26R0020 P171 Weapons Magazines - PLA Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
About this file
This document is a Project Labor Agreement (PLA) Request for Information (RFI) for a design-bid-build construction project at Naval Weapons Station Yorktown in Virginia. The project involves constructing five Containerized Long Weapons Storage Two Bay (CLWS 2B) High Explosive magazines, two segregation facilities, and one forklift charging station, with an anticipated construction magnitude between $250M - $500M and a performance period of approximately 974 calendar days.
The RFI includes a detailed questionnaire seeking industry input on labor availability, contractor interest, potential project costs, and perspectives on Project Labor Agreements. Key questions explore respondents' organizational type, labor market conditions, willingness to participate under a PLA requirement, comparisons of union versus prevailing wage rates, and potential cost implications. The document is specifically seeking market feedback to inform the Navy's approach to labor agreements for this complex munitions facility construction project.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 26R0020 P171 Weapons Magazines - PLA RFI.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT (PLA) REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)
FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) P171 WEAPONS MAGAZINES, NAVAL WEAPONS STATION YORKTOWN, YORKTOWN, VIRGINIA
Project Labor Agreement (PLA) Questionnaire
| Questions |
| Responses |
1) Are you responding as a representative of a government entity, union, contractor (union or non-union) and/or qualified small business?
2) Would the work involve specialized construction that is available from only a limited number of contractors or subcontractors? Explain in detail.
3) What is your understanding of the availability of union labor and non-union labor in this area for this type of project? Are you otherwise aware of national, regional, or local interest in participating in this project by union or non-union contractors. Explain in detail.
4) As a qualified contractor for a project of this type, would you be interested in participating in this project?
Would the requirement of a PLA under this project impact your interest in any way? Explain in detail.
PLEASE SPECIFY IF YOU WOULD OR WOULD NOT BID ON THIS PROJECT IF A PLA WAS REQUIRED**
5) Are you aware of PLAs having been used on other similar construction projects in the area and/or other nearby areas? Explain in detail.
6) How do union wage rates compare to prevailing wage rates for this type of project and in this area, i.e., prevailing wage rates under the Construction Wage Rates Requirements statute (formerly known as the Davis-Bacon Act). Explain in detail.
7) Are there any ways in which the requirement of a PLA might increase costs on a project of this type in this area? Explain in detail.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .