35055_EvaluationScoreMatrix_Final_PRR.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 54 KB Posted

Attached to
Oregon Wildfire Recovery - Debris Insurance Collection Program
Solicitation number
S-73000-00002778
Issued by
Marion County, Oregon

About this file

This document is an Evaluation Score Matrix for Request for Proposal (RFP) #35055 for the Oregon Wildfire Recovery - Debris Insurance Collection Program, issued by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The program is intended to assist the agency in recovering insurance proceeds for property owners affected by the 2020 wildfires, in order to prevent a duplication of federal aid and insurance benefits. The evaluation matrix provides scores for three proposal submissions from AC Disaster Consulting, LLC, CDR Maguire, Inc., and Copper Claims Services, Inc. based on project approach, management approach, experience, key personnel qualifications, and clarity of proposal. AC Disaster Consulting, LLC received the highest total average score of 19, followed by CDR Maguire, Inc. at 17 and Copper Claims Services, Inc. at 10. The contract will be awarded to the highest-ranked firm.

The evaluation matrix does not provide details on pricing or funding sources. The contract opportunity covers the jurisdictions of Marion County and the City of Salem in Oregon. No information is given about incumbent contractors, set-asides, or the current contracting environment.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFP 2022-42 Hydraulic Model Update.pdf PDF
Notice of Intent to Award~11.pdf PDF
35055_Attachment A_Sample Contract_Final_Post.doc DOC document
35055_Attachment G_Responsibility Inquiry.docx DOCX document
35055_Attachment H_SOW_Final_Post.docx DOCX document
35055_ITA_ACDC.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Summary Scores

RFP Number: 35055 Project Name: Oregon Wildfire Recovery – Debris Insurance Collection Program
EVALUATION SCORE SUMMARY
Enter data only in gray highlighted fields on Summary, Proposal, Interview and Reference Score worksheets as applicable.
SOP Evaluation Summary ScoresNumber of Proposal evaluators:3
Evaluation Team
Score
Firmevaluator 1evaluator 2evaluator 3evaluator 4evaluator 5TotalAverageRank
AC Disaster Consulting, LLC22111125158191
CDR Maguire, Inc.2029221250172
Copper Claims Services, Inc.1131317329103
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Firm Name040404004
Statistics
High Score221125
Low Score11111171
Range11108
Interview Evaluation Summary ScoresNumber of interview evaluators:ERROR:#REF!
Evaluation Team
Score
Firmname1name2name3name4name5TotalAverageRank
ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
Statistics
High ScoreERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
Low ScoreERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
RangeERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
References Summary ScoresNumber of references scored:ERROR:#REF!
References
Score
Firmreference1reference2reference3reference4reference5TotalAverageRank
ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!
ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!ERROR:#REF!

FINAL SCORES (with COST SCORES if applicable)

ProposalInterviewEnterReferencesFinal Scores
FirmAverageAverageCost ScoresTotalRank
AC Disaster Consulting, LLC1918271
CDR Maguire, Inc.1725222
Copper Claims Services, Inc.1035153
firm 404004
firm 504004
firm 604004

Ver 10/20/16

Proposal Detail Scores

RFP Number: 35055 Project Name: Oregon Wildfire Recovery – Debris Insurance Collection Program
SOP SCORE DETAILS
Proposal Evaluation Detail ScoresEnter actual number of evaluators:3
Evaluation Team
Maximum
Scoreevaluator 1evaluator 2evaluator 3evaluator 4evaluator 5
1AC Disaster Consulting, LLC

Administrator: Scoring deductions, if any, are provided by OPO after eval committee has completed SOP evaluation and scoring.

Enter scoring deduction as percentage; i.e., "2%". (See Required Items section of RFP.)3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5535
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5545
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5425
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5405
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5425
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
Scoring Deductions
Total25221125000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)22112500
2CDR Maguire, Inc.
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5404
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5434
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5534
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5435
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5304
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
0Scoring Deductions
TOTAL2520921000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)2092100
3Copper Claims Services, Inc.
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5303
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5313
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5203
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5204
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5104
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
0Scoring Deductions
TOTAL2511117000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)1111700
4Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
5Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
6Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
7Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
8Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
9Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
10Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
11Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
12Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
13Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
14Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
15Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
16Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
17Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000
18Firm Name
3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach5
3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management5
3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects5
3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel5
3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements5
Enter Eval Criterion 60
Enter Eval Criterion 70
Enter Eval Criterion 80
00Scoring Deductions
TOTAL25000000%
Scoring Deduction Points00000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)00000

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .