3 - Technical Evaluation Criteria.pdf
PDF 113 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Advanced Acoustics Model (AAM) Support - Volpe Center Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 6913G623Q300029
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 6 - Amendment 2 - Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| 2 - SOW -- Revised (Amendment 1).pdf | ||
| 5 - 52.217-9 -- Option Clause (Amendment 1).pdf | ||
| 1 - AAM Support -- Line Items.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2 - SOW.pdf | ||
| 4 - SAP Commercial Terms and Conditions.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Quotation (RFQ) No.: 6913G623Q300029
PR V3242161 TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
General
The offeror’s technical and cost proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria described below. It is important that the offeror direct its proposal to the specific criteria and cover each appropriately in response to the solicitation requirement.
The technical evaluation criteria to be used in evaluating the proposals resulting from the RFP are:
Technical approach Staffing Management approach
Technical Evaluation Criteria
The response to the Government request for quote shall include the candidate’s technical approach for performing the requirements detailed under Statement of Work Tasks 1-8. The response shall also describe proposed project staff, including resumes of candidates with past experience in testing and evaluating software. This experience shall demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the Advanced Acoustics Model (AAM), as well as conducting project-level AAM analyses for Volpe and Department of Defense/Air Force. Finally, the response shall also include a satisfactory approach for developing and maintaining a schedule of deliverables, or management approach, including availability of equipment to perform and complete the work within the project period of performance of September 30, 2024:
• Technical Approach (Technical Merit): Contractor approach to the tasks described in the Statement of Work, including software testing (5 pages or less, Times New Roman 12 font, double-spaced).
• Staffing: Team résumés (5 pages or less per résumé, Times New Roman 12 font, double-spaced).
• Management Approach: Contractor approach to maintaining schedule (3 pages or less, Times New Roman 12 font, double-spaced).
Price Evaluation
The Price proposal shall represent the offeror’s response to the requirements of the RFP. The Government will evaluate using: Total Evaluated Price.
Basis for Award
a. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is determined to be technically capable according to the evaluation criteria and lowest price.
Technical Evaluation Team Member
Clay Reherman, V320 Aaron Hastings, V324
PR V3242161 TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .