ATTACHMENT G - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE - NX EQ Circulatory Assist Units Revised 8.8.24.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C10G24Q0046
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity related to the procurement of NX EQ Circulatory Assist Units. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Strategic Acquisition Center (SAC) is currently in the process of awarding a contract for this requirement under Solicitation Number 36C10G24Q0107. The questionnaire is to be completed by references provided by the offeror, and covers evaluation criteria such as quality of service, cost control, timeliness of performance, and business relations. The references are asked to provide an overall satisfaction rating and indicate whether they would choose to work with the offeror again. The completed questionnaires are to be emailed to the VA SAC by August 19, 2024.
The related federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation notice for the procurement of GetingeA brand name or equal Circulatory Assist Units, Intra-Aortic Balloon. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of Procurement, Acquisition and Logistics (OPAL) Strategic Acquisition Center (SAC) is seeking a qualified source to provide this equipment on an agency-wide basis under a Requirements Contract with Firm-Fixed Price orders. The anticipated period of performance is for a one-year base period with four one-year option periods. Vendors must be registered in SAM, certified in the appropriate NAICS code, and SDVOSB/VOSB vendors must be verified in the SBA database.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C10G24Q0107 0002.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT D - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS - NX EQ Circulatory Assist Units Revised 8.824.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G24Q0107 0001.pdf | ||
| 36C10G24Q0046 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G24Q0046.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment G Past Performance Questionnaire
SOLICITATION NO.: 36C10G24Q0107
DESCRIPTION: NX EQ CIRCULATORY ASSIST UNITS– Brand Name or Equal
Offerors: Please Send to Each Reference Cited in Submitted Proposal (Maximum of Five References from Past Three Years)
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)
STRATEGIC ACQUISITION CENTER (SAC)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
TO: Lesa Duran and Deidre Parker E-MAIL: Lesa.Duran@va.gov and Deidre.Parker@va.gov
VA SAC is currently in the process of awarding a contract for the solicitation described above. The offeror identified below has provided your organization’s name as a reference under the contract described below:
Offeror Name:
(Insert Offeror’s Name Here)
| Contract Number: |
| (Insert Applicable Contract Number Here) |
Please rate the offeror in each of the categories on this questionnaire. See “Rating Guidelines” section for detailed description of categories and ratings. There is room for comments where you deem remarks would be helpful to our evaluation (see ‘Comment from Reference’ under “Offeror Evaluation.” Please note that the past performance evaluators for this solicitation may contact you for further details in making a fair assessment of this offeror’s past performance. Thank you for your organization’s assistance in fairly evaluating offeror proposals for this solicitation.
Please E-mail Questionnaire to: Lesa.Duran@va.gov and Deidre.Parker@va.gov by August 19, 2024, at 11:59 AM EST.
| Name of Reference: |
| (Reference Complete These Sections) |
Title of Reference:
Phone Number:
E-Mail Address:
Name of Organization:
Contract Period of Performance (Month/Day/Year Begin and End):
Total Contract Value (Base and All Option Years):
Options Exercised on Contract (Yes/No)?
Brief Description of Services/Commodity Provided by Offeror:
Show Cause Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Stop Work Order Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Termination for Convenience, Cause, or Default Issued on Contract (Yes/No)?
Rating Guidelines:
| Rating |
| Quality of Service |
| Cost Control |
| Timeliness of Performance |
| Business Relations |
| 1: Unsatisfactory |
| Offeror is not in compliance and has jeopardized achievement of contract objectives |
| Offeror is unable to manage costs effectively |
| Offeror delays have jeopardized performance |
| Responses to inquiries and issues are not effective |
| 2: Satisfactory |
| Minor inefficiencies and errors have been identified |
| Offeror is usually effective in managing costs |
| Offeror is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Responses to inquiries and issues is usually effective |
| 3: Excellent |
| Offeror is in compliance with contract requirements and delivers quality services |
| Offeror is effective in managing costs and submits proper invoices |
| Offeror is effective in meeting and exceeding milestones and delivery schedule |
| Responses to inquiries have been effective and/or exceeded expectations and established deadlines |
Offeror Evaluation:
| Rating (List Number Based on Rating Guidelines Above) |
| Category |
| Description |
| Quality of Service |
| In compliance with contract requirements, submits accurate reports/deliverables, has effective personnel, and has achieved/maintained technical excellence: |
Comment from Reference: _______________________
| Cost Control |
| Has achieved efficiencies in costs, managed costs effectively, and has submitted timely/accurate invoices with supporting documentation: |
| Timeliness of Performance |
| Has met milestones, is reliable, is responsive to technical direction, and has completed milestones on-time or ahead of schedule: |
| Business Relations |
| Has maintained effective management of contract, has exhibited reasonable/cooperative behavior, is responsive to contract requirements, is responsive to inquiries/issues, and is proactive about resolving problems: |
| |_| YES |_| NO |
| Overall Satisfaction |
| Would you (reference) choose to work with this offeror again? |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .