3-Appendix D - Advanced PowerBI Consultant.pdf
PDF 365 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Advanced PowerBI Consultant
- Solicitation number
- 26-665-1100-78296
- Issued by
- New Mexico
About this file
This document is a vendor performance evaluation form with a series of rating questions designed to assess a vendor's performance across multiple dimensions. The form contains eight questions that allow the evaluator to rate the vendor on various aspects of their service, including their expertise in business intelligence and data management, flexibility with project scope and timelines, quality of digital materials, staff interaction, and individual representative performance. The rating scale ranges from 0 (Unacceptable) to 3 (Excellent), with space provided for detailed comments after each question.
The evaluation form covers comprehensive areas of vendor assessment, such as the evaluator's prior working relationship with the vendor, their knowledge of PowerBI and data management, ability to adapt to project changes, quality of digital materials produced, interpersonal dynamics between vendor personnel and staff, and satisfaction with developed products. The form also includes a section for rating individual vendor representatives and their skills, allowing for a nuanced and detailed evaluation of the vendor's overall performance and capabilities.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUESTIONS:
1. In what capacity have you worked with this vendor in the past?
COMMENTS:
2. How would you rate this firm's knowledge and expertise with regard to business intelligence, data management, and of PowerBI?
(3 = Excellent; 2 = Satisfactory; 1 = Unsatisfactory; 0 = Unacceptable)
3. How would you rate the vendor's flexibility relative to changes in the project scope and timelines?
4. What is your level of satisfaction with digital materials produced by the vendor?
(3 = Excellent; 2 = Satisfactory; 1 = Unsatisfactory; 0 = Unacceptable, N/A = Not applicable)
5. How would you rate the dynamics/interaction between vendor personnel and your staff?
6. Who are/were the vendor’s principal representatives involved in your project and how would you rate them individually? Would you, please, comment on the skills, knowledge, behaviors or other factors on which you based the rating?
Name: Rating:
Name: Rating:
7. How satisfied are/were you with the products developed by the vendor?
(3 = Excellent; 2 = Satisfactory; 1 = Unsatisfactory; 0 = Unacceptable, N/A = Not applicable)
8. With which aspect(s) of this vendor's services are/were you most satisfied?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .