Attachment E - Past Performance Questionnaire Court Reporting_Final.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24424Q0300
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a solicitation for court reporting and stenography services. The past performance questionnaire is intended to collect performance ratings and assessments from references for incumbent contractors. It requests information on contract details, evaluator information, and ratings on quality of services, timeliness, business relations, and an overall performance rating.
The related solicitation is for five-year blanket purchase agreements to provide court reporting and stenography services across Veterans Integrated Service Network 4. It is set aside entirely for Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses and requires registration in the System for Award Management. Proposals are due by March 4, 2024. The work will be fixed-price and awarded to a single awardee. The North American Industry Classification code is 561492 with a $30 million small business size standard.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24424Q0300_3.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24424Q0300_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment D - Wage Determinations - Court Reporting.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24424Q0300_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24424Q0300 - Combo - VISN Court Reporting_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment A - PWS Stenography Services_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment B - QASP VISN 4 Court Reporting.pdf | ||
| Attachment C - PRICE SCHEDULE_Final.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NUMBER – 36C24424Q0300
VISN 4 Court Reporting (Stenography Services)
CONTRACTOR: PLEASE SENT TO YOUR RATEES. YOUR RATEES ARE TO COMPLETE.
RATEES: PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT. PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETED FORM TO JOANN CHUKINAS, JOANN.CHUKINAS@VA.GOV, SOLICITATION CLOSE DATE IS 9:00AM EST MONDAY MARCH 4, 2024.
I. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION:
Contractor:
Contract Number:
Period of Performance:
Negotiated price or cost at award:
Current estimated contract dollar amount:
Describe service acquired:
II. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:
Name:
Organization:
Phone Number:
Relation to Program:
(i.e., Contracting Officer, Program Manager, Contract Specialist/Administrator, Contracting Officer's Technical Representative, etc.)
Time On Contract:
III. ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS: Narrative statements are vital. Please provide a narrative for each element below and then an adjectival rating under pars. III.A2, III.B.2, III.C.2, and an overall Past/Present Performance adjectival rating under par. III.F based on the attached Adjectival Rating Descriptions. Attach additional pages if there is insufficient space in the comment space.
PERFORMANCE ADJECTIVAL RATINGS: Choose the appropriate adjective that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance based on the descriptions below.
| EXCELLENT |
| GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
A. QUALITY OF SERVICES
1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to provide qualified personnel (including experienced managers and/or supervisors), for performance of your contract, and contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions.
2. Rating for Quality of Services: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
|_| Excellent |_|Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory
| B. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: | |
| 1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to meet the contract’s | specific response times and Contractor’s timeliness in providing administrative reports/documents required by your contract. |
2. Rating for Timeliness of Performance: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
| C. BUSINESS RELATIONS | ||
| 1. Narrative: Address Contractor’s willingness to improve and correct | noncompliance issues and concerns. Describe Contractor’s ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. Does Contractor display initiative and flexibility? Do Contractor personnel promote a strong working relationship with your agency/organization? Are Contractor personnel courteous and | responsive? Do Contractor personnel interface effectively with your staff? |
2. Rating for Business Relations: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
D. Identify the contractor’s overall strengths and weaknesses:
E. Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?
YES |_| NO |_|
If no, please explain:
F. CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE RATING: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .