Amendment 002.pdf

PDF 230 KB Posted

Attached to
Pool Maintenance Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
20342325Q00005
Issued by
Department of the Treasury Bureau of the Fiscal Service

About this file

This is Amendment 002 to RFQ 20342325Q00005 for Pool Maintenance Services at the Armed Forces Retirement Home (AFRH) in Washington, D.C., issued by the Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service on November 26, 2024.

The amendment provides government responses to two vendor questions, clarifying that the required 96 maintenance visits per year (twice weekly) are not distributed evenly across 52 weeks, but represent a minimum number of visits required. The amendment also confirms that the incumbent pricing is based on a 5-year period. This RFQ is for a firm-fixed-price contract with a 12-month base period and four 12-month option periods, running from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2029.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Pool Maintenance Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment A - Pricing Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 001.pdf PDF
20342325Q00005.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Amendment 002 Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service

Division of Procurement

DATE: November 26, 2024

FROM: Kaitlyn Eaton, Contract Specialist

SUBJECT: RFQ: 20342325Q00005 – AFRH Pool Maintenance Services

Amendment 002

The purposes of this amendment are:

1. To provide the Government’s answer to vendor questions.

Please find vendor submitted questions below with the Government’s response to the questions.

1. On question 16 in Amendment 001. The government response to question 16 "Can you provide an estimate or range for the number of services anticipated during a 12-month period?" says 96 visits during a 12-month period, twice a week, I assume this would not be on a 52-week basis, please clarify.

The Government Response:

Yes, that is correct. twice a week, is not on a 52-week basis. 96 visits at a min.

2. Is the incumbent pricing based on 5 years?

The Government Response:

Yes

2024-11-26T12:14:30-0500
Gregory L. Johnson

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .