36C24422R0144.docx
DOCX document 134 KB Posted
- Attached to
- C219--NRM| 595-22-4-5482-0026 | 595-21-103 Replace Steam, Condensate and Vaults Phase I Design
- Solicitation number
- 36C24422R0144
About this file
This announcement is for the selection of an architect-engineeral firm to provide design services for the Replace Steam, Condensate and Vaults Phase I project located at the Lebanon VAMC in Lebanon, Pennsylvania. Interested firms must submit a Standard Form 330 by May 25, 2022 to the Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office. The contract will be awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis to provide Title I design services including surveys, drawings, specifications, cost estimates and construction period support. This is a 100% set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses under NAICS code 541330 for engineering services. Submissions must include registration in SAM and VA VetBiz systems as well as details on labor categories, disciplines and percentages to be performed by the prime firm and any subcontractors. The selection criteria will evaluate submissions based on qualifications and past performance.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SUBJECT*
NRM| 595-22-4-5482-0026 | 595-21-103 Replace Steam, Condensate and Vaults Phase I Design
GENERAL INFORMATION
| CONTRACTING OFFICE’S ZIP CODE* |
| 15215 |
| SOLICITATION NUMBER* |
| 36C24422R0144 |
| RESPONSE DATE/TIME/ZONE |
| 05-25-2022 11:59PM EASTERN TIME, NEW YORK, USA |
| ARCHIVE |
| 30 DAYS AFTER THE RESPONSE DATE |
| RECOVERY ACT FUNDS |
| N |
| SET-ASIDE |
| SDVOSBC |
| PRODUCT SERVICE CODE* |
| C219 |
| NAICS CODE* |
| 541330 |
| CONTRACTING OFFICE ADDRESS |
| Department of Veterans Affairs |
Network Contracting Office 4
1010 Delafield Rd
POINT OF CONTACT*
Contracting Officer Steph Carhart stephanie.carhart@va.gov 412-680-6879
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
| ADDRESS |
| Lebanon VAMC |
1700 S Lincoln Ave
Lebanon Pennsylvania
| POSTAL CODE |
| 17042 |
| COUNTRY |
| USA |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
AGENCY’S URL
URL DESCRIPTION
AGENCY CONTACT’S EMAIL ADDRESS
EMAIL DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION
This announcement is for the selection of an Architect-Engineer (AE) for the Replace Steam, Condensate and Vaults Phase I AE Design project. The locations of the project will be at the Lebanon VAMC, Lebanon, PA 17042.
SF330 INFORMATION: All potential offerors must provide a SF 330 containing all required information listed below – do not send a full proposal or pricing. The form format must be the General Services Administration SF 330 found on the website GSA Forms Library at https://www.gsa.gov/reference/forms#. SF330 Extra Sections and Extra Parts may be used as needed.
CONTRACT INFORMATION: The Government intends to award a Firm Fixed Price Contract. The contract award will incorporate the Scope of Work.
Expected A-E services: Title I - Design Services.
This contract is being procured in accordance with the Brooks AE Act as implemented in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subparts 36.602-2 Evaluation Boards and 36.602-3 Evaluation Board Function and Veterans Administration Acquisition Regulation (VAAR) 836.6. The SF330 will be evaluated, and the top three vendors shall provide oral presentations and pricing. This contract is 100% set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business’s (SDVOSB) capable of completing work under the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code 541330, Engineering Services. The contract will be awarded as a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract.
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Interested firms having the capabilities to perform this work must submit the Standard Form 330 (SF 330) via email to stephanie.carhart@va.gov no later than 11:59 PM EST on May 25, 2022. All questions are to be sent to the attention of stephanie.carhart@va.gov.
Additionally, the submission must include the following information:
Unique ID Number Tax ID Number The e-mail address and phone number of the Primary Point of Contact
Prior to submittal of the SF 330, the selected firm must be registered in SAM at https://sam.gov/content/home and VA VetBiz at https://vetbiz.va.gov/vip/. Vendors who are not registered at both sites at time of submission will NOT be considered for oral presentations.
To assure compliance with FAR Clause 52.219-14(b)(1) – Limitations on Subcontracting, all To assure compliance with FAR Clause 52.219-14(b)(1) – Limitations on Subcontracting, all firms submitting SF 330’s for this Sources Sought Notice are required to indicate what percentage of the cost of contract performance will be expended by the Prime A-E firm’s employees and in which discipline(s) and percentage of cost of contract performance to be expended (and in what disciplines) by any other subcontracted or otherwise used small or large business entity(s). Any subcontracted or otherwise business entity(s) used must be identified by name, office location and size/type of business (i.e.
SDVOSB, VOSB, 8(a), large, etc). Personal visits by A-E firms, for the purpose of discussing this announcement or the submittal is not permitted. No contract for construction of any project shall be awarded to the firm, subsidiaries or affiliates that designed the project.
SELECTION CRITERIA: The VA will use the following criteria to determine competition when reviewing the SF 330 received. If a submitting firm fails to meet these criteria they will be deemed non-responsive and shall be rated accordingly. Selection criteria as identified in FAR Subpart 36.6 will be used.
A-E SELECTION BOARD GUIDE CRITERIA
Replace Steam, Condensate and Vaults Phase I
FOR
LEBANON VA MEDICAL CENTER
1. There are five evaluation factors for each firm: Professional Qualification, Specialized Experience, Past Performance, Capacity to Accomplish Work, and Location. Detailed evaluation guidance is offered for each factor below. The adjectival system uses the adjectives and associated definitions listed in the table below.
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
| OUTSTANDING |
| Firm has excellent ability to meet project requirements |
| GOOD |
| Firm has good ability to meet project requirements |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| Firm has average ability to meet project requirements |
| MARGINAL |
| Firm has a minimum ability to meet project requirements |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| Firm does not meet project requirements |
Note: All ratings are not used for each factor. Some objective factors simply use unacceptable, acceptable, and outstanding.
2. The initial evaluation of the packages should determine which firms are the most highly qualified firms. The Selection Board shall produce a list in the order of preference with a narrative explanation supporting the order of preference. Where firms are rated the same adjective, credence will be given to the descending order of importance. The Source Selection Authority will then select no less than two but no more than five firms for interviews, unless a logical break in the rankings occur. For example, if six firms are rated GOOD, the sixth firm will be given an interview. Upon completion of interviews, the Selection Board will then rank the interviewed firms from most highly qualified to least highly qualified. Negotiations will begin with the most highly qualified firm.
3. The Professional Qualification, Specialized Experience and Past Performance factors are significantly more important than the other two factors which are listed in descending order of importance.
4. The determination of a firm's overall rating shall be made in accordance with the following guidance. The lower of a firm's rating in the three key areas (Professional Qualifications, Specialized Experience and Past Performance) establishes the maximum overall rating a firm can receive as shown below.
Overall Rating
| Lowest of Professional Qualifications, Specialized Experience and Past Performance |
| If the remaining two factors are not both “unacceptable” ratings. |
| If the remaining two factors are both “unacceptable” ratings |
| “Outstanding” |
| OUTSTANDING |
| GOOD |
| “Good” |
| GOOD |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| “Acceptable” |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| MARGINAL |
| “Marginal” |
| MARGINAL |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| “Unacceptable” |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
5. Recency/Relevance: Evaluators will grade the ten projects that the firms submitted in part F of the SF Form 330. If a firm submitted more than ten projects, only the first ten shall be evaluated, the additional projects shall be ignored. Each of the ten projects will be assigned a grade of “relevant” if the project’s professional services completion year (F22) is within the past five years AND the evaluator believes that the project is similar in size and scope to the statement of work for this solicitation. A project that is only partially similar in size and scope AND has been completed in the past eight years may receive a grade of “somewhat relevant”. A project that is not similar in size and score OR has not been completed in the last eight years will be assigned a grade of “not relevant”. Relevancy is a judgement call made by the evaluator. Typical items that influence the relevancy decision include function (exact, similar, not-similar), size/purpose, and new construction vs renovation.
6. Professional Qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required services: This is intended to evaluate the personal experience and qualifications of firm members who work in the firm's project office and are scheduled to be assigned to the design team and who are listed in section E.
a. The number of key positions will vary based on the scope of work of the project. Key positions include Project Manager(s), Quality Assurance, and technical staff that are important to the successful outcome of the project. A complex multi-disciplined project may have many key technical staff, including Architects, Civil Engineers, Electrical Engineers, Environmental Engineers, Fire Protection Engineers, Health Care Planners, Interior Designers, Mechanical Engineers, Structural Engineers and Surveyors. A simpler parking lot project may only have Civil Engineers and Surveyors as key technical staff although all assigned personnel are required to be qualified to practice in their field.
b. Of the personnel listed in section E, each board member shall determine which individuals are actually key individuals.
c. For an individual in a key position to count as experienced, they must have experience in relevant projects as documented in Sections E or F/G, and they must have the appropriate professional qualifications for their role.
i. All lead engineers must have a Professional Engineers license (PE) (per Federal Law, they do not need to be licensed in PA, just in one of the 54 states or territories). Best approach is to have at least one PE per discipline
ii. Lead Architect must be a registered architect, this is normally indicated by NCARB, RA or AIA. Associate AIA are not registered and, therefore, do not count.
iii. Interior Designer registration is preferred (NCIDQ)
iv. Surveyors must be licensed (PLS)
v. Other qualifications include (each board member shall determine the requirement for and relevancy of additional credentials)
1. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LED AP or LEED AP BD+C)
2. Project Management Professional (PMP, PgMP)
3. Constructions Specifications Institute (CSI, CCS, CCCA, CDT)
4. Other industry qualifications
d. Determination of what personnel are sub-contractor personnel and what personnel are in branch offices versus the main office shall be made based on Section C and D, and Part II
e. The larger proportion of key personnel who have the required experience/qualifications and work for the Prime Contractor, the higher the grade as shown on the chart below.
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| The majority of personnel assigned to the key positions do not appear to have any experience in designing the type of facilities and systems anticipated in this contract or, none of the key personnel listed appear to work in the firm’s designated project office. |
| MARGINAL |
| The majority of personnel assigned to the key positions appear to have experience on one or fewer of the type anticipated in this contract |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| The majority of personnel assigned to the key positions appear to have experience on one to three projects of the type anticipated in this contract or at least four of the key personnel are subcontractor personnel |
| GOOD |
| The majority of personnel assigned to the key positions appear to have experience on at least three projects of the type anticipated in this contract or any of the key personnel are subcontractor personnel |
| OUTSTANDING |
| All personnel assigned to the key positions appear to have experience with more than three projects of the type anticipated in this contract and are employees of the prime A-E firm. |
7. Specialized Experience and Technical Competence in the type of work required. This factor evaluates the experience of the firm in completing projects relevant to this contract.
a. Firms provided sample projects as part of section F. Each board member determines which projects are relevant, somewhat relevant and not relevant.
b. Extra consideration may be given for experience designing projects for Department of Veterans Affairs Facilities.
c. For a project to count as relevant for this section, the offeror must have completed the project as the prime contractor. Projects completed by the firm as a sub-contractor or projects completed by key personnel while employed by another firm are not relevant for this section.
d. Board members may use their judgement in providing some credit for projects that are only somewhat relevant but must be consistent.
e. The more projects that the firm has completed, the higher the grade as shown below.
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| The firm does not have experience completing any projects of the type anticipated for this contract |
| MARGINAL |
| The firm's experience completing projects of the type anticipated for this contract is limited to one project or only projects that do not include a majority of the skills required |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| The firm has experience completing at least two projects of the type anticipated for this contract or primarily projects that do not include the majority of the skills required |
| GOOD |
| The firm has experience completing at least four projects of the type anticipated for this contract or includes projects that do not include the majority of the skills required |
| OUTSTANDING |
| The firm has experience completing at least six projects of the type anticipated for this contract including the majority of the skills required |
8. Past performance on contracts with Government agencies (Particularly Department of Veterans Affairs) and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work and compliance with performance schedules.
a. Sources of past performance information include CPARS and personal knowledge.
b. The VA is solely responsible for accessing CPARS data.
c. Board members may give as much weight to contractor provided performance data as they feel appropriate. This data, when provided, is in section H.
d. The more favorable the information, the higher the grade as shown below.
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| Past performance evaluation reports indicate significant negative information or board members have firsthand knowledge of significant poor performance |
| MARGINAL |
| Past performance evaluation reports indicate minor negative information or board members have firsthand knowledge of minor poor performance |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| Past performance evaluation reports contain some favorable information with few instances of unfavorable information or board members have predominantly favorable firsthand knowledge of past performance |
| GOOD |
| Past performance evaluation reports contain several instances of favorable information or board members have firsthand knowledge of several instances of favorable past performance with few to no instances of negative past performance. |
| OUTSTANDING |
| Past performance evaluation reports indicate multiple instances of favorable information or board members have firsthand knowledge of multiple instances of favorable past performance. No negative past performance information was found |
9. Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time: this factor evaluates the ability of the A-E firm, given their current projected workload and the availability of their key personnel, to accomplish the project in the required time.
a. Each A/E firm should address their capacity in part H. This is typically expressed as a firm having a percentage of their resources available for additional work.
b. A firm whose part II section 11 shows a large revenue number likely needs a lower percent capacity in order to perform our project then a firm with a small revenue number. Typically, a design firm will bill 70% of the design fee over the first year and then 30% over the next two years.
c. Rating a firm to have unacceptable capacity requires positive knowledge that they are unable to perform or have had substantial difficulty performing in the past.
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| The firm's past history or current/projected workload indicates that the firm does not have the capacity to accomplish work in accordance with standard design schedules |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| The firm's past history indicates problems with meeting schedules, but the current/projected workload indicates that the firm should have the capacity to accomplish the work in accordance with the standard design schedules |
| OUTSTANDING |
| The firm's past and the current/projected workload indicate that the firm has the capacity to accomplish the work in accordance with standard design schedules |
10. Location in the general geographic area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project: This factor evaluates the distance from the A-E firms design office from the location of work (Lebanon VA Medical Center). The personnel identified as the design team staff are expected to work in the design office identified for evaluation of this factor.
a. Distance shall be measured from the Lebanon VA Medical Center, Lebanon, PA
b. Sections C, D, E and Part II shall be used to determine what project office the majority of key personnel are operating from.
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| Majority of key personnel and designated project office are over 400 miles from the project location |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| Majority of key personnel and designated project office are between 200 and 400 miles from the project location |
| OUTSTANDING |
| Majority of key personnel and designated project office are less than 200 miles from the project location |
Sources Sought Notice Sources Sought Notice
| *= Required Field |
| Sources Sought Notice |
Sources Sought Notice
Lebanon VA Medical Center Lebanon, Pennsylvania
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SCOPE OF WORK
FOR
Replace Steam, Condensate and Vaults Phase 1 595-21-203
| Construction Budget: $5,000,000 - $6,000,000 |
| Bid Documents ready by: 301 DAYS AFTER Notice to Proceed |
| Contracting Officer: Stephanie Carhart |
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR): Jeanette Musembi
-- Services --
Provide professional Architect/Engineer (A/E) services to include:
· Conduct site investigations - architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, site surveys, etc.
· Construction drawings and develop specifications
· Provide a 3rd Party cost estimates
· Provide a cost estimate of expected construction cost as per the schedule of values at the end of each phase
· Provide construction period services - review of submissions, provide recommendations regarding contractor change proposals, visit site per VA's request and add to drawings as-built conditions from contractor's record drawings and VA correspondence during construction. A/E shall review all construction change orders and provide an independent cost estimate on each change order request. A/E shall respond on site within a two-hour period when requested and shall provide site visits as requested during construction.
· Develop an Infection Control Risk Assessment (ICRA) including a drawing and specification
-- Project Scope --
GENERAL:
Complete a survey of the campus steam system identifying deficiencies that need repair, piping that is no longer required or that should be reduced in size. Create a system to categorize the findings, in order of importance, explaining the finding and how the importance ranking was determined. After the survey is complete, provide a full set of construction documents to correct the findings identified in the survey targeting the areas in most urgent need of repair based on the importance ranking while keeping to the construction budget.
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS:
The survey shall include all steam system piping, insulation, and appurtenances that are underground, outside aboveground, in vaults, manholes, tunnels, basements, crawlspaces, and attics. The survey shall also include structural deficiencies and life safety analysis for vaults, manholes, crawlspaces and tunnels to assure that appropriate access and space is available. The survey and construction documents shall include, but are not limited to, the following items:
· steam supply and condensate piping
· steam supply and condensate insulation
· support hangers and brackets
· valves (ball, gate, globe, check, air relief, pressure relief, etc.)
· building isolation valves to be remote controlled by Delta system
· pressure gauges
· meters
· eliminate flange fittings in vaults, manholes, and tunnels.
· steam traps
· asbestos identification and abatement
· expansion joints
· steam tunnels (specifically connecting the central utility plant to the main campus)
· vaults
· manholes
· crawlspaces
· basements
· add building ties-ins and isolation valves for supplemental/emergency steam supply and condensate return
· determine whether steam and condensate piping should (example - to laundry) should be reduced
· update utility drawing based on actual locations
· identify phasing plans to minimize work disruption to the campus facilities
· add measures to provide steam or heat supplement, where necessary, for long downtimes
SCHEDULE:
Submit review package so they are received on or before the noted day. All days below are calendar days. The issuance of the Notice to Proceed (NTP) shall be the first PDT Meeting. A/E shall be required to attend and take minutes of each Project Design Team (PDT) Meeting. Minutes shall be submitted electronically to the COR and Contracting Officer within three (3) business days of each meeting.
| Initial Project Design Team (PDT) Meeting |
| Day 0 |
| Schematic Submission |
| 60 Days after Initial PDT meeting |
| Government Review |
| 21 Days after receipt |
| Design Development 1 (DD1) – 35% Design |
| 60 Days after Schematic Approval |
| Government Review |
| 21 Days after receipt |
| Design Development 2 (DD2) – 65% Design |
| 60 Days after DD1 Approval |
| Government Review |
| 21 Days after receipt |
| Construction Documents 1 (CD1) – 95% Design |
| 45 Days after DD2 Approval |
| Government Review |
| 14 Days after receipt |
| Construction Documents 2 (CD2) – 100% Design |
| 30 Days after CD1 Approval |
| Government Review |
| 14 Days after receipt |
| Bid Documents |
| 14 Days after CD2 Approval |
| Total |
| 360 Days |
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
· Use the latest VA Master Construction Specifications (PG-18-1), supplemented by the Lebanon VAMC specific sections 01 00 00 General Requirements and 01 35 26 Safety Requirements. Where an appropriate specification does not exist, create a specification in the same format and ensure that it is not proprietary to a single manufacturer.
· Perform all services in accordance with the current VA Design and Construction Procedures (PG-18-3)
· Perform all services in accordance with the current VA Building Information Modeling (BIM) Manual and current VA Drawing Deliverable Requirements (PG-18-4): https://www.cfm.va.gov/til/projREq.asp
· Perform all services in accordance with the current VA Equipment Guides and Planning Information (PG-18-5):
· All designs shall be compliant with space criteria referenced in VA space planning criteria (PG-18-9): http://www.cfm.va.gov/til/space.asp
· Perform all work in accordance with current VA Design Manuals in PG-18-10, including Physical Security and Resiliency. If a section of one of the manuals cannot be met, the A/E shall notify the VA immediately, and assist the VA in the waiver process. These design manuals are supplemented by Lebanon VAMC specific design criteria.
· Perform all work in accordance with current VA Barrier Free Design Standard (PG-18-13)
· Perform all work in accordance with current VA Roof Finishes, Door, and Hardware Schedule (PG-18-14)
· Ensure patient privacy criteria are met (e.g. computerized information, patient privacy, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act).
· Design and construction work shall be coordinated with other construction projects on-going at the hospital. A list of current projects will be provided upon approval of the 35% submission.
· A/E shall use most current healthcare delivery processes and the VA design criteria as a guide. The direction that fits the situation the best will be used in the design.
· If shutdowns are required during construction, a full shutdown plan shall be included in the design. Shutdown plans shall include the particular energy source to shut off (e.g. breaker, valve, etc.) and what area, outlets, utilities and/or equipment the shutdown affects. The specific name of the energy source to be shut off shall be identified, for example: “panel H1L1, breaker 2” for electric, or “Valve 3-f” for a water source, etc. Drawings and a written narrative shall be provided.
· A Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Silver Rating is desired with the construction. A rating will not be sought, but practices will reflect LEED Silver requirements. Proof of possible LEED credits shall be provided. The VA shall conduct an Energy Review upon receipt of the 65% submittal (DD2).
· Bid Alternates/Deducts shall be designed into the project to decrease the price of the project 20%.
· A/E shall be responsible for providing certified industrial hygiene services to perform asbestos survey investigations, sampling, development of specifications and drawings, and construction period services. Any place where a sample is taken shall be restored to original condition.
· A/E shall pay particular attention to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), International Building Code (IBC), and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements. Upon receipt of the 65% (DD2) and 95% (CD1) submittals, the VA shall conduct a third-party life safety review. The A/E shall be responsible for making any necessary changes for code compliance and assisting the VA in the waiver process if required.
· A/E shall be responsible for providing all services necessary for design of this project, e.g. structural, industrial hygiene, mechanical, electrical, etc.
SITE INVESTIGATION REQUIREMENTS:
Make site visits as required to determine existing as-built conditions affecting this project. Note: Information including drawings and other documentation provided to the A/E shall be used as reference only. A/E shall field verify every aspect that relates to the project, including all dimensions, wall layouts, capacities, etc. A/E shall coordinate visits with the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) as assigned after award. The A/E shall arrange for and oversee the performance of such investigations as required for the proper design of the project.
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:
· Deliver all design packages in person directly or by traceable carrier to the COR on the established dates to allow the VA Project Design Teams to meet as scheduled. A transmittal letter is required to go to the Contracting Officer on the same day as delivery.
· Electronic Narratives shall be provided in portable document format (.pdf)
· Electronic Specifications shall be provided in both portable document format (.pdf) and Microsoft word (.docx) format compatible with the VA’s system.
· Electronic Drawings shall be provided in document format (.pdf), AutoCAD format (.dwg) and REVIT format compatible with the VA’s system.
· Schematic Submission
· All items required in Attachment B Design Submission Requirements
· At least three (3) proposed layouts (facility project) or solutions (utility project) as outlined at the initial PDT meeting. More layouts shall be required if the provided layouts do not meet the needs of the medical center. The A/E shall be required to present the advantages, disadvantages and costs of each layout to the Medical Center director for approval
· One (1) physical copy and an electronic copy of the narrative report describing the layouts/solutions with their advantages, disadvantages and costs
· One (1) physical copy and an electronic copy of the narratives required in Attachment B
· Two (2) physical copies, 30” x 42” size, and an electronic copy of the drawings of each proposed layout/solution including all information required in Attachment B
· Design Development 1 Submission (35%)
· All items required in Attachment B Design Submission Requirements
· The A/E shall be required to present the layout, renderings and sample boards to the Medical Center director for approval
· One (1) physical copy and an electronic copy of all non-drawing items required in Attachment B
· Two (2) physical copies, 30” x 42” size, and an electronic copy of the drawings including all information required in Attachment B. One hard copy shall be broken up into Civil/Site, Structural, Architectural, Hazardous Material, Equipment, Life Safety and Fire Protection, Plumbing and Heating, Air Conditioning, and Electrical sections.
· Identification of potential bid deducts
· Annotated responses to all comments provided by the VA during the review of the schematic submission
· Provide the period of performance for the construction of the design
· Design Development 2 Submission (65%)
· All items required in Attachment B Design Submission Requirements
· The A/E shall be required to present the layout, renderings and sample boards to the Medical Center director for approval
· One (1) physical copy and an electronic copy of all non-drawing items required in Attachment B
· Two (2) physical copies, 30” x 42” size, and an electronic copy of the drawings of including all information required in Attachment B. One hard copy shall be broken up into Civil/Site, Structural, Architectural, Hazardous Material, Equipment, Life Safety and Fire Protection, Plumbing and Heating, Air Conditioning, and Electrical sections
· Identification of potential bid deducts
· Annotated responses to all comments provided by the VA during the review of the Design Development 1 submission
· Construction Documents 1 Submission (95%)
· All items required in Attachment B Design Submission Requirements
· One (1) physical copy and an electronic copy of all non-drawing items required in Attachment B
· Two (2) physical copies, 30” x 42” size, and an electronic copy of the drawings including all information required in Attachment B. One hard copy shall be broken up into Civil/Site, Structural, Architectural, Hazardous Material, Equipment, Life Safety and Fire Protection, Plumbing and Heating, Air Conditioning, and Electrical sections
· Identification of potential bid deducts
· Annotated responses to all comments provided by the VA during the review of the Design Development 2 submission, including the life safety review and energy review
· Construction Documents 2 Submission (100%)
· All items required in Attachment B Design Submission Requirements
· One (1) physical copy and an electronic copy of all non-drawing items required in Attachment B
· Two (2) physical copies, 30” x 42” size, and an electronic copy of the drawings including all information required in Attachment B
· Identification of potential bid deducts
· Annotated responses to all comments provided by the VA during the review of the Construction Documents 1 submission, including the life safety review
· Bid Documents
· One (1) physical copy and an electronic copy of all non-specifications/drawing items that changed during the CD2 review
· One (1) physical copy and an electronic copy of the specifications with stamps/seals
· Two (2) physical copies, 30” x 42” size, and an electronic copy of the drawings with stamps/seals
· Annotated responses to all comments provided by the VA during the review of the Construction Documents 2 submission
· Provide the period of performance for the construction of the design
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD SERVICES REQUIREMENTS:
· Assist the VA with a price reasonableness determination of bid prices
· Review all submissions and provide recommendations to the VA within fifteen calendar days
· Review and provide replies to contractor generated Requests for Information (RFI) within 5 workdays
· Review contractor’s change order request and provide an independent cost estimate for each change order request.
· Make 50 site visits, including those necessary for acceptance inspections, at the request of the VA and prepare written reports to include agreed upon changes in design as determined necessary during the construction. Visits made based on errors and omissions in design will be at no cost to the VA.
· Within 30 days after receipt of red-line drawings that the contractor kept during construction, prepare as-built drawings with A/E’s stamp. Transpose contractor’s as-builts to the current version of AutoCAD and provide a set of updated as-builts, specifications and BIM model.
Attachment A:
Attachment B: Design Submission Requirements
1. GENERAL, SURVEY, GEOTECHNICAL, CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE: Submit the following:
| General, Survey, Geotech, Civil, Landscape |
| Schematic |
| 35% DD1 |
| 65% DD2 |
| 95% CD1 |
| 100% CD2 |
Narrative
· Site Feasibility Analysis
· Circulation Study
· Phasing Analysis
· Parking Analysis
· Subsurface Investigation Report
· Boring Logs
Drawings
· General Information
· List of sheets and symbols
· Code summary
· Orientation Maps
· Layout Plan showing location of
· Buildings and Structures
· Roads
· Fire Access
· Parking
· Accessible Spaces
· Van Spaces
· Mechanical and Electrical Equipment on Grade
· Future Expansion
· Off-site Roads
· Off-site Utilities
· Service Areas
· Entrances and Exits
· Walks
· Inlets
· Contractor’s Staging Area
· Temporary fencing
· Soil borings
· Vertical and Horizontal Road Alignment
· Paving Joint Patterns
· Grading Plan Showing:
· Existing Contours
· Proposed Contours
· Spot Elevations at Structure Corners, Entrances, Equipment Pads, etc
· First Floor Elevations
· Rim and Invert Elevations on Storm Drainage Fixtures
· Erosion and Sedimentation Control
· Rock Excavation (Quantity)
· Demolition Plan
· Planting Plan Showing
· Landscape Drawings with Plant Groupings
· List of Plant Material
· Site Details
· Landscape Details
· Signage Plan and Schedule
· Phasing Plan
· Infection Control Plan
2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Submit the following:
| Hazardous Materials |
| Schematic |
| 35% DD1 |
| 65% DD2 |
| 95% CD1 |
| 100% CD2 |
Narrative
· Summary results of building records
· Summary results of station personnel interview
· Determination of materials known to contain asbestos, lead, PCBs, Ozone Depleting Substances or other toxins
· Visual inspection of work area to determine location and condition of hazardous materials
· Sample strategy
· Table of quantities and types of materials to be abated
Drawings
· Major Decontamination Areas
· Limits of sealing off the location
· Locations, types, and quantities of hazardous materials to be removed
· Locations and quantities of hazardous materials to remain
· Arrangements for auxiliary rooms
· Engineering of negative air systems
· Path of hazardous materials to loading areas
· Location and connection to required utilities
· Personal decontamination area
· Minor Decontamination Areas
· Local, types and length of items to be abated by glove and bag approach
· Other abatement features
· Restoration of impacted areas
· Abatement phasing
3. STRUCTURAL: Submit the following:
| Structural: |
| Schematic |
| 35% DD1 |
| 65% DD2 |
| 95% CD1 |
| 100% CD2 |
Narrative
· Three alternative structural systems for typical bays
· Supporting calculations
· Cost estimates for each system
· Recommend preferred system
Drawings
· Inspection Requirements
· Structural plans
· Sections
· Details
· Existing Columns
· New Columns
· Beams
· Lateral load resisting elements
· Shear load resisting elements
· Load bearing walls
· Slabs
· Foundations
· Elevations
· Schedules
· General notes
· Estimated quantity of rock
· Spray on fireproofing
· Phasing
4. ARCHITECTURAL, INTERIOR DESIGN, EQUIPMENT: Submit or show the following:
| Architectural, Interior Design, Equipment: |
| Schematic |
| 35% DD1 |
| 65% DD2 |
| 95% CD1 |
| 100% CD2 |
Narrative
· Schematic Options
· Circulation Study
· Phasing Analysis
· Written interior design concept
Floor Plans/Drawings
· Rooms (w/Names & Numbers)
· Doors
· Corridor(s)
· Basic column grid/sizes
· Electrical closets
· Equipment rooms
· IT closets
· Mechanical shafts and space
· Stair(s)
· Ramp(s)
· Elevator(s)
· Penthouse
· Program net/designed net SF
· Size and shape of all departmental functions and services
· Exterior dimensions/total building gross area
· Exterior building elevations
· Expansion and seismic joints
· Roof plan
· Pipe basement
· Pipe tunnel
· Reflected ceiling
· Demolition plans
· Exterior finishes
· Finish floor elevations
· Wall thickness and ratings
· Plumbing fixtures
· Wall sections
· Building sections
· Finish grades at corners, entrances, exits, platforms and ramps
· Lead-lined and radio-frequency-shielded partitions
· Psychiatric areas
· Fire extinguisher cabinets
· Construction details
· Drafting symbols, abbreviations, and general notes
· Door, window, and louver schedules
· Perspectives of key spaces
· Interior details, elevations, sections and perspectives
· Wayfinding and Signage
· Interior finishes Plan
· Wall protection and handrails
· Flooring
· Finish Schedule
· Major Equipment
· All Equipment from PG-18-5
· Equipment elevations and details
· Equipment schedule
· Phasing
Color renderings (interior and exterior)
Sample Boards for interior and exterior materials, products, and finishes
Activation Equipment List (Excel format)
5. FIRE PROTECTION: Submit the following:
| Fire Protection: |
| Schematic |
| 35% DD1 |
| 65% DD2 |
| 95% CD1 |
| 100% CD2 |
Narrative:
· Fire and smoke separation
· Fire sprinkler/standpipe system
· Size of fire pumps
· Water supply available/max. demand
· Water flow testing results
· Fire alarm systems
· Calculations
· Estimated capacities for proposed air handling units in cubic meters (cubic feet) per minute
Drawings:
· Kitchen extinguishing systems
· Size of air handling unit
· Exit paths from each zone
· Distances to stairs
· Occupancy of each area
· Exit calculations for each floor
· Smoke control features
· Life Safety Summary
· Sprinkler zones
· Fire alarm zones
· Smoke zones
· Building water supply
· Interior sprinkler supply lines
· Standpipes
· Fire extinguisher cabinets
· Fireproofing of structural members
· Sprinkler/standpipe riser supply piping
· Termination of sprinkler main and inspector test drains
· Sprinkler alarm valves
· Waterflow and tamper switches
· Sprinkler system fire department connections
· Sprinkler design hazards per
NFPA 13
· Occupied areas not protected by automatic sprinklers
· Fire alarm system
· Annunciator panels
· Pull stations
· Flow switches
· Audio-visual devices
· Smoke detectors
· Duct smoke detectors
· Smoke dampers
· Fire dampers
· Fire alarm risers
· Exit signs
· Emergency lighting
· Fire sprinklers
· Standpipes
· Fire hydrants
· Fire pumps
· Post indicator valves
· Sectional valves
· Electromagnetic door hold- open devices
· Wall sections indicating fire resistive ratings
· Staff sleeping rooms
· Excavation plan signage
· Door and window schedule with fire rating or fire rated glazing
· Zoning of each fire alarm initiating device
· Details:
· Fire pump system (capacity and pressure)
· Elevation and isometric view of fire pump
· Stairwell sign
· Annunciator panel
· Interconnection of fire alarm system with:
· Smoke dampers
· Air handlers
· Elevator controls
· Kitchen fire extinguishing and fire pump system
· HVAC system with smoke duct detectors
· Single line riser diagram for fire alarm system
· Height/configuration of storage racks and shelving
6. PLUMBING: Submit the following:
| Plumbing |
| Schematic |
| 35% DD1 |
| 65% DD2 |
| 95% CD1 |
| 100% CD2 |
Narrative
· Demolition plans
· Existing plumbing systems to be used and necessary modifications
· New plumbing systems
· New or modified water treatment
· Calculations (equipment & piping)
· Existing systems: water, sewer, storm, & gas with sources, disposal methods, pressures, condition, etc.
· New sanitary systems
Floor Plans/Drawings
· Demolition Plan
· Room Names
· Identify
· Existing and new plumbing fixtures w/VA numbering system
· Existing and new equipment
· Existing and new medical gas outlets
· Existing and new laboratory/ process gas outlets
· Existing and new sanitary connections and drains
· Plumbing piping
· Size of Pipe
· Equipment schedule
· Fire & smoke partitions
· Riser diagrams
· Legend, notes, and details
· Invert Elevations
· Location/Size
· Pumps
· Storage Facilities
· Treatment Equipment
· Fire Hydrants
· Sectional and post indicator valves
· Backflow preventer
· sprinkler riser, standpipes, system connection and fire pumps
· Profiles of sanitary & storm sewers
· Location of emergency eyewash and shower equipment
· Phasing
7. HVAC: Submit the following:
| HVAC |
| Schematic |
| 35% DD1 |
| 65% DD2 |
| 95% CD1 |
| 100% CD2 |
Narrative
· Description of HVAC systems
· Equipment for each functional space
· Life cycle cost analysis
· Block layout of equipment
· Selection of HVAC Equipment
· Engineering calculations
· Selection of HVAC equipment
· Catalog cuts of equipment
· Room by room heating and cooling loads
· Zone by zone heating & cooling loads
· Building block heating & cooling loads
· Tabulation of steam consumption
· Psychometric chart for air handling unit
· Fan motor heat gains
· Consumption of humidification loads
· Sound/acoustic analysis
· Total heating and cooling loads
· Domestic hot water load
· Humidification load
· Equipment steam demand
· Zoning of systems
· Capacity
· Quantity and type of equipment
HVAC Drawings
· Main supply, return and exhaust ductwork
· Volume dampers
· Fire and smoke partitions
· Smoke detectors
· Automatic control dampers
· Air Quantities for each room
· Air inlets/outlets
· Rises and drops in ductwork
· Expansion loops
· Anchors
· Vanes
· Drip Assemblies
· Balance Fittings
· Equipment Rooms
· Vertical shafts
· Louvers:
· Outside air
· Exhaust air
· Relief air
· Air changes per hour in each room
· Room-by-room air balance charts
· Coil entering and leaving conditions
· Interconnection of HVAC equipment with fire protection equipment (see fire protection)
· Plan/Section of mechanical rooms
· Schematic flow and riser diagrams
· HVAC demolition
· Phasing plan
· Equipment Schedule
· Seismic bracing
· VA symbols and abbreviations
· Section of
· Pumps
· Fans
· Expansion tanks
· Steam to hot water convertor
· Heat exchangers
· Complete data section
· Outside chilled water and condenser water distribution
· Automatic temperature control drawings
8. ELECTRICAL: Submit the following:
| Electrical |
| Schematic |
| 35% DD1 |
| 65% DD2 |
| 95% CD1 |
| 100% CD2 |
Narrative
· Design
· Life cycle cost analysis
· Method of short-circuit calculations
· Method of voltage drop and demand calculations
· Utility company correspondence
· Utility company requirements
· Load calculations for normal & emergency use
· Calculations for emergency generator(s)
Drawings Showing:
· Electric closets
· IT closets
· Signal closets
· Major Electrical equipment
· Electrical plot plan of existing and proposed underground power (including manholes)
· Signal inter-building systems
· Proposed electrical system
· Lighting fixture schedule
· Emergency Life Safety Equipment (see fire protection)
· Electrical distribution equipment
· Symbols, note, abbreviations
· Lighting layouts
· Power layouts
· Signal layouts
· Specialty area layouts
· IT Layout
· Demolition plans
· Riser diagrams/On-Line diagrams
· Panel Schedules
· Engine-generator sets
· Substation/pad mounted transformer
· Location of smoke dampers and duct smoke detectors
· Phasing scheme
· Electrical details
9. AUTOMATIC TRANSPORT: Submit the following:
| Automatic Transport: |
| Schematic |
| 35% DD1 |
| 65% DD2 |
| 95% CD1 |
| 100% CD2 |
Narrative:
· Narrative w/ recommended improvements for exiting system
· Traffic study including existing and proposed ATS w/ alternate methods of distribution
· Rail loadings
· Hydraulic elevator piston pit loads
Drawings:
· Automatic Transport Systems
· Elevators
· Dumbwaiters
· Other ATS systems
· Changes to existing systems (arch. dwgs.)
· Hoistway (arch. dwg.)
· Machine room vents (arch. dwg.)
· Type of ventilation (mech. dwg.)
· Electrical requirements (elect. dwg.)
· Hoistway enclosures
· Pits
· Pit ladders
· Machine area ladder and railings
· Entrances
· Machine rooms
· Elevator cars
· Entrances
· Counterweights
· Trap doors
· Location of hoistway vents
· Location of steel hoisting beams
· Size of machine beams
· Size of end reactions
· Location/detail of machine beam pockets
· Hoistway entrances for elevators
· Carlifts
· Dumbwaiters
· Elevator machine room equipment layout
· Interface with automatic recall and shutdown (see fire protection)
10. SPACE PLANNING
| SPACE PLANNING: |
| Schematic |
| 35% DD1 |
| 65% DD2 |
| 95% CD1 |
| 100% CD2 |
Narrative:
Space-Accounting Summary Table
11. ESTIMATING: Submit the following:
| Estimating: |
| Schematic |
| 35% DD1 |
| 65% DD2 |
| 95% CD1 |
| 100% CD2 |
Cost estimate in compliance with Manual for Preparation of Estimates (separate estimates for new construction and alteration work)
12. SPECIFICATIONS
| Specification: |
| Schematic |
| 35% DD1 |
| 65% DD2 |
| 95% CD1 |
| 100% CD2 |
Specifications:
· Table of Contents
· Marked up Specifications
· Complete Specifications
· Submittal Register
End of Document Page 1 of image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .