25MACISPM2 - Scorecard - Final.docx
DOCX document 111 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- BD-25-1026-DOE02-DOE01-115156
- Issued by
- Middlesex County, Massachusetts
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Criteria Scorecard for a state procurement opportunity issued by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, specifically focused on computer science education courses for educators. The solicitation (Alternate ID: 25MACISPM2) seeks providers of computer science content and training programs for educators teaching grades 5-12, with a strong emphasis on supporting historically underrepresented groups in technology education. Bidders must demonstrate success in preparing students at an introductory computer science level and have the capability to offer courses statewide.
The scorecard outlines a comprehensive evaluation process with seven key assessment areas, including organizational service descriptions, support for underrepresented groups, anti-racist practices, course materials, financial support options, course eligibility, and documented student impact. The scoring methodology ranges from 0-5 points across different criteria, with a maximum possible score of 100 points. Preferred attributes include cost-effective course offerings, culturally sustaining instructional practices, and the ability to provide course vouchers. Critical evaluation requirements include proven success in computer science education, statewide course availability, and demonstrable support for diverse student populations.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 25MACISPM2 - Bid - Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| IP Language.docx | DOCX document | |
| Prompt Pay Discount - PPD Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFR - Required Specifications from OSD 10.1.21.docx | DOCX document | |
| 25MACISPM2 - Attachment A - final.docx | DOCX document | |
| DESE Required Language 3-26-24.docx | DOCX document | |
| Small Business Program Plan Language.docx | DOCX document | |
| State Forms - Read Only - UPDATED Dec 2024.pdf | ||
| IT RFR Required Specifications.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02148 Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD
Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation)
| Name of Bidder: |
| Name of Reviewer(s): |
| Date Reviewed: |
Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)
| 1 |
| Demonstrated success in effectively preparing students in computer science content at an introductory level. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 2 |
| Demonstrated experience providing courses for educators who teach grades 5-12. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 3 |
| The ability to make the course available to educators statewide. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
Scoring rubric:
| Non-Responsive |
| Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request |
| Unsatisfactory: |
| Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing. |
| Below Average: |
| Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing. |
| Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise. |
| Above Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
| Outstanding: |
| Application materials is complete, suggest exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
Alternate ID: 25MACISPM2 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-25-1026-DOE02-DOE01-115156 Non-Responsive 0 pts.
Unsatisfactory 1 pt.
Below Average 2 pts.
Average 3 pts.
Above Average 4 pts.
Outstanding 5 pts.
| Multiplier |
| Maximum |
Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)
Additional Evaluation Criteria:
| 1 |
| Section 1: Description of your organization details how services provided will be successful to this procurement. |
| (x4) |
| 20 |
| 2 |
| Preferred: |
- Demonstrates success in effectively supporting students from historically underrepresented groups (e.g., female, Black, Lantina/o etc.) in learning computer science content.
- Preferred: A cost-effective course such that it is affordable for people with a variety of income levels and an ability to provide course vouchers to educators should the Department elect to purchase them.
- Preferred: Demonstrates success in infusing culturally and linguistically sustaining practices into their instruction.
| (x2) |
| 10 |
| 3 |
| Section 3: Bidder provides evidence of activities focused on addressing racial inequities, articulates how their organization has and is currently working on supporting anti-racist mindsets, internal practices, and services/offerings, and bidder shares specific examples of how their services/offerings are culturally responsive and anti-racist. |
| (x2) |
| 10 |
| 4 |
| Section 2 & 4: A list of courses in Digital Literacy and/or Computer Science geared towards educators that your organization provides and quality and detail of course materials as requested in Attachment A |
| (x6) |
| 30 |
| 5 |
| Section 5: Examples of scholarships and/or financial support provided to educators for this or similar coursework |
| (x2) |
| 10 |
| 6 |
| Section 6: Clear description of eligibility requirements to participate in the course |
| (x2) |
| 10 |
| 7 |
| Section 7: Strong evidence of impact of CS and educator coursework on students taking the course |
| (x2) |
| 10 |
| Total: |
| 100 |
Comments:
image1.jpeg image2.gif
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .