20230111_RFQ_Attachment_3_Prior_Contract_Reference_Form.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amendment #1 Command Team Spouse Development Program - Brigade Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W91QF4-23-R-0003
About this file
This document includes an attachment requesting past performance references and a solicitation for a non-personal services contract. The solicitation is to provide instruction for the spouses of Brigade Commanders and Brigade Command Sergeants Major. The contractor will provide all personnel, equipment, facilities, transportation, tools, and other non-personal services necessary to perform the instruction as defined in the Performance Work Statement, excluding Government-furnished property and services. The contractor must perform to the standards outlined in the contract. The solicitation was issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Eustis. It requests vendors to submit documentation of relevant past performance on contracts of similar size, nature, and complexity, along with points of contact and a description of the work performed.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 1 Change Summary.docx | DOCX document | |
| 20230208_W91QF423R0003_CombinedSynSol_CTSDP_Brigade_Amend 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 20230111_RFQ_Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| 20230112_PWS_BDE_CTSDP.docx | DOCX document | |
| 20220112_W91QF423R0003_CombinedSynSol_CTSDP_Brigade.docx | DOCX document | |
| 20230112_Wage Determination LV.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment #3 W91QF423R0003
Specific Contract Reference Sheet
The vendor shall provide documentation outlining its past performance with contracts, as a prime or major subcontractor, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this solicitation. The submittal shall include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and how it was determined that the work performed previously was the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. Vendors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate.
Past Performance Citation No.
Vendor Name Company/Division):
CAGE Code:
DUNS No.
Address:
Program Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type(s):
List all that apply
Contracting Agency/Customer:
Period of Performance:
Contract Value Exclude Unexercised Options
| Ceiling: |
| Original: |
| Current: |
Reason for Change(s) in Value:
| Completion Date: |
| Original: |
Current:
Estimate at Complete ($):
Number and Reason for Change(s) in Schedule:
Points of Contact:
| Program Manager |
| Contracting Officer |
| Admin Contracting Officer |
Name:
Office:
Address:
Phone:
E-Mail:
Description of Effort:
Subcontractor/Teaming Partner shall identify Prime Contractor.
The narrative description shall explain what aspects of the example are deemed relevant to this solicitation by highlighting those portions of the example, and explaining its relevancy to this requirement.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .