23-RFP-002-TH Addendum 1.pdf
PDF 178 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Return on Investment (ROI) of Workforce Programs
- Solicitation number
- RFP-03471
- Issued by
- Leon County, Florida
About this file
This document is an Addendum to a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for solicitation number 23-RFP-002-TH, titled "Return on Investment (ROI) of Workforce Programs." The RFP seeks to procure statistical methods, processes, and parameters for two ROI models that evaluate Career and Technical Education (CTE) and several federal workforce program outcomes. The contractor will also develop resources, tools, and processes to facilitate the ongoing application of these education and workforce ROI models to new inputs. The RFP has an opening date of December 21, 2022, at 3:00 P.M. EST.
The evaluation criteria for the proposals include Technical Response Submittal (65 points), Past Performance References (10 points), and Cost Proposal (25 points). The RFP specifies that the maximum available points for the Cost Proposal will be awarded to the respondent with the lowest responsive cost proposal, and the remaining respondents will receive a pro-rata portion of the points based on a formula. The jurisdictions involved are Leon County and the City of Tallahassee.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 23-RFP-002-TH Return On Investment (ROI) of Workforce Programs_Final.pdf | ||
| DEO Vendor Core Contract.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
Addendum No. 1
SOLICITATION NO.: 23-RFP-002-TH
SOLICITATION TITLE: Return on Investment (ROI) of Workforce Programs
OPENING DATE: December 21, 2022 at 3:00 P.M., EST
DATE: November 30, 2022
Please be advised that the following changes are applicable to the original and/or previously amended specifications of the above referenced RFP.
Changes to the Specifications are indicated by underscore, deletions are indicated by a strikethrough.
1. Attachment I, Evaluation Criteria is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
ATTACHMENT I
EVALUATION CRITERIA
EVALUATION CRITERIA MAXIMUM
POINTS
AVAILABLE
A. Technical Response Submittal 65
1. Administration and Management (Company Profile) 20
The Respondent must include a description of the organizational structure and management style established and the methodology to be used to control cost, ensure reliable services and to maintain schedules; as well as the means of coordination and communication between the organization and the DEO. Information about the company’s experience shall be submitted including company profile, experience, years in business, salary, and references. The proposal should include three (3) examples of similar projects for separate clients. The proposal should be written in non-technical language to summarize the Respondent’s overall capabilities and approaches for accomplishing the services specified herein. This would include the number of staff and number of hours proposed to complete the services specified herein.
2. Technical Approach 30
The Respondent must explain the approach, capabilities, and methods it proposes to use to accomplish the tasks in the Scope of Work outlining specific details as to how the work will be accomplished. The Respondent should identify any safety concerns and how it will address those issues. Any specific techniques it will use should also be provided.
3. Identification of Key Personnel 15 The Respondent must provide the names of key personnel on the Respondent’s team, as well as a resume for each individual proposed and a description of the functions and responsibilities of each key person relative to the tasks to be performed. The approximate percent of time to be devoted exclusively for this project and to the assigned tasks should also be indicated. The Respondent should also include this information for any vacant positions anticipated to be filled and used in the Contract.
B. Past Performance References 10
C. Cost Proposal 25
D. Total Possible Points for the Response Submittal 100 Points
NOTE: The maximum available points (25 points in total) for the Cost Proposal Submittal will be awarded to the Respondent with the lowest responsive Cost Proposal. The remaining proposals from all other Respondents will be awarded a pro rata portion of points based on the following cost formula:
(A/B = C) x M = P
A = Lowest responsive Cost Proposal
B = Actual responsive Cost Proposal for each of the other Respondents
C = Pro rata portion (percentage) assigned for each of the other Respondents
M = Maximum Points Available for the Cost Proposal (= 25 points)
P = Points Awarded to each of the other Respondents
Addenda or clarifications to this RFP will be posted on the Florida Vendor Information Portal (VIP). It is the Respondent’s responsibility to monitor the Florida Vendor Information Portal for any solicitation updates.
- Remainder of page intentionally left blank -
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .