25R0102 Synopsis Final.pdf

N62742-25-R-0102 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR VARIOUS UTILITY SYSTEMS STUDIES AT

VARIOUS LOCATIONS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVAL FACILITIES

ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND, PACIFIC

Description: ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A

STANDARD FORM SF 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED

HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PACKAGE TO

DOWNLOAD.

This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for various utility systems studies at various locations under the cognizance of Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Pacific; but may also include work worldwide. These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $30,000,000. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term (including all option years) is $10,000. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. Estimated start date is March 2026.

This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code 541330, Engineering Services, with a small business size standard of $25,500,000. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the selection criteria.

The type of multi-discipline A-E services expected to be performed under this contract are electrical utility system studies, mechanical utility system studies, and civil utility system studies. Design and construction engineering will not be accomplished under this contract. The type of utility system studies and services expected to be performed under this contract include:

1. Electrical utility (Generation and Distribution) system studies

a. System condition

b. System reliability (i.e. outage trending and analysis)

c. System capacity (i.e. load projection for future growth)

d. Power quality (frequency, voltage, current, clarity/distortion, etc.)

e. Resolution of other technical deficiencies and system aspects including vulnerability, load flow, fault current analysis, arc flash risk assessment, transient stability modeling, and relay coordination study.

2. Mechanical utility (Production and Distribution) system studies (Steam, Demineralized water, High temperature hot water, Chilled water, Compressed air, Salt water, LPG and Natural gas)

a. System condition

b. System reliability

c. System capacity

d. System capability

e. Commodity quality (purity, pressure, flow volume, temperature, etc.)

f. Resolution of other technical deficiencies and system aspects including vulnerability, water treatment, fuels diversity, combustion efficiency, maintenance

3. Civil utility (Production, Treatment, Distribution and Collection) system studies (Potable water and Wastewater)

a. System condition

b. System reliability

c. System capacity

d. System capability

e. Commodity quality (purity, pressure, flow volume, etc.)

f. Resolution of other technical deficiencies and system aspects including system vulnerability, water treatment, discharge testing, maintenance

4. Utilities GPS mapping, GIS data coordination, geometric network, utility network and information coordination

5. System operational modeling to determine various performance indicators at various locations throughout the system

6. Facility project site notional renderings

7. SCADA systems and utility operation center studies

8. Engineering services for various studies with associated multi-discipline architect-engineer and planning support services

9. Technical document translation between English to Korean, Tagalog, Ilocano or Japanese

Interested firms are advised to ensure System of Award Management (SAM) registration is current at time of offer submission and at the time of award. For instructions on registering with SAM, see the SAM website at https://www.sam.gov/.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that provide design or engineering services for a project under this contract cannot provide design or engineering services for the same project under a separate construction contract. The prime firm and subconsultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 36.209, firms are advised that no contract for the construction of a project shall be awarded to the firm that designed the project or its subsidiaries or affiliates, except with the approval of the head of the agency or authorized representative.

Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firms to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions, or provide complete information may affect the firm’s evaluation or disqualify the firm from further consideration. The following selection criteria, listed in descending order of importance, will be used to evaluate the qualifications of the A-E firms:

1. Specialized Experience

2. Professional Qualifications

3. Past Performance

4. Program Management and Capacity

5. Personnel of U.S. or Naturalized Citizenship

6. Ability to Translate Technical Documents Between English and Korean, Tagalog, Ilocano and Japanese

7. Firm Location

8. Commitment to Small Business

9. Volume of Work

Criterion 1- Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I, Section F):

Firms will be evaluated on specialized experience in performance of services anticipated under this contract, listed in order of importance with one being the most important: through evaluation of experience in:

1. Studies of electrical power utility distribution, transmission, and generation systems, power system/quality analysis including use of power system analysis programs such as Easypower or SKM; mechanical utility production, and distribution systems (steam, compressed air, salt water and demineralized water) and infrastructure; civil utility production, treatment, distribution and collection systems (potable water and wastewater) and infrastructure, civil utility system analysis including use of civil hydraulic modeling programs such as SewerGEMS and/or WaterGEMS.

2. GPS mapping and GIS data coordination

3. SCADA control and data systems and interface.

Firms may be considered more favorably by demonstrating the following:

1. Experience in all disciplines listed above (electrical study, mechanical study, civil study, GIS, mapping, and SCADA study).

2. Experience performing utility system studies in tropical environments similar to Hawaii, Guam and Pacific Ocean Areas.

3. For Prime contractor-subcontractor/JVs/LLCs/LTDs, a history of working together on prior projects.

4. Specialized recent experience and technical competence of firm or particular staff members of the prime A-E will be evaluated more favorably.

Submission Requirements:

Provide a maximum of seven (7) projects completed within the past five (5) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice that best demonstrate specialized experience of the proposed team in the areas outlined above. Do not include design and construction projects.

Sufficient information to determine the date of completion of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered. Projects located under the cognizance of NAVFAC Pacific will be evaluated more favorably. If the project detail does not clearly delineate the work performed by the offeror, the project will be evaluated less favorably. If more than the maximum number of projects are submitted, the Government will only evaluate projects up to the maximum number authorized in the order submitted.

All projects provided in the SF330 must be completed by the actual office/branch/regional office/individual team member proposed to manage and perform work under this contract.

Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the Unique Entity Identifier number along with each firm name in the SF330 Part 1, Section F, block 25, “Firm Name” Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). In block 24, include the project description, the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to the specialized experience as outlined above. For projects performed as a subcontractor or joint venture involving different partners; specifically indicate the value of the work performed as a subcontractor or by those firms proposed for this contract, and identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration.

NOTE: If the firm is a joint venture or an LLC, projects performed by the joint venture or LLC should be submitted. However, if there are no relevant projects performed by the joint venture or LLC, projects may be submitted for either joint venture partner or LLC member company, not to exceed a total of seven (7) relevant projects.

Projects shall be submitted on the SF-330 at Part I, Section F and shall be completed projects.

Projects not completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. Instead, list relevant task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated.

All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in the SF330, Part I, Section F. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in the evaluation of Criterion 1.

Criterion 2- Professional Qualifications (SF330, Part I, Sections E & G):

Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications, competence, and experience of the proposed key personnel in providing services to accomplish the tasks required under this contract, including participation in example projects as outlined in the SF330, Part 1, Section G.

Key personnel are individuals who will be dedicated staff performing the work, have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise.

Specific disciplines that must be included in key personnel are:

Principal-in-Charge of the prime A-E firm Project Manager Civil Project Engineer Mechanical Project Engineer Electrical Project Engineer Electrical Protection Engineer GIS Specialist Mapping GPS Specialist or Surveyor SCADA Project Engineer

Key personnel expected to have direct control of project execution for this contract should be listed. Failure to provide qualified personnel in each technical area as described above will be evaluated less favorably. The professional qualifications of the prime or lead contractor’s key personnel will be evaluated more favorably than those of a subcontractor’s key personnel.

Limit to a single individual for each key personnel category.

Submission Requirements:

SF330, Part I, Section E. Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate experience in the work proposed under this contract. Resumes are limited to two (2) pages each and should indicate: professional registration, certification, licensure and/or accreditation in appropriate disciplines; cite recent (within the past five (5) years) project-specific experience and demonstrating competence in work relevant to the services required under this contract; and indicate proposed role in this contract. Any pages over this limit will not be considered. Indicate participation of key personnel in example projects in the SF330, Part 1, Section G.

Criterion 3- Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS for Criterion 1 projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government including contacts with points of contact in other criteria. NOTE: Past performance information for projects listed under Criterion 1 may be given greater weight.

Submission Requirements:

SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION FOR EACH PROJECT UNDER

CRITERION 1. IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) included in this notice is provided for the firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project included under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. Ensure CPARS/PPQs are properly labeled and identifiable for each project under Criterion 1. DO NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS

AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the firm is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, firms should complete and submit with their responses the first page of the PPQ (Attachment (A)), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Firms may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form as posted with this Synopsis. Firms should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If requested by the client, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific, Code ACQ31, Attn: Mr. Mitchell Yoshimura via email at mitchell.s.yoshimura.civ@us.navy.mil, prior to the response date. Firms shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A/E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 1 Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Information shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single-sided pages) in total.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

A subconsultant’s past performance will not be given the same level of consideration as either the prime contractor or the joint venture partner(s).

Criterion 4 - Program Management and Capacity (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the firm’s ability to plan for and manage work under the contract and the capacity to accomplish the work in the required time.

Submission Requirements:

1. Provide an organizational chart for the team and discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization. Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable.

2. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.

Description shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single-sided pages) in total. If more than two double-sided pages (or four single-sided pages) are submitted, the Government will only evaluate pages up to the maximum number authorized in the order submitted. General statements of availability or capacity may be considered less favorably.

Criterion 5 - Personnel of U.S. or Naturalized Citizenship (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Personnel shall be of U.S. or naturalized citizens who can qualify for access to security areas.

Submission Requirements:

Provide an acknowledgment that personnel assigned to work on task orders under this contract shall be U.S. or naturalized citizens with no criminal record and can be cleared for access to security areas.

Criterion 6 - Ability to Translate Technical Documents Between English and Korean, Tagalog, Ilocano and Japanese (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Submission Requirements:

Describe the proposed translation process and indicate who on the team will be performing the translation and their qualifications for performing the translation.

Criterion 7 - Firm Location (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated on the locations of their office or offices that will be performing the work under this contract and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographic areas in which projects could be located. Evaluation of firms will include consideration of their location within the general geographic area of the anticipated projects, primarily Hawaii, Guam, Japan, Washington, and California. Offices within a short commuting distance of NAVFAC Pacific and NAVFAC Hawaii in Honolulu, NAVFAC Marianas on Guam, and NAVFAC Far East in Yokosuka, Japan may be evaluated more favorably.

Submission Requirements:

1. Indicate location of the office(s) that will be performing the work, including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members. Demonstrate how this will be advantageous to the government. Address the ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on-site support.

2. Provide a narrative describing the team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas to be covered by this contract to operate effectively under state, city/county, territorial and host nation laws and regulations.

Criterion 8 – Commitment to Small Business (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated in terms of the extent to which they have identified and committed to Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZone SB), Veteran- Owned Small Business (VOSB), and Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on: (A) Past performance in utilization of small business concerns, and (B) Participation of small business concerns for this requirement. In support of (A), all firms shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone SB, VOSB, and SDVOSB. Large Businesses shall submit “final” or “most recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for contracts associated with each project cited under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. If ISRs are not FINAL or MOST RECENT, they will not be considered. If subcontracting goals were not met, provide an explanation. If Individual Subcontracting Reports were not applicable to the Section F projects, large businesses shall submit other documentation, which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for the contracts. Small Businesses shall also submit documentation, which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of relative size. In support of (B), large businesses shall submit a draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in which they will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify, commit to and demonstrate in the plan to meet the following goals:

Small Business – 40% HUBZone – 3% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business – 5% Small Disadvantaged Business – 5% Women-Owned Small Business – 9%

If a large business firm is selected for award, a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in accordance with FAR 19.7 and DFAR 219.7, will be required and incorporated into the contract award. A draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required from small businesses;

however, small businesses shall submit similar information on the extent to which they identify and commit to subcontracting to large business (LB), SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone SB, VOSB, and SDVOSB if applicable in the performance of this contract.

The Small Business size standard classification is NAICS 541330, Engineering Services, size standard $25.5 million.

The attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template (Attachment (B)) shall be used by large businesses to complete the draft subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their “draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plans utilizing this template, and ONLY this template.

All firms shall submit small business subcontracting information associated with each project cited under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience, in the format provided in Attachment (C), Small Business Subcontracting Record. Historical Small Business Utilization will only be evaluated if performed by the offeror.

All firms shall submit a small business participation and commitment strategy including all data elements shown in Attachment (D), Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy.

Submission Requirements:

1. Identify in terms of the dollar value and percentage of the total acquisition the extent of work the firm will self-perform as the prime contractor. If submitting an offer as a joint venture, identify the percentage of work each member will be responsible for and indicate the size status of each member (e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, other than small business).

2. Include supplemental narratives (shall not exceed five single-sided pages) to address other elements of the firm’s strategy such as binding agreements covering post award roles for execution of the contract and specific initiatives and tools that will be employed under the contract to enhance small businesses opportunities to both participate in this acquisition and build capabilities to support future NAVFAC acquisitions.

3. The anticipated prime and first tier overall small business participation rate for this acquisition (i.e. work to be performed by small businesses as the prime and/or subcontractors) is 25% of the contract value. Firms are encouraged to exceed this percentage and seek meaningful levels of participation in each of the small business socioeconomic programs listed in Attachment (D) consistent with efficient contract performance. Firms shall explain in their participation and commitment strategies how proposed participation rates were established. The small business participation and commitment strategy must be in agreement with any required small business subcontracting plan and will be made a part of the contract upon award.

NOTE: The Government reserves the right to consider achievements information on other recent, relevant projects from all available sources. If the firm is a new joint venture, partnership or other entity consisting of more than one company, provide achievements information for each individual business entity(ies) that will be responsible for managing the subcontracting program and clearly describe those responsibilities.

Failure to provide ISRs or any other requested information must be fully explained and may negatively impact your evaluation.

Criterion 9 – Volume of Work (SF330, Part 1, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified A&E firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD A&E contracts.

Submission Requirements:

Firms do not submit data for this factor.

SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed SF- 330 package. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11-point Times New Roman or larger. Part I shall not exceed 100 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets, dividers, or other requested documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, proof of A-E firm registration) provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. The organizational chart may be one page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11-point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables).

Please include your Unique Entity Identifier and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330.

**In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b), contracts for architect-engineer services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering.

Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires A-E firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require A-E firm registration, the firm must provide proof eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture should include with their submission a copy of the joint venture agreement. Firms who are offering as a Limited Liability Company (LLC) should include with their submission a copy of the operating agreement. Failure to include the joint venture agreement or operating agreement may result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture or LLC shall include with their submission a copy of the joint venture or operating agreement along with a detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate:

The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing.

The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control.

The structure and decision making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

Identify by name and title the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents)

A list of partners/parties, to include company name, UEI and CAGE numbers, address, point of contact, Email address, phone number and facsimile number.

Architect-engineer firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit three (3) paper copies of the SF-330 and one (1) CD to:

For SF330s sent via United States Postal Services (USPS):

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific Code CON31 (N62742-25-R-0102), Attn: MY 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100

JBPHH, HI 96860-3134

For SF330s sent via courier service or hand-delivered:

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific Code CON31 (N62742-25-R-0102), Attn: MY 4256 Radford Drive, Building 62 Honolulu, HI 96818-3296

Firms responding to this announcement by 2:00 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time (HST) on 09 September 2025 will be considered. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The point of contact is Mr.

Mitchell Yoshimura, Contract Specialist, at mitchell.s.yoshimura.civ@us.navy.mil. The alternate point of contact is Mr. Erik S. Torngren, Contracting Officer, at erik.s.torngren.civ@us.navy.mil.

If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized.

Inquiries concerning this procurement should include announcement number and title and be forwarded via email to mitchell.s.yoshimura.civ@us.navy.mil no later than fifteen (15) days of the closing date. Questions submitted after this date may not be addressed by the Government due to time constraints.