21F0123 JEFO_Redacted.pdf
PDF 129 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USCIS/SPEED/Ekagra Partners
- Solicitation number
- FY25_0011
About this file
This is a Justification for Exception to Fair Opportunity document from USCIS seeking approval for a sole-source extension to Ekagra Partners, LLC for Task Order No. 70SBUR21F00000123. The extension is for DevSecOps services to operate and maintain major USCIS systems, particularly BenefitsHub and related immigration form processing systems.
The extension period is 6 months (January 1, 2025 through June 30, 2025), consisting of a three-month base and three one-month options. Key work includes completing I-829 capacity development, implementing patches for I-914 form suite, finishing I-765 gap analysis, migrating BenefitsHub assets from XD to Figma, resolving I-824 duplicate notice issues, and continuing I-485 digitization work. The justification cites economy and efficiency as the basis for the sole-source extension, noting Ekagra's current satisfactory performance since June 2021 and the impracticality of transitioning to a new contractor given USCIS's 90-day contractor onboarding timeline. A competitive recompete called RIVER (Resources for InnoVation and Enterprise Readiness) is scheduled for award in February 2025 under solicitation 70SBUR24Q00000106.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
www.uscis.gov
Rev: 10/13/2023
Justification for Exception to Fair Opportunity, Exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, SPEED Extension/Ekagra
REFERENCE: Justification Log Number: FY25-0011 and PR Number: OIT256008, OIT255008, OIT255012
1. Agency and Contracting Activity.
The Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Office of Contracting, proposes to modify an existing task order on behalf of the Office of Information Technology (OIT) / Systems Delivery Division (SDD) pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 16.505(b)(2), Exceptions to the fair opportunity process.
2. Nature and/or description of the action being approved.
This action seeks approval for a sole source extension to Ekagra Partners, LLC (Ekagra) via modification to Task Order No. 70SBUR21F00000123 to continue the system maintenance and security work currently within the technical scope being performed. The current task order was competitively awarded in June 2021 through a small business set aside solicitation under the CIO- SP3 Small Business Government-Wide Acquisition Contract.
3. Description of Supplies/Services.
The SPEED Performance Work Statement (PWS) details DevSecOps services to operate and maintain major USCIS systems. The Government requires these services for 6 months, with one three-month base and three one-month options, and a total performance period from 1/1/2025 through 6/30/2025. The total estimated price for this performance period is
This justification seeks approval to continue the following work unique to 70SBUR21F00000123 on BenefitsHub and related systems:
1. Continue to develop the I-829 capacity by repairing the detailed view, editing capacity, and receipting. Slated to be completed in Q2 of FY25.
2. Continue patches on Edit and Read-Only functions on the I-914, I-914A, and I-914B forms.
Slated to be completed in Q2 of FY25.
3. Finish form I-765gap analysis in BenefitsHub. Slated to be presented in Q3 of FY25.
4. Finish migration of BenefitsHub assts from XD to Figma, slated to be completed in Q2 of
FY25.
5. Continue to resolve I-824 dupe approval notice, mark I-918 duplicate notices. Slated to be completed in Q3 of FY25.
6. Continue I-485 digitization and manage production release of I-191 and I-612 forms. Slated to continue through transition to RIVER with major releases through Q3 of FY25.
JEFO, Exceeding the SAT, SPEED - Ekagra Justification Log Number: FY25-0011
4. Statutory exception and supporting rationale.
The applicable statutory FAR citation and basis for using an exception to fair opportunity process is:
FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(C). The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency because it is a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order.
Rationale:
As outlined in the PWS, the work currently being, performed is agile development on various public facing and internal systems, not limited to BenefitsHub. The scope of the current order extends the entire agile process, starting with partnering with the program office to establish user stories and acceptance criteria from communicated priorities. The work extends through development and testing, presentation to product owners, code release, and follow up documentation. It also includes service desk support to process service tickets and system administrators to monitor the health of BenefitsHub and the network which connects them. Ekagra is continuing to implement patches for already digitized forms which are not fully operational in all features required for 508 compliance and optimal functionality. In sum, the work on SPEED – Ekagra is all encompassing of the entire process, from discovery to deployment and maintenance, for the priorities listed in section 3 of this justification and provides ongoing support to priorities that have been established in the last 3 years to promote smooth transition and maintenance.
While the work is iterative in nature, as outlined in the PWS and in the agile development process, with emphasis on trial and constant improvement, the full benefit of a single initiative is not realized in the forms and priorities listed in section 3 of this justification until over the course of several deployments. For example, the agency has prioritized form digitization for several years and has made significant strides via this order to do so. If the agency does not extend this order, the release of form I-191 and I-612 will not be supervised and managed and the Government will not receive benefit from the work put into the digitization process. The PWS for this extension will remain identical to what is currently established under the order to promote efficiency in acquisition and to eliminate complication of contractor performance. The work to be completed under this extension, then, is within the technical scope. Priorities, user story plans, and release schedules are already established and preparing to be implemented for the next iteration of select SPEED work. The work will continue to improve upon current priorities, constantly reinforcing and improving the current capabilities of the systems outlined to service the immigrant and push necessary information to the stakeholder. The work will ensure that security vulnerabilities which arise are patched as is the current nature of iterative releases. It will also ensure that enhancements made to the systems outlined and the connective network are maintained and improved such that they function efficiently and effectively to support the digital immigration process. While Ekagra has proved capable in providing stable services, the work to be completed under this extension will not include discovery work to implement new initiatives. Rather, this work will remain focused on BenefitsHub maintenance and implantation of FY25 agency goals.
Second, this order is in the interest of economy and efficiency. In summary of the established Acceptable Quality Levels and PWS, the contractor is required to release code on a weekly basis, release code without error, collaborate and cooperate with other SPEED contractors, and understand the work well enough to being innovative in problem solving and efficient in resource use. The Government does not anticipate recovery of competition costs for this short extension as the best value remains most achievable under the Ekagra order. The contractor remains capable of maintaining staffing and providing satisfactory services specified in the PWS without having to compromise performance standards that may otherwise be anticipated with a change in contractors to complete initiatives already in progress. Another major risk associated with staffing is the Agency’s Entrance On Duty timeline for new contractors is roughly 90 days. This, coupled with the requirement for transition to a new contractor at the end of the proposed performance period, would render the next 6-months as valueless in terms of development, testing and deployment progress.
The Government performed market research through November 2024 using techniques including surveying industry and Government experts and surveying similar requirements. The conclusions pertaining to economy and efficiency described above are supported by that market research.
Should this task order not be extended, the following forms and tools which are critical to the USCIS mission will not be supported:
Designers will not realize the full benefits of Figma’s real time collaboration features, cloud-based access, and design features if a full migration is not complete.
Edit and read-only functions will not function properly on the suite of I-914 forms, preventing seamless online filing and reducing the benefit the Government receives from its investment.
The I-824 will continue to send improper and duplicate notices, putting stress on the person-to-person customer service system at USCIS.
5. Determination by the contracting officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.
The Contracting Officer has determined that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable. The Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE) for this work was based on two factors. One, three years of acquisition history for the SPEED procurement which shows that the contractor did not require additional funding to complete the scheduled requirements outlined in the PWS. Two, that the original task order award was made on a competitive basis and determined to be a best value to the Government. The labor rates awarded on the IDIQ contract was determined fair and reasonable by the awarding Contracting Officer. Further, the labor rates resulting from the SPEED competition were determined fair by the ordering Contracting Officer. The Government will use any price analysis technique(s) found within FAR 15.404-1(b) to evaluate the extension proposal and may conduct negotiations as necessary to ensure that the price is fair and reasonable.
6. Any other facts supporting the justification.
The recompete for this work has been competitively solicited and is scheduled to be awarded in February 2025 under the nomenclature Resources for InnoVation and Enterprise Readiness (RIVER). The Government has faced numerous delays in awarding the new contracts that further necessitates this sole-source extension. In the interest of economy and efficiency, the Government will continue to prioritize the competitive recompete award. The Government has determined that a non-competitive extension to the current award is the most efficient method to continue system maintenance and the current iteration of SPEED requirements under the Ekagra task order.
The RIVER, acquisition plan was finalized in August 2024. The RIVER requirement services two customers and as such, there were several delays in building out a coding challenge. There are related requirements of a similar scope which were determined to be better acquired if competed separately. The above listed delays, combined with system delays outside of the control of OCON and OIT, contributed to the current need for an exception to fair opportunity.
7. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers that led to the exception to fair opportunity before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services is made.
The Government will continue to work expeditiously towards the competitive award of the SPEED recompete, solicited as RIVER under Request for Quotations Number 70SBUR24Q00000106.
8. USCIS intends to post this requirement on Sam.gov pursuant to FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(D).
9. Technical/Requirements Personnel Certification.
Pursuant to FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(9), I certify that this requirement meets the Government’s minimum need and that the supporting data, which form a basis for the justification, are accurate and complete.
Chris Wallace Date Chief, OIT/SDD
10. Contracting Officer Certification
Pursuant to FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(8), I certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Monty Kurtz Contracting Officer
APPROVAL: Pursuant to FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(10), I hereby determine the circumstance identified in Section 4 applies to the order.
Alternate Procuring Activity Advocate for Competition
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .