3-RFQ031874 - Offeror Response Workbook - Publish.xlsx

About this file

View the file

Other files

Work with this file

Text version

XLSX spreadsheet 80 KB Posted Mar 16, 2026

Attached to: Building and Zoning - Fee Study and Cost Recovery Consultation Services
Solicitation number: RFQ031874
Issued by: Franklin County, Columbus City, Ohio

Written by GovTribe AI · Mar 17, 2026

This is an Offeror Response Workbook for the City of Columbus, Ohio, Department of Building and Zoning Services (BZS), solicitation RFQ031874 for fee study and cost recovery consultation services. The City seeks a qualified consultant to conduct a comprehensive review of the department's fee structure and business environment and develop a fee model meeting departmental goals. The project scope includes reviewing the current fee structure, business practices, state tax obligations, revenue sharing agreements, and peer municipality comparisons; analyzing historical and projected expenses; conducting interviews with senior staff; providing an accepted fee plan to the executive team; recommending best practices; and delivering a user-friendly fee model for future adjustments. The workbook requires offerors to submit responses in Excel format by a deadline of December 18, 2026 (the City's target full acceptance date), with answers to all submitted questions available by 3:00 p.m. on Friday, April 10, 2026. The response workbook comprises eleven tabs covering offeror information, subcontractors, terms and conditions, core competencies, project team qualifications, references and prior city engagements, project approach, specifications and requirements, and cost and solution pricing details.

The evaluation criteria total 100 points, with weighted scoring across seven categories: Offeror Ability (10 points), Competency (20 points), Past Performance (10 points), Service Approach (20 points), Quality and Feasibility (20 points), Cost (10 points), and Response Clarity and Efficiency (10 points). The City is currently funded through both the General Fund and the Development Services Fund (Special Revenue Fund), with anticipated 2026 revenue of approximately $40 million to the Development Services Fund and an additional $4.5 million from the General Fund, supporting 278 budgeted full-time equivalents. The department's overarching goals include supporting the private development industry while promoting equity and inclusion, recovering costs, maintaining competitiveness with peer municipalities, and accumulating and maintaining a fund balance sufficient to cover three to six months of upcoming expenses. The fee model must be based on software currently utilized by the City of Columbus, excluding MS Access, and must allow for easy adjustments, analysis, tracking, publication, and future modifications as organizational needs change.

File	Type	Posted
6-Formal Bid Terms and Conditions.pdf	PDF	Mar 16, 2026
4-Supplement 8.4.1 - 2026 Combined Development Related Fee Schedule.pdf	PDF	Mar 16, 2026
7-Bid Incentive Request Form.pdf	PDF	Mar 16, 2026
1-EQUAL OPPORTUNITY CLAUSE.pdf	PDF	Mar 16, 2026
2-Appendix A - CoC Standard Service Agreement Template.pdf	PDF	Mar 16, 2026
5-RFQ031874 - Fee Study and Cost Recovery Consultation Services - BZS - (Publish).pdf	PDF	Mar 16, 2026

On GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Total weight

Total Calc'd score

Total possible score

Percentage

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

1 - Instructions

1	Instructions
Workbook Instructions
	For proposals to be considered responsible, this workbook MUST be completed, and submitted in Excel format (no other formats).

Cells shaded	Required	are for required offeror response.
Some answers can be lengthy, and/or require charts, diagrams or other pictorials. Such response content may be included in a separate "attachment." For ease and organization, one file (rather than multiple) is recommended for all such content. When response extends out to such an attachment, please tell us where to look -- references (filename, page, ref point) need to be included within this workbook pointing to said content. While not required, we recommend references in the opposite direction as well (from attachment back to this workbook). To facilitate evaluation, all short, concise responses must be recorded within this workbook -- do NOT place all answers/responses within the attachment and leave this workbook blank.

Cells shaded Optional are for optional offeror response information within attachments.

	Other than the green and orange shaded cells as described above, do not modify any other content.
	For ease of referencing, note that item numbers are simply the tab number concatenated with the Excel row number.
No Proposal Reply
	To assist us in obtaining feedback regarding the quality of our Request for Proposal, we ask that each firm that has received an invitation, but does not wish to propose, state their reason(s) below and return it to us.

This information will not preclude receipt of future invitations.

Unfortunately, we must offer a "No Proposal" at this time because:

Offeror name:

We do not wish to participate in the proposal process.

We do not wish to propose under the terms and conditions of the RFP document. Our Objections are:

We do not feel we can be competitive because...

We do not provide the services on which the Proposals are requested.

Other

&"-,Bold"&18Offeror Response Workbook

2 - Offeror Info

2	Offeror Information	Offeror Ability	0.0
		EVALUATORS: The column labeled "Gr." (highlighted yellow) is where you will record grades. Grades are 0 - 4 per the grading key below.

General Offeror Information
Item #	Question/Item	Offeror Response	Ext. filename	pg	ref	Category	Evaluator notes	Gr.	Wt.	Sc.
2.5	Offeror Legal Entity Name								0	0
2.6	Doing Business As								0	0
2.7	Previous Company Name(s) within last 5 years?					Other			1	0
2.8	Parent Company name (if applicable)								0	0
2.9	Offeror Company Corporate Address								0	0
2.10	Primary Point of Contact (POC)								0	0
2.11	POC Title								0	0
2.12	POC Contact Phone, Email								0	0
2.13	Company site addresses in Ohio if applicable (include site type, e.g. sales office, support center, HQ, etc.)								0	0
2.14	Duns Number (if applicable)								0	0
2.15	Tax ID								0	0
2.16	Number of years in business					Other			1	0
2.17	Number of years providing solutions/services comparable to this proposal					Other			1	0
2.18	Number of employees								1	0
2.19	How many solution/services engagement projects does your company have active at this time? Anticipated to be active at the time of this project?								1	0
2.20	Is your company the OEM or publisher for all proposed solutions/services?								1	0
2.21	List applicable OEMS/publishers other than Offeror, included in proposed solutions/services								1	0
2.22	List Offeror's certifications for third party OEM/publisher solutions								1	0
2.23	Please describe company's market position within proposed solution/services space								1	0
2.24	Is your company publicly traded or privately held?								0	0
2.25	If public, provide a link to or copy of your most recent annual and quarterly reports.					Other			1	0
2.26	If private, provide your most recent annual and quarterly revenue and expense amounts. Please include total debt.*					Other			1	0
2.27	Has your company been involved in any contracts which were ended due to termination for cause, any unresolved claims, any litigation, or arbitration with the City of Columbus and/or one of our city departments in the past 5 years, or any other local, state, or federal government agency in the United States? If "yes," provide details.					Other			1	0
2.28	Industry awards, articles, third party evaluations (links, attachments)								1	0
2.29	Team Availability	Be sure to complete column J on Tab 6 - Proj. Team							1	0	NOTE: This score should be based upon Tab 6, column J
2.30	Payment address								0	0
2.31	Legal notice address								0	0
2.32	Conflict of Interest: include a statement indicating if the offeror or any people that may work on or benefit from the Project through the offeror have a possible conflict of interest (e.g., employed by the City, etc.).								1	0
2.33	Describe standard and discount invoice terms								1	0
2.34	Proof of Insurance: attach a copy of certificate of insurance in the form that Section 9.2 of the RFP requires.								0	0
2.35	W-9: attach a copy of the Offeror company's W-9.								0	0
2.36	Assumptions: please describe any assumptions regarding this project that are being made, that impact the offeror proposal.					Other			1	0
2.37	Offeror company officer/executive name and title that is providing attestation to the accuracy of this proposal (include executive signed cover letter with attestation to accuracy statement within the attachment).								0	0

*NOTE: the City may request financial statements from private companies during the evaluation process.
		Tab 2		Tab 3		Tab 4		TOTAL
	Total weight	17		0		3			20
	Total Calc'd score		0		0		0		0
	Total possible score		68		0		12		80
	Percentage								0

possible 10

&"-,Bold"&18Offeror Response Workbook

3 - Subcontractors

3	Subcontractors	Offeror Ability	see Tab 2
List of Subcontractors

GRADING

4 - Exceeds City Requirement/Need/Objective 3 - Fully meets City Requirement/Need/Objective 2 - Mostly meets City Requirement/Need/Objective 1 - Somewhat Meets City Requirement/Need/Objective 0 - Does Not Meet City Requirement/Need/Objective List all subcontractors (if any) providing service for the solution. If you choose to include details regarding subcontractors within attachment, please include all fundamental information about them within this workbook.

	Have any of your proposed subcontractors been involved in any contracts which were ended due to termination for cause, any unresolved claims, any litigation, or arbitration with the City of Columbus and/or one of our city departments in the past 5 years, or any other local, state, or federal government agency in the United States? If "yes," provide details.
		Ext. filename	pg	ref	Category	Evaluator notes	Gr.	Wt.	Sc.
3.9								1	0	Evaluator: if there are no subcontractors
										do not grade 3.9.

	Item #	Company Name	Address	Primary Contact	Contact Title	Contact Info
(Email, Phone)	Description of Role/Work	Contractor statement indicating understanding and compliance with RFP requirements & terms and conditions	Ext. filename	pg	ref
	3.15						0	0
	3.16						0	0
	3.17						0	0
	3.18						0	0
	3.19						0	0
	3.20						0	0
	3.21						0	0
	3.22						0	0
	3.23						0	0
	3.24						0	0

Total weight	0
Total Calc'd score		0
Total possible score		0

&"-,Bold"&18Offeror Response Workbook

4 - Terms & Cond.

4	Terms and Conditions	Offeror Ability	see Tab 2
		GRADING

Acceptance
Item #	Question/Item	Offeror Response	Ext. filename	pg	ref	Category	Evaluator notes	Gr.	Wt.	Sc.
4.5	Does Offeror understand and accept the City's Standard Terms and Conditions for Services as specified within section 9.2 of the RFP? Please list any compliance or acceptance concerns that the Offeror has.					City T&Cs			1	0
4.6	Offeror response must include Agreement documentation for consideration and review, as specified within Section 7 & 9.4 of the RFP (SOW, Solution Summary, Price Sheet, T&C's, EULA, ELA, etc.).					Vend. T&Cs			1	0
4.7	Name and title of Offeror staff member that is authorized to negotiate contracts on behalf of Offeror, and is attesting to responses above.								1	0

Total weight	3
Total Calc'd score		0
Total possible score		12

&"-,Bold"&18Offeror Response Workbook

5 - Core Competency

5	Core Competencies	Competency	0.0
		GRADING

Offeror Core Competencies
Item #	Question/Item	Offeror Response	Ext. filename	pg	ref	Category	Evaluator notes	Gr.	Wt.	Sc.
5.5	Describe company history, core business competencies and why the Offeror is a good fit for the services required in this RFP.								1	0
5.6	Number of government clients/customers in the U.S.								1	0
5.7	Number of customers in production with solutions/services comparable to this proposal								1	0
5.8	Contracts terminated for cause, or litigation/arbitration in last five years (provide details).					Other			1	0
5.9	Number of employees working in roles/areas, and with expertise related to the solutions/services associated with this proposal.								1	0
5.10	Number of employees that are focused on government sector customers.
5.11	Number of project managers on staff qualified to manage an implementation of this nature.								1	0
5.12	Explain your company's strategy to deal with turnover of staff as it relates to providing service to your clients.								1	0

0 20

&"-,Bold"&18Offeror Response Workbook

6 - Proj. Team

6	Offeror Project Team Qualifications	Competency; Ability	see Tab 5
Offeror Project Team Members to be Assigned to this Project

GRADING

4 - Exceeds City Requirement/Need/Objective 3 - Fully meets City Requirement/Need/Objective 2 - Mostly meets City Requirement/Need/Objective 1 - Somewhat Meets City Requirement/Need/Objective 0 - Does Not Meet City Requirement/Need/Objective List the proposed staff intended to be members of the project team. If you choose to include details regarding project team members within attachment, please include all fundamental information about them within this workbook. Consider section 3.5 in the RFP for your responses. All Titles should be accounted for, even if the same teammate will fill multiple roles.

#	Name	Title	Credentials/ Certifications	Offeror or subcontractor employee?	Yrs. w/ Company	Project Role	Total Yrs. Experience	Describe team members experience that is comparable to this project	Hours per week & dates avail to this project	Ext. filename	pg	ref	Category	Evaluator notes	Gr.	Wt.	Sc.
Project Manager
6.10		Service Manager														1	0	NOTE: Column J should assessed and scored on Tab 2.
																		Scores on this tab should be based on assessment of
Analysts, Leads, Trainers, Other Team Members that would be Assigned																		all other columns, except J.
6.13		Business Analyst														1	0
6.14		Implementation Lead														1	0
6.15		Training Lead														1	0
6.16																0	0
6.17																0	0
6.18																0	0
6.19									d							0	0
6.20																0	0
6.21																0	0
6.22																0	0
															Total weight	0
															Total Calc'd score		0
															Total possible score		0

&"-,Bold"&18Offeror Response Workbook

7 - Refer., Prior City

7	References, Prior City Engagements	Past Performance	0.0
Previous City Engagements

GRADING

	Have you provided previous solutions/services to the City or other City Departments? If so, describe each and list the dates for the engagement(s).	Category	Evaluator notes	Gr.	Wt.	Sc.
7.6					1	0	Evaluator: if 7.6 response is blank do not grade it.
							Offeror is supposed to provide minimum 3 references.

Customer References (please list a minimum of four that are comparable to the City in size and project/solution scope)
#	Organization	Primary Contact	Contact Phone	Contact Email	Description of Solution/Services	Year Implemented	Ext. filename	pg	ref
7.12											1	0
7.13											1	0
7.14											1	0
7.15											0	0
7.16											0	0
7.17											0	0
7.18											0	0
										Total weight	3
										Total Calc'd score		0
										Total possible score		12
										Percentage		0

0 10

&"-,Bold"&18Offeror Response Workbook

8 - Proj. Approach

8	Project Approach	Project Approach	0.0
		GRADING

Offeror's Approach to this Project
Item #	Question/Item	Offeror Response	Ext. filename	pg	ref	Category	Evaluator notes	Gr.	Wt.	Sc.
8.5	Given what is documented in this RFP, and answers to questions during the inquiry period, present a project plan including Gantt chart for this project. Be sure to account for the City's target full acceptance date of December 18, 2026. Please explain concerns and/or risks associated with the target date. Consider RFP sections 1, 2 and 3 in your response.					Other			4	0
8.6	List and describe the offeror's approach to developing recommendations that will meet the City's goals (Section 1.5).					Mand. Reqs.			4	0
8.7	What revenue and expense modeling will be provided as part of your services package (RFP section 3.3.4)? Describe modeling tools and how they are utilized if applicable.					Technical			4	0
8.8	Present offeror's understanding of the scope and challenges of this project.					Mand. Reqs.			4	0
8.9	Describe the offeror's project management practices and administration, to include communication practices, expectations management, risk management, task management, escalation processes, and issue resolution management. Consider RFP section 3 in your response.					Mand. Reqs.			4	0
8.10	List and describe the offeror products/solution components that will be included in the proposal for this project.					Technical			1	0
8.11	List and describe all offeror services that will be proposed for this project. Consider RFP sections 1, 2, and 3 in your response.					Technical			1	0
Additional Requirements/Questions
General Solution Questions
8.14	List any products/services that are not included with your product/services, but are required for meeting project goals.								1	0
8.15	Indicate any products/services that are bundled with your solution but made/performed by a third party.								1	0
8.16	Describe the types of consulting and services your company offers post implementation. Include rate cards.								0	0
Transition and Support
8.18	Describe incident/issue resolution and support during the project, including pre acceptance and post acceptance support (RFP sections 3.3.7 - 3.3.8).					Technical			1	0
9.19	Describe support services prior to go-live (planning, documentation, training, knowledge transfer, etc.).								1	0
9.20	Describe support services post go-live.								1	0
Future City Features/Functionality
8.22	What, if any, additional solution features/functionality does the Offeror have available, that the City has not expressed interest in, but may be of interest to the City in the future?								0	0
9.23	When in post-acceptance production, the City's model for support escalation is expected to be City Project Manager to Vendor Service Manager. Describe post-production vendor support models (including days and times).								1	0

Total weight	28
Total Calc'd score		0
Total possible score		112
Percentage		0

0 20

&"-,Bold"&18Offeror Response Workbook

9 - Specs. & Reqs.

9	Specifications and Requirements	Quality and Feasibility	0.0	0.0
		GRADING

4 - Exceeds City Requirement/Need/Objective 3 - Fully meets City Requirement/Need/Objective 2 - Mostly meets City Requirement/Need/Objective 1 - Somewhat Meets City Requirement/Need/Objective 0 - Does Not Meet City Requirement/Need/Objective Item # Question/Item Does proposed solution meet the requirement? Explanation/description of how requirement is met, or why not met. Ext. filename pg ref Category Evaluator notes Gr. Wt. Sc. Cat Gr. Cat Wt. Cat. Sc. Req ID #

Specify whether or not the requirement can be met with the offeror solution current version/release in column C. If met, describe how the requirement is met in column D; if not met describe why not in column D. For open-ended questions or description requests, leave column C blank and respond in column D. Note that Explanations/Descriptions in column D that clearly cover how the City's requirement is met may be scored higher than overly-simplistic or unclear responses.

Mandatory Requirements - Section 2
9.10	Comprehensive Review of Current In-Scope Fee Structure and Business Environment, including, but not limited to: existing fees and fines, business practices, state tax obligations, revenue sharing agreements, peer and local neighboring municipalities, and cost recovery.	Mand. Reqs.		4	0	4	0
9.11	Comprehensive Review of In-Scope Expenses, including historical expenses and future expense projection modeling.	Mand. Reqs.		4	0	4	0
9.12	Interviews with senior staff to gain context	Technical		4	0	4	0
9.13	Provide an accepted fee plan that will be presented to the department’s executive team which meets the stated goals of this project.	Mand. Reqs.		4	0	4	0
9.14	Provide recommendations of best practices not in use by the department.	Other		4	0	4	0
9.15	Provide an accepted, user-friendly model for the department to use in future years to allow adjustments to fees based upon changing needs. The format should be easily used and maintained by staff, allow analysis and tracking of fee changes in the future, allow for easy publication, allow for additions, revisions, or removal of direct and overhead costs, allow for updates to the fee schedule from year to year as the organization changes, allow for the addition of future service areas, enable calculations for the estimated costs of providing new services, and be based on software curently utilized by the City of Columbus, not including MS Access	Technical		4	0	4	0
Additional Functionality
9.17	Evaluator: In Column C, describe any other functionality that you saw in the Offeror response that would bring value to the City and/or your department, that doesn't fall under one of the Mandatory Requirements section. Please give this item a score to the right.	Other		1	0	1	0
			Total weight	25		25
			Total Calc'd score		0		0
			Total possible score		100		100
			Percentage		0		0

possible 20 20

&"-,Bold"&18Offeror Response Workbook

10 - Cost

10	Cost	Cost	0.0
		GRADING

Provide descriptions, or answers to questions for the following:

Item #	Question/Item	Offeror Response	Ext. filename	pg	ref	Category	Evaluator notes	Gr.	Wt.	Sc.
10.8	Describe the pricing model used to respond to the request for pricing information.					Other			1	0
10.9	Describe any feature/functionality/module bundling options, or if solution is all inclusive.								1	0
10.10	Describe optional support and maintenance packages; summarize the services, deliverables and terms included. Explain cost differences.					Other			1	0
10.11	Are there any additional costs for support and maintenance of the third party application integration/interface solution(s)?					Other			1	0
10.12	Can caps be negotiated on year-over-year increases in subscription, licensing, support and maintenance fees?					Other			1	0

Proposed Cost

Offeror will include solution pricing in Tab 11. 10 0 Evaluators: This grade is based on Tab 11 - Solution Pricing.

Total weight	15
Total Calc'd score		0
Total possible score		60
Percentage		0

0 10

&"-,Bold"&18Offeror Response Workbook

11 - Solution Pricing

11	Solution Pricing	Cost
Solution Pricing Instructions

Offerors, please utilize this worksheet to record pricing details for the solution proposed. Please adhere to the Categories listed in Column B. Please insert additional rows for additional items required for a category. Offeror Columns to be filled in are B (Category), C (Vendor Part #), D (Item description), E (Term Price, e.g. $100/month), F (Annual Unit List Price), G (Discount %), J (Quantity of item in Year 1 - implementation), M (Quantity of item in Year 2), P (Quantity of item in Year 3).

Optional Item/Add-on (and Annual) is for items that are NOT part of the proposed solution and proposed solution cost -- they are optional and considered above and beyond the project and proposal scope. They are informational only.

Solution Pricing Details

Bill of Products and Services									Year 1 (implementation)			Year 2			Year 3			TOTAL
Item #	Category	Vendor Part #	Item Description	Term Price (if applicable)	Annual Unit List Price	Discount %	Annual Unit offered Price	Comments	Qty	Extended List Price	Extended Offered Price	Qty2	Extended List Price3	Extended Offered Price4	Qty5	Extended List Price6	Extended Offered Price7	Extended List Price14	Extended Offered Price15
11.13	Consultant Services						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.14	(Offerors: Insert additional rows as needed for each category)						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.15	Implementation Services		…				$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.16	Implementation Services						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.17	Training Services						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.18	Training Services						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.19	Other Project Related Cost						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.20	Other Project Related Cost						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.21	Subscription						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.22	Subscription						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.23	Annual Maintenance/Support						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.24	Annual Maintenance/Support						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.25	Other Annual Recurring Cost						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.26	Other Annual Recurring Cost						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.27	Optional Item/Add-on*						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.28	Optional Item/Add-on*						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.29	Optional Annual Item/Add-on*						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.30	Optional Annual Item/Add-on*						$ - 0			$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.31
11.32	PROPOSAL TOTAL									$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
11.33	Optional Item/Add-on Total (Note: these are NOT included with the proposal, or proposal total)									$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0

5-Year TCO by Category	Year 1 (implementation)			Year 2			Year 3			TOTAL
Category		Extended List Price	Extended Offered Price		Extended List Price	Extended Offered Price		Extended List Price	Extended Offered Price	Extended List Price	Extended Offered Price
Hardware		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
Software License		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
Implementation Services		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
Training Services		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
Other Project Related Cost		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
Subscription		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
Annual Maintenance/Support		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
Other Annual Recurring Cost		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
PROPOSAL TOTAL		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0		$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0

OPTIONAL - NOT PART OF PROPOSAL TOTAL
Optional Item/Add-on*	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
Optional Annual Item/Add-on*	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0
Optional Item/Add-on Total	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0	$ - 0

&"-,Bold"&18Offeror Response Workbook

Sheet1

Evaluation Criteria
Evaluation Criteria	Description	Weight (points)	Evaluator scorecard
Offeror Ability	Availability, RFP terms and conditions compliance, Qualified to Bid (see Section 3.7), etc.	10	0.0
Competency	Offeror's core competencies, other government work, staffing solutions, and other related work.	20	0.0
Past Performance	Past City experience, Offeror customer references (effectiveness, cost, timeliness, support, etc.).	10	0.0
Service Approach	Goals met; Service practices; project approach, communication, training, services, support, etc.	20	0.0
Quality and Feasibility	Requirements met (see Section 2).	20	0.0
Cost	Direct initial and recurring costs; third party costs proposed as part of the offer	10	0.0
Response Clarity and Efficiency	Completeness, accuracy, and organization of response items, descriptions, attachments, etc., and alignment with this RFP.	10	0.0	Manual Scoring
TOTAL		100	0.0

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Mar 17, 2026.