24MAOSTBH1 - Scorecard - pathway A - Final.docx

DOCX document 112 KB Posted

Attached to
24MAOSTBH1 | Interpreter in Education Course Delivery
Solicitation number
BD-24-1026-DOE02-DOE01-89929
Issued by
Middlesex County, Massachusetts

About this file

This document is an Evaluation Criteria Scorecard used by agency staff to evaluate responses to Solicitation 24MAOSTBH1 for an Interpreter in Education Course Delivery opportunity in Massachusetts. The scorecard outlines the required qualifications for bidders, including having staff with the necessary experience and expertise, access to the required technology, and the ability to collaborate effectively with Department staff. Bidders must receive a "yes" on all the required qualifications criteria to move on to the additional evaluation criteria.

The additional evaluation criteria include the bidder's established reputation as a provider of professional development to public school educators, the quality of the proposed course format, instructor experience, and prior experience providing related services, the bidder's experience interacting with public school districts and professional developers, direct experience working with interpreters or families who require interpretation, the proposed fee structure, knowledge of interpretation and translation best practices, and general knowledge of educational content and terminology. Bidders are also evaluated on their evidence of activities focused on addressing racial inequities, their articulation of how their organization is working on supporting anti-racist mindsets, internal practices, and services/offerings, and how their services/offerings are culturally responsive and anti-racist.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
24MAOSTBH1 - Amendment II - Final.docx DOCX document
CommonwealthTermsAndConditions.pdf PDF
IP Language.docx DOCX document
24MAOSTBH1 - Bid - Final.docx DOCX document
IT RFR Required Specifications.doc DOC document
RFR - Required Specifications from OSD 10.1.21.docx DOCX document
vendor-assurance 1 17 24.docx DOCX document
StandardContractForm_Instructions 7.22.2021.pdf PDF
Standard Contract Form- 7.22.2021.docx DOCX document
24MAOSTBH1 - Attachment A - UPDATED - Final April 2024.docx DOCX document
24MAOSTBH1 - Q and A March 6 2024.docx DOCX document
DESE Required Language 10.28.2022.docx DOCX document
24MAOSTBH1 - Attachment B - final.docx DOCX document
24MAOSTBH1 - Scorecard - pathway B - final.docx DOCX document
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

75 Pleasant Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148-4906 Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD

Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation) Updated 9-26-22

Name of Bidder:
Name of Reviewer(s):
Date Reviewed:

Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)

1
Staff members with the requisite experience, expertise, and skills to deliver the services proposed; including an identified individual with demonstrated proficiency in English and another language
Yes |_|
No |_|
2
If applying for Pathway A: identified individual who has completed or will complete DESE instructor training course
Yes |_|
No |_|
3
Access to technology necessary to provide the online format (LMS system and platform for registration)
Yes |_|
No |_|
4
If necessary, capacity to serve as a fiscal agent, billing individuals and districts for course enrollment. Districts must be able to pay via their usual procedures.
Yes |_|
No |_|
5
Ability to collaborate effectively with Department staff.
Yes |_|
No |_|
6
Control/access to a wheelchair accessible space which is large enough for vendor’s proposed maximum group size, with space and furniture that must be practicable for flexible instructional groupings, if applying to provide the Blended Learning format.
Yes |_|
No |_|

Scoring rubric:

Non-Responsive
Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request
Unsatisfactory:
Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing.
Below Average:
Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing.
Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise.
Above Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise.
Outstanding:
Application materials is complete, suggest exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise.

Alternate ID: 24MAOSTBH1 -- PATHWAY A COMMBUYS Document #: BD-24-1026-DOE02-DOE01-89929 Non-Responsive 0 pts.

Unsatisfactory 1 pt.

Below Average 2 pts.

Average 3 pts.

Above Average 4 pts.

Outstanding 5 pts.

Multiplier
Maximum

Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)

Additional Evaluation Criteria:

1
Established reputation as a provider of professional development to public school educators.
(x3)
15
2
Quality of proposed course format, instructor experience, and prior experience providing related services
(x5)
25
3
Staff with experience interacting with public school districts and professional developers, capable of working with instructors, districts, and the Department to establish workable course schedules
(x2)
10
4
Direct experience working with interpreters or families who require interpretation
(x2)
10
5
Proposed Fee structure is of best value
(x2)
10
6
Knowledge of interpretation and translation best practices and its importance in schools
(x2)
10
7
General knowledge of educational content and terminology
(x2)
10
8
Bidder provides evidence of activities focused on addressing racial inequities, articulates how their organization has and is currently working on supporting anti-racist mindsets, internal practices, and services/offerings, and bidder shares specific examples of how their services/offerings are culturally responsive and anti-racist.
(x2)
10
Total:
100

Comments:

image1.jpeg image2.gif

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .