 | |
| 4.9 52.225-9 BUY AMERICAN—CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS (MAY 2014) | 57 | |
| 4.10 SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS | 60 | |
| 4.11 52.252-2 CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998) | 60 | |
| 4.12 52.222-36 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES (JUL 2014) | 62 | |
| 4.13 VAAR 852.203-70 COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING (MAY 2018) | 64 | |
| 4.14 VAAR 852.211-72 TECHNICAL INDUSTRY STANDARDS (NOV 2018) | 64 | |
| 4.15 VAAR 852.219-10 VA NOTICE OF TOTAL SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE (JUL 2019) (DEVIATION) | 64 | |
| 4.16 VAAR 852.219-74 LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING—MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE (JUL 2018) | 66 | |
| 4.17 VAAR 852.232-72 ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PAYMENT REQUESTS (NOV 2018) | 67 | |
| 4.18 VAAR 852.228-70 BOND PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT (JAN 2008) | 68 | |
| 4.19 VAAR 852.232-71 PAYMENTS UNDER FIXED-PRICE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS (INCLUDING NAS– CPM) (NOV 2018) | 68 | |
| 4.20 VAAR 852.236-71 SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION (APR 2019) | 71 | |
| 4.21 VAAR 852.236-72 PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY THE CONTRACTOR (APR 2019) | 72 | |
| 4.22 VAAR 852.236-79 CONTRACTOR PRODUCTION REPORT (APR 2019) | 72 | |
| 4.23 VAAR 852.236-80 SUBCONTRACTS AND WORK COORDINATION (APR 2019) ALTERNATE I (APR 2019) | 73 | |
| 4.24 VAAR 852.242-70 GOVERNMENT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION (APR 2019) | 74 | |
| 4.25 VAAR 852.243-70 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CHANGES—SUPPLEMENT (SEP 2019) | 75 | |
| 4.26 VAAR 852.270-1 REPRESENTATIVES OF CONTRACTING OFFICERS (JAN 2008) | 76 | |
| DESIGN BUILD SPECIFICATIONS | 76 | |
| 4.27 GENDER | 76 | |
| 4.28 CONTRACTOR'S COST BREAKDOWN | 76 | |
| 4.29 SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS FOR DESIGN SERVICES | 77 | |
| 4.30 OWNERSHIP OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS | 77 | |
| 4.31 RETENTION OF REVIEW DOCUMENTS | 77 | |
| 4.32 CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PLANNING INFORMATION | 77 | |
| 4.33 COORDINATION WITH MEDICAL CENTER | 78 | |
| 4.34 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR | 78 | |
| WAGE DETERMINATIONS | 79 | |
| ATTACHMENTS | 99 |
INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS TO BIDDERS/OFFERORS
Page 1 of Page 1 of
NOTICE TO PROPOSERS
THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL IS ISSUED AS A TWO-PHASE DESIGN BUILD PROCUREMENT (REFERENCE FAR 36.3). THE TIME AND DATE SET FORTH WITHIN IS FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS FOR PHASE I ONLY. PHASE II REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL WILL BE ISSUED ONLY TO THE SUCCESSFUL OFFERORS DETERMINED TO BE THE MOST HIGHLY QUALIFIED FROM PHASE I.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO.: 36C24520R0072
| PHASE I PROPOSAL DUE DATE: | August 13, 2020, 3:00 PM | |
| Eastern Time |
| PROJECT TITLE: | Loch Raven Pharmacy Compounding | |
| Project 512A5-20-002 | Loch Raven VAMC, Baltimore MD |
ALL INQUIRIES CONCERNING THE ATTACHED RFP MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING ON THE ATTACHED RFI SHEET BY EMAIL TO THE BELOW ADDRESS, AND MUST BE RECEIVED NO LATER THAN July 22, 2020 AT 12:00PM EST, IN ORDER TO PERMIT ADEQUATE TIME FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO REPLY TO INQUIRIES.
YOU MAY SEND YOUR INQUIRIES (on the attached RFI sheet) TO THE ATTENTION OF Alison Klein, VIA E-MAIL TO: Alison.klein@va.gov. It is recommended to use a read receipt or call for verification of receipt, 304-623-3461 x 4143.
YOUR PROPOSAL AND/OR OTHER CORRESPONDENCE REQUESTING INTERPRETATION AND/OR CLARIFICATION SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO:
Alison Klein at alison.klein@va.gov
The Bid Guarantee shall not be submitted with the Phase I requirement
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO DESIGN BUILD
Loch Raven Pharmacy compounding area VA Project No: 512A5-20-002 Loch Raven VA Medical Center, Baltimore MD
| A. | PART I - General |
| A1. | Scope |
A. This Request for Proposal (RFP) is issued as Two-Phase Design-Build procurement (Reference FAR 36.3). Proposals will be evaluated in Phase I to determine which offerors will submit proposals for Phase II. A maximum number of three (3) offerors will proceed to Phase II in accordance with FAR 36.303-1. Phase II RFP amendment will be issued only to those successful offerors determined to be most highly qualified from Phase I. One contract will be awarded using competitive negotiation.
B. This is a Design-Build project for renovation of several rooms within First Floor of Building 1 (CLC) at the Loch Raven VA Medical Center to create a new USP 979/800 Compliant Pharmacy Compounding Area (~800SF) and conference room (~250SF), and creation/installation of a new hazardous material storage area (~100SF) at selected exterior site location. It is the intent and objective of the Department of Veteran Affairs to award a single contract for the design and renovation as a design-build delivery. Renovation work for the pharmacy will include complete demolition of existing office/conference room spaces, upgrading interior utilities which include complete replacement of existing HVAC with a new dedicated air handling unit (100% OA and 12 ACPH), installation of biological safety cabinets, electrical and communication system modifications, security camera and card reader systems, chilled/heating water system integration, clean room procedures and products, and other specific tasks. Hazardous material storage area scope will include construction of new hazardous material storage room/enclosure and ventilation/fire protection system modifications as required by applicable life safety codes. Design/Build contractor will have limited use of building freight elevators and loading dock/outdoor laydown area as required. D/B contractor shall also account for VA Infection Control and Interim Life Safety Measures as required by work scope. A schematic architectural layout and proposed pharmacy equipment product data developed during pre-design charettes with VA Pharmacy staff will be provided to the Phase II offerors as a basis for further design development.
C. Loch Raven VA Medical Center, Baltimore, MD is an active hospital and therefore will require consideration to those areas with patient and staff. The Contractor shall be responsible for the administration and management of all aspects of the scope of work, specifications and drawings. This includes responsibility for all Contractor employees, subcontractors, agents and anyone acting for or on behalf the Contractor. The Government is authorized to restrict access to Government property those individuals that are identified as a potential threat to the health, safety, security, general well-being, or operational mission of the Medical Center and its population. The parties agree that the Contractor’s personnel working as a result of this contract shall not be considered VA employees for any purpose and shall be employees of the Contractor. The Contractor shall be responsible for SECURITY. Contractors shall not be allowed access to any VA personnel or VA patients Personal Health Information (PHI) or Personally Identifiable Information (PII) in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall not connect contractor-owned IT devices to a VA internal trusted (non-public) network. Computer certification and accreditation requirements do not apply. Contractors, contractor personnel, subcontractors, and subcontractor personnel shall be subject to the same Federal laws, regulations, standards, and VA Directives and Handbooks as VA and VA personnel regarding information and information system security. Contractor shall comply with agency personal identity verification procedures and badging. Expense and time/travel required to obtain required badges shall be considered to be included in the contractor’s proposal price/schedule.
| A2. | Definitions |
| A. | Design-Build (DB) as defined by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is the procurement by the VA, under one contract, with one firm or joint venture (JV) for both design and construction services for a specific project. |
| 1. | Contracting Officer (CO): The services to be performed under this contract are subject to the general supervision, direction, control and approval of the Contracting Officer. |
| 2. | Project Manager (PM): The Contracting Officer's Representative responsible for administering contracts under the immediate direction of the contracting officer. |
| 3. | Contracting Officer Representative (COR): The Contracting Officer's authorized representative at the construction site. The COR is responsible for protecting the Government's interest in the execution of the construction contract work. His duties include surveillance of all construction work to assure compliance with the contract documents, interpretation of the contract documents, approval of changed work, approval of all submittals, samples, shop drawings, etc. The COR may issue change orders and modifications to the Contractor within the limitations set forth in his delegation of authority from the Contracting Officer. This person may also function as the Project Manager (PM). |
| 4. | Design Build Contract: This term, as used herein, refers to the Contract(s) to perform the design and construction of the project. |
| 5. | Contractor: This term, as used herein, refers to the contractor under this contract or the DB team. |
| 6. | AE: This term, as used herein, refers to the ArchitectEngineer firm(s) that are a part of the DB team, also referred to as DB/AE. |
7. Normal work hours are Monday through Friday 8:00am – 4:30pm local time excluding weekends and Federal National holidays (New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Day, Presidents’ Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veteran’s Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and any other day specifically declared by the President of the United States).
B. Source Selection Procedures
1. Source Selection Overview: In accordance with FAR 15.3, the objective of source selection is to select the proposal that represents the best value. A contracting officer is designated as the source selection authority (SSA), unless the agency head appoints another individual. The SSA establishes an evaluation team that includes appropriate contracting, legal, and technical expertise to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of offers. The award decision is based on evaluation factors and significant sub-factors that are tailored to the acquisition. The factors represent the key areas of importance and emphasis to be considered in the source selection decision; and support meaningful comparison and discrimination between and among competing proposals.
2. Evaluation: The proposal evaluation is an assessment of the proposal and the offeror’s ability to perform the prospective contract successfully. The technical, price, and source selection boards will evaluate competitive proposals and then assess their qualities solely on the factors and subfactors specified in the solicitation. Evaluations will be conducted using adjectival ratings. The relative strengths, deficiencies, significant weaknesses, and risks supporting proposal evaluation shall be documented in the contract file.
| Rating |
| Standard |
| Exceptional |
| The proposal contains significant strengths and no weaknesses. The proposal exceeds the performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW. |
| Good |
| The proposal contains significant strengths, and only a few minor weaknesses. The Offeror’s proposal meets the performance and technical capability requirements as defined in the SOW. The evaluator has a high degree of confidence that the Offeror can successfully achieve the requirements in the SOW. |
| Acceptable |
| The proposal contains strengths that outweigh any existing weaknesses. The Offeror’s proposal meets the performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW. The evaluator has a moderate degree of confidence that the Offeror can successfully achieve the requirements in the SOW |
| Marginal |
| The proposal meets the bare minimum performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW and at the same time have multiple weaknesses. . |
| Unacceptable |
| The proposal contains one or more weaknesses and deficiencies. Proposal fails to meet specified minimum performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW. |
Standard Definitions
| Rating |
| Standard |
| Strength |
| A strong attribute or quality of particular worth or utility; an inherent asset. |
| Weakness |
| A flaw that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance |
| Deficiency |
| A material failure to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. |
Evaluation Scale for Factor 3 –Firm’s Past Performance
| Rating |
| Standard |
| Low Risk |
| Offeror’s past performance record provides essentially little doubt that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Moderate Risk |
| Offeror’s past performance record provides some doubt that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| High Risk |
| Offeror’s past performance record provides substantial doubt that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Unknown Risk |
| Offeror has no relevant performance record on contracts of similar scope, size or complexity. |
3. Past Performance: Past performance information is one indicator of an offeror’s ability to perform the contract successfully. The currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor’s performance shall be considered. This comparative assessment of past performance information is separate from the responsibility determination required under FAR Subpart 9.1.
4. Tradeoff Source Selection: If tradeoffs are performed, the source selection records shall include an assessment of each offeror’s ability to accomplish the technical requirements; and a summary, matrix, or quantitative ranking, along with appropriate supporting narrative, of each technical proposal using the evaluation factors.
5. SSA’s Final Decision: The SSA’s decision shall be based on a comparative assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation. While the SSA may use reports and analyses prepared by others, the source selection decision shall represent the SSA’s independent judgment. The source selection decision shall be documented, and the documentation shall include the rationale for any business judgments and tradeoffs made or relied on by the SSA, including benefits associated with additional costs. Although the rationale for the selection decision must be documented, that documentation need not quantify the tradeoffs that led to the decision.
6. Source Selection for this procurement:
a. Phase I of this procurement will result in a narrowing of offerors to a maximum of three (3) firms in accordance with FAR 36.303-1 based on the following technical evaluation factors listed in descending order of importance:
(1) Proposed Team
· Subfactor 1A: Previous Relevant Projects (Pharmacy/Compounding)
· Subfactor 1B: Personnel ‘s Specialized and Consultant Experience
(2) Technical Capabilities and Approach
(3) Past Performance
b. The Phase I successful offerors will receive a Phase II Request for Proposal (RFP) amendment. During Phase II, a pre-proposal conference and site visit will be held at Loch Raven VAMC. The Phase I factors are not to be resubmitted in Phase II; however, the cumulative rating from the Phase I factors carries through to Phase II and is as equal in importance to Phase II. Phase II “Design Concepts” in accordance with FAR 303-2 evaluation technical factors (Factors 4 – 7) are listed below in descending order of importance. The Phase I and Phase II technical evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price.
Phase II:
(4) Technical Solution
(5) Construction Management:
| Subfactor 5A: Ability to Staff Project |
| Subfactor 5B: Management Approach |
| Subfactor 5C: Capability to Perform |
(6) Schedule
(7) Price
| c. | The Government reserves the right to negotiate with any or all offerors; to award a contract that is the best value through the tradeoff process. This process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non-cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal. The perceived benefits of the higher priced proposal shall merit the additional cost, and the rationale for tradeoffs must be documented in the file in accordance with FAR 15.406. Offerors are advised an award may be made in Phase II without discussion or any contact concerning the proposals received. Offerors should not assume that they would be contacted or afforded an opportunity to qualify, discuss, or revise their proposals. However, the Government reserves the right to clarify certain aspects of individual proposals or conduct discussions providing an opportunity for the offeror to revise its proposal if errors are suspected. | |
| d. | Schedule Objectives - The anticipated completion of this project is 365 days after “Notice to Proceed” (NTP). The proposed schedule may be shorter than this, see Phase II, Factor 6. | |
| A3. | Magnitude of Construction | |
| The anticipated cost range for this project is between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000. | ||
| A4. | Pre-Proposal Conference (PHASE II ONLY) |
A pre-proposal conference will be held on a date to be determined at the Loch Raven VAMC. All offerors, consultants, subcontractors, manufacturers and suppliers are invited to attend. The following agenda is furnished for this meeting:
| 1. | Open meeting |
| 2. | Specifications, Network analysis system and project phasing |
| 3. | General requirements, SOW requirements and Offer Submission Procedure |
| 4. | Review of "Buy American Act" |
5. Phase II Source Selection Process
6. Questions and answers
7. Site walk through. Please be advised that there will only be one site visit. Proposers are highly encouraged to attend the site visit.
A6. Selection Criteria A. General: Phase I Proposals will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified offerors to advance to Phase II. A Responsibility determination will be made in accordance with FAR Part 9.1, Responsible Prospective Contractors. Phase II Proposals will be evaluated and award will be made on the basis of both price and technical considerations most advantageous to the VA as per FAR Part 15.101(a), Tradeoff, as the Government may consider award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror if it is in the best interest of the Government.
B. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS, PHASE I & PHASE II: The basis of evaluation for the Phase I & Phase II technical evaluation factors is located within Part III, Section C with each evaluation factor. The Phase I factors are not to be resubmitted in Phase II; however, the cumulative rating from the Phase I factors carries through to Phase II and is as equal in importance to Phase II, Factor 4 for proposal evaluation. Phase II evaluation technical factors (Factors 4 – 7) are in descending order of importance. The Phase I and Phase II technical evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price. Offerors are advised the Tradeoff process is determined to be in the best interest of the Government and award may be made to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror (Reference FAR 15.101-1).
C. Phase II Non-Technical Factor 7, Price
1. Phase II, Factor 7, Price: Offerors are advised the Tradeoff process (Reference FAR 15.101-1) is determined to be in the best interest of the Government and award may be made to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.
| a. | The Government reserves the right to make price/technical trade-offs that are in the best interest and advantageous to the Government in accordance with FAR 15.101, Tradeoff. |
| b. | Price will be evaluated based on its reasonableness, and acceptability to the Government subject to availability of funds. Pricing shall be entered onto the Bid Schedule located within the SF1442. |
| c. | Analysis will be performed using one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price: |
| (a) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP. | |
| (b) Comparison of proposed prices with the Independent Government Cost Estimate. | |
| (c) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information. | |
| (d) Comparison of market survey results. | |
| B. | PART II - RESPONSIBILITIES |
| B1. | VA Team |
| A. | The VA team is comprised of VA Office of Construction & Facilities Management (CFM), Contracting Officer (CO), Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), and VA Medical Center staff. The coordinator/manager of the VA team on site will be the COR, who will have Contracting Officer Authority. |
| B2. | Design-Build Team: |
A. The DB team includes all J/V partners (if applicable), consultants and subcontractors to the one firm. The DB team shall provide any Architectural and Engineering disciplines required for the preparation of construction documents, and construction contractor capabilities for construction of the project.
B. The RFP documents are intended to define existing conditions, certain required items, and design parameters to be included in the project. It is the DB Team’s responsibility to complete the documents and construction in a manner consistent with the intent of the RFP documents within the required time period (contract length).
| C. | PART III - PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS |
| C1. | General |
| A. | Phase I proposals shall be based on solicitation documents issued for RFP Solicitation Number 36C24520R0072. Proposals will be in the format stipulated in Section C3. |
| 1. | Phase I proposals shall be received BY 3:00 PM Eastern Time, August 13, 2020. Proposals that are received after this time shall be late and shall not be considered. There will be no public opening of the proposals. |
| 2. | Submit sealed proposals to: |
| a. | Commercial Delivery Services (Monday - Friday, 7:00 AM to 3:30 PM): |
Department of Veterans Affairs ATTN: Alison Klein, Contracting Officer (NCO5) Louis A Johnson VAMC Rosebud (90C) 1 Med Center Drive Clarksburg, WV 26301
3. Phase I will be evaluated for technical qualifications only. Offeror shall separately tab each section (see Table 1 provided in Section C3). Each section must therefore be labeled with the Offeror's organization, business address, and VA Project Number. Offerors shall affix their names and return addresses on their envelope/packaging. See Section C3 for submission requirements.
B. Phase II proposals shall be based on solicitation documents issued to the three (3) Phase I offerors determined to be the most highly qualified. Proposals will be in the format stipulated in Section C4.
1. The due date, time, and submission address of Phase II proposals will be given within the Phase II RFP amendment.
| 2. | Phase II evaluation will request technical and price proposals. Offeror shall separately tab each section (See Table 2 provided in Section C4). See section C4 for submission requirements. |
| C2. | Proposal Revisions (FAR 52.215-1) |
A. If determined to be necessary, proposal revisions may be requested from the offerors determined to be in the competitive range. The Contracting Officer will identify those offerors in accordance with the selection criteria identified in the request for proposal. Revised proposals will be due at a time and place to be determined.
B. Please be advised that the Government intends to evaluate Phase I & Phase II and award a contract from Phase II proposals without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.
C3. PHASE I – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
A. The Phase I proposal shall address the evaluation factors listed at C3.A.1 - 3. Offeror is required to prepare and submit three (3) copies plus electronic files on CD of the technical evaluation factors in a binder CLEARLY MARKED: “PHASE I TECHNICAL PROPOSAL”. Evaluation scores will be based, in order of importance, upon the criteria in Section A2, B (Source Selection) paragraph 6a and 6b. The following page provides a checklist that should be included in the front of the technical proposal.
PHASE I TECHNICAL PROPOSAL BINDER SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
(Three copies)
RFP: 36C24520R0072
Project Title: Loch Raven VAMC Pharmacy Compounding Area
VA PROJECT # 512A5-20-002
| INTRO PAGE |
| First page MUST clearly indicate: |
Name and Address of Proposer Business Arrangement (Joint Venture or Teaming Arrangements clearly identified) Contact Name and Phone Number Email Address DUNS Number CAGE Code Tax Identification Number
| TAB 1 |
| Factor 1, Proposed Team, Subfactor 1A: Previous Relevant Projects (Pharmacy/Compounding)(with supporting documentation per RFP) |
| TAB 2 |
| Factor 1, Proposed Team, Subfactor 1B: Personnel and Specialized Consultant Experience (with supporting documentation per RFP) |
| TAB 3 |
| Factor 2, Technical Capabilities and Approach (with supporting documentation per the RFP) |
| TAB 4 |
| Factor 3, Firm’s Past Performance (with supporting documentation per RFP) If Offeror has PPIRS or CPARS reports, printed copies of these reports shall be included in this section. |
CD of Phase I Technical proposal electronic files
Table 1: Phase I Technical Proposal Binder Submittal Checklist
1. Phase I, Factor 1, Proposed Team –The evaluation of subfactors 1A and 1B are of equal importance to the determination of Factor 1 rating.
a. Subfactor 1A: Project Experience:
i. Submission Requirements: Submit a minimum of three (3) completed construction projects within the last seven (7) years by a Design Build contract and/or contract similar in size ($1M - $10M) and scope to this project. (Design Build as defined by the VA, see article A.2). The Offeror shall demonstrate their experience on relevant Design/Build and projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. Scoring will be more favorable if both criteria are met. Indicate the number of design/build projects construction contractor and AE have completed together. In describing project design and construction experience, provide the following information:
a) Project title, location and brief description including the building use (Medical Facility, Major Building Renovation, etc) and contracting method (design build, design bid construct, CM at risk etc).
b) Project owner, owner’s point of contact and telephone number of owner’s contact person.
c) Project Design Architect and Engineers (consultants if utilized) and name and telephone number of contact person(s).
d) Project Prime Contractor and Major Subcontractors and name and telephone number of contact person(s). Note each firm and managing persons (project manager / superintendent as the case may be) also proposed for this solicitation.
e) Project Statistics including start and completion dates (original vs. actual) for design and construction; cost (with brief explanation of what is included in the cost); square footage; number of levels; and any awards (prizes) received.
ii. Basis of Evaluation: Phase I, Factor 1, Subfactor 1A: Project Experience: The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. Proposals that fail to provide required and complete information will be rated lower. Relevant projects where the Prime and Sub-contractors have previously worked together will receive a higher rating. Relevant projects that demonstrate design build experience will receive a higher rating. Offerors providing more projects (maximum 7) of similar size and scope will be more favorably rated.
b. Phase I, Factor 1, Subfactor 1B: Project Personnel Experience (Specialized experience and technical competence):
i. Submission Requirements: The Offeror shall demonstrate the relevant experience of key project personnel who will be assigned to this project.
a) Biographical data shall include the following:
i. Name of individual.
ii. Company employed by.
iii. Company position title.
iv. Years with the company.
v. Describe work experience with projects that were completed by the design build process, were medical facilities and the company (by name) they worked for when involved in the project.
vi. An indication of which (if any) projects submitted under Corporate Experience (above) the individual participated in and what the individuals responsibility was for that project.
vii. An indication of which other individuals submitted under Project Personnel Experience this individual has worked with and the project they worked on together, noting if that project has been submitted under Factor 1, Subfactor 1A, Corporate Experience.
b) Supply this biographical data for key personnel for at least the following: (Note if one individual is proposed for more than one position listed):
i. Overall Senior Project Manager
ii. Design Project Manager
iii. Construction Project Manager.
iv. Architect/Engineer Field Representative.
v. Construction Superintendent
vi. Quality Control Manager
ii. Basis of Evaluation: Phase I, Factor 1, Subfactor 1B: Personnel Experience: The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s proposed personnel’s experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the personnel’s experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror’s personnel to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.
2. Phase I, Factor 2, Technical Approach
a. Submission Requirements: Provide a brief narrative describing the Offeror’s method to manage the project to achieve design and construction design objectives as described in the RFP. Include at minimum all aspects covered in scope of work. The following shall be included in the narrative:
| 1) Design Approach: Describe the techniques and methods for an efficient, effective design to include interface and coordination with the existing building systems, appropriate equipment sizing, and DDC controls integration. |
| 2) Construction Approach: Describe the techniques and methods for this construction project to include coordination with the design package development, the synchronization of phases, and integration with the existing building systems. |
b. Basis of Evaluation: Phase I, Factor 2, Technical Approach: The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s proposed technical approach for this design build project as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s method to manage the project shall be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s ability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.
| 3. | Phase I, Factor 3, Firm’s Past Performance (Client Satisfaction) - Contact persons supplied for Phase 1, Subfactor 1A - Corporate Project Experience projects will be contacted by the Evaluation Panel and asked the questions listed below at 3.a.1)–3)and 3.b.1)– 4). The contact's responses will be scored based on the following elements with projects participated in by the Prime (Construction Contractor and Architect firm) being weighted more heavily than projects participated in by consultants, sub-contractors and individuals. If Offeror has PPIRS reports, printed copies of these reports shall be submitted for this factor and included on the CDs. |
| a. | Client Overall Satisfaction with Project: Contact persons will be asked: |
| 1) | Did the project fulfill the requirements of the clients stated function? |
| 2) | Did the project require unexpected maintenance activity? |
| 3) | Have any latent defects been found? |
| b. | Client Overall Satisfaction with Design Build Period Services: Contact persons will be asked: |
| 1) | Was the team's response time to client’s questions acceptable? |
| 2) | Was the staffing level consistent with the project size and complexity? |
| 3) | Was communication of schedule and problem issues adequate and consistent? |
| 4) | Was there an established problem-solving routine? Would the client like to use this firm again? |
| c. | In addition to the above, the VA may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)and/or Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/ affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. While the VA may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror. |
d. Basis of Evaluation: Phase I, Factor 3, Firm’s Past Performance: The basis of evaluation will be the degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS,CPARS, FAPIIS, eSRS, performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering 1) a pattern of successful completion of tasks; 2) a pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality; 3) a pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); 4) tasks that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand; and 5) fiscal responsibility of Government funds. If the offeror lacks a record of relevant or available past performance history or there is no expectation of either successful or unsuccessful performance based on the offeror’s past performance record, the past performance evaluation will be given a neutral rating.
PHASE II
(FOR SUCCESSFUL OFFERORS FROM PHASE I)
Through an amendment to the Phase I solicitation, Phase I successful offers will be notified to submit the Phase II Technical and Price Proposals.
DO NOT SUBMIT PHASE II FACTORS WITH PHASE I
C4. PHASE II – TECHNICAL AND PRICE SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
(FOR SUCCESSFUL OFFERORS FROM PHASE I ONLY)
A. Phase II, Technical Proposal Requirements: The Phase II Proposal shall address the evaluation factors listed C4.A.1 – 4 (below). Offeror is required to prepare and submit three (3) copies plus CDs of electronic files of the following technical evaluation factors in a SEPARATE BINDER FROM PRICE, CLEARLY MARKED: “PHASE II TECHNICAL PROPOSAL”. Evaluation scores will be based, in order of importance, upon the criteria in Section A2, B (Source Selection) paragraph 6a and 6b. The below checklist should be included in the front of the technical proposal.
PHASE II, TECHNICAL PROPOSAL BINDER SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
RFP: 36C24520R0072
| INTRO PAGE |
| First page MUST clearly indicate: |
Name and Address of Proposer Business Arrangement (Joint Venture or Teaming Arrangements clearly identified) Contact Name and Phone Number Email Address DUNS Number
TAB 1
Factor 4, Technical Solution (with supporting documentation per RFP)
TAB 2
Factor 5, Construction Management, Subfactor 5A: Ability to Staff (with supporting documentation per RFP)
| TAB 3 |
| Factor 5, Construction Management, Subfactor 5B: Management Approach(with supporting documentation per RFP) |
| TAB 4 |
| Factor 5, Construction Management, Subfactor 5C: Capability to Perform |
| TAB 5 |
| Factor 6, Schedule (with supporting documentation per RFP) |
CD of Technical Proposal
Table 2: Phase II Technical Proposal Binder Submittal Checklist
1. Phase II, Factor 4, Technical Solution:
a. Submission Requirements: Provide detailed narrative of conceptual design addressing requirements of the RFP. The evaluation of the conceptual facilities design will be based on the criteria set forth in the project program contained in the RFP. Complying with and exceeding project program requirements by providing HVAC, plumbing, fire protection and life safety, electrical, mechanical, architectural and other compliant systems that provide quality of life, energy savings, and sustainability will be most highly rated. Include in the discussion, but do not limit to the following:
1) Conceptual drawings shall be provided to supplement the narrative (i.e. floor and roof plans and riser diagrams).
2) Design approach, with emphasis on efficient and sustainable pharmacy operations, USP 797/800 compliance, interface and coordination with the existing building systems and architectural layout, and appropriate HVAC equipment sizing to meet air quality requirements.
3) Controls networking and integration into existing controls system.
4) Proposed solutions to construction challenges, including the delivery/installation logistics of installing a new air handler in the existing building, exhaust system design, and routing of ductwork/piping between 1st floor pharmacy space and mechanical attic space.
5) Preliminary Training for VAMC engineering personnel
6) Warranties
7) Demonstrate energy-efficiency of proposed HVAC solution and units and describe how goals will be met by the proposed solution.
b. Basis of Evaluation: Phase II, Factor 4, Technical Solution: The basis of evaluation will include the narrative and conceptual drawings considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the construction and design team’s technical solution to determine the likelihood that the work will be performed in accordance with the technical requirements of the RFP and will be successful in meeting project goals.
2. Phase II, Factor 5, Construction Management: Factor 5 consists of three Subfactors: 5A: Ability to Staff Project; 5B: Management Approach; and 5C, Capability to Perform. The evaluation of subfactors 5A, 5B, & 5C are of equal importance to the determination of Factor 5 rating.
a. Subfactor 5A: Ability to Staff Project:
1) Submission Requirements:
a. Demonstrate the ability to staff the project for the scope of work required; describe how the Design-Build Team will be structured, i.e., how many firms are involved and the responsibility of each firm for this project. Indicate the extent to which resources and personnel will be drawn from various sources: in-house, subcontractor, and/or separate consultant firms. Describe D/B management approach, including but not limited to management of multiple designers and subs/trades working in parallel on several different facilities at one time. Describe construction material staging plan coordinated with the limited available site area.
b. Project Personnel Experience (Specialized experience and technical competence proposed in Phase I). The Offeror shall demonstrate the relevant experience of Phase I proposed key project personnel who will be assigned to this project.
i. Position that the individual will hold in regard to this contract/project team, description of duties and what percentage of the individual’s time would be committed to the project during both the design and construction phases.
ii. Describe job related educational experience including degrees, certificates, etc., and granting institutions.
b. Subfactor 5B, Management Approach:
1)Submission Requirements: The Offeror shall demonstrate the following, relevant to the subject procurement.
| a) | Project Delivery Approach - Include statements concerning: | |
| i. Elements for Successful Partnering: Communication, Commitment and Conflict Resolution. | ||
| ii. Proposed Design Period Peer Review technical/administrative by VA | ||
| b) | Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan see section 1.3, General requirements (01 00 00). | |
| c) | Project Organizational Chart and Narrative - Include team members submitted under Project Personnel Experience above. Clearly describe the prime responsible firm (or firms if a J/V) and individuals as well as the roles and responsibilities of individuals proposed as consultants and sub-contractors. Provide a list of all consultants and all proposed major subcontractors, including telephone number, address, and name of contact. | |
| d) | The Offeror shall describe in a written narrative the plan for phasing the work so that the facility remains operational. | |
| e) | Offeror shall clarify its requirements for the portions of the site indicated to be available to the contractor for materials staging, waste collection, and other activities as shown in the design solution material. | |
| c. | Subfactor 5C, Capability to Perform: | |
| 1) | Submission Requirements: | |
| a) Provide the offeror's total bonding capacity (from Offeror’s surety), current available bonding capacity and expected available capacity in 2021. | ||
| b) Provide the offeror's current workload and availability of staff proposed in Phase I, Factor 1 Project Personnel Experience to manage the project. Include project schedules for current and pending projects, as well as the anticipated impact of this project on those schedules and staffing plans. |
d. Basis of Evaluation: Phase II, Factor 5, Construction Management: The basis of evaluation will include the assessment of the Offeror’s ability to staff, Offeror’s management approach, and Offeror’s capability to perform the project as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .