Responses to RFP Questions 01Feb23.pdf
PDF 157 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Request for Proposals - Data Software Services
- Solicitation number
- 23-3
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Government Responses to Industry Questions and Comments on RFP FA8806-23-R-0001
01 February 23
1. ITO Section 2.1.3: Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale.
Which volume, section should exceptions be captured, if any exist?
USG Response:
Volume III.
2. SOW 3.1 and Questionnaire 3a: The question in the questionnaire does not seem to match with technical requirements of 3.1 and the subparagraphs. Will the Government consider replacing "pull, process and integrate" with "ingest" to be consistent with the SOW requirements and evaluation criteria?
USG Response:
The wording in is appropriate for both documents. The purpose of the commercial questionnaire is to identify the proposed solution’s commerciality.
3. SOW 6.4 and Instruction 6.2.2: The instruction requires evidence of existing DOD IL-5/6 while the
SOW under 6.4 and subfactors only references C2S and SC2S which is not an IL-5/6 environment.
Can the government deconflict this by replacing the instruction language to make it consistent with the SOW language emphasizing C2S and SC2S?
USG Response:
Offerors are encouraged to review current RFP documents.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .