The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02148 | Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 | TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD
Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation)
| Name of Bidder: |
| Name of Reviewer(s): |
| Date Reviewed: |
Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)
| 1 |
| Have received an Approved or Approved with Distinction designation based on their most recent review; |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 2 |
| Offer initial teacher licensure programs that correspond to the attestation(s) that are approved or approved with distinction |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 3 |
| If relevant: Implement evidence-based early literacy programs aligned to Early Literacy Program Approval Criteria for relevant programs |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 4 |
| Submitted Subject Matter Knowledge Statement of Assurance indicating programs have been revised in support of ensuring candidates meet expectations as outlined in the Subject Matter Knowledge Guidelines (where applicable) |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 5 |
| Have a Dean or Dean-equivalent who will sign off on all attestations (one individual identified per organization) |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 6 |
| Have one designated content expert per MTEL who will sign off on all the corresponding attestation in accordance with their content expertise (see below for additional information on content expertise) |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
Scoring rubric:
| Non-Responsive |
| Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request |
| Unsatisfactory: |
| Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing. |
| Below Average: |
| Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing. |
| Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise. |
| Above Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
| Outstanding: |
| Application materials is complete, suggesting exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
Alternate ID: 26MACISCS5 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-26-1026-DOE02-DOE01-127733 Non-Responsive 0 pts.
Unsatisfactory 1 pt.
Below Average 2 pts.
Average 3 pts.
Above Average 4 pts.
Outstanding 5 pts.
Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)
Additional Evaluation Criteria:
| 1 |
| Quality of submission requirements for Viability section, including all submission Requirements in Attachment |
| (x6) |
| 2 |
| Quality of submission requirements for Alignment section, including all submission Requirements in Attachment A |
| (x7) |
| 3 |
| Quality of submission requirements for Utility and Impact section, including all submission Requirements in Attachment A |
| (x3) |
| 4 |
| Quality of project plan and timeline submitted in accordance with the Submission Requirements in Attachment A |
| (x2) |
| 5 |
| Quality of budget narrative and budget workbook submitted in accordance with the Submission Requirements in Attachment A |
| (x2) |
Comments:
image1.jpeg image2.gif