2024-326C Application Package - 508 FINAL.docx
DOCX document 2 MB Posted
- Opportunity number
- ED-GRANTS-022224-001
- Issued by
-
Department of Education
About this file
This document provides an application package for a cooperative agreement federal grant opportunity issued by the Department of Education. The grant solicitation aims to establish a National Center on Rigorous Comprehensive Education for Students with Disabilities under the Special Education Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities program (CFDA #84.326). Eligible applicants include state and local governments, nonprofits, higher education institutions, and tribal organizations. The project period is five years with annual awards up to $5 million. The purpose is to promote academic achievement and improve outcomes for children with disabilities through technical assistance, model demonstration projects, and dissemination of evidence-based practices. Applications were due February 24, 2024.
2024-326C Application Package - 508 FINAL
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2024-08759.pdf | ||
| 2024-06376.pdf | ||
| 2024-326C Application Package - 508 FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2024-326C Application Package - 508 FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2024-03595.pdf | ||
| 2022-26554.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
U.S. Department of Education
OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION & REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS
WASHINGTON, DC 20202
FISCAL YEAR 2024
APPLICATION FOR NEW GRANTS UNDER THE
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT (IDEA)
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND DISSEMINATION TO IMPROVE SERVICES AND RESULTS FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM
(ALN 84.326)
APPLICATIONS FOR NEW AWARDS;
NATIONAL CENTER ON RIGOROUS COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
(ALN 84.326C)
dated material: open immediately closing date: April 25, 2024 form approved — omb no. 1820-0028, exp. date: 07/31/2025
B-1 A-2
Contents
| Applicant Letter | A1 |
| Notice Inviting Applications | A6 |
| Federal Register Notice | A7 |
| Grants.gov Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants | A50 |
| Priority Description and Selection Criteria | B1 |
| National Center on Rigorous Comprehensive Education for Students with Disabilities | B2 |
| Selection Criteria and Format for the Applications for New Awards— National Center on Rigorous Comprehensive Education for Students with Disabilities (CFDA 84.326C) Competition | B26 |
| General Information on Completing an Application | C1 |
| Application Transmittal Instructions and Requirements for Intergovernmental Review | D1 |
| Appendix | D5 |
| Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs | D6 |
| State Single Points of Contact (SPOCs) | D7 |
| Notice to All Applicants Ensuring Equitable Access and Application Forms and Instructions | E1 |
| Part I: Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) | E6 |
| Part II: Budget Information (ED Form 524) | E23 |
| Part III: Application Narrative | E28 |
| Part IV: Assurances and Certifications | E29 |
| ED General Education Provisions Act (GEPA) 427 Form | E30 |
| Certification Regarding Lobbying….. | E32 |
| Grant Application Receipt Acknowledgement | E36 |
| Grant and Contract Funding Information | E36 |
Paperwork Burden Statement According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 1820-0028. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 45 hours and 40 minutes per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to:
U.S. Department of Education Washington, DC 20202-4651 If you have comments or concerns regarding the status of your individual submission of this form, write directly to:
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education 400 Maryland Ave. SW Washington, DC 20202
Applicant Letter
A-4 Dear Applicant, This application packet contains information and the required forms for you to use in submitting a new application for funding under one program authorized by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This packet covers one competition under the Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities (Assistance Listing Number 84.326) program— Applications for New Awards; Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities-- National Center on Rigorous Comprehensive Education for Students with Disabilities (Assistance Listing Number 84.326C).
Please take the time to review all of the applicable requirements, definitions, selection criteria, and application instructions thoroughly. An application will not be evaluated for funding if the applicant does not comply with all of the procedural rules that govern the submission of the application or if the application does not contain the information required. (EDGAR §75.216 (b) and (c)).
Please note the following:
· Grants.gov Application Submission and SAM Registration.
Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (www.Grants.gov). Please read carefully the Grants.gov Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants document included on page A-48, which includes helpful tips about submitting electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site. Grants.gov registration involves many steps including registration on SAM (www.sam.gov) which may take approximately one week to complete but could take as many as several weeks to complete. You may begin working on your application while completing the registration process, but you cannot submit an application until all of the Registration steps are complete. Please note that once your SAM registration is active, it will take 24-48 hours for the information to be available in Grants.gov. You cannot submit an application through Grants.gov until Grants.gov has received your SAM registration information. We strongly encourage you to familiarize yourself with SAM and Grants.gov, and strongly recommend that you register and submit early.
Applicants are required to upload any narrative sections and all other attachments to your application as files in either Portable Document Format (PDF) or Microsoft Word. However, it is recommended that applicants upload files as PDFs.
Information on computer and operating system compatibility with Adobe and links to download the latest version of Adobe are available on Grants.gov. Please note that you must follow the Application Procedures as described in the Federal Register notice announcing this grant competition. Information (including dates and times) about how to submit your application electronically can also be found in section D of this application package, Application Transmittal Instructions and Requirements for Intergovernmental Review. Additional instructions for sending applications electronically are provided on page D-2, Application Forms and Instructions for Grants.gov Applications.
· MAXIMUM AWARD AMOUNT.
The competition included in this package has maximum award amounts. Please refer to the specific information for the priority/competition to which you are submitting an application (i.e., Section D of this package) for detailed budget information for the total grant period requested. Please be advised that for the priority in this package, the maximum award amount covers all project costs including indirect costs.
· RECOMMENDED PAGE LIMITS AND LINE SPACING OF APPLICATION NARRATIVE.
The competition included in this package limits the Application Narrative to a recommended number of double-spaced pages. This recommended page limit and double-line spacing applies to all material presented in the application narrative. This recommended double-line spacing applies to all titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, reference citations, and captions, as well as all text in charts, tables, figures, graphs, screen shots, and logic models included in the application narrative. (Please refer to the specific recommendations on page limits for the priority/competition to which you are submitting an application, Section B of this package).
· FORMAT FOR OTHER SECTIONS OF THE APPLICATION.
Additional information regarding formatting applications has been included on page C-2 of the “General Information on Completing an Application” section of this package.
Appendix A: Reviewers will be instructed to review the content of Appendix A as they do the application narrative. Reviewers will not be required to review any other appendices.
Charts, tables, figures, graphs, screen shots and logic models that provide information directly relating to the application requirements for the narrative should be the only items included in Appendix A. Appendix A should not be used for supplementary information. Please note that charts, tables, figures, graphs, screen shots, and logic models can be single-spaced when placed in Appendix A.
Abstract: For the application Abstract, applicants should use the template located at:
https://www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/osep/new-osep-grants.html.
ABSOLUTE PRIORITY.
This competition includes one absolute priority and, within that absolute priority. The Department will use peer reviewers to review and score applications on the selection criteria.
Prior to the peer review, Department staff will determine if an application has met the qualifications of the absolute priority and is eligible for peer review. An application that has not met the absolute priority will not be considered for funding and may not be reviewed.
PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH.
The discretionary grant Application Form SF-424 requires applicants to indicate whether they plan to conduct research involving human subjects at any time during the proposed project period. The Protection of Human Subjects in Research Attachment is an integral part of the SF-424 form. It includes information that applicants need to complete the protection of human subjects item and, as appropriate, to provide additional information to the Department regarding human subjects research projects. Additional information on completing the protection of human subjects item is also available and can be accessed on the internet at:
http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/humansub.html
RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE AND RESULTS ACT (GPRA)
As required by the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010, the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) has developed a strategic plan for measuring GPRA performance. The program included in this announcement is authorized under Part D - National Activities to Improve Education of Children with Disabilities of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Projects funded under this competition are required to submit data on GPRA performance measures as directed by OSEP. See Performance Measures included in the Priority Description section of this application package. Applicants are encouraged to consider this information when preparing their applications.
COPIES OF THE APPLICATION.
Unless you qualify for an exception in accordance with the instructions found in the Notice inviting applications, you must submit your application electronically. Therefore, you do not need to submit paper copies of the application. If you are granted an exception, current Government-wide policy requires that an original and two paper copies need to be submitted. Please note: If an application is recommended for funding and a grant award is issued, we will contact the applicant to request an electronic copy of the application in MS Word or a PDF file. The Department is moving toward an electronic grant filing system and an electronic copy of all applications that are being funded will facilitate this effort.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
OSEP also provides information on developing performance measures and logic models at https://www.osepideasthatwork.org/logicModel to assist you in preparing a quality application. For information about other U.S. Department of Education grant and contract opportunities, we encourage you to use the Department's grant information web page which can be accessed on the internet at http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/grants/grants.html.
We appreciate your efforts to improve the provision of services for individuals with disabilities.
Sincerely, /s/ David J. Cantrell, OSEP Deputy Director and Acting Research to Practice Division Director
A-2
Notice Inviting Applications
A-5 Federal Register Notice 4000-01-U
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities-- National Center on Rigorous Comprehensive Education for Students with Disabilities AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
Overview Information:
Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities-- National Center on Rigorous Comprehensive Education for Students with Disabilities Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2024.
Assistance Listing Number (ALN): 84.326C.
Dates:
Applications Available: February 22, 2024.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: April 25, 2024.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: June 21, 2024.
Pre-Application Webinar Information: No later than February 27, 2024, the Office of Special Education Programs and Rehabilitative Services will post pre-recorded informational webinars designed to provide technical assistance (TA) to interested applicants. The webinars may be found at https://www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/osep/new-osep-grants.html.
Addresses:
For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal Register on December 7, 2022 (87 FR 75045) and available at http://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/12/07/2022-26554/common-instructions-for-applicants-to-department-of-education-discretionary-grant-programs For Further Information Contact:
David Emenheiser Telephone: (202) 987-0124 Email: David.Emenheiser@ed.gov
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.
Full Text of Announcement I. Funding Opportunity Description Purpose of Program:
The purpose of the Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities program is to promote academic achievement and to improve results for children with disabilities by providing technical assistance (TA), supporting model demonstration projects, disseminating useful information, and implementing activities that are supported by scientifically based research.
Priority:
This competition includes one absolute priority. In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(v), the absolute priority is from allowable activities specified in or otherwise authorized in sections 663 and 681(d) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. 1463 and 1481(d)).
Absolute Priority:
For FY 2024 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
The National Center on Rigorous Comprehensive Education for Students with Disabilities.
Background:
| Students receiving special education and related services are general education students first and foremost. In the 2004 reauthorization of IDEA, Congress found that “[a]n effective educational system serving students with disabilities should maintain high academic achievement standards and clear performance goals for children with disabilities, consistent with the standards and expectations for all students in the educational system and provide for appropriate and effective strategies and methods to ensure that all children with disabilities have the opportunity to achieve those standards and goals.” 20 U.S.C. 1450(4)(A). “Raise the Bar: Lead the World is the U.S. Department of Education's call to action to transform P-12 education and unite around what truly works—-based on decades of experience and research—-to advance educational equity and excellence” (www.ed.gov/raisethebar/), including for students with disabilities. Through the Raise the Bar initiative, the Department seeks to focus attention to “deliver a comprehensive and rigorous education for every student.” Currently, students with disabilities too frequently lack access to a rigorous comprehensive education and remain under-challenged to achieve and progress from grade to grade (Cole et al., 2023). |
| A cornerstone of special education under IDEA is a free appropriate public education (FAPE) in the least restrictive environment (LRE). It is through high-quality person-centered[footnoteRef:2] individualized education programs (IEPs) that local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools plan and deliver evidence-based instruction, supports, and services to students with disabilities to provide FAPE in the LRE. However, States, LEAs, and schools continue to face significant challenges with providing FAPE, including person-centered, rigorous, and specially designed instruction and service delivery. Recent research indicates that the majority of IEPs are incomplete and lack substantive sufficiency of the statement of present levels of performance, which is the crucial initial component of a person-centered IEP (e.g., Hott et al., 2021; Lequia et al., 2023). Although LEA, school-level, and classroom-level programming directly influence student outcomes, school teams are often too overwhelmed to implement the many projects, priorities, curricula, frameworks, and initiatives they are tasked to do (Wong et al., 2017). Schools end up piecing together multiple competing and fragmented priorities, instructional materials, and programs (Kaufman et al., 2020). [2: Some States and organizations have defined “person-centered,” as used in this notice, to reference when students and their families are actively sought to participate in their schooling, including IEP development and implementation, the course of study, and related and transition services, however this term is still developing in the field. The discussions and decisions leading to a person-centered program are founded upon the unique school, extracurricular, and post-secondary strengths, interests, and goals of the student and their family.] |
| Schools have supported students’ academic recovery in post-COVID schooling through accelerated learning, compensatory education, mental health supports, trauma-informed practices, and other activities (Page et al., 2021), but study findings suggest that the pandemic worsened existing inequity (Kuhfeld et al., 2022). As a result, LEAs and schools often struggle to address the needs of students with disabilities. School personnel need strategies, resources, and supports to assist them in streamlining, braiding, blending, and integrating instructional materials, standards, initiatives, frameworks, priorities, and practices into comprehensive and rigorous programming, which can result in increased and improved access, opportunities, and outcomes for students with disabilities as a whole and among subpopulations (e.g., disability category, age, grade, gender, race, ethnicity). |
| The current instructional environment is further challenged when novice and underqualified personnel provide instruction and services to students with disabilities, serve on IEP teams, and manage caseloads of students with disabilities (Garcia et al., 2019). The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) data show that 45 percent of public schools are operating without a full teaching staff (https://ies.ed.gov/schoolsurvey/), with special education positions disproportionately vacant, and 52 percent report great difficulty in filling vacancies by teachers with the appropriate certification or license. Additionally, all school professionals, including special education and general education personnel, should have a strong understanding of their roles on school teams to develop rigorous IEPs and to implement instruction and service delivery consistent with students’ IEPs (Lequia et al., 2023). Teams must work together to develop and implement rigorous and comprehensive educational programming that allows students with disabilities to meet person-centered, rigorous objectives across the school’s curricular, co-curricular, and extracurricular offerings. |
| Taken together, these challenges indicate the local context remains both unique from LEA to LEA and crucial to the programming offered, the objectives identified, and the services and supports needed to overcome the challenges and meet the objectives. To assist in addressing them, this project will develop and disseminate models and resources and provide TA to school teams to support the development and implementation of a rigorous and comprehensive education, which will result in improved educational results and functional outcomes for students with disabilities. |
Priority:
The purpose of this priority is to fund a cooperative agreement to establish and operate a National Center on Rigorous Comprehensive Education for Students with Disabilities (project). The project will assist public, private, charter, Tribal, and correctional school teams, including administration, general and special education, related services, families, the community, and, to the extent possible, students, to increase the number and quality of evidence-based[footnoteRef:3] IEPs with person-centered, rigorous objectives, the implementation of which will support the progress of students with disabilities from grade to grade and preparation for postsecondary education, employment, and community living. [3: For the purposes of this priority, “evidence-based” means, at a minimum, evidence that demonstrates a rationale (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1) based on high-quality research findings or positive evaluation that such activity, strategy, or intervention is likely to improve student outcomes or other relevant outcomes.]
| The project must achieve, at a minimum, the following expected outcomes: |
| (a) Support of school teams to achieve consistent implementation of person-centered specially designed instruction, related services, and accommodations consistent with the students’ IEPs and through use of evidence-based and best instructional practices to allow students with disabilities to achieve person-centered, rigorous objectives; |
| (b) Development and use of models for streamlining, braiding, blending, and integrating instructional materials, standards, initiatives, frameworks, priorities, and practices into a cohesive school-wide program easing professional burden while simultaneously raising school team expectations of students with disabilities to achieve person-centered, rigorous objectives; |
| (c) Development and increased use of evidence-based strategies, resources, and supports that allow schools to provide rigorous educational programming to prepare students with disabilities for postsecondary education, employment, and community living; and |
| (d) Support of school teams to achieve improved equity of access, opportunities, achievement, attainment, and outcomes, including academic achievement and social, emotional, and behavioral development by students with disabilities as a whole group and among disaggregated groups. |
| In addition to these programmatic requirements, to be considered for funding under this priority, applicants must meet the application and administrative requirements in this priority, which are: |
| (a) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under “Significance,” how the proposed project will-- |
| (1) Identify and address the challenges to forming and sustaining effective school teams that include administration, general and special education personnel, related services providers, families, the community, and students; |
| (2) Identify and address the challenges facing public, private, charter, Tribal, and correctional school teams in their substantive and procedural implementation of educational programming for children with disabilities; and |
| (3) Apply evidence-based strategies and best practices that will effectively address the nature and magnitude of the challenges, described in response to paragraphs (a)(1) and (2), within a variety of schools, LEAs, and community contexts. |
| (b) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under “Quality of project services,” how the proposed project will-- |
| (1) Ensure equal access and treatment for members of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national origin, gender, age, or disability. To meet this requirement, the applicant must describe how it will-- |
| (i) Identify the needs of the intended recipients for TA and information; and |
| (ii) Ensure that services and products meet the needs of the intended recipients of the project services; |
| (2) Achieve its goals, objectives, and intended outcomes. To meet this requirement, the applicant must provide-- |
| (i) Measurable intended project outcomes; and |
| (ii) In Appendix A, the logic model (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1) by which the proposed project will achieve the expected outcomes and that depicts, at a minimum, the goals, activities, outputs, and intended outcomes of the proposed project; |
| (3) Use a conceptual framework (and provide a copy in Appendix A) to develop project plans and activities, describing any underlying concepts, assumptions, expectations, beliefs, or theories, as well as the presumed relationships or linkages among these variables, and any empirical support for this framework; |
Note: The following websites provide more information on logic models and conceptual frameworks: https://osepideasthatwork.org/sites/default/files/2021-12/ConceptualFramework_Updated.pdf and www.osepideasthatwork.org/resources-grantees/program-areas/ta-ta/tad-project-logic-model-and-conceptual-framework.
| (4) Be based on current research and make use of evidence-based practices (EBPs). To meet this requirement, the applicant must describe-- |
| (i) The current research and practices on developing, implementing, evaluating, and improving rigorous comprehensive education for students with disabilities to progress grade to grade and be ready for postsecondary education, employment, and community living; |
| (ii) The current research and practices about adult learning principles and implementation science that will inform the proposed product development, training, and TA; |
| (iii) How the proposed project will incorporate current research and practices in the development and delivery of its products and services; and |
| (iv) How the proposed project will transfer the pertinent resources and products developed by the PROGRESS Center (www.promotingprogress.org) and maintain the continuity of services to their TA recipients as part of the transition to a new award, as appropriate; |
| (5) Develop products and provide services that are of high quality and sufficient intensity and duration, responsive to the users’ changing capacity, to achieve the intended outcomes of the proposed project. To address this requirement, the applicant must describe-- |
| (i) How it proposes to identify or develop the knowledge base regarding-- |
| (A) Defining and operationalizing high expectations for students with disabilities, and supporting the students, their families, and the professionals working with them to strive to meet the high expectations; |
| (B) Clarifying the appropriate use of EBPs by disaggregating the research evidence of effectiveness among diverse settings and populations, such as areas with low and high population densities, diverse levels of wealth and poverty, and underserved populations, such as populations of color, homeless, food insecure, migrant, and justice-involved populations; |
| (C) Clarifying roles and strengthening meaningful participation of administrators, general educators, special educators, related service providers, and others to set high expectations and person-centered, rigorous objectives; |
| (D) Building capacity of school teams to leverage expertise of all school and LEA personnel, families, students, and community members in providing instruction, supports, and services so that students with disabilities progress from grade to grade and are prepared for postsecondary education, employment, and community living; |
| (E) Building and sustaining community partnerships among schools, community-based programs, child and youth associations, and places of worship, among others, to establish, strengthen, and sustain rigorous comprehensive education within various community contexts; and |
| (F) Allocating resources effectively and efficiently, including personnel who are qualified to serve students with disabilities but are currently not in special education positions (e.g., dual certified teachers); |
| (ii) Its proposed approach to universal, general TA,[footnoteRef:4] which must describe-- [4: “Universal, general TA” means TA and information provided to independent users through their own initiative, resulting in minimal interaction with TA center staff and including one-time, invited or offered conference presentations by TA center staff. This category of TA also includes information or products, such as newsletters, guidebooks, or research syntheses, downloaded from the TA center's website by independent users. Brief communications by TA center staff with recipients, either by telephone or email, are also considered universal, general TA.] |
| (A) The intended recipients, including the type and number of recipients, that will receive the products and services; |
| (B) The products and services that the project proposes to make available; |
| (C) How it proposes to develop and maintain a high-quality website, with an easy-to-navigate design, that meets or exceeds government- or industry-recognized standards for accessibility; and |
| (D) The expected reach and impact of universal, general TA; |
| (iii) The proposed approach to targeted, specialized TA,[footnoteRef:5] which must describe-- [5: “Targeted, specialized TA” means TA services based on needs common to multiple recipients and not extensively individualized. A relationship is established between the TA recipient and one or more TA center staff. This category of TA includes one-time, labor-intensive events, such as facilitating strategic planning or hosting regional or national conferences. It can also include episodic, less labor-intensive events that extend over a period of time, such as facilitating a series of conference calls on single or multiple topics that are designed around the needs of the recipients. Facilitating communities of practice can also be considered targeted, specialized TA.] |
| (A) The intended recipients, including the type and number of recipients, that will receive the products and services; |
| (B) The products and services that the project proposes to make available; and |
| (C) The expected impact of targeted, specialized TA; |
| (iv) Its proposed approach to intensive, sustained TA,[footnoteRef:6] which must describe-- [6: “Intensive, sustained TA” means TA services often provided on-site and requiring a stable, ongoing relationship between the TA center staff and the TA recipient. “TA services” are defined as negotiated series of activities designed to reach a valued outcome. This category of TA should result in changes to policy, program, practice, or operations that support increased recipient capacity or improved outcomes at one or more systems levels.] |
| (A) The intended recipients, including the type and number of recipients from a variety of settings and geographic distributions, that will receive the intensive, sustained TA products and services designed to impact the number and quality of IEPs with person-centered, rigorous objectives that support the progress of students with disabilities from grade to grade and preparation for postsecondary education, employment, and community living; |
| (B) The proposed approach to determine the readiness, capacity, and commitment of the-- |
| (1) Project to engage specific LEA and school teams–-that include administration, general and special education personnel, related services providers, families, and the community-- in a manner that is responsive to the local context (as described in the Background section of this notice), giving special attention to engage those LEAs and schools with the greatest need for support; |
| (2) Public, private, charter, Tribal, and correctional LEA and school teams to specify the scope and duration of intensive work to effect change of policies, programs, and operations and allocate the resources; and |
| (3) Project, LEA, and school teams to allocate the resources to implement the TA plan and measure and evaluate the improvement, spread, and sustainment of the new policies, programs, and operations at the district and school levels, and among disaggregated populations; and |
| (C) The expected impact of intensive, sustained TA; and |
| (v) How the proposed project will intentionally engage families of children with disabilities and individuals with disabilities--including underserved families[footnoteRef:7] and individuals--in the development, implementation, and evaluation of its products and services across all levels of TA; [7: For the purposes of this priority, “underserved families” refers to foster, kinship, migrant, technologically unconnected, and military- or veteran-connected families; and families of color, living in poverty, without documentation of immigration status, experiencing homelessness or housing insecurity, or impacted by the justice system, including the juvenile justice system. Underserved families also refers to families that include: members of a federally or State recognized Indian Tribe; English learners; adults who experience a disability; members who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, or intersex (LGBTQI+); adults in need of improving their basic skills or with limited literacy; and disconnected adults.] |
| (6) Develop products and implement services that maximize efficiency. To address this requirement, the applicant must describe-- |
| (i) How the proposed project will use technology to achieve the intended project outcomes; |
| (ii) The organizations with which the proposed project will collaborate, three of which must be the FY 2023 funded National Center for Innovative Development of Educational Approaches for Leaders, National Center on Intensive Interventions, and National Center for Systemic Improvement, and the intended outcomes of the collaboration; and |
| (iii) How the proposed project will use non-project resources to achieve the intended project outcomes, including the dissemination of pertinent products developed by other Department-funded projects; and |
| (7) How the project will systematically disseminate information, products, and services to varied intended audiences. To address this requirement the applicant must describe-- |
| (i) The variety of dissemination strategies the project will use throughout the five years of the project to promote awareness and use of its products and services; |
(ii) How the project will tailor dissemination strategies across all planned levels of TA to ensure that products and services reach intended recipients and those recipients can access and use those products and services;
| (iii) How the project’s dissemination plan is connected to the proposed outcomes of the project; and |
| (iv) How the project will ensure, by evaluating and, when necessary, correcting, all digital products and external communications meet or exceed government or industry-recognized standards for accessibility. |
| (c) In the narrative section of the application under “Quality of the project evaluation,” include an evaluation plan for the project developed in consultation with and implemented by a third-party evaluator.[footnoteRef:8] The evaluation plan must-- [8: A “third-party” evaluator is an independent and impartial program evaluator who is contracted by the grantee to conduct an objective evaluation of the project. This evaluator must not have participated in the development or implementation of any project activities, except for the evaluation activities, nor have any financial interest in the outcome of the evaluation.] |
| (1) Articulate formative, diagnostic, and summative evaluation questions, including important process and outcome evaluation questions, the answers to which provide evidence of the success and impact of the project reaching the outcomes listed in this notice. These questions must be related to the project’s proposed logic model required in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this notice; |
| (2) Describe how resources, costs, progress, and fidelity of implementation, as well as project outcomes, will be measured to answer the evaluation questions. In measuring progress of implementation across all levels of TA, the plan must include criteria for determining the extent to which the project’s products and services reached intended recipients, data on how recipients use the products and services, and the impact of the products and services. Data collected must include feedback from recipients. The plan must also specify the measures and associated instruments or sources for data appropriate to the evaluation questions and include information regarding reliability and validity of measures where appropriate; |
| (3) Describe strategies for analyzing data and how data collected as part of this plan will be used-- |
| (i) To inform and improve service delivery and efficiency over the course of the project; |
| (ii) To refine the proposed logic model and evaluation plan, including subsequent data collection; and |
| (iii) To report formative and summative project performance; and |
| (4) Provide a timeline for conducting the evaluation and include staff assignments for completing the plan. The timeline must indicate that the data will be available annually for the annual performance report (APR) and at the end of Year 2 for the review process described under the heading, Fourth and Fifth Years of the Project; and |
| (5) Dedicate sufficient funds in each budget year to cover the costs of developing or refining the evaluation plan in consultation with a third-party evaluator, as well as the costs associated with the implementation of the evaluation plan by the third-party evaluator. |
| (d) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under “Adequacy of resources and quality of project personnel,” how-- |
| (1) The proposed project will encourage applications for employment from persons who are members of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national origin, gender, age, or disability, as appropriate; |
| (2) The proposed key project personnel, consultants, and subcontractors have the qualifications and experience to carry out the proposed activities and achieve the project’s intended outcomes; |
| (3) The applicant and any key partners have adequate resources to carry out the proposed activities; |
| (4) The proposed project will have processes, resources, and funds in place to provide equitable access for project staff, contractors, and partners who require digital accessibility accommodations;[footnoteRef:9] and [9: For information about digital accessibility and accessibility standards from Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, visit https://osepideasthatwork.org/resources-grantees/508-resources.] |
| (5) The proposed costs are reasonable in relation to the anticipated results and benefits. |
| (e) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under “Quality of the management plan,” how-- |
| (1) The proposed management plan will ensure that the project’s intended outcomes will be achieved on time and within budget. To address this requirement, the applicant must describe-- |
| (i) Clearly defined responsibilities for key project personnel, consultants, and subcontractors, as applicable; and |
| (ii) Timelines and milestones for accomplishing the project tasks; |
| (2) Key project personnel and any consultants and subcontractors will be allocated and how these allocations are appropriate and adequate to achieve the project’s intended outcomes; |
| (3) The proposed management plan will ensure that the products and services provided are of high quality, relevant, and useful to recipients; and |
| (4) The proposed project will benefit from a diversity of perspectives, including those of families, educators, TA providers, researchers, and policy makers, among others, in its development and operation. |
| (f) Address the following application requirements. The applicant must-- |
| (1) Include, in Appendix A, personnel-loading charts and timelines, as applicable, to illustrate the management plan described in the narrative; |
| (2) Include, in the budget, attendance at the following: |
| (i) A one and one-half day kick-off meeting in Washington, DC, after receipt of the award, and an annual planning meeting in Washington, DC, with the OSEP project officer and other relevant staff during each subsequent year of the project period. |
Note: Within 30 days of receipt of the award, a post-award teleconference must be held between the OSEP project officer and the grantee’s project director or other authorized representative;
| (ii) A three-day project directors’ conference in Washington, DC, during each year of the project period; |
| (iii) Two annual two-day trips to attend Department briefings, Department-sponsored conferences, and other meetings, as requested by OSEP; and |
| (iv) A one-day intensive 3+2 review meeting in Washington, DC, during the second year of the project period; |
| (3) Include, in the budget, a line item for an annual set-aside of 5 percent of the grant amount to support emerging needs that are consistent with the proposed project’s intended outcomes, as those needs are identified in consultation with, and approved by, the OSEP project officer. With approval from the OSEP project officer, the project must reallocate any remaining funds from this annual set-aside no later than the end of the third quarter of each budget period; |
| (4) Describe how the project will engage doctoral students or post-doctoral fellows, including those who are multilingual and racially, ethnically, and culturally diverse, in the project to increase the number of future leaders in the field who are knowledgeable about special education leadership, knowledge development, TA, and Department-funded projects; |
| (5) Provide an assurance that it will post its annual project progress toward meeting project goals on the project website; and |
| (6) Include, in Appendix A, an assurance to assist OSEP with the transfer of pertinent resources and products and to maintain the continuity of services to LEAs and schools during the transition to a new award at the end of this award period, as appropriate. |
Fourth and Fifth Years of the Project:
In deciding whether to continue funding the project for the fourth and fifth years, the Secretary will consider the requirements of 34 CFR 75.253(a), including--
| (a) The recommendations of a 3+2 review team consisting of experts with knowledge and experience in school administration, special education leadership, TA, and project evaluation. This review will be conducted during a one-day intensive meeting that will be held during the last half of the second year of the project period; |
| (b) The timeliness with which, and how well, the requirements of the negotiated cooperative agreement have been or are being met by the project; and |
| (c) The quality, relevance, and usefulness of the project’s products and services and the extent to which the project’s products and services are aligned with the project’s objectives and likely to result in the project achieving its intended outcomes. |
Under 34 CFR 75.253, the Secretary may reduce continuation awards or discontinue awards in any year of the project period for excessive carryover balances or a failure to make substantial progress. The Department intends to closely monitor unobligated balances and substantial progress under this program and may reduce or discontinue funding accordingly.
References:
Cole, S. M., Murphy, H. R., Frisby, M. B., & Robinson, J. (2023). The relationship between special education placement and high school outcomes. Journal of Special Education, 57(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669221097945.
Garcia, E., & Weiss, E. (2019). The teacher shortage is real, large and growing, and worse than we thought. The first report in “The Perfect Storm in the Teacher Labor Market” series. Economic Policy Institute. https://files.epi.org/pdf/163651.pdf.
Hott, B. L., Jones, B. A., Randolph, K. M., Kuntz, E., McKenna, J. W., & Brigham, F. J. (2021). Lessons learned from a descriptive review of rural individualized education programs. Journal of Special Education, 55(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466920972670.
Kaufman, J. H., Doan, S., Tuma, A. P., Woo, A., Henry, D., & Lawrence, R. A. (2020). How instructional materials are used and supported in U.S. K–12 classrooms: Findings from the 2019 American Instructional Resources Survey. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/rra134-1.
Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Lewis, K., Ruzek, E., & Johnson, A. (2022). The COVID-19 school year: Learning and recovery across 2020-2021. AERA Open, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221099306.
Lequia, J. L., Vincent, L. B., Lyons, G. L., Asmus, J. M., & Carter, E. W. (2023). Individualized education programs of high school students with significant disabilities. Education & Training in Autism & Developmental Disabilities, 58(1), 22–35.
Page, E., Leonard-Kane, R., Kashefpakdel, E., Riggall, A., & Guerriero, S. (2021). Learning loss, learning gains and wellbeing: A rapid evidence assessment. Education Development Trust.
Wong, V. W., Ruble, L. A., Yu, Y., & McGrew, J. H. (2017). Too stressed to teach? Teaching quality, student engagement, and IEP outcomes. Exceptional Children, 83(4), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917690729.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking:
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) the Department generally offers interested parties the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities. Section 681(d) of IDEA, however, makes the public comment requirements of the APA inapplicable to the priority in this notice.
Program Authority:
20 U.S.C. 1463 and 1481.
Note: Projects will be awarded and must be operated in a manner consistent with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Federal civil rights laws.
Applicable Regulations:
(a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99.
(b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485.
(c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants except federally recognized Indian Tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of higher education (IHEs) only.
II. Award Information Type of Award:
Cooperative agreement.
Estimated Available Funds:
The Administration has requested $55,345,000 for the Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities program for FY 2024, of which we intend to use an estimated $3,250,000 for this competition. The actual level of funding, if any, depends on final congressional action. However, we are inviting applications to allow enough time to complete the grant process if Congress appropriates funds for this program.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2025 from the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
Maximum Award:
We will not make an award exceeding $3,250,000 for a single budget period of 12 months.
Estimated Number of Awards:
1.
Project Period:
Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants:
SEAs; State lead agencies under Part C of the IDEA; LEAs, including public charter schools that are considered LEAs under State law; IHEs; other public agencies; private nonprofit organizations; freely associated States and outlying areas; Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations; and for-profit organizations.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching:
This competition does not require cost sharing or matching.
3. Other: General Requirements:
(a) Recipients of funding under this competition must make positive efforts to employ and advance in employment qualified individuals with disabilities (see section 606 of IDEA).
(b) Applicants for, and recipients of, funding must, with respect to the aspects of their proposed project relating to the absolute priority, involve individuals with disabilities, or parents of individuals with disabilities ages birth through 26, in planning, implementing, and evaluating the project (see section 682(a)(1)(A) of IDEA).
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions Applicants are required to follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal Register on December 7, 2022 (87 FR 75045) and available at http://www.federalregister.gov/d/2022-26554, which contain requirements and information on how to submit an application.
2. Intergovernmental Review:
This competition is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this competition.
3. Funding Restrictions:
We reference regulations outlining funding restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
4. Recommended Page Limit:
The application narrative is where you, the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the application narrative to no more than 70 pages and (2) use the following standards:
• A “page” is 8.5" x 11", on one side only, with 1" margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
• Double-space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, reference citations, and captions, as well as all text in charts, tables, figures, graphs, and screen shots.
• Use a font that is 12 point or larger.
• Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, Courier New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the assurances and certifications; or the abstract (follow the guidance provided in the application package for completing the abstract), the table of contents, the list of priority…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .