21Q0005 0001 Update 52.212-2 Addendum.pdf

APRIL MCNELLIE

RCO MCAGTFTC MCAGCC 760.830.5125

TWENTYNINE PALMS CA 92278

M0124421SUC4001

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to modify the FAR 52.212-2 Addendum.

All other solicitation terms and conditions remain the same.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 09-Nov-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X M6739921Q0005

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Nov-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

09-Nov-2020

CODE

REGIONAL CONTRACTING OFFICE

P. O. BOX 788153, BLDG 1102

MCAGCC

TWENTYNINE PALMS CA 92278-8153

M67399 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE M67399

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

M6739921Q0005

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

52.212-2 ADDENDUM

52.212-2 EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS – ADDENDUM

Basis for contract award - This acquisition is being conducted under FAR Parts 12 and 13.5. Quoters will be evaluated using the factors identified in FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial Items and this Addendum. Award will be made utilizing a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection method.

First, the quotes will be ranked in order from lowest to highest based on price. The lowest priced quotation will then be evaluated and receive a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable based on the criteria below. In order to be rated as

Acceptable, the technical quote must meet the Government's requirements as described in the 52.212-1 provision, the 52.212-1 Addendum and this 52.212-2 Addendum. Quotes deemed Unacceptable are those that fail to meet the

Government's minimum requirements.

Past performance will then be evaluated and assigned a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable. In order to be rated as

Acceptable, the past performance must present either a reasonable expectation that the Quoter will successfully perform the required effort or that the Quoter’s performance record is unknown.

If the lowest priced Quoter’s technical quote and past performance are rated acceptable, the Government will then evaluate pricing to determine fair and reasonableness per FAR 13.106-3(a).

If the lowest priced quotation is evaluated to have an acceptable technical quote, acceptable past performance, and fair and reasonable prices, per FAR 13.106-3(a), the Government will complete a responsibility determination IAW the criteria specified in FAR 9.104-1. If found responsible, the Government will stop the evaluation process at this point as that quote represents the best value to the Government. Award shall be made to that Quoter without further consideration of any other quotes.

If the lowest priced quotation is assigned an unacceptable rating (either technical or past performance), or if the price is determined not fair and reasonable or if the Quoter is found to be non-responsible, the next lowest priced quote will be evaluated. This process will continue (in ascending order) until a Quoter is evaluated to have an acceptable technical rating, an acceptable past performance rating, fair and reasonable prices and the Quoter is deemed responsible or until all quotes have been evaluated.

1) Factor One: Technical Capability. The Quoter shall submit resumes detailing pilots/adversary instructors qualifications, proposed aircraft specifications for rotary wing, and, optional, fixed wing adversary support, completed draft DD Form 254 Department of Defenses Contract Security

Classification Specification and include a management plan to meet the task requirements listed in

Section 4 of the PWS.

Technical capability will be evaluated using the below adjectival ratings.

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Quotation meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Quotation does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

M6739921Q0005

2) Factor Two: Price. In order to be considered for award, price must be determined to be fair and reasonable, and balanced (or if unbalanced pricing exists that it does not pose an unacceptable risk to the government) using one or more techniques set forth in FAR 13.106-3(a).

3) Factor Three: Past Performance Information. The Government will conduct a performance risk assessment of the Quoter’s record of past and current performance as noted in the Contractor

Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and the Federal Awardee Performance and

Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) as well as that of its proposed subcontractors and team members as it relates to the probability of successfully performing the requirements of the solicitation.

The past performance evaluation will consider the Quoter's demonstrated recent (within the past three years) and relevant (present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort as the requirement detailed in this solicitation) record of performance in supplying services that meet the solicitation’s requirements. Quoters are advised that in conducting the past performance assessment, the Government may use data provided in the Quoter’s quotation and data obtained from other sources.

Past performance will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis in accordance with the below table.

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Based on the Quoter’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Quoter will successfully perform the required effort, or the Quoter’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the Quoter’s performance record, the

Government has no reasonable expectation that the Quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of a Quoter without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Therefore, the Quoter shall be determined to have “unknown” past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

The Government reserves the right to award no contract at all depending on the quality of the quotes submitted and availability of funds for the requirement. The Government intends to evaluate quotes and award a contract or multiple contracts without requesting or accepting revised quotes. Therefore, the quoters will be advised that their initial quote should contain the most favorable terms and reflect its best possible performance potential. The

Government does reserve the right to clarify aspects of the quotes and hold discussions.

(End of Summary of Changes)