Attachment I - Past Performance Questionnaire 273FCC21R0005_REV 1.doc
DOC document 86 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FCC Broadband Serviceable Location Fabric Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 273FCC21R0005
- Issued by
- Federal Communications Commission
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for a Broadband Serviceable Location Fabric database. The Federal Communications Commission is seeking to award a contract to create a common dataset of all locations in the United States where fixed broadband internet access service can be installed, as required by the Broadband DATA Act. Respondents must complete the past performance questionnaire and submit it to the contracting officer by July 1, 2021 to be evaluated. The questionnaire includes ratings on technical performance, timeliness, customer satisfaction, cost controls, and whether the evaluator would do business with the contractor again. The opportunity is a full and open competition using FAR Part 15.1-1 Best Value Tradeoff procedures. The FCC is looking to provide broadband mapping support through acquisition of this serviceable location fabric database.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 273FCC21R0005 REV 1.pdf | ||
| Attachment ii Instructions to Offerors and Evaluation Criteria REV 2.pdf | ||
| SF30-Amendment 0002 273FCC21R0005.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - SOO Fabric - REV 1.pdf | ||
| Amend 02 - Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| Attachment II - Instructions to Offerors and Evaluation Criteria REV 1.pdf | ||
| SF30-Amendment 0001 273FCC21R0005 060121.pdf | ||
| Question and Answer Amend 01.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Fabric - Pricing Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment I - Past Performance Questionnaire 273FCC21R0005.doc | DOC document | |
| 273FCC21R0005 - Fabric RFP.pdf | ||
| Attachment II - Instructions to Offerors and Evaluation Criteria.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - SOO Fabric.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Broadband Location Serviceable Fabric Database Past Performance Questionnaire
Attachment I Past Performance Questionnaire Solicitation no. 273FCC21R0005 The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) intends to award a contract for Broadband Location Serviceable Fabric Database.
In order to accurately evaluate the vendor’s past performance, your assistance is requested in obtaining and verifying the past performance of this vendor.
This Past Performance Questionnaire is comprised of two parts: 1) a Performance Rating Form; and 2) an Additional Comment Form. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please submit it as an e-mailed attachment to the Contracting Officer, Teresa Dailey, at Teresa.Dailey@fcc.gov. Please make the subject line of the e-mail read: Solicitation no. 273FCC21R0005- Past Performance Questionnaire – (Insert Evaluated Company's Name). To qualify for evaluation under this procurement, the form must be received by the Contracting Officer – Teresa.Dailey@fcc.gov no later than 4pm EDT on July 1, 2021.
The following standards shall be used in arriving at the rating.
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Performance Rating Form
Name of Company Evaluated:
Address of Company Evaluated:
Contract Number:
Contract Period of Performance:
Contract Value:
Contract Type:
Contracting Officer Name (or equivalent for non-Government entity):
Address, Fax and Telephone Number, and Email Address:
Type of Services Performed:
Name of Evaluator, Company/Agency, Address, Fax and Telephone Number And Email Address:
Date Evaluation Provided:
Awards Received:
Place an “X” in the appropriate rating for each question.
| Performance Element |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Technical Performance (Quality of Product or Service)
1. Quality of TECHNICAL APPROACH and Design:
(For example: Were the products and services comprehensive, complete, and feasible? Did the contractor meet the needs of the customer, perform successfully within contract constraints, and accommodate changing requirements)
2. Understanding of Requirements:
(For example: Did the contractor show an understanding of the scope of the requirements and an appreciation of the complexity of the requirements? And did the contractor effectively identify flaws, inconsistencies and other inaccuracies in your technical direction?)
Timeliness of Performance (Quality of Product or Service)
3. Effective and Efficient Use of Resources:
(For example: Was the contractor able to obtain in a timely manner the amount and type of personnel resources required to support the project, effectively train personnel to perform the work, and maintain the required workforce throughout the term of the contract?)
4. Timeliness of Performance:
(For example: Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic schedules, monitoring performance, completing work on time, and implementing corrections/changes in a timely manner?)
Customer Satisfaction and Contractor Behavior/Communication
5. Customer Satisfaction:
(For example: Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction? Was the customer satisfied with the final product or service?)
6. Business Behavior:
(For example: Was the contractor reasonable and cooperative at the corporate and program levels in response to changes in technical direction? Did the contractor personnel conduct themselves in a professional manner?)
7. Communication:
(For example: Did the contractor work and communicate well with contracting officers, contracting officer's representatives, end users, other contractors, subcontractors, and inhouse staff?)
Cost Controls
8. Cost Controls:
(For example: Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic costs, monitoring performance, operating at or below budget, and implementing corrections/changes in a cost-effective manner?)
Recommendation
PLEASE ANSWER “Yes” or “No”, as appropriate
9. Given the choice, would you do business with this contractor again?
Additional Comment Form Please provide any explanation regarding your performance ratings above, or any additional comments, in the space below.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .