THE FOLLOWING BEST VALUE DETERMINATION WILL BE USED TO EVALUATE THE QUOTES

USING LOW PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE EVALUATION CRITERIA:

QUOTERS – PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING FOR EVALUATION CRITERIA

The following Best Value Factors listed will be used to evaluate the Quotes using Low Price Technically Acceptable Evaluation Criteria – GO – NO GO Criteria:

• TECHNICAL APPROACH

• DELIVERY

• PAST PERFORMANCE

Technical Acceptance Factor #1: Technical Approach Quoters will need to provide product literature or a capabilities document which outlines how the vendor will provide the Custom Test Cabinet IAW the Specs provided. See below compliance matrix which has a GO/NO GO section that will need filled out as part of technical acceptance. The product literature or capabilities document will be evaluated by the Requiring Technical Authority (RTA) in conjunction with the compliance matrix to ensure technical acceptance.

Technical Acceptance Factor #2: Delivery Quoters will need to fill out the Quoter’s Proposed Delivery Schedule table for evaluation by the Government. All vendors who can meet the Government’s required delivery date will be deemed technically acceptable. The Government will not review individual quotes for delivery only the Quoter’s Proposed Delivery Schedule below.

Technical Acceptance Factor #3: Past Performance Past performance will be evaluated based on the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS).

In accordance with (IAW) provision 252.204-7024(e) the Government will review the Quoter’s Summary Report" for Product Service Code (PSC) information. IAW provision 252.204-7024(c)(3), the Government will also utilize the "Suppliers Risk Report" will be utilized to assess the risk of unsuccessful performance and supply chain risk. Below is a snapshot of the supplier color legend listed in the report in each report. In addition, IAW provision 252.204-7024(c)(1) and (2) the Government will review the Quoter's “Item/Risk Report” to determine whether the procurement represents high performance risk to the Government as well as to ensure the quoted pricing is consistent with historical prices paid for the products or otherwise creates a risk for the Government.

SUPPLIER COLOR CODE LEDGEND

BLUE Top 5%

PURPLE Next 10%

GREEN Next 70%

YELLOW Next 10%

RED Lowest 5%

Summary Report:

The Government will review the summary report score for the PSC(s) associated with this effort only.

Supplier Risk Report:

The Government will review the supplier risk score as well as the suspected counterfeit area.

Item/Price Risk Report:

The Government will review the item/price risk score utilizing the various search functions.

Past performance will be based on GO / NO GO basis. An unacceptable (NO GO) equals a yellow or red listing in the SPRS system for the PSC(s) in the summary report as well as the supplier risk score/suspected counterfeit area and the item/price risk report. A quoter with no past performance (scores in either summary or supplier risk report) will be evaluated as neutral.

DELIVERY TABLE

The Government requires delivery to be made according to the following schedule:

The Government will evaluate equally, as regards time of delivery, offers that propose delivery of each quantity within the applicable delivery period specified above. Offers that propose delivery that will not clearly fall within the applicable required delivery period specified above, will be considered non-responsive and rejected. The Government reserves the right to award under either the required delivery schedule or the proposed delivery schedule, when an offeror offers an earlier delivery schedule than required above. If the offeror proposes no other delivery schedule, the required delivery schedule above will apply.

COMPLIANCE MATRIX

Absolute Maximum Ratings

OFFEROR’S PROPOSED DELIVERY SCHEDULE

ITEM NO QUANTITY WITHIN DAYS AFTER DATE OF CONTRACT

Power Transistor TO-3 Package 200 4 Weeks ARO

OFFEROR’S PROPOSED DELIVERY SCHEDULE

ITEM NO QUANTITY WITHIN DAYS AFTER DATE OF CONTRACT

Power Transistor TO-3 Package 200

Characteristic Symbol Value Unit GO NOGO Exceeds specifications and explain how exceeds

Collector–Emitter Voltage

VCEO 140 Vdc

Collector–Emitter Voltage

VCEX 160 Vdc

Electrical Characteristics

Collector–Base

VCBO 160 Vdc

Emitter–Base Voltage

VEBO 7 Vdc

Collector Current (Continuous) IC 16 Adc

Collector Current (Peak) IC 30 Adc

Base Current (Continuous) IB 4 Adc

Total Power Dissipation (@ Tc = 25°C)

PD 150 W

Operating & Storage Junction Temperature

TJ, Tstg –65 to +200 °C

Characteristics Symbol Min Max Unit Test Condition s

GO NOG

O

Exceeds specifications and explain how exceeds

Collector–Emitter Breakdown Voltage

VCEO(s

us) 140 — Vdc

IC = 0.2

Adc, IB =

DC Current Gain hFE 15 60 —

IC = 8

Adc, VCE = 4 Vdc

DC Current Gain hFE 5 — —

IC = 16

Collector–Emitter Saturation Voltage

VCE(sa

t) — 1.4 Vdc

IC = 8

Adc, IB = mAdc

Collector–Emitter Saturation Voltage

VCE(sa

t) — 4.0 Vdc

IC = 16

Adc, IB =

3.2 Adc

Thermal Characteristics

Packaging Information

SEE TECHNICAL ACCEPTANCE EVALUATION MATRIX BELOW:

Quoter’s by checking a “GO” column you are certifying that your company meets technical acceptance evaluation factors. Matrix must be filled out for consideration of award.

TECHNICAL ACCEPTANCE

EVALUATION FACTOR

GO NO GO IF YOU CAN EXCEED ANY

TECHNICAL ACCEPTANCE

EVALUATION CRITERIA PLEASE

INDICATE HOW BELOW

CONFORMANCE TO Power Transistor TO-3 Package By checking GO in this box you are certifying you can provide Power Transistor TO-3 Package required that meets all aspects outlined in the specs

CONFORMANCE TO DELIVERY

By checking GO in this box you are certifying that your company meets the Government’s Required Delivery Schedule table.

CONFORMANCE TO PAST

PERFORMANCE

Base–Emitter On

VBE(on) — 2.2 Vdc

IC = 8

Characteristic Symbol Value Unit GO NOGO Exceeds specifications and explain how exceeds

Thermal Resistance, Junction–to–Case

RθJC 1.17 °C/W

Device Package Description GO NOGO Exceeds specifications and explain how exceeds

Power Transistor TO-3 Package

By checking GO in this box you are certifying that your company will not be either yellow or red in the SPRS Summary or Supplier Risk Report.

A RESPONSIVE QUOTE CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING

• Signed SF 1449 (ALL PAGES RETURNED, 1 to 31)

• All pricing must be entered on each CLIN of the SF 1449 – You will only be considered responsive to this section if you fill in the CLINs and return with the solicitation pages noted above.

• Quoter’s Proposed Delivery Schedule filled out with delivery dates – You will only be considered responsive to this section if you fill in the Quoter’s Proposed Delivery Schedule table and return within the full solicitation noted above.

• provide product literature or a capabilities document.

• Must be a 100% total small business.

• Must have a current SAM.gov account and not currently excluded.

• The evaluation Criteria Attachment to include the following filled out and returned

• Compliance Matrix completely filled out

• Technical Evaluation Matrix completely filled out

The Government will review in three (3) phases:

- Responsiveness, see A below

- Technical Acceptance, see B below

- Pricing, see C below

A. RESPONSIVENESS

If anything is not provided or in the manner addressed above (under a Responsive Quote Consists of the Following) you will not be considered responsive and your quote will not be evaluated for technical acceptance. Quoters are able to provide quotes on their own format and other documents they wish however, it must be in conjunction with the documents listed above (under a Responsive Quote Consists of the Following) and in the manner the Government has made clear or it will be considered non responsive. In order to move to phase B, responsiveness to the solicitation must be adhered to.

B. TECHNICAL ACCEPTANCE

To be considered technically acceptable all quoters must meet the above criteria, see technical acceptance factors one (1) and two (2). Once quoters have been deemed technically acceptable, then and only then will price be evaluated.

C. PRICING

Upon certifying responsiveness and technical acceptance, award will be made to the lowest priced vendor.

Pricing will be evaluated for aggregate total for CLINs to include any option CLINs as well.

Quotes that are non-compliant with any material requirement of this solicitation may be rejected without further consideration for award. This will be a firm fixed price contract and will be awarded utilizing Simplified Acquisition Procedures.

(End of provision)