3-ESR Rolling Consultation CherryFireESR.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted

Attached to
NC27-115 Cherry Fire, ESR Cultural Resources Inventory, WRI 8058
Solicitation number
NC27-115
Issued by
Grand County, Utah

About this file

This is an Environmental Site Review (ESR) Rolling Consultation template document prepared for the Cherry Fire project in Juab County, Utah, under State of Utah Division of Purchasing contract NC27-115 (WRI 8058). The document serves as a standardized archaeological assessment form organized into three rolling consultation sessions designed to document and evaluate cultural resource sites identified during the archaeological survey. The template requires contractors to systematically record site information including site number, site type, dimensions in meters, square footage, artifact counts, feature counts, detailed descriptions, fire effects assessment, site condition, preliminary eligibility determinations, State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) concurrence, dates, and comments. The form emphasizes the importance of documenting tools, diagnostic artifacts, and feature components to enable the Fuels Archaeologist to make determinations regarding site eligibility and appropriate treatment actions during project implementation.

The document includes instructional examples demonstrating proper completion methodology for three sessions, with sample sites including a Historic Trash Scatter featuring sanitary can fragments and a potential historic period Navajo Hogan structure that was determined eligible for protection, and a Lithic Scatter with flake chert materials that was deemed not eligible. Sites identified as eligible are to be avoided during implementation, while documentation of fire effects (direct and indirect), site condition (ranging from deteriorating), and SHPO concurrence is required for all assessed locations. This rolling consultation approach allows for phased archaeological assessment and consultation throughout the project lifecycle, supporting compliance with cultural resource management requirements for fuel reduction activities on public lands.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
8058_CherryFireESR_SurveyIntensity.zip ZIP file
8058_CherryFireESR_SurveyIntensity.kmz KMZ file
8058_CherryFireESR_APE.kmz KMZ file
5-8058 CherryFireESR SOW MAforArch.pdf PDF
2-Att.-A-PO-Terms-and-Conditions.docx DOCX document
8058_CherryFireESR_APE.zip ZIP file
1-Vendor Prerequisites - IFB Agency.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Session 1

Site #Type of SiteDimensions (m)Square Meters# of Artifacts# of FeaturesDescriptionFire EffectsConditionEligbility (Prelim)SHPO Concur?DateComments
Two examples of how to complete this ESR Rolling Consutlation Sheet have been provided below. Any tools, diagnostic artifacts, and/or feature components should be mentioned outright in the description section. A breif but detailed description will enable the Fuels Archaeologist to make determinations regarding eligibility and treatment actions.
Example Site Number 1Historic Trash Scatter1X1M1X1M891Site includes eighty sanitary can fragments and nine hole in top can fragments. The feature consists of a structural footprint with an east facing doorway which may represent a historic period Navajo Hogan.Direct effect: Supression, dozer line went through northend of site.DeterioratingEligibleYes11/27/05site will be avoided during implementation.
Example Site Number 2Lithic Scatter1X1M1X1M200Consits of a small lithic scatter comrpised of flake chert materials. No tools identified.Indirect effect: looter piles observed.DeterioratingNot EligibleYes11/27/05none

Session 2

Site #Type of SiteDimensions (m)Square Meters# of Artifacts# of FeaturesDescriptionFire EffectsConditionEligbility (Prelim)SHPO Concur?DateComments
Two examples of how to complete this ESR Rolling Consutlation Sheet have been provided below. Any tools, diagnostic artifacts, and/or feature components should be mentioned outright in the description section. A breif but detailed description will enable the Fuels Archaeologist to make determinations regarding eligibility and treatment actions.
Example Site Number 1Historic Trash Scatter1X1M1X1M891Site includes eighty sanitary can fragments and nine hole in top can fragments. The feature consists of a structural footprint with an east facing doorway which may represent a historic period Navajo Hogan.Direct effect: Supression, dozer line went through northend of site.DeterioratingEligibleYes11/27/05site will be avoided during implementation.
Example Site Number 2Lithic Scatter1X1M1X1M200Consits of a small lithic scatter comrpised of flake chert materials. No tools identified.Indirect effect: looter piles observed.DeterioratingNot EligibleYes11/27/05none

Session 3

Site #Type of SiteDimensions (m)Square Meters# of Artifacts# of FeaturesDescriptionFire EffectsConditionEligbility (Prelim)SHPO Concur?DateComments
Two examples of how to complete this ESR Rolling Consutlation Sheet have been provided below. Any tools, diagnostic artifacts, and/or feature components should be mentioned outright in the description section. A breif but detailed description will enable the Fuels Archaeologist to make determinations regarding eligibility and treatment actions.
Example Site Number 1Historic Hogan and Artifact Scatter1X1M1X1M891Site includes eighty sanitary can fragments and nine hole in top can fragments. The feature consists of a structural footprint with an east facing doorway which may represent a historic period Navajo Hogan.Direct effect: Supression, dozer line went through northend of site.DeterioratingEligibleYes11/27/05site will be avoided during implementation.
Example Site Number 2Lithic Scatter1X1M1X1M200Consits of a small lithic scatter comrpised of flake chert materials. No tools identified.Indirect effect: looter piles observed.DeterioratingNot EligibleYes11/27/05none

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .