2017_RoutineBridgeInspectionReport.pdf
PDF 6 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 69056720B000013
About this file
This document contains a bridge inspection report and related federal contract opportunity. The inspection report details the condition of the West Fork Sulphur Creek Bridge located in Lassen Volcanic National Park. It finds the painted steel multi-girder bridge to be in fair condition overall, with issues including cracking and efflorescence in the concrete deck, diagonal cracking in the pier cap, and minor rusting and paint deterioration. It recommends replacing the bituminous wearing surface and cleaning and spot painting rusted steel areas.
The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number 69056720B000013 from the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration for bridge preservation work on the West Fork Sulphur Bridge. The prequalification period closes on June 15, 2019 and bids are due on July 12, 2019. The work includes cleaning and painting steel components, repairing the deck, and other preservation tasks to address the issues identified in the inspection report.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| BidSum West Fork Sulphur Bridge Preservation.pdf | ||
| BridgeAs-BuiltDrawings.pdf | ||
| IFB_West Fork.pdf | ||
| 2018_InterimBridgeInspectionReport.pdf | ||
| Plans_West Sulphur.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P
WEST FORK SULPHUR CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 7/18/17
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 4 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 214.0 FT (65.2 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 105.0 FT (32.0 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.0 FT (10.1 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. 1975
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... / RG1900 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 20 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1975-Two interior girders added; original stringers & floor beams removed; new deck.
2003-Approach guardwalls added; parapet height extended 9"; partial deck joint replacement.
LOCATION
LASSEN VOLCANIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 1.81 (KM PT 2.91)
STATE: ................................. CALIFORNIA LOCATION: 2 miles north of South Entrance at MP 1.81
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ LASSEN PARK ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WEST FORK SULPHUR CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
See next page.
INSPECTION TEAM: F. R. QUINONEZ, K. FOSTER
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
FABRICIO R. QUINONEZ, PE, FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7705
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/6/17
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY CONTINUED
This painted steel multi-girder bridge is in fair condition overall. Other problems include widespread cracking with efflorescence throughout the underside of the concrete deck and overhangs, as well as diagonal (shear) cracking of the pier cap, and minor rusting of the bearings and paint deterioration along the exterior girder lower flanges. These problems may be exacerbated by leakage through the deck, and it is therefore recommended that the bituminous wearing surface be replaced. In addition, the areas of rusted steel should be cleaned and spot painted. Other corrective measures should be performed as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
A small crack previously noted in a longitudinal stiffener on the north exterior girder does not appear to have propagated further since the last inspection. The crack is located at a welded butt joint in a compression zone, and was probably a result of shrinkage of the filler metal during the welding process when the girders were fabricated. No repairs to the crack are deemed necessary, but this condition will continue to be monitored.
The failed sliding plate anchorages on both the east and west ends have been repaired the last inspection. However, the sidewalk-curb cover plate at the southwest corner of the joint has completely detached and should be repaired.
It should also be noted that, based on the results of the 1998 scour study, the bridge is considered scour-critical, i.e.
the calculated scour depth resulting from a 500-year flow could theoretically result in a loss of stability for the spread footing at the pier. Although no scour countermeasures are deemed necessary at this time, it would be prudent to monitor the structure during and immediately after major floods for signs of scour around the pier footing.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK
1. DECK SLAB
2. EXPANSION JOINTS
3. WEARING SURFACE
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10. OTHER (STRIPING)
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 6
1. BEARING DEVICES F
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS F
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S) N
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS N
5. TRUSSES N
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING G
7. PAINT F
8. FASCIA(E) N
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G
10. ALIGNMENT G
11. OTHER N
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 6
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
2. PILE BENTS
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
5. FOUNDATIONS (BURIED)
6. WINGWALLS
7. WEEP HOLES
8. EXPANSION JOINTS
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
11. SLOPE PROTECTION
12. OTHER (TREES)
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
14. PILE BENTS
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
16. FOUNDATIONS (BURIED)
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19. OTHER
F G F F F G G N G F
G N G G N G G N F G N F
G N F N F G N
58.1
58.2
58.3,4
58.5
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
WIDESPREAD MINOR TO MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF
DECK CONCRETE, WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING
FROM CRACKS VISIBLE ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK AND OVERHANGS.
CRACKING IS ESPECIALLY ACUTE IN VICINITY OF PIER; CRACKS
EXTEND INTO DECK FACES AND UNDERSIDE OF SIDEWALKS (SEE
58.5).
MINOR SCALING OF FACE AND UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS BELOW
DECK DRAINS AND ALONG DRIP EDGE.
JOINT OPENING 2" TO 2-1/2" AT 65 DEGREES. MODERATE DEBRIS
ACCUMULATION IN JOINTS. JOINT ARMORING HAS WIDESPREAD
SURFACE RUST. PREVIOUSLY NOTED FAILED SLIDING PLATE
ANCHORAGES FOR JOINTS AT EAST AND WEST END HAVE BEEN
REPAIRED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION, EXCEPT AS NOTED
BELOW.
WEST JOINT:
ANCHORAGE FOR SLIDING PLATE IN SIDEWALK/CURB HAS FAILED
AND HAS COMPLETELY DETACHED, LIKELY DUE TO SNOW PLOW
DAMAGE.
EAST JOINT:
MODERATE SOIL AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION.
LOOSE WITH SOIL AND GRAVEL.
CHIP SEAL TOP WEARING SURFACE; TOTAL ASPHALT DEPTH
TYPICALLY 3", ROUGH RIDE AT WEST END.
SEVERAL PATCHED POTHOLES IN WEARING SURFACE, LARGEST
MEASURING 3' X 1-1/2'.
MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF
SIDEWALK OVERHANGS, SHALLOW HOLE AT EAST END OF NORTH
SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE.
MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURB FACES WITH
EFFLORESCENCE; MINOR SCRAPES AND SPALLS IN CURB FACES,
LIKELY DUE TO SNOWPLOW DAMAGE.
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL 6
G F N G N
MED
SUFF
50 FT.
ALLUVIAL
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION 5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
1. APPROACH SLABS
(PAVED WATERWAY)
N N G G G G N G G
223. RETAINING WALL 8
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.
FOUNDATION 3.
WEEP HOLES 2.
1. WALL
(BURIED)
G G N G G N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
58.6 CONCRETE PARAPET WALLS HAVE BEEN RAISED 9" TO 2'-5" FROM
TOP OF CURB. WALLS HAVE BEEN PAINTED AND PAINT IS IN
GENERALLY GOOD CONDITION.
MINOR TO MODERATE SCRAPES WITH MINOR SPALLS UP TO 1"
DEPTH ON TOPS OF PARAPETS AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS, LIKELY
DUE TO SNOWPLOW DAMAGE; LONGEST SCRAPE LOCATED IN
NORTH PARAPET OVER PIER, APPROXIMATELY 44' LONG.
MODERATE VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN OUTSIDE
FACE OF NORTH PARAPET NEAR WEST END.
58.7 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH AND DEBRIS ALONG SOUTH
CURBLINE.
58.10 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF DECK AND APPROACH STRIPING.
59.1 THREE BEARINGS TILTED TOWARD BACKWALLS: 9 DEGREES AT
SOUTHWEST BEARING; 6 DEGREES AT NORTHWEST BEARING; 4
DEGREES AT NORTHEAST BEARING; ALL OTHER BEARINGS ARE
VERTICAL.
59.1,2,6,7 PAINT DETERIORATION AND RUSTING OF BEARINGS; TYPICALLY
WORSE AT EAST ABUTMENT. SEVERAL ANCHOR NUTS NOT FULLY
SEATED.
MINOR PAINT DETERIORATION WITH PEELING FROM TOP OF
BOTTOM FLANGE AND EDGES OF TOP FLANGE OF STEEL GIRDERS,
MORE SEVERE ON EXTERIOR GIRDERS EXPOSING LEAD-BASED
PRIMER.
MINOR RUSTING AT GIRDER SPLICES, ALONG TOP AND EDGE OF
BOTTOM FLANGE, AND AT DIAPHRAGM-TO-GIRDER CONNECTIONS.
59.2 CRACK IN LONGITUDINAL STIFFENER ON NORTH EXTERIOR
GIRDER (COMPRESSION ZONE) APPROXIMATELY 20' FROM WEST
END. CRACK IS 2-7/8" LONG AND LOCATED AT WELDED BUTT JOINT,
PROBABLY DUE TO SHRINKAGE OF WELD DURING COOLING.
HORIZONTAL RUST STAIN 16" FROM TOP FLANGE ON OPPOSITE
SIDE OF WEB.
SEVERAL VERTICAL AND LONGITUDINAL STIFFENERS ARE BENT,
PROBABLY DURING FIELD ASSEMBLY (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING
THIS INSPECTION).
MINOR PACK RUST AT LOWER PART OF SPLICE PLATE NEAR
BOTTOM FLANGE MOSTLY IN EAST SPAN.
59.6 DIAPHRAGM #8A AND 9A, EAST SPAN, IS BENT BETWEEN GIRDERS
#1 AND #2 LOWER GUSSET CONNECTION TO BEAM #2 (UNABLE TO
VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION).
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
60.1 MINOR SPALL ON PEDESTAL FOR GIRDER #1 AND PATCH ON PEDESTAL FOR GIRDER #3, WEST ABUTMENT.
60.3,4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN BOTH ABUTMENT BACKWALLS.
MINOR SOIL AND DEBRIS ON BEARING SEATS.
60.9 MODERATE SLOPE EROSION AT EAST ABUTMENT DUE TO RUNOFF PIPE DISCHARGE AT NORTH SIDE; TOP PORTION OF SLOPE HAS BEEN REPAIRED WITH SHOTCRETE. END OF DRAINAGE PIPE CHUTE IS UNDERMINED
DUE TO RUNOFF, BUT SUPPORTED BY SHOTCRETE.
60.12 NUMEROUS SMALL-MEDIUM (UP TO 12" DIA.) TREES GROW UNDER WEST SPAN.
60.13 PATCH ON WEST FACE OF PIER WITH MAP CRACKING ABOUT 10' FROM GROUNDLINE. LOWER PORTION OF
PATCH SOUNDED AND DELAMINATION DETECTED.
60.15 MINOR TO MODERATE DIAGONAL (SHEAR) CRACKS IN CONCRETE PIER CAP; MINOR TO MODERATE
EFFLORESCENCE FROM CRACKS.
MINOR SPALL 7" X 6" AT TOP CORNER OF CAP ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN BEAMS #1 AND #2.
HONEY COMB VOID 6" X 6" ON UNDERSIDE OF NORTH HAMMER HEAD OVERHANG.
60.16,17, 61.2
2013 INSPECTION NOTED 2 FOOT DEEP SCOUR HOLE AT DOWNSTREAM EAST FACE, UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING
CURRENT INSPECTION (SEE 61.4).
2013 INSPECTION NOTED TOP 3" OF PIER FOOTING PARTIALLY EXPOSED ALONG DOWNSTREAM FACE; FOOTING
NOT EXPOSED DURING THIS INSPECTION.
61.2 WIDESPREAD EROSION OF EAST BANK FROM COLLECTIVE RUNOFF AT EAST END OF BRIDGE; EROSION HAS
EXPOSED ROOTS OF SEVERAL TREES UPSTREAM OF BRIDGE.
MODERATE EROSION OF WEST BANK 20' DOWNSTREAM FROM PIER, EXPOSING ROOTS OF LARGE TREE.
61.4 TREE TRUNKS IN CHANNEL DIRECT FLOW AWAY FROM PIER. SMALL TREES GROWING AGAINST DOWNSTREAM
FACE OF PIER.
222.3 STONE MASONRY FACED GUARDWALLS AT APPROACHES. MINOR CRACKING OF APPROACH CURBS. NO CURB
AND GUTTER ALONG SOUTH SIDE OF APPROACH SLABS.
222.7 OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT AT ALL CORNERS OF STRUCTURE.
"1964" ON NORTHEAST APPROACH CURB.
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
222.9 RIPRAP WATERWAY AT WEST APPROACH, SOUTH EMBANKMENT,
BEYOND END OF APPROACH PARAPET.
PAVED WATERWAY ALONG NORTHEAST RETAINING WALL COLLECTS FROM ADJACENT PARKING LOT AS WELL AS EAST APPROACH. ALL RUNOFF THEN FLOWS INTO STEEL CORRUGATED CHANNEL, THEN ONTO SHOTCRETED
EAST BANK.
223 STONE MASONRY FACED RETAINING WALL ADJACENT TO NORTHEAST WINGWALL IS IN GOOD CONDITION.
36.B,C,D APPROACH GUARDWALLS DO NOT MEET CURRENT MINIMUM HEIGHT SPECIFICATIONS, ARE NOT CONNECTED
TO BRIDGE RAILINGS, AND ARE NOT TERMINATED ACCORDING TO STANDARD.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 23 21 38 34
TYPE 3 22 20 37 33
TYPE 3S2 26 23 43 39
TYPE 3-3 28 26 47 43
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: LASSEN VOLCANIC NATIONAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... WEST FORK SULPHUR CREEK BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 8400-001P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 001P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S):
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... RG1900
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
069 - CALIFORNIA (CA)
089 - SHASTA
161000100
WEST FORK SULPHUR CREE
LASSEN PARK ROAD
8400001P0000000
2 miles north of South En
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
1.81 (KM PT 2.91)
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
4 - STEEL CONTINUOUS
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
105.0 FT (32.0 M)
214.0 FT (65.2 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 22.6 TONS (20.5 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 37.8 TONS (34.3 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 7/17 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: Y - 1 - DECK SURVEY (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 5 - SCOUR
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: 9/98 INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 40°26'52.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 121°32'10.70" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 33.0 FT (10.1 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 71 MI (115 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 25.0 FT (7.6 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 293 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 20 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2007 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 352 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2027 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 3.0 FT (0.9 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 1 - CONCRETE
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.42 FT (0.74 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL:
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1000
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
3 - Scour critical; foundations un
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
C - MODERATE
$3,500
$188,000
$0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1975-Two interior girders added; original stringers & floor beams removed; new deck. 2003-Approach guardwalls added; parapet height extended 9"; partial deck joint replacement.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
Span #1 & #2 - Length 105'
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD SOUTH ENTRANCE
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL WEARING SURFACE DEPRESSION, EASTBOUND
LANE NEAR WEST APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF PREVIOUS PHOTO
PHOTO #6 - POTHOLES IN WESTBOUND LANE NEAR WEST END OF
BRIDGE
PHOTO #7 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF PREVIOUS PHOTO
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL VIEW OF SLIDING PLATE JOINT AND WEARING
SURFACE; EAST JOINT SHOWN
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF STEEL JOINT ARMORING AT EAST
APPROACH
PHOTO #10 - SOIL AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION IN JOINT AT EAST END
OF BRIDGE
PHOTO #11 - DISLODGED STEEL JOINT ARMORING ON CURB, WEST
APPROACH SOUTH SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PARAPET AND CURB,
LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL PARAPET SPALLING, SOUTH PARAPET SHOWN
PHOTO #14 - VEHICLE SCRAPES ALONG CORNER OF NORTH PARAPET
OVER PIER, LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #15 - SPALLING IN CURB AT WEST END OF BRIDGE, SOUTH
SIDE
PHOTO #16 - VIEW OF SOUTHWEST APPROACH PARAPET
PHOTO #17 - VIEW OF EAST APPROACH
PHOTO #18 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF WEST SPAN LOOKING
EAST; NOTE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE
PHOTO #19 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
DECK UNDERSIDE EAST SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #20 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW AT PIER; NOTE CRACKING AT
HAMMERHEAD
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL RUST STAINS AT SPLICE ASSEMBLY, EAST SPAN
SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - TREE GROWTH UNDER STRUCTURE UNDER WEST SPAN
PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE OF DECK OVERHANGS, SOUTH SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #24 - CRACK IN LONGITUDINAL STIFFENER ON NORTH
EXTERIOR GIRDER APPROXIMATELY 20' FROM WEST END
PHOTO #25 - PEELING OF PAINT AT ISOLATED EXTERIOR LOCATIONS
PHOTO #26 - TYPICAL PAINT DETERIORATION AND RUSTING OF
BEARINGS, SOUTHWEST BEARING SHOWN
PHOTO #27 - SOIL ACCUMULATION AT BEARINGS, SOUTHEAST
BEARING SHOWN
PHOTO #28 - VIEW OF PIER, EAST FACE
PHOTO #29 - GENERAL CONDITION OF PIER CAP, WEST FACE SHOWN;
NOTE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE
PHOTO #30 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST EMBANKMENT
PHOTO #31 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST EMBANKMENT; NOTE EROSION
OF EMBANKMENT MATERIAL
PHOTO #32 - VIEW OF RUNOFF PIPE AT NORTH SIDE OF EAST
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #33 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO #34 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .