2324 Exhibit A - NG911 GAP Report.pdf
PDF 301 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 2324
- Issued by
- Kenosha County, Wisconsin
About this file
This is a NextGen 911 (NG911) Quality Control Assessment Report prepared by Geo-Comm for Kenosha County, Wisconsin, evaluating the county's GIS data readiness for NG911 implementation. The assessment examines critical geographic information system datasets including road centerlines, site/structure address points, emergency service boundaries, PSAP boundaries, and provisioning boundaries against established NG911 standards and best practices developed by the Wisconsin Department of Military Affairs and NENA (National Emergency Number Association). The report identifies 121,269 quality control errors and 60 ETL fallouts within the existing datasets, with overall data accuracy currently measured at 87.88% for combined GIS data, ALI, and MSAG records, and 88.19% for GIS data alone. Critical deficiencies include missing ESN values in address points and road centerlines, absence of mandatory fields such as DiscrpAgID, DateUpdate, Country, and State fields across multiple layers, and zero percent accuracy ratings for all three emergency service boundaries (Fire, Law, and EMS).
The remediation roadmap outlines a phased approach to achieve NG911 compliance, with projected accuracy improvements reaching 99.46% following implementation of critical error corrections. Priority remediation tasks include adding and populating all mandatory fields across all boundary layers, removing leading and trailing spaces in field values, correcting domain value violations in street name elements, eliminating boundary gaps and overlaps, and resolving address range conflicts. The assessment recommends migrating legacy street name elements to CLDXF (Civic Location Data eXchange Format) standard with fully spelled-out values and no abbreviations, establishing unique identifiers for each GIS layer, and implementing comprehensive ALI-to-RCL and SSAP-to-RCL synchronization corrections. Long-term maintenance recommendations include aligning centerlines across jurisdictional borders, creating access points for multi-unit structures, and establishing ongoing quality control and synchronization protocols to maintain data integrity above the 98 percent best-practice threshold.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2324 Addendum 1.pdf | ||
| 2324 RFP Documents.pdf | ||
| 2324 Scores Tabulation.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 1
Public Safety GIS Simplified www.geo-comm.com 2/11/2021
General QC Observations
• Site/Structure Address Points and Road Centerlines do not contain ESN values.
Counties in this situation will require special attention when transitioning to a NG911 environment. Adding the numerous ESN values from the E911 environment to the 911 GIS data in these cases may not be necessary and will be dependent on the Next Generation Core Service (NGCS) provider. In some cases, a PSAP can transition from multiple ESNs to a single ESN. MSAG Communities, however, are typically required and may need to be added.
• Due to the use of the MSAG street name fields for potential ALI and MSAG synchronization there are many outside acceptable values; county does have the USPS abbreviations present in the data.
• QC Errors: 121,269 o These can be found in the Exceptions folder: QCFallouts.csv & geodatabase o More details are found in the report below
• ETL Fallouts: 60 o These can be found in the Exceptions folder | ETLFallouts.csv o 1 – Law Boundary polygon due to self-intersections o 1 – PSAP Boundary polygon due to self-intersections o 1 – Provisioning Boundary polygon due to self-intersections o 1 – County Boundary polygon due to self-intersections o 56 – Site/Structure Address Points due to the presence of the Address
Number suffix in the Address Number field
Quality Control Notes
• Ingest check Road Centerline Range to Zero: set as default
• Ingest check Site/Structure Address Point Remove: set as default
• Road Centerline one-way check: not configured
• Road Centerline range gap check: configured
• Road Centerline line in polygon check: configured
• Site/Structure Address Point zone check: configured
• UniqueIDs added for QC processing:
o Site/Structure Address Points o Road Centerline
• Site/Structure Address Point to Road Centerline: MSAG Community used for refinement
• MSAG to Road Centerline: No MSAG provided
• ALI to Road Centerline: MSAG Community used for refinement
• ALI to Site/Structure Address Point: MSAG Community used for refinement
• Range overlap: MSAG Community used for refinement
• Site/Structure Address Point duplicates: MSAG Community used for refinement file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com MFleming Typewritten Text RFP 2324 Exhibit A Geocomm NG911 GAP Report
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 2
Contents General QC Observations
Quality Control Notes
Standards and Reference Documents
Accuracy of Current GIS Data to NG9-1-1 Standards
Remediation Recommendations
Correct Critical Errors for NG9-1-1 Call Routing and Location Validation
Migrate Legacy street name elements to CLDXF street name elements
Correct all non-critical errors
Maintenance Recommendations
Road Centerlines
Site / Structure Address Points
Other important items
Data Received
Field Mapping
PSAP Boundary
Emergency Service Boundary – Fire
Emergency Service Boundary – Law
Emergency Service Boundary – EMS
Provisioning Boundary | County Boundary used
Road Centerlines
Site/Structure Address Points
Incorporated Municipalities
Counties or Equivalents file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 3
Standards and Reference Documents
• Wisconsin Department of Military Affairs, Office of Emergency Communication NG9-1-1 Website | https://dma.wi.gov/DMA/oec/programs/nextgen911
• Wisconsin NG9-1-1 GIS Data Standards and Best Practices | https://dma.wi.gov/DMA/divisions/oec/library/2020/WI_NG911_GIS_Data_Standa rd_and_Best_Practices_FINAL.pdf
• Wisconsin Land Information Association | https://www.wlia.org/
• NENA Standard for NG9-1-1 GIS Data Model – NENA-STA-006.1.1-2020 | https://www.nena.org/?page=NG911GISDataModel
• NENA Next Generation United States Civic Location Data Exchange Format (CLDXF) – NENA-STA-004.1-2014 | https://www.nena.org/?NG911CLDXF
• NENA Information Document for Development of Site/Structure Address Point GIS Data for 9-1-1 – NENA-STA-014.1-2015 | https://www.nena.org/?SSAP
• NENA Information Document for GIS Data Stewardship for Next Generation 9-1- 1 – NENA-INF-028.1-2020 | https://www.nena.org/page/GISDataStewardship o At the current time only PSAP boundaries are a part of the document;
Emergency Service Boundaries and Road Centerline additions are currently under development
• NENA NG9-1-1 Transition Plan Considerations Information Document – NENA- INF-008.2-2014 | https://www.nena.org/page/NG911_TransitionPlng
Accuracy of Current GIS Data to NG9-1-1 Standards
Overall Accuracy (Includes GIS data, ALI & MSAG) 87.88%
GIS Data (Includes only GIS data) 88.19%
RCL 89.70%
SSAP 88.16%
Provisioning Boundary 80.00%
PSAP Boundary 66.67%
EMS Emergency Service Boundary 0.00%
Law Emergency Service Boundary 0.00%
Fire Emergency Service Boundary 0.00%
Incorporated Municipalities 85.71%
County Boundary 80.00%
ALI to RCL 93.51%
ALI to SSAP 87.84%
MSAG to RCL N/A file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com https://dma.wi.gov/DMA/oec/programs/nextgen911 https://dma.wi.gov/DMA/divisions/oec/library/2020/WI_NG911_GIS_Data_Standard_and_Best_Practices_FINAL.pdf https://dma.wi.gov/DMA/divisions/oec/library/2020/WI_NG911_GIS_Data_Standard_and_Best_Practices_FINAL.pdf https://www.wlia.org/ https://www.nena.org/?page=NG911GISDataModel https://www.nena.org/?NG911CLDXF https://www.nena.org/?SSAP https://www.nena.org/page/GISDataStewardship https://www.nena.org/page/NG911_TransitionPlng
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 4
Remediation Recommendations
Correct Critical Errors for NG9-1-1 Call Routing and Location Validation
All accuracy information below is estimated and depends on the number of secondary errors that may occur as errors are corrected.
1. Add and populate all mandatory fields or migrate to the WI NG 911 Data Model and populate all mandatory fields
a. DiscrpAgID [srcOfData]
i. Site/Structure Address Points
ii. Road Centerline
iii. Provisioning Boundary
iv. PSAP Boundary
v. County Boundary
vi. Fire Boundary
vii. Law Boundary
viii. EMS Boundary
ix. Incorporated Municipality Boundary
b. Date Updated [LastEdit]
i. Site/Structure Address Points
ii. Road Centerline
iii. Provisioning Boundary
iv. PSAP Boundary
v. County Boundary
vi. Fire Boundary
vii. Law Boundary
viii. EMS Boundary
c. Country
i. Site/Structure Address Points
ii. Road Centerline
iii. Incorporated Municipality Boundary
iv. County Boundary
d. State
i. Site/Structure Address Points
ii. Road Centerline
iii. PSAP Boundary
iv. County Boundary
v. Fire Boundary
vi. Law Boundary
vii. EMS Boundary
viii. Incorporated Municipality Boundary
e. County
i. Site/Structure Address Points file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 5
ii. Road Centerline
f. Incorporated Municipality
i. Site/Structure Address Points (a few)
ii. Road Centerline (a few)
g. Parity
i. Road Centerline
h. Address Number
i. Site/Structure Address Points (a few)
i. Ranges
i. Road Centerline (a few)
j. MSAG Community
i. Site/Structure Address Points (a few)
ii. Road Centerline (a few)
k. ESN
i. Site/Structure Address Points
ii. Road Centerline
2. Remove leading, trailing, multiple and white spaces in all mandatory fields
a. Road Centerline
i. MSAG Community
Mandatory fields are shown in bold font in the charts under Field Mapping starting on page 11.
3. If not already present, add and populate a unique identifier for every layer
a. Site/Structure Address Points
b. Road Centerline
Ultimately the unique ID will be combined with a layer abbreviation, @, and the agency identifier. Examples are:
RCL1234@kenosha.state.wi.us | SSAP131044@kenosha.state.wi.us RCL1234@kenoshajs.org | SSAP131044@kenoshajs.org
4. Correct all values outside of domain (pre-directional, post-type, post-directional, parity, state, country) in the Road Centerline and Site/Structure Address Point data layers
a. Site/Structure Address Points
i. Legacy Type | 142, 50, 83, AV, F, HM, JR, LA, NEST, PKY, TERR, VALE, Z
b. Road Centerlines
i. Legacy Type | AV, LA, NEST, TR, VALE, VIEW
GIS Data Accuracy will increase to 95.55% Overall Accuracy will increase to 94.91% file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 6
NOTE: If the Legacy Types are outside the USPS Pub 28 but match the legacy databases the type should be placed into the Street Name until the legacy databases can be updated.
See the WI and NENA standards reference in the Standards and Reference Documents section for acceptable values.
5. Ensure the Emergency Service Boundaries and PSAP Boundaries are fully covered by the Provisioning Boundary.
6. Correct all Emergency Service and PSAP Boundary gaps and overlaps.
7. Correct all Road Centerline and Site/Structure Address Points not covered by the
Provisioning Boundary
8. Correct all range overlaps in the Road Centerlines
9. Correct all remaining critical errors (NG & WI):
a. Range From higher than To
b. Range Parity
c. Road Centerline complex geometry
d. Road Centerline multipart geometry
e. Road Centerline line in polygon & Site/Structure Address Point zone check (Incorporated Municipality value compared to the value in the Incorporated Municipality Boundary)
f. Site/Structure Address Point duplicates
10. Correct all ALI to Road Centerline Errors
a. Correct in the following order:
i. No matching street name found
ii. Address found multiple times and Address found multiple times on the same feature
1. May already be resolved by correcting road centerline overlaps
iii. Address is higher/lower than compatible ranges
iv. Address falls in a gap in the compatible ranges
v. Address could not be found in the compatible ranges
vi. Address found only in a different ESN and/or Community
vii. ESN only if required by current systems
GIS Data Accuracy will increase to 99.35% Overall Accuracy will increase to 98.65%
GIS Data Accuracy will increase to 99.46% Overall Accuracy will increase to 98.94%
GIS Data Accuracy will increase to 99.01% Overall Accuracy will increase to 98.22% file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 7
Migrate Legacy street name elements to CLDXF street name elements
1. Add the eight (8) CLDXF street name elements or migrate to the WI NG911 Data Model
2. Populate fields using values from the four (4) legacy street name elements in the following order:
a. Legacy Street Name Pre Directional → Street Name Pre Directional
b. Legacy Street Name → Street Name (temporary)
c. Legacy Street Name Type → Street Name Post Type
d. Legacy Street Name Post Directional → Street Name Post Directional
e. Utilize the Street Name (temporary) field to populate the following fields:
i. Street Name Pre Modifier
ii. Street Name Pre Type
iii. Street Name Pre Type Separator
iv. Street Name Post Modifier
f. Update the Street Name field to contain only the street name (no other data for other elements)
NOTES:
• CLDXF must be fully spelled out and no abbreviations.
• If values are populated into the Street Name Pre Modifier field you will need to ensure the values for all other fields are correctly populated. Pre Modifier is BEFORE the pre directional.
• Pre Types and Pre Type Separators must follow the NENA registry (e.g.
AVENUE, HIGHWAY, etc.). The full list can be found here:
o Pre Types:
http://technet.nena.org/nrs/registry/StreetNamePreTypesAndStreetNameP ostTypes.xml o Pre Type Separators:
http://technet.nena.org/nrs/registry/StreetNamePreTypeSeparators.xml
• If values are populated into the Street Name Post Modifier you will need to ensure the values for all other fields are correctly populated. Post Modifier is AFTER the post directional.
• Examples are provided in the Wisconsin NG9-1-1 GIS Standard and will be provided during the educational sessions.
Correct all non-critical errors
1. Correct all Site/Structure Address Points to Road Centerline errors in the following order:
a. No house number
b. No matching street name found
c. Address found on multiple road segments
i. May already be resolved by correct road centerline overlaps
d. Address is higher/lower than compatible ranges
e. Address falls in a gap in the compatible ranges
f. Address could not be found in the compatible ranges file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 8
g. Wrong side
h. Address found only in a different ESN and/or Community
i. ESN only if required by current systems
2. Correct all remaining road centerline errors including but not limited to:
a. Segment not broken at boundaries (Mandatory attribution)
b. Segment topology snapping
3. Correct all ALI to Site/Structure Address Points in the following order:
a. No matching street name found
b. Address found multiple times
i. This may be an indication of missing sub-addressing values in the ALI and may not be correctable in the synchronization process utilizing the existing ALI format.
c. Address found with different house suffix
d. Address found with different unit designation
e. Address is higher/lower than existing house numbers
f. Address lies between existing house numbers
g. Address found only in a different ESN and Community
i. ESN only if required by current systems
Maintenance Recommendations
Maintenance begins when remediation of NG9-1-1 GIS data is critical error free and at or above 98% (best practice). The process of quality control and synchronization is a vital process within maintenance. The following items should be considered in maintenance.
Road Centerlines
• Add elevation for under / overpasses; this may be limited by the local CAD vendor – ensure no conflict prior to adding
• Align the centerlines with bordering cities, counties, and states; data must be “snapped” to borders with neighboring jurisdictions
• Convert 0-0 address ranges to NULL-NULL unless the local CAD software is not compatible or when there is a ½ address which requires a 0 range
• Reach out to military installations within the jurisdiction to obtain the most recent centerline data, if applicable
• Populate validation right / left fields to indicate which centerline should be used for validation | This will be valuable if converting to a GIS based MSAG.
o N – do NOT use for validation
Site / Structure Address Points
• Align address points to structures
• Create access points when required o Hidden entrances, multiple entrances, etc.
• Create points for structures with units or sub-address o Placement based on entrance type – shared/non-shared file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 9
▪ Non-shared: at or near each addressed unit entrance
▪ Shared: may require stacked points o Points should fall within the building footprint
Other important items
• Create basic metadata (additional guidance to be development)
• Review the NENA Information Documents and Standards for changes and updates file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 10
Data Received 9-1-1 Layer County Layer Name Notes
Road Centerlines ROADS_2020
Added and populated UniqueID for QC processing | will need to be added & populated locally for NG911
Separated out address range prefixes and converted range values to numeric values only
IncMuni refinement used for SSAP to RCL sync and RCL range overlaps
MSAG Community refinement used for ALI to RCL sync
No MSAG to RCL sync due to no MSAG provided
Site Structure Address Points
Addresses_2020
Added and populated UniqueID for QC processing | will need to be added & populated locally for NG911
Separated out full address field (ADDRESS) into a house number and full street field (there is a house number suffix field, where the info is not included in the full address, so this will allow for using the house number suffix info and provide more accurate results)
Separated out house number prefixes and converted house number values to numeric values only
IncMuni refinement used for SSAP to RCL SSAP duplicates
MSAG Community refinement used for ALI to SSAP sync
ESN Boundary
ESB Fire Boundary Kenosha_Fire_2020.shp
ESB Law Boundary Kenosha_Law_2020.shp
ESB EMS Boundary Kenosha_EMS_2020.shp
Provisioning Boundary KENOSHA_ProvisioningBo undary
PSAP Boundary Kenosha_PSAP_2020.shp
Incorporated Municipality Boundary
CTV_Jan_2020 GEOID field used for UniqueID field for QC processing
County Boundary KENOSHA_CountyBoundar y
ALI
Kenosha Co MSAG Extract 2-4-21.txt
Converted text file to Excel
Removed VOIP, wireless, cell, etc. records prior to processing
MSAG No MSAG provided file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 11
Field Mapping
PSAP Boundary
Descriptive Name Field Name Field Present (Local)
Local Field Name
Discrepancy Agency ID DiscrpAgID No
Date Updated DateUpdate No
Effective Date Effective No
Expiration Date Expire No
Emergency Service Boundary NENA Globally Unique ID
ES_NGUID Yes GlobalID
State State No
Agency ID Agency_ID No
Service URI ServiceURI No
Service URN ServiceURN No
Service Number ServiceNum No
Agency vCard URI AVcard_URI No
Display Name DsplayName Yes CountyName
Emergency Service Boundary – Fire
Descriptive Name Field Name Field Present (Local)
Local Field Name
Discrepancy Agency ID DiscrpAgID No
Date Updated DateUpdate No
Effective Date Effective No
Expiration Date Expire No
Emergency Service Boundary NENA Globally Unique ID
ES_NGUID Yes GlobalID
State State No
Agency ID Agency_ID No
Service URI ServiceURI No
Service URN ServiceURN No
Service Number ServiceNum No
Agency vCard URI AVcard_URI No
Display Name DsplayName Yes FireJurisd
Emergency Service Boundary – Law
Descriptive Name Field Name Field Present (Local)
Local Field Name
Discrepancy Agency ID DiscrpAgID No
Date Updated DateUpdate No
Effective Date Effective No
Expiration Date Expire No
Emergency Service Boundary NENA Globally Unique ID
ES_NGUID Yes GlobalID
State State No
Agency ID Agency_ID No
Service URI ServiceURI No
Service URN ServiceURN No
Service Number ServiceNum No
Agency vCard URI AVcard_URI No
Display Name DsplayName Yes POLbeatID file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 12
Emergency Service Boundary – EMS
Descriptive Name Field Name Field Present
(Local) Local Field
Name
Discrepancy Agency ID DiscrpAgID No
Date Updated DateUpdate No
Effective Date Effective No
Expiration Date Expire No
Emergency Service Boundary NENA Globally Unique ID
ES_NGUID Yes GlobalID
State State No
Agency ID Agency_ID No
Service URI ServiceURI No
Service URN ServiceURN No
Service Number ServiceNum No
Agency vCard URI AVcard_URI No
Display Name DsplayName Yes MedJurisdi
Provisioning Boundary | County Boundary used
Descriptive Name Field Name Field Present
(Local) Local Field
Name
Discrepancy Agency ID DiscrpAgID No
Date Updated DateUpdate No
Effective Date Effective No
Expiration Date Expire No
Provisioning Boundary NENA Globally Unique ID
PB_NGUID Yes GlobalID
Road Centerlines
Descriptive Name NENA Field Name Field Present
(Local) Local Field Name
Discrepancy Agency ID DiscrpAgID No
Date Updated (Date Edited) DateUpdate No Effective Date Effective No
Expiration Date Expire No
Road Centerline NENA Globally Unique ID
RCL_NGUID Yes JOIN_ID
Left Address Number Prefix (Address Prefix Left)
AdNumPre_L No
Right Address Number Prefix (Address Prefix Right)
AdNumPre_R No
Left FROM Address (From Address Left)
FromAddr_L Yes Ladd1
Left TO Address (To Address Right) ToAddr_L Yes Ladd2
Right FROM Address (From Address Right)
FromAddr_R Yes Radd1
Right TO Address (To Address Right)
ToAddr_R Yes Radd2
Parity Left Parity_L No
Parity Right Parity_R No file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 13
Descriptive Name NENA Field Name Field Present
(Local) Local Field Name
Street Name Pre Modifier St_PreMod No
Street Name Pre Directional St_PreDir No
Street Name Pre Type St_PreTyp No
Street Name Pre Type Separator St_PreSep No
Street Name (Base Street Name) St_Name No
Street Name Post Type St_PosTyp No
Street Name Post Directional St_PosDir No
Street Name Post Modifier St_PosMod No
Abbreviated Pre Modifier*
Legacy Street Name Pre Directional LSt_PreDir Yes MSAGpredir
Legacy Street Name LSt_Name Yes MSAGpretype & MSAGstrname
Legacy Street Name Type LSt_Type Yes MSAGstrtype
Legacy Street Name Post Directional LSt_PosDir Yes MSAGstrdir
Full Street Name* No
Abbreviated Full Street Name* No
ESN Left (Emergency Service Number Left)
ESN_L No
ESN Right (Emergency Service Number Right)
ESN_R No
MSAG Community Name Left MSAGComm_L Yes MSAGmunileft
MSAG Community Name Right MSAGComm_R Yes MSAGmuniright
Country Left Country_L No
Country Right Country_R No
State Left (State Name Left) State_L No
State Right (State Name Right) State_R No
County Left (County Name Left) County_L No
County Right (County Name Right) County_R No
Additional Code Left AddCode_L No
Additional Code Right AddCode_R No
Postal Code Left (Zip Code Left) PostCode_L Yes ZipLeft
Postal Code Right (Zip Code Right) PostCode_R Yes ZipRight
Postal Community Name Left (Municipal Zip Code Name Left)
PostComm_L No
Postal Community Name Right (Municipal Zip Code Name Right)
PostComm_R No
Incorporated Municipality Left (Municipal Name Left)
IncMuni_L Yes Lmunic
Incorporated Municipality Right (Municipal Name Right)
IncMuni_R Yes Rmunic
Unincorporated Community Left UnincCom_L No
Unincorporated Community Right UnincCom_R No file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 14
(Local) Local Field Name
Neighborhood Community Left NbrhdCom_L No
Neighborhood Community Right NbrhdCom_R No
Road Class (Road Classification) RoadClass Yes Class
One-Way (The Flow of Routing) OneWay Yes OneWay
(“both” values are NULL instead of “B”)
Speed Limit SpeedLimit Yes Speed_FT
Validation Left Valid_L No
Validation Right Valid_R No
Site/Structure Address Points
Descriptive Name NENA Field Name Field Present
(Local) Local Field Name
Discrepancy Agency ID DiscrpAgID No
Date Updated (Date Edited) DateUpdate No
Effective Date Effective No
Expiration Date Expire No
Site NENA Globally Unique ID Site_NGUID Yes JOIN_ID
Road Centerline NENA Globally Unique ID *
RCL_NGUID No
Country Country No
State (State Name) State No
County (County Name) County No
Additional Code AddCode No
Additional Data URI AddDataURI No
Incorporated Municipality (Municipal Name)
Inc_Muni Yes Muni
Unincorporated Community Uninc_Comm No
Neighborhood Community Nbrhd_Comm No
Address Number Prefix AddNum_Pre No
Address Number Add_Number Yes HOUSENUM
Address Number Suffix AddNum_Suf No
Street Name Pre Modifier St_PreMod No
Street Name Pre Directional St_PreDir No
Street Name Pre Type St_PreTyp No
Street Name Pre Type Separator St_PreSep No
Street Name (Base Name) St_Name No
Street Name Post Type St_PosTyp No
Street Name Post Directional St_PosDir No
Street Name Post Modifier St_PosMod No
Legacy Street Name Pre Directional LSt_PreDir Yes MSAGpredir
Legacy Street Name LSt_Name Yes MSAGpretype & MSAGstrname
Legacy Street Name Type LSt_Type Yes MSAGstrtype file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 15
(Local) Local Field Name
Legacy Street Name Post Directional LSt_PosDir Yes MSAGstrdir
Abbreviated Post Modifier* FullStNm No
Full Street Name* abFullStNm No
ESN ESN No
MSAG Community Name MSAGComm Yes MSAGmuni Postal Community Name Post_Comm No
Postal Code Post_Code Yes ZIPCODE
ZIP Plus 4 Post_Code4 No
Building (Building Identifier) Building No
Floor (Building Floor) Floor No
Unit Unit No
Room (Building Room) Room No
Seat (Seat Identifier) Seat No
Additional Location Information Addtl_Loc No
Complete Landmark Name LandmkName No
Mile Post Mile_Post No
Place Type Place_Type No
Placement Method (Location Type) Placement No
Longitude Long No
Latitude Lat No
Elevation Elev No
Structure Structure No
Incorporated Municipalities
Descriptive Name Field Name Field Present
(Local) Local Field
Name
Discrepancy Agency ID DiscrpAgID No
Date Updated DateUpdate Yes DOACngDate
Effective Date Effective No
Expiration Date Expire No
Incorporated Municipality NENA Globally Unique ID
IncM_NGUID Yes GlobalID
Country Country No
State State No
County County Yes CNTY_NAME
Additional Code AddCode No
Incorporated Municipality Inc_Muni Yes MCD_NAME
Counties or Equivalents
Descriptive Name Field Name Field Present
(Local) Local Field Name
Discrepancy Agency ID DiscrpAgID No
Date Updated DateUpdate No
Effective Date Effective No
Expiration Date Expire No
County NENA Globally Unique ID CntyNGUID Yes GlobalID file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
Kenosha County, WI NG911 QC Assessment 16
Country Country No
State State No
County County Yes CountyName file://///geo-comm.local/geoshare/Marketing/Marketing_User/Campaign%20Planning/2017/Brand%20Update/Items%20that%20need%20to%20be%20rebranded/www.geo-comm.com
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .