35712 Att-D_References.doc
DOC document 49 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Audiometric Testing Services
- Solicitation number
- S-73000-00007348
- Issued by
- Clackamas County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Attachment D - Reference Check Form for an RFP for Audiometric Services solicited by the State of Oregon for the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The RFP solicits proposals for audiometric testing services, including mobile testing, to be provided to ODOT and the jurisdictions of Marion County and the City of Salem. The reference form requests proposers to provide contact information for references and asks the references to rate the proposer's overall quality of services, delivery of service, and responsiveness to customer service issues on a scale of 0-5. The form also asks the reference to provide comments and indicate how the final project cost compared to the initial proposed cost, though this is not scored.
The RFP solicitation number is S-73000-00007348, and the RFP title is "Audiometric Services". No other details about the procurement, such as response due dates, award dates, contract terms, or pricing, are provided in this attachment.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 35712 AttB_ Disclosure Exemption Certification.doc | DOC document | |
| 35712 AttF_Certified Disadvantaged Business Outreach Plan.doc | DOC document | |
| 35712_RFP~1.doc | DOC document | |
| Notice of Intent to Award-All - RFP 23-119-PSC Commercial Insurance Broker Services.pdf | ||
| 35712 AttA Sample Contract.doc | DOC document | |
| 35712 AttC_Proposer Information and Certification Sheet.doc | DOC document | |
| 35712 Ex. E_ Price Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]
ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
RFP Solicitation S-73000-00007348 – Audiometric Services
ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
Proposer Name:
Reference Entity:
Reference Contact Name:
Contact Telephone Number:
Contact Email Address:
Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-5:
0 = Not satisfied 3 = Moderately satisfied 5 = Extremely satisfied.
1. How would you rate the Proposer’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Proposer?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
2. How would you rate the Proposer’s delivery of service?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
3. How would you rate the Proposer’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
4. How did the final project cost compare to the initial proposed cost (Not scored, information only)?
Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014 Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .