Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Amd_2.doc
DOC document 84 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 28321319Q00000034
- Issued by
-
Social Security Administration
About this file
Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show all 38
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY
The purpose of this survey is to obtain information regarding the quality of the (below) named contractor’s (offeror’s) past performance relative to a contract (completed or in progress) at your company/agency. Social Security Administration (SSA) requests the Reference Agency submit the completed Past Performance Questionnaire to Molly.Seipp@ssa.gov no later than 9:00am ET on April 8, 2019. SSA may validate the information included in the survey by contacting the reference provided.
Offeror Completes the Yellow Sections Below
Name and Address of Contractor (Offeror):
Contractor (Offeror’s) E-Mail address and Contact Information:
Contract Number or Project Title:
Contract or Project Period of Performance (fill in date contract began, and anticipated completion date):
Reference Agency / Company
Completes the Blue Sections Below
Name of Agency/Company completing this Survey:
| U.S. Government Only: Is there a CPARs / PPIRS Report Card available for this reference |
| · Yes |
· No
· N/A – Not a federal contract reference
Name of Person Completing this Survey:
Email address and Contact Information of Person Completing this survey:
Brief Description of Services Provided:
Contract Type (FFP, FP-EPA, IDIQ, Labor Hours, etc.):
Contract Start Date:
Contract Completion Date (if all options exercised):
Annual Contract Value:
Total Contract Value inclusive of all options, if exercised
The Below Rating Chart provides a brief description of what justifies each of the adjectival ratings and is consistent with the rating system utilized in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). Please use this chart when selecting your ratings in each of the categories.
Source Selection Information -- See FAR 3.104
PERFORMANCE RATING GUIDELINES
| MEASUREMENT CATEGORIES |
| QUALITY OF SERVICE |
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
Management of Key Personnel
BUSINESS RELATIONS
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements, and exceeds many contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
| The contractor’s performance was consistently superior. Performance clearly exceeds the performance level described as excellent. |
| The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level. This rating will be used in rare circumstances where the contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance level described as very good. |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues were always proactive and effective. Performance clearly exceeds the performance level described as excellent. |
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements, and exceeds some contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective
| There were no delays and the contractor has exceeded the agreed upon time schedule. |
| No management issues and the contractor has exceeded contract requirements. |
| Responses to inquiries regarding technical, service, and administrative issues exceeded Government expectation. |
Satisfactory
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory |
| There are no, or minimal delays that impact achievement of contract requirements. |
| The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues were consistently effective. |
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
| Delays required minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues were somewhat effective. |
Unsatisfactory
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Delays compromised compliance with contract requirements. |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues were consistently ineffective. |
E=Exceptional VG =Very Good S=Satisfactory M=Marginal U=Unsatisfactory
| Rating Category and Questions |
| Please Check the Applicable Box using the Rating Key (Above) and the Performance Rating Guidelines on Page 2. NOTE: For statements indicating “Marginal” or “Unsatisfactory”, please provide a brief explanation in the comments section of the survey. |
| QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
1. The contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship.
2. The contractor provided an effective quality control plan/program.
3. The contractor utilized personnel that were properly trained and experienced.
4. How would you rate the contractor’s commitment to customer satisfaction?
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
5. The contractor was reliable and responsive to technical direction.
6. Contract deliverables were completed and provided timely and in accordance with contract schedules.
7. The contractor adhered to contract schedule, there were no deductions taken for timeliness issues.
| MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
8. How well did the contractor match the qualifications of the key position, as described in the contract, with the person who filled the key position?
| 9. If a key person did not perform well, was action taken by the contractor to correct this? |
| Y |
| N |
| 10. If a replacement of a key person was necessary, did the replacement meet or exceed the qualifications of the position as described in the contract schedule? |
| Y |
| N |
| BUSINESS RELATIONS |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
11. The contractor demonstrated effective and efficient management.
12. The contractor cooperated with the government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective solutions to issues.
13. The contractor promptly notified the government in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.
14. The contractor was successful in recruiting and maintaining qualified and reliable personnel.
15. The product/services adequately met the needs of the government, and I am satisfied with the performance of the contractor under this effort.
| OVERALL PERFORMANCE |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance on this effort?
| Based on the contactor’s overall performance, would you award this contractor another similar contract? |
| YES |
NO
Additional comments are greatly appreciated:
Note to Agency Completing Reference – Please complete this form and return to Molly.Seipp@ssa.gov no later than 9:00am ET on April 8, 2019. Thank you for your participation.
File details come from the government source that posted it.