2027 EGLE EQP 2020 EQP 2030 EQP 2225 Decals BID REQUEST 10-26 .docx
DOCX document 175 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 2027 EGLE EQP 2020 2030 2225 DECALS
- Solicitation number
- RFQ 171 270000000044 1
- Issued by
- Eaton County, Detroit City, Michigan
About this file
This is a printing services bid request issued by the Michigan Department of Technology, Management & Budget for the production of outdoor-use decals for the Department of Environmental Quality, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE). The bid encompasses three distinct decal products: EQP 2020 (250 units at 3" X 9" finished size), EQP 2030 (70 units at 6" X 4" finished size), and EQP 2225 (300 units at 8.5" X 11" finished size). All decals must be manufactured from 4 mil white vinyl with polyester overlam (Fasson 700-G Vinyl or equivalent), die-cut with 1/2" radius round corners, scored on the back, and printed in black ink on a white background. Each product must withstand outdoor weather conditions for a one-year period. Electronic files will be provided by the state, and vendors must submit PDF proofs for approval prior to production. The bid request specifies submission to Bradley M. Schumann, Print Consultant, at the DTMB Print and Mail Management office in Dimondale, Michigan, with a completion date of June 30, 2028.
Vendors must submit a detailed quote letter with their bid, and failure to do so will result in automatic disqualification. Decals are to be wrapped in groups of 10 with split backing and packaged accordingly. The Department of Technology, Management & Budget awards bids based on best price and value to the state, and may reject the lowest bidder if quality concerns exist or requirements cannot be met. Only prequalified vendors are eligible for consideration. No specific set-asides, funding amounts, or contract renewal terms are identified in the bid request.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| State of Michigan Print Mail Management Terms Conditions (1).docx | DOCX document | |
| EQP 2225 SAMPLE ONLY.png | PNG image | |
| Standard Contract Terms - Short Form.pdf | ||
| EQP 2020 EQP 2030 SAMPLE ONLY.png | PNG image |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT & BUDGET
PRINTING SERVICES
BID REQUEST
JOB DESCRIPTION
Title: 2027 EGLE EQP 2020 EQP 2030 EQP 2225 Decals BID REQUEST 10-26
| Quantity: See comments |
| COMMENTS |
Finish Size: See Comments
Electronic file provided, PDF proof required for approval prior to production
EQP 2020
• Fasson 700-G Vinyl or Equivalent
• QTY: 250
• Finished size 3” X 9” die-cut, made of 4 mil white vinyl with polyester overlam
• Die Cut, Round Corner, 1/2” Radius
• For outdoor use and must withstand weather for a 1-year period
• Back of decal to be scored
• Printed in black ink on a white background
DATE CHANGES TO: JUNE 30, 2028
EQP 2030
• QTY:70
• Finished size 6” X 4” die-cut, made of 4 mil white vinyl with polyester overlam
• For outdoor use and must withstand weather for a 1-year period
• Back of decal to be scored
• Printed in black ink on a white background
| • | Fasson 700-G Vinyl or Equivalent. |
| • | Die Cut, Round Corner, 1/2” Radius |
DATE CHANGED TO: JUNE 30,2028
EQP 2225
• Fasson 700-G Vinyl or Equivalent
• QTY: 300
• Finished size 8.5 x 11” X made of 4 mil white vinyl with polyester overlam
• Die Cut, Round Corner, 1/2” Radius
• For outdoor use and must withstand weather for a 1-year period
• Back of decal to be scored
• Printed in black ink on a white background
Sip Back To:
Bradley M. Schumann Print Consultant DTMB Print and Mail Management General Services Building 7461 Crowner Dr.
Dimondale, MI 48821
*Vendor must attach a detailed quote letter(s). Failure to do so will result in bid disqualification.
Ink(s): Black on White Background
Cover:
Text:
Bindery: Split backer
Packing: Wrap in 10
File:
Sample:
Proof: PDF Required
The Department of Technology, Management & Budget awards bids on best price and value to the state. In some situations, the lowest bidder may not receive an award because the bid does not provide best value. Examples include past quality concerns or inability to meet requirements. Only prequalified vendors will be considered.
image1.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .