2025 TK Recruitment and Training_Project Narrative.docx

DOCX document 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Local Food Promotion Program Fiscal Year 2025
Opportunity number
USDA-AMS-TM-LFPP-G-25-0004
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Project Narrative form for the Farmers Market Promotion Program (FMPP) and Local Food Promotion Program (LFPP) 2025 Turnkey Recruitment and Training grant opportunity. The grant is administered by the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service and focuses on supporting local and regional food systems through recruitment, training, and capacity-building activities for agricultural producers and market entities. Applicants must select at least three prescribed project objectives, which include strategies for vendor and producer recruitment, market development, increasing producer viability, and improving food safety practices.

The grant requires a 25% cost share from applicants and offers funding for activities such as developing strategic plans, establishing partnerships, creating market access points, training stakeholders, and enhancing local food production infrastructure. Potential applicants include agricultural businesses, cooperatives, nonprofits, local governments, and tribal organizations. The application requires detailed documentation including a project work plan, budget justification, outcome indicators, and information about key staff and project management. Eligible entities can request federal funds to support various initiatives that expand local food systems, with a focus on increasing market opportunities, improving producer capabilities, and developing regional food chain coordination.

2025 TK Recruitment and Training_Project Narrative.docx

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Farmers Market Promotion Program

AND

Local Food Promotion Program 2025 Turnkey RECRUITMENT AND TRAINING Project Narrative Form and instructions This form is mandatory for all Turnkey Recruitment and Training applications. Turnkey applications do NOT require the completion of the Farmers Market Promotion Program (FMPP) and Local Food Promotion Program (LFPP) Narrative Form. Thoroughly review the applicable FMPP or LFPP Request for Applications (RFA) before completing this form. This form must be converted to PDF and attached to the application package within Grants.gov.

1. Applicant Organization Must match box 8 of the SF-424.

Name:

Email:

Phone:

Mailing Address:

2. Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) This person is responsible for signing any documentation should the grant be awarded. Must match box 21 of the SF-424.

Name:

Email:

Phone:

Mailing Address: ☐ Check if same as above

3. Project Coordinator or Director (PC/PD) This cannot be the same person listed as the AOR.

Name:

Email:

Phone:

Mailing Address: ☐ Check if same as above

4. Applicant Entity Type OMB No. 0581‐0240 Select each applicable entity type as defined in Section 2.1 of the RFA. If your organization is a State Agency Regional Farmers Market Authority, you must provide the regulatory statute(s) that identify your agency as that entity type.

☐ Agricultural Business or Cooperatives ☐ Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) Network or Association ☐ Economic Development Corporation ☐ Food Council ☐ Local Government ☐ Nonprofit Corporation ☐ Producer Network or Association ☐ Public Benefit Corporation ☐ Regional Farmers Market Authority ☐ State Agency Regional Farmers Market Authority (Indicate Regulation Below): Comment by Lakins, Velma - MRP-AMS: Flagging for review. This entity is not listed as an eligible entity in the RFA or in the statutory language.

☐ Tribal Government ☐ Other (Specify Below):

5. Project Activity Category Project activities have already been preselected specific to Recruitment and Training Turnkey project focus.

þ Farmer Recruitment and Retention þ Training and Education

6. Project Title (Provide a descriptive title. Must match box 15 of the SF-424.):

7. Grant Application Project Type (Only select one Program Project Type. Described in Section 3.3 of the RFA) Comment by Lakins, Velma - MRP-AMS: Add language "ONLY select one Program Project Type"

FMPP:

☐ FMPP Turnkey Recruitment and Training

LFPP:

☐ LFPP Turnkey Recruitment and Training

8. Requested Funds Insert the total amount ($) of Federal funds requested. This must match the total amount requested on Line 18a. Estimated Federal Funding of the SF-424.

9. Cost Share Funds Applicant must provide a 25% cost share on the total Federal portion of the grant. This must align with the total amount requested on Line 18b Applicant Funding of the SF-424. See Section 2.4 of the RFA for more information.

10. Does the proposal address the Low Income/Low Access (LI/LA) Priority Consideration as described in Section 3.4 of the RFA?

See instructions on how to determine priority eligibility at Qualifying for Priority Consideration at the end of this form.

☐ Yes ☐ No

11. Project Implementation Physical Address Enter up to three addresses where this project will be implemented. If you are requesting consideration as a priority area, enter the Food Access Research Atlas Low Income/Low Access (LI/LA) Census Tract number. For detailed instructions, see Qualifying for Priority Consideration at the end of this form.

#
Address
LI/LA
LI/LA Census Tract # (if applicable)

Executive Summary In 250 words or less, briefly describe the project’s purpose; activities to be performed, deliverables and expected outcomes; intended beneficiaries; including subrecipients, key partners and collaborators (when applicable); and any other pertinent information. This summary will be made available to the public. Comment by Massey, Elijah - MRP-AMS: Should we add the qualifying “If awarded…” to this sentence?

Technical Merit Work Plan Describe the activities and timeline associated with each project objective selected for the turnkey project. The Turnkey project work plan includes five (5) prescribed objectives. There is flexibility in specific activities, budget, timeline and staffing for each objective. Fill out the table below to include the following information:

A list and description of each planned activity, anticipated date of completion; resource required; milestone(s) for assessing progress and success; and who is responsible for completing the activity, including collaborative arrangements or subcontractors.

Reminder that the project must specifically benefit farm and ranch operations serving local markets, and must benefit more than one agricultural producer, vendor, or individual. To qualify for this Turnkey application, you must work on at least 3 of the objectives in the chart below. For those you will NOT be doing, please mark N/A in the second column for that objective. DO NOT modify this Project Narrative form. The only acceptable modification is to add additional rows to the tables.

Objective:

Include the objective this activity will be tied to List and describe each planned activity:

Include the scope of work and how it relates to the project objectives

Anticipated completion date:
Required resources:

For completion of each activity Milestones:

For assessing progress and success of each activity Who will do the work?

Include collaborative arrangements or subcontractors

Sample Activity 1
October 20XX
Hire contractor

Refrigerator equipment Milestone 1: Complete XX assessment

Milestone 2: Initiate XX equipment purchases ABC Best Contracting Service

XYZ Company’s Executive Director

Identify and analyze new or improved strategies for vendor and producer recruitment, training, or both.

Develop or revise strategies or plans for vendor or producer recruitment, training, or both.

Design materials for vendor and producer recruitment, training, or both.

Implement plans for vendor and producer recruitment, training, or both

Evaluate outcomes related to vendor and producer recruitment, training, or both.

Have you received a past FMPP or LFPP grant award?

☐ Yes ☐ No Have you submitted this project to another Federal grant program?

☐ Yes ☐ No Are you a current Regional Food System Partnership (RFSP) recipient?

☐ Yes ☐ No If yes to the above questions, please provide the information below. Provide AMS agreement number for grants received in the past 5 years. Describe how the project is/was different from previous grants or how it supplements the proposed activities; and the results of the current project (if applicable). Include lessons learned, what can be improved, and how these lessons and improvements will be incorporated into this application to meet program goals effectively and successfully.

Year
Grant award
Program Name, Type of Grant (if applicable) and/or AMS Grant Agreement Number (if applicable)Comment by Massey, Elijah - MRP-AMS: In order to help guide applicants to provide the requested information accurately, should we say:

AMS Grant Agreement number;

OR

Federal Financial Assistance Number (FAIN)?

(I don’t think we need both) Description

Achievability This section includes the outcome indicator evaluation plan.

Outcome Indicators Complete all applicable project Outcomes and Indicators with baseline and/or estimated realistic target numbers. Applicants must choose at least one Outcome and Indicator(s). If an outcome indicator does not apply, check N/A (Not Applicable). For additional information on how to collect data for these outcomes and indicators, refer to the Performance Measures Data Collection Guide. The outcomes below are the FMPP and LFPP outcomes that are specific to the Recruitment and Training Turnkey Application. Comment by Massey, Elijah - MRP-AMS: As with the “regular” PN, should we add a statement notifying applicants that if all indicators related to an outcome’s table are marked “N/A” they may collapse the table (to help with page count limitations)? If so, we might want to add a statement that any collapsed table will be treaded as the applicant indicating the outcome does not apply to the proposed project (since once the applicant uploads a PDF of the PN to grants.gov, the Agency will not have the ability to expand the table’s content following conversion).

Such direction would respond to positive feedback we received regarding applicant’s ability to expand/collapse Outcome/indicator tables in the fillable PDF PN in FY25. However, it also presents the potential for new confusion and the possibility of an applicant collapsing a table which contains relevant indicator information. Comment by Massey, Elijah - MRP-AMS: As with the “regular PN” should we add a statement notifying applicants that if all indicators related to an outcome’s table are marked “N/A” they may collapse the table (to help with page count limitations)? If so, we might want to add a statement that any collapsed table will be treaded as the applicant indicating the outcome does not apply to the proposed project (since once the applicant uploads a PDF of the PN to grants.gov, the Agency will not have the ability to expand the table’s content following conversion).

Such direction would respond to positive feedback we received regarding applicant’s ability to expand/collapse Outcome/indicator tables in the fillable PDF PN in FY25. However, it also presents the potential for new confusion and the possibility of an applicant collapsing a table which contains relevant indicator information. Comment by Lakins, Velma - MRP-AMS: The applicant converts the word document to a PDF to upload in Grants.gov. The PDF will not allow to expand the outcome indicators that have been collapsed. Recommendation to not collapse.

Outcome 2:

Outcome 1: Facilitate Regional Food Chain Coordination Andand Increase Capacity Ofof Direct-To-Consumer Entities Comment by Massey, Elijah - MRP-AMS: Does not align with “regular” PN numbering. Should we revise (this would be Outcome 2)?

Renumbering would align with the approach taken in FY24.

Indicator
Description
Estimated number
N/A
21.1
Total number of partnerships and/or collaborations established between producers/ processors and local/regional supply networks ___. Of those established:
21.1a
The number formalized with written agreements (i.e. MOU’s, signed contracts, etc.)
12.2
Of the total number of partnerships and collaborations identified in 2.1, the number that reported:
12.2a
Expanded/improved regional food systems
12.2b
Higher profits
12.2c
More efficient transportation
12.2d
Improved marketing channels
12.2e
Other mid-tier value chain enhancements
12.3
Total number of stakeholders trained on how to develop or sustain a direct-to-consumer enterprise
12.3a
Of those trained, the number that are new/ beginning producers
12.4
Number of strategic plans developed or updated
12.5
Total number of new direct producer-to-consumer market access points established ___. Of those, the number that were:
12.5a
Farmers markets
12.5b
Roadside stands
12.5c
Agritourism
12.5d
Grocery stores
12.5e
Wholesale markets/buyers
12.5f
Restaurants
12.5g
Agricultural cooperatives
12.5h
Retailers
12.5i
Distributors
12.5j
Food hubs
12.5k
Shared-use kitchens
12.5l
School food programs
12.5m
Community-supported agriculture (CSAs)
12.5n
Other
Outcome 32: Develop Thethe Market Forfor Local/Regional Agricultural ProductsComment by Massey, Elijah - MRP-AMS: Does not align with “regular” PN numbering. Should we revise (this would be Outcome 3)?
Indicator
Description
Estimated number
N/A
23.1
Number of stakeholders that gained technical knowledge about producing, preparing, procuring, and/or accessing local/regional foods ___. Of those, the number that were:
23.1a
Farmers Markets
23.1b
Roadside Stands
23.1c
Agritourism
23.1d
Grocery stores
23.1e
Wholesale markets/buyers
23.1f
Restaurants
23.1g
Agricultural cooperatives
23.1h
Retailers
23.1i
Distributors
23.1j
Food hubs
23.1k
Shared-use kitchens
23.1l
School food programs
23.1m
Community supported agriculture (CSAs)
23.1n
Other
23.2
Total number of delivery systems/market access points that increased engagement with local/regional producers ___. Of those, the number that were:
23.2a
Farmers Markets
23.2b
Roadside Stands
23.2c
Agritourism
23.22d
Grocery stores
23.22e
Wholesale markets/buyers
23.22f
Restaurants
23.22g
Agricultural cooperatives
23.22h
Retailers
23.22i
Distributors
23.22j
Food hubs
23.22k
Shared-use kitchens
23.22l
School food programs
23.22m
Community supported agriculture (CSAs)
23.22n
Other
23.3
Number of new tools/ technologies developed to improve local/regional food processing, distribution, aggregation, or storage ___.
23.3a
Number of stakeholders trained to use new tools/technologies
23.4
Number of delivery systems/market access points that reported increased or improved:
23.4a
Processing
23.4b
Distribution
23.4c
Storage
23.4d
Aggregation of locally/ regionally produced agricultural products
23.5
Total number of delivery systems/market access points that established and/or expanded local/regional agricultural product or service offerings___. Of those, the number that were:
23.5a
Farmers Markets
23.5b
Roadside Stands
23.5c
Agritourism
23.5d
Grocery stores
23.5e
Wholesale markets/buyers
23.5f
Restaurants
23.5g
Agricultural cooperatives
23.5h
Retailers
23.5i
Distributors
23.5j
Food hubs
23.5k
Shared-use kitchens
23.5l
School food programs
23.5m
Community supported agriculture (CSAs)
23.5n
Other
23.6
Number of delivery systems/market access points that reported increased:
23.6a
Revenue
23.6b
Sales
23.6c
Cost savings
Outcome 43: Increase Viability Ofof Local/Regional Producers Andand ProcessorsComment by Massey, Elijah - MRP-AMS: Does not align with “regular” PN numbering. Should we revise (this would be Outcome 4)?
Indicator
Description
Estimated number
N/A
34.1
Number of producers/processors who gained knowledge about new market opportunities
34.23
Number of producer/processors that reported increased engagement with new delivery systems or market access points
34.3
Number of producers/processors that implemented new or improved operational methods
34.4
Number of value-added agricultural products developed
34.5
Number of producers/processors that reported selling new local/regional food products
34.5a
Number that reported selling new value-added products
34.6
Number of producers/processors that reported a reduction in on-farm food waste through new business opportunities and marketing
34.7
Number of producers/ processors that reported increased:
34.7a
Revenue
34.7b
Sales and/or
34.7c
Cost savings due to local/regional food, operational, and/or value-added product activities
34.8
Number of local/regional agricultural jobs
34.8a
Created
34.8b
Maintained
34.9
Total number of new producers who went into local/regional food production ___. Of those, number who are:
34.9a
Beginning farmers/ranchers
34.9bd
Veteran farmers/ranchers
Outcome 54: Improve Food Safety Oof Local/Regional Agricultural ProductsComment by Massey, Elijah - MRP-AMS: Does not align with “regular” PN numbering. Should we revise (this would be Outcome 5)?
Indicator
Description
Estimated number
N/A
45.1
Number of stakeholders that gained knowledge about prevention, detection, control, and/or intervention food safety practices, including relevant regulations to mitigate risk (and to improve their ability to comply with the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) and/or meet the standards for aligned third party food safety audits such as Harmonized GAP/GHP)
45.23
Number of stakeholders that:
45.23a
Established a food safety plan
45.23b
Revised or updated their food safety plan
45.3
Number of specialty crop stakeholders who implemented new/improved prevention, detection, control, and intervention practices, tools, or technologies to mitigate food safety risks (and/or to improve their ability to comply with the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) and/or meet the standards for aligned third party food safety audits such as Harmonized GAP/GHP)
45.4
Number of prevention, detection, control, or intervention practices developed or enhanced to mitigate food safety risks
45.5
Number of stakeholders that used these grant funds to:
45.5a
Purchase

þ

45.5b
Upgrade food safety equipment

þ

Expertise and Partners Key Staff (Applicant Personnel and External Partner/Collaborators) List key staff, including applicant personnel and external project partners and collaborators (see section 33.23 in the RFA for definitions) that comprise the Project Team, their role, their relevant experience, and past successes in developing and operating projects similar to those to be conducted under this project. Applicant must include Letters of Commitment from Partner and Collaborator Organizations to support the information (see section 4.8 5.2.7 in the RFA). If needed, add additional rows. Comment by Massey, Elijah - MRP-AMS: Should we add language directing an applicant to add rows to the table as needed?

Or is there a single place (p.1?) where we can provide such guidance applicable to all tables in the PN?

Key staff Name and Title

Role
Relevant experience and past successes

Project Management Plan Describe your management plan for coordination, communication, and data sharing and reporting among members of the Project Team and stakeholder groups, including both internal applicant personnel and external partners and collaborators.

Fiscal Plan and Resources Please complete the Budget and Justification below and ensure that you have included Critical Resources and Infrastructure letters to support the application information (see section 4.9 5.2.8 in the RFA). If needed, add additional rows to the tables. You must fill the SF-4234 A Budget Information Non – Construction Programs Form along with this section Budget and JustificationSummary The budget must show the total cost for the project and describe how category costs listed in the budget are derived. The budget justification must provide enough detail for reviewers to easily understand how costs were determined and how they relate to the Project Objectives and Expected Outcomes. The budget must show a relationship between work planned and performed to the costs incurred. The budget summary table totals must match with the subtotals for each expense category.

Refer to RFA Section 3.6 Allowable and Unallowable Costs and Activities for more information on allowable and unallowable expenses.

Budget Summary

Expense category
Federal funds
Cost Sshare or match

applicant and 3rd parties

Personnel

Fringe benefits

Travel

Supplies

Contractual

Other (specify)

Direct costs subtotal

Indirect costs

Total budget (direct + indirect)

Personnel List each person who has a substantive role in the project and the amount of the request and/ or the value of his or her cost share match. Personnel costs should be reasonable for the services rendered, conform to the established written policy of your organization, and consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities. For annual salary please provide the salary for each year.

#
Personnel Name/title and justification for requesting fundsComment by Massey, Elijah - MRP-AMS: As with the “regular PN” staff reported that separating the “justification” for each cost as a separate section following each expense category table were a valuable modification in FY24 to the PN format.

Suggest we consider a similar approach for the FY25 PN.

Level of effort (# of hours OR

% FTE)

Annual Ssalary requested
Total Ffunds Requested
MatchCost Share Vvalue
MatchCost Share tType

Year 1: $ Year 2: $

$
$
Cash: ☐

In-Kind: ☐

Year 1: $

$
$
Cash: ☐

Year 1: $

$
$
Cash: ☐

In-Kind: ☐

Personnel subtotals:
$
$

PERSONNEL JUSTIFICATION

For each individual listed in the above table, describe the activities to be completed by name/title including approximately when activities will occur.

Personnel 1: Justification Personnel 2: Justification Personnel 3: Justification Personnel subtotals: $ $ Fringe Benefits Provide the fringe benefit rates for each of the project’s salaried employees listed above. The costs of fringe benefits should be reasonable and in line with established policies of your organization.

#
Fringe Benefits Name/tTitle
Fringe Benefit Rate
Funds Requested
MatchCost Share Value
MatchCost Share Type
$
$
Cash: ☐
$
$
Cash: ☐
$
$
Cash: ☐

In-Kind: ☐

Fringe Benefits Subtotals:
$
$

Fringe benefits subtotals: $ $ Travel Explain the purpose for each Trip Request. Please note that travel costs are limited to those allowed by formal organizational policy; in the case of air travel, project participants must use the lowest reasonable commercial airfares. For recipient organizations that have no formal travel policy and for-profit recipients, allowable travel costs may not exceed those established by the Federal Travel Regulations, issued by GSA, including the maximum per diem and subsistence rates prescribed in those regulations. This information is available at http://www.gsa.gov.

Trip #
Trip Ddestination, timing, and justification for requesting funds
Type of expense

(airfare, car rental, hotel, meals, mileage, etc.)

Unit of measure (days, nights, miles)

# of units
Cost Per Unit
Travelers Claiming Expense
Funds Requested
MatchCost Share Value
MatchCost Share Type
$
$
Cash: ☐
$
$
Cash: ☐
$
$
Cash: ☐

In-Kind: ☐

Travel subtotals:
$
$

CONFORMING WITH YOUR TRAVEL POLICYTravel subtotals: $ $

☐ By checking this box, I affirm that my organization’s established travel policies will be adhered to when completing the above-mentioned trips in accordance with 23 CFR 2300.474 or 48 CFR subpart 31.23, as applicable.

TRAVEL JUSTIFICATION

For each trip listed in the above table, describe the purpose of this trip and how it will achieve the objectives and outcomes of the project. Be sure to include approximately when the trip will occur.

Trip 1: (Approximate Date of Travel MM/YYYY), justification Trip 2: (Approximate Date of Travel MM/YYYY), justification Trip 3: (Approximate Date of Travel MM/YYYY), justification

Supplies List the materials, supplies, and fabricated parts costing less than $510,000 per unit and describe how they will support the purpose and goal of the proposal.

Item #
Item Description
Cost Per-unit
# of units/pieces purchased
Acquisition Date
Funds requested
MatchCost Share value
MatchCost Share type
$
$
Cash: ☐
$
$
Cash: ☐
$
$
Cash: ☐

In-Kind: ☐

Supplies subtotal:
$
$Comment by Massey, Elijah - MRP-AMS: Add item # column for consistency with other tables.

Supplies subtotal: $ SUPPLIES JUSTIFICATION Describe the purpose of each supply listed in the table above purchased and how it is necessary for the completion of the project's objective(s) and outcome(s).

Supply 1: Justification Supply 2: Justification Supply 3: Justification Contractual The Contractual section includes contractual, consultant, and subaward agreements that are part of the completion of the project. A subaward is an award provided by the non –federal entity to a subrecipient for the subrecipient to carry out part of a Federal award received by the non-federal entity. Contractual/consultant costs are expenses associated with purchasing goods and/or procuring services performed by an individual or organization other than the applicant in the form of a procurement relationship. If there is more than one contractor or consultant or subaward, each must be described separately.

Type
Contractual Name/oOrganization and justification for requesting funds
Hourly / Flat Rate
Funds Requested
MatchCost Share Value
MatchCost Share Type

☐ Contract ☐ Subaward

$
$
Cash: ☐

In-Kind: ☐

$
$
Cash: ☐

In-Kind: ☐

$
$
Cash: ☐

In-Kind: ☐

Contractual subtotal:
$
$

CONFORMING WITH YOUR PROCUREMENT STANDARDS Contractual subtotal: $ $ ☐ By checking this box, I affirm that my organization followed the same policies and procedures used for procurements from non-federal sources, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations and conform to the Federal laws and standards identified in 23 CFR §2300.317 through §2300.3237, as applicable. If the contractor(s)/consultant(s) is/are not already selected, I affirm that my organization will follow the same requirements.

CONTRACTUAL JUSTIFICATION

Provide for each of your real or anticipated contractors listed above a description of the project activities each will accomplish to meet the objectives and outcomes of the project. Each section should also include a justification for why contractual/consultant services are to be used to meet the anticipated outcomes and objectives. Include timelines for each activity. If contractor employee and consultant hourly rates of pay exceed the salary of a GS-15 step 10 Federal employee in your area, provide a justification for the expenses. This limit does not include fringe benefits, travel, indirect costs, or other expenses. If awarded, copies of the contractual agreements will be required.

Contractual 1: Justification Contractual 2: Justification Contractual 3: Justification

Other Include any expenses not covered in any of the previous budget categories. Be sure to break down costs into cost/unit. Expenses in this section include, but are not limited to, meetings and conferences, communications, rental expenses, advertisements, publication costs, and data collection.

Item #
Item Description and Justification for Requesting Funds
Per-Unit Cost
# of Units/Pieces Purchased
Acquire When?Acquisition Date
Funds Requested
MatchCost Share Value
MatchCost Share Type
$
$
Cash: ☐
$
$
Cash: ☐
$
$
Cash: ☐

In-Kind: ☐

Other subtotal:Comment by Massey, Elijah - MRP-AMS: Add item # column for consistency with other tables.
$
$

Other subtotal: $ $OTHER JUSTIFICATION Describe the purpose of each item listed in the table above and how it is necessary for the completion of the project's objective(s) and outcome(s).

Other 1: Justification Other 2: Justification Other 3: Justification Indirect Indirect costs (also known as “facilities and administrative costs”—defined at 23 CFR §2300.1) represent the expenses of doing business that are not readily identified with a particular grant, contract, or project function or activity, but are necessary for the general operation of the organization and the conduct of activities it performs. For the indirect cost formula and additional information, refer to Section 3.74.2 of the RFA.

Indirect Cost Rate Requested (%)
Funds Rrequested
MatchCost Share Vvalue
MatchCost Share Ttype
$
$
Cash: ☐

Qualifying for Priority Consideration Food Access Research Atlas (Atlas) http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-access-research-atlas.aspx Once you enter the Atlas, check one of the four the map layer(s) that applies to the proposal’s targeted community.

Zoom in on the map to identify your community. Clicking on your targeted area will produce the census tract and additional information about the locale. In the example below, the dark green area qualifies as low income and low access, and the census tract would be 35047957600.

Equal Opportunity Statement USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Paperwork Burden Statement According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501), an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0581-02340. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 4 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

image1.png image2.png image3.png image4.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .