2017 MCASP Evaluation Matrix.docx
DOCX document 202 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Grants to Local Educational Agencies for Military-Connected Academic and Support Programs
- Opportunity number
- HE1254-17-R-9999
- Issued by
-
Department of Defense
About this file
Evaluation Matrix Template
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 MCASP Cover Page.docx | DOCX document | |
| FY17MCASPBudgetForm.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2017MCASPRequestforProposal.pdf | ||
| oppHE1254-17-R-9999-cfda12.556.pdf | ||
| 2017MCASPRequestforProposal.pdf | ||
| oppHE1254-17-R-9999-cfda12.556-instructions.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Matrix
Note: Applicants are permitted to include up to three (3) goals. You must have at least one (1) goal from the Primary Focus Area. Applicants are permitted to include up to three (3) strategies for each goal. Strategies must be selected from the approved list (RFP, pg. 12).
Grantee Name:
Project Title:
Goal 1:
Strategy 1:
Strategy 2:
Strategy 3:
Fidelity of Strategy Implementation
| Evaluation Question(s) |
| Evaluation Activities |
| Data Collection Instruments |
| Benchmark indicators |
| Data Collection Schedule |
Strategy 1:
1. Has the strategy been implemented according to plan?
Strategy 2:
Strategy 3:
Process Monitoring of Ongoing Implementation
| Evaluation Question(s) |
| Evaluation Activities |
| Data Collection Instruments |
| Benchmark indicators |
| Data Collection Schedule |
Strategy 1:
1. What proportion of eligible military dependent students are being served?
2. Did service delivery improve?
Strategy 2:
Strategy 3:
Annual Summative Measures
Outcome Target:
| Goal 1 Interim Indicators |
| Include instrument, comparisons, and target in question. |
1. Planning year:
2. June 2019
3. June 2020
4. June 2021
5. June 2022
Goal 2:
Strategy 1:
Strategy 2:
Strategy 3:
Fidelity of Strategy Implementation
| Evaluation Question(s) |
| Evaluation Activities |
| Data Collection Instruments |
| Benchmark indicators |
| Data Collection Schedule |
Strategy 1:
2. Has the strategy been implemented according to plan?
Strategy 2:
Strategy 3:
Process Monitoring of Ongoing Implementation
| Evaluation Question(s) |
| Evaluation Activities |
| Data Collection Instruments |
| Benchmark indicators |
| Data Collection Schedule |
Strategy 1:
3. What proportion of eligible military dependent students are being served?
4. Did service delivery improve?
Strategy 2:
Strategy 3:
Annual Summative Measures
| Goal 2 Interim Indicators |
| Include instrument, comparisons, and target in question. |
1. Planning year:
2. June 2019
3. June 2020
4. June 2021
5. June 2022
Goal 3:
Strategy 1:
Strategy 2:
Strategy 3:
Fidelity of Strategy Implementation
| Evaluation Question(s) |
| Evaluation Activities |
| Data Collection Instruments |
| Benchmark indicators |
| Data Collection Schedule |
Strategy 1:
3. Has the strategy been implemented according to plan?
Strategy 2:
Strategy 3:
Process Monitoring of Ongoing Implementation
| Evaluation Question(s) |
| Evaluation Activities |
| Data Collection Instruments |
| Benchmark indicators |
| Data Collection Schedule |
Strategy 1:
5. What proportion of eligible military dependent students are being served?
6. Did service delivery improve?
Strategy 2:
Strategy 3:
Annual Summative Measures
| Goal 3 Interim Indicators |
| Include instrument, comparisons, and target in question. |
1. Planning year:
2. June 2019
3. June 2020
4. June 2021
5. June 2022 image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it.