2017_RoutineBridgeInspectionReport.pdf

PDF 6 MB Posted

Attached to
CA NPS BP LAVO 2019(1), West Fork Sulphur Bridge Preservation
Solicitation number
69056720B000013
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a bridge inspection report and related federal contract opportunity. The inspection report details the condition of the West Fork Sulphur Creek Bridge located in Lassen Volcanic National Park. It finds the painted steel multi-girder bridge to be in fair condition overall, with issues including cracking and efflorescence in the concrete deck, diagonal cracking in the pier cap, and minor rusting and paint deterioration. It recommends replacing the bituminous wearing surface and cleaning and spot painting rusted steel areas.

The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number 69056720B000013 from the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration for bridge preservation work on the West Fork Sulphur Bridge. The prequalification period closes on June 15, 2019 and bids are due on July 12, 2019. The work includes cleaning and painting steel components, repairing the deck, and other preservation tasks to address the issues identified in the inspection report.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
BidSum West Fork Sulphur Bridge Preservation.pdf PDF
BridgeAs-BuiltDrawings.pdf PDF
IFB_West Fork.pdf PDF
2018_InterimBridgeInspectionReport.pdf PDF
Plans_West Sulphur.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P

WEST FORK SULPHUR CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 7/18/17

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 4 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 214.0 FT (65.2 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 105.0 FT (32.0 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.0 FT (10.1 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. 1975

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... / RG1900 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 20 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1975-Two interior girders added; original stringers & floor beams removed; new deck.

2003-Approach guardwalls added; parapet height extended 9"; partial deck joint replacement.

LOCATION

LASSEN VOLCANIC NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 1.81 (KM PT 2.91)

STATE: ................................. CALIFORNIA LOCATION: 2 miles north of South Entrance at MP 1.81

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ LASSEN PARK ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WEST FORK SULPHUR CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

See next page.

INSPECTION TEAM: F. R. QUINONEZ, K. FOSTER

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

FABRICIO R. QUINONEZ, PE, FIELD TEAM LEADER 360-619-7705

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/6/17

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY CONTINUED

This painted steel multi-girder bridge is in fair condition overall. Other problems include widespread cracking with efflorescence throughout the underside of the concrete deck and overhangs, as well as diagonal (shear) cracking of the pier cap, and minor rusting of the bearings and paint deterioration along the exterior girder lower flanges. These problems may be exacerbated by leakage through the deck, and it is therefore recommended that the bituminous wearing surface be replaced. In addition, the areas of rusted steel should be cleaned and spot painted. Other corrective measures should be performed as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

A small crack previously noted in a longitudinal stiffener on the north exterior girder does not appear to have propagated further since the last inspection. The crack is located at a welded butt joint in a compression zone, and was probably a result of shrinkage of the filler metal during the welding process when the girders were fabricated. No repairs to the crack are deemed necessary, but this condition will continue to be monitored.

The failed sliding plate anchorages on both the east and west ends have been repaired the last inspection. However, the sidewalk-curb cover plate at the southwest corner of the joint has completely detached and should be repaired.

It should also be noted that, based on the results of the 1998 scour study, the bridge is considered scour-critical, i.e.

the calculated scour depth resulting from a 500-year flow could theoretically result in a loss of stability for the spread footing at the pier. Although no scour countermeasures are deemed necessary at this time, it would be prudent to monitor the structure during and immediately after major floods for signs of scour around the pier footing.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

2. EXPANSION JOINTS

3. WEARING SURFACE

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10. OTHER (STRIPING)

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 6

1. BEARING DEVICES F

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS F

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S) N

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS N

5. TRUSSES N

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING G

7. PAINT F

8. FASCIA(E) N

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G

10. ALIGNMENT G

11. OTHER N

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 6

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

2. PILE BENTS

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

5. FOUNDATIONS (BURIED)

6. WINGWALLS

7. WEEP HOLES

8. EXPANSION JOINTS

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

11. SLOPE PROTECTION

12. OTHER (TREES)

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14. PILE BENTS

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16. FOUNDATIONS (BURIED)

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19. OTHER

F G F F F G G N G F

G N G G N G G N F G N F

G N F N F G N

58.1

58.2

58.3,4

58.5

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

WIDESPREAD MINOR TO MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF

DECK CONCRETE, WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING

FROM CRACKS VISIBLE ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK AND OVERHANGS.

CRACKING IS ESPECIALLY ACUTE IN VICINITY OF PIER; CRACKS

EXTEND INTO DECK FACES AND UNDERSIDE OF SIDEWALKS (SEE

58.5).

MINOR SCALING OF FACE AND UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS BELOW

DECK DRAINS AND ALONG DRIP EDGE.

JOINT OPENING 2" TO 2-1/2" AT 65 DEGREES. MODERATE DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION IN JOINTS. JOINT ARMORING HAS WIDESPREAD

SURFACE RUST. PREVIOUSLY NOTED FAILED SLIDING PLATE

ANCHORAGES FOR JOINTS AT EAST AND WEST END HAVE BEEN

REPAIRED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION, EXCEPT AS NOTED

BELOW.

WEST JOINT:

ANCHORAGE FOR SLIDING PLATE IN SIDEWALK/CURB HAS FAILED

AND HAS COMPLETELY DETACHED, LIKELY DUE TO SNOW PLOW

DAMAGE.

EAST JOINT:

MODERATE SOIL AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION.

LOOSE WITH SOIL AND GRAVEL.

CHIP SEAL TOP WEARING SURFACE; TOTAL ASPHALT DEPTH

TYPICALLY 3", ROUGH RIDE AT WEST END.

SEVERAL PATCHED POTHOLES IN WEARING SURFACE, LARGEST

MEASURING 3' X 1-1/2'.

MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF

SIDEWALK OVERHANGS, SHALLOW HOLE AT EAST END OF NORTH

SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF CURB FACES WITH

EFFLORESCENCE; MINOR SCRAPES AND SPALLS IN CURB FACES,

LIKELY DUE TO SNOWPLOW DAMAGE.

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 6

G F N G N

MED

SUFF

50 FT.

ALLUVIAL

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS

(PAVED WATERWAY)

N N G G G G N G G

223. RETAINING WALL 8

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

(BURIED)

G G N G G N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

58.6 CONCRETE PARAPET WALLS HAVE BEEN RAISED 9" TO 2'-5" FROM

TOP OF CURB. WALLS HAVE BEEN PAINTED AND PAINT IS IN

GENERALLY GOOD CONDITION.

MINOR TO MODERATE SCRAPES WITH MINOR SPALLS UP TO 1"

DEPTH ON TOPS OF PARAPETS AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS, LIKELY

DUE TO SNOWPLOW DAMAGE; LONGEST SCRAPE LOCATED IN

NORTH PARAPET OVER PIER, APPROXIMATELY 44' LONG.

MODERATE VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN OUTSIDE

FACE OF NORTH PARAPET NEAR WEST END.

58.7 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH AND DEBRIS ALONG SOUTH

CURBLINE.

58.10 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF DECK AND APPROACH STRIPING.

59.1 THREE BEARINGS TILTED TOWARD BACKWALLS: 9 DEGREES AT

SOUTHWEST BEARING; 6 DEGREES AT NORTHWEST BEARING; 4

DEGREES AT NORTHEAST BEARING; ALL OTHER BEARINGS ARE

VERTICAL.

59.1,2,6,7 PAINT DETERIORATION AND RUSTING OF BEARINGS; TYPICALLY

WORSE AT EAST ABUTMENT. SEVERAL ANCHOR NUTS NOT FULLY

SEATED.

MINOR PAINT DETERIORATION WITH PEELING FROM TOP OF

BOTTOM FLANGE AND EDGES OF TOP FLANGE OF STEEL GIRDERS,

MORE SEVERE ON EXTERIOR GIRDERS EXPOSING LEAD-BASED

PRIMER.

MINOR RUSTING AT GIRDER SPLICES, ALONG TOP AND EDGE OF

BOTTOM FLANGE, AND AT DIAPHRAGM-TO-GIRDER CONNECTIONS.

59.2 CRACK IN LONGITUDINAL STIFFENER ON NORTH EXTERIOR

GIRDER (COMPRESSION ZONE) APPROXIMATELY 20' FROM WEST

END. CRACK IS 2-7/8" LONG AND LOCATED AT WELDED BUTT JOINT,

PROBABLY DUE TO SHRINKAGE OF WELD DURING COOLING.

HORIZONTAL RUST STAIN 16" FROM TOP FLANGE ON OPPOSITE

SIDE OF WEB.

SEVERAL VERTICAL AND LONGITUDINAL STIFFENERS ARE BENT,

PROBABLY DURING FIELD ASSEMBLY (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING

THIS INSPECTION).

MINOR PACK RUST AT LOWER PART OF SPLICE PLATE NEAR

BOTTOM FLANGE MOSTLY IN EAST SPAN.

59.6 DIAPHRAGM #8A AND 9A, EAST SPAN, IS BENT BETWEEN GIRDERS

#1 AND #2 LOWER GUSSET CONNECTION TO BEAM #2 (UNABLE TO

VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION).

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

60.1 MINOR SPALL ON PEDESTAL FOR GIRDER #1 AND PATCH ON PEDESTAL FOR GIRDER #3, WEST ABUTMENT.

60.3,4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN BOTH ABUTMENT BACKWALLS.

MINOR SOIL AND DEBRIS ON BEARING SEATS.

60.9 MODERATE SLOPE EROSION AT EAST ABUTMENT DUE TO RUNOFF PIPE DISCHARGE AT NORTH SIDE; TOP PORTION OF SLOPE HAS BEEN REPAIRED WITH SHOTCRETE. END OF DRAINAGE PIPE CHUTE IS UNDERMINED

DUE TO RUNOFF, BUT SUPPORTED BY SHOTCRETE.

60.12 NUMEROUS SMALL-MEDIUM (UP TO 12" DIA.) TREES GROW UNDER WEST SPAN.

60.13 PATCH ON WEST FACE OF PIER WITH MAP CRACKING ABOUT 10' FROM GROUNDLINE. LOWER PORTION OF

PATCH SOUNDED AND DELAMINATION DETECTED.

60.15 MINOR TO MODERATE DIAGONAL (SHEAR) CRACKS IN CONCRETE PIER CAP; MINOR TO MODERATE

EFFLORESCENCE FROM CRACKS.

MINOR SPALL 7" X 6" AT TOP CORNER OF CAP ON EAST SIDE BETWEEN BEAMS #1 AND #2.

HONEY COMB VOID 6" X 6" ON UNDERSIDE OF NORTH HAMMER HEAD OVERHANG.

60.16,17, 61.2

2013 INSPECTION NOTED 2 FOOT DEEP SCOUR HOLE AT DOWNSTREAM EAST FACE, UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING

CURRENT INSPECTION (SEE 61.4).

2013 INSPECTION NOTED TOP 3" OF PIER FOOTING PARTIALLY EXPOSED ALONG DOWNSTREAM FACE; FOOTING

NOT EXPOSED DURING THIS INSPECTION.

61.2 WIDESPREAD EROSION OF EAST BANK FROM COLLECTIVE RUNOFF AT EAST END OF BRIDGE; EROSION HAS

EXPOSED ROOTS OF SEVERAL TREES UPSTREAM OF BRIDGE.

MODERATE EROSION OF WEST BANK 20' DOWNSTREAM FROM PIER, EXPOSING ROOTS OF LARGE TREE.

61.4 TREE TRUNKS IN CHANNEL DIRECT FLOW AWAY FROM PIER. SMALL TREES GROWING AGAINST DOWNSTREAM

FACE OF PIER.

222.3 STONE MASONRY FACED GUARDWALLS AT APPROACHES. MINOR CRACKING OF APPROACH CURBS. NO CURB

AND GUTTER ALONG SOUTH SIDE OF APPROACH SLABS.

222.7 OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT AT ALL CORNERS OF STRUCTURE.

"1964" ON NORTHEAST APPROACH CURB.

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

222.9 RIPRAP WATERWAY AT WEST APPROACH, SOUTH EMBANKMENT,

BEYOND END OF APPROACH PARAPET.

PAVED WATERWAY ALONG NORTHEAST RETAINING WALL COLLECTS FROM ADJACENT PARKING LOT AS WELL AS EAST APPROACH. ALL RUNOFF THEN FLOWS INTO STEEL CORRUGATED CHANNEL, THEN ONTO SHOTCRETED

EAST BANK.

223 STONE MASONRY FACED RETAINING WALL ADJACENT TO NORTHEAST WINGWALL IS IN GOOD CONDITION.

36.B,C,D APPROACH GUARDWALLS DO NOT MEET CURRENT MINIMUM HEIGHT SPECIFICATIONS, ARE NOT CONNECTED

TO BRIDGE RAILINGS, AND ARE NOT TERMINATED ACCORDING TO STANDARD.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 23 21 38 34

TYPE 3 22 20 37 33

TYPE 3S2 26 23 43 39

TYPE 3-3 28 26 47 43

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: LASSEN VOLCANIC NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... WEST FORK SULPHUR CREEK BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 8400-001P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 001P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S):

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... RG1900

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

069 - CALIFORNIA (CA)

089 - SHASTA

161000100

WEST FORK SULPHUR CREE

LASSEN PARK ROAD

8400001P0000000

2 miles north of South En

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

1.81 (KM PT 2.91)

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

4 - STEEL CONTINUOUS

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

105.0 FT (32.0 M)

214.0 FT (65.2 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 22.6 TONS (20.5 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 37.8 TONS (34.3 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 7/17 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: Y - 1 - DECK SURVEY (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 5 - SCOUR

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: 9/98 INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 40°26'52.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 121°32'10.70" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 33.0 FT (10.1 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 71 MI (115 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 25.0 FT (7.6 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 293 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 20 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2007 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 352 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2027 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 3.0 FT (0.9 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 1 - CONCRETE

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.42 FT (0.74 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1000

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

3 - Scour critical; foundations un

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

C - MODERATE

$3,500

$188,000

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1975-Two interior girders added; original stringers & floor beams removed; new deck. 2003-Approach guardwalls added; parapet height extended 9"; partial deck joint replacement.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

Span #1 & #2 - Length 105'

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 8400-001P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD SOUTH ENTRANCE

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL WEARING SURFACE DEPRESSION, EASTBOUND

LANE NEAR WEST APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF PREVIOUS PHOTO

PHOTO #6 - POTHOLES IN WESTBOUND LANE NEAR WEST END OF

BRIDGE

PHOTO #7 - CLOSE-UP VIEW OF PREVIOUS PHOTO

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL VIEW OF SLIDING PLATE JOINT AND WEARING

SURFACE; EAST JOINT SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF STEEL JOINT ARMORING AT EAST

APPROACH

PHOTO #10 - SOIL AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION IN JOINT AT EAST END

OF BRIDGE

PHOTO #11 - DISLODGED STEEL JOINT ARMORING ON CURB, WEST

APPROACH SOUTH SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PARAPET AND CURB,

LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL PARAPET SPALLING, SOUTH PARAPET SHOWN

PHOTO #14 - VEHICLE SCRAPES ALONG CORNER OF NORTH PARAPET

OVER PIER, LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #15 - SPALLING IN CURB AT WEST END OF BRIDGE, SOUTH

SIDE

PHOTO #16 - VIEW OF SOUTHWEST APPROACH PARAPET

PHOTO #17 - VIEW OF EAST APPROACH

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF WEST SPAN LOOKING

EAST; NOTE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE

PHOTO #19 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

DECK UNDERSIDE EAST SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #20 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW AT PIER; NOTE CRACKING AT

HAMMERHEAD

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL RUST STAINS AT SPLICE ASSEMBLY, EAST SPAN

SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - TREE GROWTH UNDER STRUCTURE UNDER WEST SPAN

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE OF DECK OVERHANGS, SOUTH SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #24 - CRACK IN LONGITUDINAL STIFFENER ON NORTH

EXTERIOR GIRDER APPROXIMATELY 20' FROM WEST END

PHOTO #25 - PEELING OF PAINT AT ISOLATED EXTERIOR LOCATIONS

PHOTO #26 - TYPICAL PAINT DETERIORATION AND RUSTING OF

BEARINGS, SOUTHWEST BEARING SHOWN

PHOTO #27 - SOIL ACCUMULATION AT BEARINGS, SOUTHEAST

BEARING SHOWN

PHOTO #28 - VIEW OF PIER, EAST FACE

PHOTO #29 - GENERAL CONDITION OF PIER CAP, WEST FACE SHOWN;

NOTE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #30 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST EMBANKMENT

PHOTO #31 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST EMBANKMENT; NOTE EROSION

OF EMBANKMENT MATERIAL

PHOTO #32 - VIEW OF RUNOFF PIPE AT NORTH SIDE OF EAST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #33 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO #34 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .