Attachment 1 PastPerfQues_RFQ2032H320F00018.doc

DOC document 45 KB Posted

Attached to
BPA for Treasury Departmental Offices Daily Newspaper and Magazine Deliveries
Solicitation number
2032H320Q00018
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Questions and Answers for BPA.docx DOCX document
RFQ2032H320Q00018 Newspaper Subscription BPA v1.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Attachment 1 Reference for: RFQ2032H320Q00018

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION 1: CONTRACT INFORMATION

A. Contract number:

B. Contract type:

C. Was this a competitive contract? Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX

D. Period of performance:

E. Place of performance:

F. Contract Value:

G. Description of service provided:

H. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

NO FORMCHECKBOX

YES: Default FORMCHECKBOX Convenience FORMCHECKBOX Pending Termination FORMCHECKBOX

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 2: EVALUATOR’S INFORMATION

A. Company/Agency:

B. Evaluator's name and title:

C. Evaluator's phone and email:

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 3: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
O
OUTSTANDING - The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that was significantly in excess of anticipated achievements and is commendable as an example to others.
G
GOOD – There are no or very minimal issues and the contractor has met the contract requirements.
A
ACCEPTABLE – Overall compliance required minor involvement by evaluator’s personnel to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
U
UNSATISFACTORY – Non-conformances jeopardized the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of evaluator’s resources. Constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards containing similar requirements.
N
NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
Quality of Product or Service
O
G
A
U
N

Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements

Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program

Program Management, Timeliness of Performance & Business Relations
O
G
F
U
N

Overall contract management (including the ability to lead, manage and control the program)

Contract problems resolved in a timely and effective manner without extensive customer guidance

Level of professionalism and cooperation when dealing with your staff.

Would you hire this contractor in the future to perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Yes FORMCHECKBOX

No FORMCHECKBOX

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature

Date

When completed, this document is source selection sensitive iaw FAR 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .