The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Summary Scores
| RFP Number: 35055 Project Name: Oregon Wildfire Recovery – Debris Insurance Collection Program | |
| EVALUATION SCORE SUMMARY | |
| Enter data only in gray highlighted fields on Summary, Proposal, Interview and Reference Score worksheets as applicable. |
| SOP Evaluation Summary Scores | | | | | | | Number of Proposal evaluators: | | 3 | | |
| | | | | Evaluation Team | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Score |
| Firm | evaluator 1 | | evaluator 2 | | evaluator 3 | | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | Total | Average | Rank |
| AC Disaster Consulting, LLC | 22 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 25 | 1 | | | 58 | 19 | 1 |
| CDR Maguire, Inc. | 20 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 21 | 2 | | | 50 | 17 | 2 |
| Copper Claims Services, Inc. | 11 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 3 | | | 29 | 10 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Statistics | | | | | |
| High Score | 22 | | 11 | | 25 | |
| Low Score | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 1 |
| Range | 11 | | 10 | | 8 | |
| Interview Evaluation Summary Scores | | | | | | | Number of interview evaluators: | | | | ERROR:#REF! | | |
| | | | | Evaluation Team | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Score |
| Firm | name1 | | name2 | | name3 | | name4 | | name5 | | Total | Average | Rank |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Statistics | | | | | | | | |
| High Score | ERROR:#REF! | | ERROR:#REF! | | ERROR:#REF! | | ERROR:#REF! | | ERROR:#REF! |
| Low Score | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Range | ERROR:#REF! | | ERROR:#REF! | | ERROR:#REF! | | ERROR:#REF! | | ERROR:#REF! |
| References Summary Scores | | | | | | | Number of references scored: | | | | ERROR:#REF! | | |
| | | | | References | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Score |
| Firm | reference1 | | reference2 | | reference3 | | reference4 | | reference5 | | Total | Average | Rank |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
FINAL SCORES (with COST SCORES if applicable)
| Proposal | | Interview | Enter | References | Final Scores | |
| Firm | Average | | Average | Cost Scores | Total | | Rank |
| AC Disaster Consulting, LLC | 19 | 1 | | 8 | | 27 | 1 |
| CDR Maguire, Inc. | 17 | 2 | | 5 | | 22 | 2 |
| Copper Claims Services, Inc. | 10 | 3 | | 5 | | 15 | 3 |
| firm 4 | 0 | 4 | | 0 | | 0 | 4 |
| firm 5 | 0 | 4 | | 0 | | 0 | 4 |
| firm 6 | 0 | 4 | | 0 | | 0 | 4 |
Ver 10/20/16
Proposal Detail Scores
| RFP Number: 35055 Project Name: Oregon Wildfire Recovery – Debris Insurance Collection Program | | | | | | | |
| SOP SCORE DETAILS | | | | | | | |
| Proposal Evaluation Detail Scores | | | Enter actual number of evaluators: | | | | 3 |
| | | | | Evaluation Team | | |
| | Maximum | | | | | |
| | Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 |
| 1 | AC Disaster Consulting, LLC | | | | | | |
Administrator: Scoring deductions, if any, are provided by OPO after eval committee has completed SOP evaluation and scoring.
| Enter scoring deduction as percentage; i.e., "2%". (See Required Items section of RFP.) | 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | 5 | 3 | 5 | | | | |
| | 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | 5 | 4 | 5 | | | |
| | 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | 4 | 2 | 5 | | | |
| | 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | 4 | 0 | 5 | | | |
| | 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | 4 | 2 | 5 | | | |
| | Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | | |
| | Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | | |
| | Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| | Total | 25 | | 22 | 11 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| | Scoring Deduction Points | | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| | TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | | 22 | 11 | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | CDR Maguire, Inc. | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | 4 | 0 | 4 | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 20 | 9 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 20 | 9 | 21 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | Copper Claims Services, Inc. | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 11 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 11 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 6 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 7 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 8 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 9 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 10 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 11 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 12 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 13 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 14 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 15 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 16 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 17 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 18 | Firm Name | | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.1 - Evaluation Item 1 – Project Approach | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.2 – Evaluation Item 2 – Approach to Project Management | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.3 – Evaluation Item 3 – Experience on Similar Projects | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.4 – Evaluation Item 4 – Qualifications on Key Personnel | 5 | | | | | | |
| 3.10.2.5 – Clarity of Proposal & Conformity with Requirements | 5 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | | | | | | |
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | | | | | | |
| 0 | 0 | | | | | | Scoring Deductions |
| TOTAL | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |