RFP Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 2021-44934
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for federal contractors. The questionnaire is to be completed by references for a contractor that submitted a proposal to provide technical assistance and support services to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under the Safe Healthcare, Epidemiology, and Prevention Research Development Program. It requests ratings on a scale of unsatisfactory to exceptional for the contractor's performance on past similar contracts, including factors such as knowledge and skills, meeting requirements, communication, resources, responsiveness, subcontractor management, deadlines, quality, and reporting. The reference is also asked to provide details on any defaults, disputes, strengths, weaknesses, and whether they would choose the contractor again. The questionnaire aims to accurately evaluate the contractor's past and present performance when assessing the current proposal.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 6 -PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Please have your references complete this Past Performance Questionnaire and ensure that they email their response to SHEPIDIQ@cdc.gov and ijk8@cdc.gov no later than the closing date of the solicitation. This questionnaire, when filled in, shall be treated as Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 3.104-3 and shall not be disclosed to anyone outside of the agency.
CONTRACTOR NAME:
The above contractor has submitted a proposal to provide technical assistance and support for Safety and Healthcare Epidemiology Prevention Research Development (SHEPheRD) Program in response to a recent solicitation. This contractor has identified your contract listed below as containing like or similar services as required under our solicitation.
BELOW------------TO BE COMPLETED BY REFERENCE
Name of respondent and role relative to the contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager) Name:
Role:
Agency or Business:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND WILL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.
PART I. SPECIFIC PROGRAM INFORMATION
Contract Title:
Brief Description:
| Contractor’s role in the program: |_|Prime | |_|Subcontractor | |_|Vendor/Supplier |
| Contract Number: | Number of years: |
Contract Type(s):
Competitive Contract Award? |_|Yes |_|No
PART II. GENERAL PROGRAM INFORMATION
Period of performance of contract or effort. Beginning Date / / through / / .
Have there been any changes to the original schedule? No Contract dollar value:
A. Original contract value:
B. Current dollar value:
C. Primary causes of changes:
NOTE: In Part III, should your response be other than “Satisfactory”, please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” under Part IV.
PART III. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS
Please check the appropriate rating below for each of the following questions:
N/A=Not Applicable U=Unsatisfactory M=Marginal S=Satisfactory V=Very Good E=Exceptional
| N/A |
| U |
| M |
| S |
| V |
| E |
1. Extent to which the Company exhibited the knowledge and skills necessary to understand and perform all technical functions as required:
2. Extent to which the Company met all requirements to deliver adequate contract deliverables:
3. Your satisfaction with the Company’s post award communication:
4. Extent to which the Company had an adequate number of dedicated resources for your program:
5. Your satisfaction with the Company’s responsiveness to the customer needs involving unscheduled requirements or contract changes:
6. Extent to which the Company managed the program to ensure subcontractor work conformed to the technical requirements:
7. Extent to which the Company met deadlines:
8. The quality of the completed product delivered by the Company:
9. Extent to which the Company met the requirements to deliver adequate reports (for example, testing results), training material, etc:
10. The company performed independently its work on the contract or effort without significant customer direction/oversight:
11. Evaluate the company’s rsponsiveness to technical direction (if applicable):
12. Completed work on time:
13. Evaluate the company’s overall performance:
PART IV. MISCELLANEOUS
1. Has this company ever defaulted on any contact or portion thereof with your company? If yes, please explain the circumstances and the resolution. (Provide additional sheets as required.)
2. Have there been any disputes or claims relative to the contract? If yes, please explain the circumstances and resolution. (Provide additional sheets as required.)
3. What were the Company’s greatest strengths/weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
4. Given the opportunity to choose other suppliers or contractors, would you choose this Company again? If not, please explain.
5. Please provide a statement describing your overall experience with the company being reviewed. (Feel free to add additional pages of attachments). Include any information you feel may be helpful in accurately evaluating this Company’s past and/or present performance.
6. Additional Remarks (Use additional pages if necessary):
Evaluator Signature Date
ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM
| E | EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| V | VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| S | SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| M | MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| U | UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| N/A | NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .