20074.MNB_Belle Isle Shelters 19, 20 - Addendum #2.pdf

DTMB-0414 (Rev 10/22)

DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND

BUDGET

State Facilities Administration Design and Construction Division

CONSTRUCTION BID ADDENDUM NO. 2

This form identifies an Addendum to Bidding Documents, and incorporates interpretations or clarifications, modifications, acceptance of proposed “or equal” materials, and other information into the Bidding Documents. Addenda will be numbered by the Professional and distributed through www.michigan.gov/SIGMAVSS as an attachment.

TO:

ALL BIDDERS

DATE ISSUED

2/12/2025

PROJECT NAME

Belle Isle – Shelter 19 and 20 Replacement

FILE NUMBER

751.20074.MNB

PROFESSIONAL

DS Architects, Inc.

PROJECT DIRECTOR

Chris Bahjet

BID OPENING DATE:

3/5/2025

This Addendum is issued for the purpose of modifying and/or clarifying the original Contract Documents and shall take precedence over them.

All work included herein shall be in accordance with the original drawings and specifications except as specifically noted herein. All incidental items required to provide the following modifications shall be included even though not specifically described.

This addendum is being sent to all bidders receiving plans and specifications. Receipt of this Addendum shall be noted on the Proposal Form in the appropriate location.

Bid Opening Date has been changed from Wednesday 2/19/2025 to Wednesday 3/5/2025.

Attachments

1. Pre-bid meeting attendance record

2. ‘Attachment I’ – referenced from specifications – Beam, Longest, and Neff Belle Isle Hazardous

Material and Structural Study Master Document dated 9-28-23.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: This Addendum must be acknowledged by the Bidder in the space provided in the Bid Summary and Bid Form. Failing to acknowledge Addenda may be cause for the Bid to be rejected. Addenda will become part of the Contract Documents.

PROFESSIONAL: DS Architects, Inc. DATE: 2/12/2025

APPROVED BY:

PROJECT DIRECTOR: DATE: Click to enter date http://www.michigan.gov/SIGMAVSS

HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS

EECTION REPORTT

BELLEE ISLE PARK

99 Pleasure Drive

Detroit, MI 48207

Preparedd for: Preparedd by:

Department of Natural Resources Beam, Longest, and Neff

525 W. Allegan Street 51151 West Pontiac Trail

PO Box 30028 Wixom, MI 48393

Lansing Michigan 48909 BLN Project ID: 230022

Client Reference: 751/22133.MNB September 8, 2023

HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUULLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

BBELLEE ISLEE HHAZARDOUSS MATERIALL ANDD

SSTRUCTURAALL SSTUDY MMASTER DDOCUMENT

1/917

HHRM Abatement Summary

No.

Structure/

Building ACM Abatement

LCP

Abatement/Encapsulation ORM Structure Total

Golf Course

Starter Bldg.

Oakway

$4,091.70 $10,250.00-$30,750.00 $37.21 $14,378.91-

$34,878.91

Golf Starter

Bldg. –

Lakeside

$347.16 No LBP identified $1,271.48 $1,618.64-$

Handball

Courts $167.16 $75.00-$225.00 $287.15 $529.31-$679.31

Kids Row

Comfort

Station

$0.00 No LBP identified. $0.00 $0.00

13 Kresge Plaza $0.00 No LBP identified. $0.00 $0.00

Lake

Muscoday-

Canals

Pump House

$9,180.00 No LBP identified. $444.55 $9,624.55

Livingstone

Lighthouse $0.00 $21,700-$65,100 $0.00

$21,700.00-

$65,100.00

Nancy

Brown

Carillon

Tower

$1,575.76 $8,910.00-$26,730.00 $0.00 $10,485.76-

$28,305.76

North Fishing

Pier $0.00 $785.00-$2,355.00 $0.00 $785.00-$2,355.00

Oxbow

Restroom $7,107.48 $10,850.00-$32,550.00 $108.20

$18,065.68-

$39,765.68

Pullman

Bridge $0.00 $36,100.00-$108,300.00 $0.00

$36,100.00-

$108,300.00

South

Fishing Pier $0.00 $70.00-$210.00 $0.00 $70.00-$210.00

Scott

Fountain $3,015.24 $168,640.00-$505,920.00 $244.75

$171,899.99-

$509,179.99

Shelter No. 2

– Shady

Nook

$43,419.92 $19,835.00-$59,505.00 $819.29 $64,074.21-

$103,744.21

8/917

Sample ID Item Description Qty Units Unit Price Total Price

3A-C Light gray, chalky, thin bead, on windows 8 SF $12.00 $96.00 9A-C Black bituminous compound between columns and masonry walls 36 SF $17.50 $630.00

ASSUMED Membrane roof system 900 SF $5.00 $4,500.00 ASSUMED Roof flashing 120 SF $14.00 $1,680.00 ASSUMED Fire-rated doors 3 UNITS $67.16 $201.48

$7,107.48

Fire extinguisher 1 UNITS $22.40 $22.40 1-gallon hand soap 2 UNITS $1.79 $3.58

32oz disinfectant bottles 15 UNITS $1.79 $26.85 1-gallon disinfectant bottles 2 UNITS $1.79 $3.58 20oz spray can deodorizer 1 UNITS $1.79 $1.79

Water tank 1 UNITS $50.00 $50.00 $108.20

$7,215.68GRAND TOTAL

Asbestos Containing Materials

Other Hazardous & Regulated Materials

Oxbow Restroom

ORM TOTAL

ACM TOTAL

50/917

Sample ID Sample Description Location

(FS/EA)

Lead Content

Unit Pricing SF Estimate

(Low) Estimate

(High)

L-01 Fascia/soffit Exterior 0.23% Paint Scrape & Encapsulation $5-15 per SF 1350 $6,750.00 $20,250.00

L-02 Column supports Exterior 0.01% Paint Scrape & Encapsulation $5-15 per SF 820 $4,100.00 $12,300.00

$10,850.00 $32,550.00

Oxbow Restroom Lead-Based Paint

TOTAL

51/917

HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS

EECTION REPORTT

OXBOWW RESTROOM

Belle Isle Park

Detroit, MI 48207

Preparedd for: Preparedd by:

Department of Natural Resources Beam, Longest, and Neff

525 W. Allegan Street 51151 West Pontiac Trail

PO Box 30028 Wixom, MI 48393

Lansing Michigan 48909 BLN Project ID: 230022

Client Reference: Hazardous Material and Structural Study May 15, 2023

HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUULLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

HHAZARDOUSS ANDD REGULATEDD

MMATERIALSS SSURVEYY RREPORT

422/534

TTABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. ES-1

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Hazardous & Regulated Materials Survey Scope of Services

1.2 Certification

2.0 Description of Structure

3.0 General Inspection Methodology

3.1 Homogenous Areas

3.2 Hazard Assessment Factors

3.3 Laboratory Analytical Methodology

4.0 Laboratory Analytical Results

5.0 Suspect Lead-Based Paint Sampling

6.0 Other Hazardous and/or Regulated Materials

7.0 Mold Observations

8.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

8.1 Asbestos Containing Materials

8.2 Lead-Based Paint

8.3 Other Regulated Materials

8.4 Mold Observations

9.0 Limitations

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1 – Laboratory Analytical Reports

Attachment 2 – Exhibit

Attachment 3 – Photographic Log

423/534

EEXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC accredited asbestos inspector completed the hazardous and regulated materials (HRM) survey of the Oxbow Restroom located at northeast portion of Belle Isle on May 15, 2023. The HRM survey was performed consistent with non-destructive methods. Suspect building materials that were visible and accessible were cataloged and sampled as part of this HRM survey. Building materials that could not be sampled without compromising the building system or were deemed inaccessible were assumed to be asbestos-containing materials (ACM).

Forty-eight (48) asbestos bulk samples, taken from sixteen (16) homogenous areas, were collected and submitted for analysis by PLM. The results of laboratory testing during the HRM survey conducted at the property indicate that three

(3) of the materials sampled were found to be asbestos containing materials (ACM), meaning that asbestos was identified at a concentration greater than 1%. In addition, two materials (fire rated doors and membrane roof and flashing system) were assumed to contain asbestos.

If any additional materials are discovered during renovation/demolition activities, such materials must be assumed to contain asbestos until sampling and analysis proves otherwise.

Seven (7) composite samples of paint, taken from interior and exterior areas of the building, were collected and submitted for analysis by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS). The results of laboratory testing during the limited lead-containing paint sampling conducted at the property indicate that five (5) samples contained levels of lead greater than the method detection limits.

Regulated materials and universal wastes are present in the subject buildings, including, one fire extinguisher. These materials should be assessed and disposed of properly.

Universal wastes have alternative management requirements identified in Rule 228 of the Part 111 hazardous waste rules from Michigan Dept. EGLE – Materials Management Division. Certain designations of hazardous waste may be managed to meet the streamlined universal waste standards instead of following the more stringent hazardous waste generator accumulation requirements. Two primary benefits of managing hazardous waste as a universal waste is that the weight of the waste is not included when determining a site’s monthly hazardous waste generator status and the waste can be stored for up to one year. If the generator does not handle these materials as universal waste, they must manage them under the hazardous waste regulations when they are listed hazardous waste or exhibit hazardous waste characteristics.

Additionally, observations for conditions relative to potential mold growth associated with the property were also conducted during the site evaluation. An active water leak was observed in FS3 that affected an area of approximately

20-square feet of concrete block wall and concrete floor. Possible slime mold was observed in this area at the time of the limited visual mold assessment.

424/534

11.0 INTRODUCTION

Beam, Longest, and Neff, LLC (BLN) has been contracted by the Department of Technology, Management and Budget

(DTMB) on behalf of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to perform hazardous and regulated materials (HRM) surveys on structures located at Belle Isle State Park. The purpose of conducting the

HRM surveys is to identify asbestos containing materials (ACM) and other hazardous and regulated materials (ORM) in connection to each structure and prepare a cost estimate for abatement of the material so that DNR may prioritize abatement activities in consideration of funding earmarked for abatement.

1.1 HAZARDOUS & REGULATED MATERIALS SURVEY SCOPE OF SERVICES

The scope of the HRM and lead survey included the following:

Review of existing asbestos reports for the building, if available;

Survey of the property building(s);

Identification of accessible suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and lead-containing paint;

Collection and analysis of bulk samples of suspect friable and non-friable materials and paint chip samples;

Identification of accessible regulated materials/universal wastes;

Describing types, locations and estimated quantities of identified regulated materials/universal wastes;

Visual evaluation of mold; and

Report preparation.

1.2 CERTIFICATION

The asbestos inspection was conducted by State of Michigan (SOM) Accredited Asbestos Inspectors identified below.

The HRM inspection was conducted on May 15, 2023. During the inspection bulk material samples were collected, and quantities of suspect asbestos-containing materials were estimated, where applicable. This inspection also included identification and quantification of other hazardous and/or regulated materials (ORM) within the building structure and in exterior portions of the Site.

TABLE 1.2.1 – Asbestos Inspectors

Inspector Name and SOM Accreditation Number Contact Information

Tony Rich - A11987 trich@b-l-n.com / (248) 270-0267

425/534

22.0 DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE

The structure was built in the late 20 century and is approximately 400 square feet in size. It is a brick framed structure situated on a concrete slab. The roof is covered with asphalt shingles. The exterior walls are brick. The windows in the building are metal. The doors are fire doors.

Property information and a description of the structure(s) and other improvements are provided below. Information was gathered from the site reconnaissance and review of municipal records.

TABLE 2.1 –– PProperty Information

Year Built Late 20 Century c.

Square Footage 400SF

Foundation Type Slab On-Grade

Building Type Restroom

Exterior Description Brick masonry restroom

Interior Description Small utility room/restroom; concrete block

426/534

33.0 GENERAL INSPECTION METHODOLOGY

BLN asbestos inspector Mr. Tony Rich conducted the asbestos inspection of the property building on May 15, 2023.

The building was visually inspected for the presence of building materials that are suspected to contain asbestos. Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected and placed into individual containers for transport to a National Voluntary

Lab Accreditation Program (NVLAP)-accredited laboratory for analysis. Materials typically known as non-asbestos items

(i.e., fibrous glass, foam rubber, wood) were not sampled. The asbestos inspection consisted of the following three basic procedures:

Conducting a visual inspection of the structure;

Identifying homogeneous areas (HAs) of suspect surfacing, thermal system insulation, and miscellaneous materials; and

Sampling accessible, friable, and non-friable suspect materials.

3.1 HOMOGENOUS AREAS

Prior to collecting any samples, homogenous areas (HAs) were identified. A homogeneous sampling area can be described as one or more areas of material that are similar in appearance and texture and that have the same apparent installation date, appearance, and function. The number of samples collected from each homogeneous sampling area may vary, based on the type of material and professional opinion of the inspector.

3.2 HAZARD ASSESSMENT FACTORS

From the list of suspect homogeneous areas, a physical assessment was performed for each material on the list. A physical assessment includes evaluating the condition, assessing the potential for disturbance, and determining the friability of each material. By definition, "friable" materials are those that can be crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Each material identified was further classified into one of three categories: surfacing materials, thermal systems insulation (TSI) and miscellaneous materials. Each of the three categories have specific sampling requirements, outlined below.

Surfacing Materials: Refers to spray-applied or troweled surfaces such as plaster ceilings and walls, fireproofing, textured paints, textured plasters, and spray-applied acoustical surfaces.

Thermal System Insulation: Refers to insulation used to inhibit heat gain or loss on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts, and various other building components.

Miscellaneous Materials: Refers to friable and non-friable products and materials that do not fit in any of the above two categories such as resilient floor covering, baseboards, mastics, adhesives, roofing material, caulking, glazing, and siding. This category also contains wallboard and ceiling tile.

ACM and assumed ACM were assessed related to their condition in one of the three categories: good (intact), fair

(damaged) or poor (significantly damaged) per Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 763. Material with localized, significant damage was also assessed as poor.

427/534

33.3 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY

Bulk samples were analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL) using polarized-light microscopy (PLM) via EPA Method

600/R-93/116. This laboratory participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program, a quality assurance program for PLM analysis.

Copies of the laboratory analytical report and corresponding chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix A.

Positive sample results are reported in percent asbestos by volume of the sample and the type of asbestos material within the sample. Other common non-asbestos components may also be noted on the analytical reports.

4.0 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Forty-eight (48) bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected for laboratory analysis and three (3) samples tested positive for the presence of asbestos fibers. Bulk materials were analyzed for asbestos pursuant to EPA Method 600/R-

93/116 using PLM, unless otherwise indicated. Bulk material samples that tested between a “trace” amount and one percent (1%) asbestos were point-counted (400-point counts; EPA 600/R-93/116) to confirm the result. TTable 4.1 provides information for material identified as ACM, including a condition classification and a recommendation for managing the ACM. Friable ACMs classified as being in poor condition should be viewed as the priority and should be abated immediately. Non-friable materials classified as being in poor condition should be considered the next priority for abatement. A cost estimate is provided for abating materials classified as being in poor and fair condition. For materials in fair to good condition, it is recommended that a qualified professional perform periodic inspections

(biannually) to monitor changes in condition. ACMs in good condition do not require maintenance in the near term but would still need to be managed appropriately during renovation activities. Table 4.2 provides summary results information regarding all bulk sampling at the site.

Copies of the laboratory analytical report and chain-of-custody forms are provided as Attachment 1, Laboratory Analytical Report. Positive sample results are reported in percent asbestos by volume of the sample and the type of asbestos material within the sample. Other common non-asbestos constituents may also be noted on the analytical reports. A figure depicting the building layout and positive ACM sample and assumed ACM locations are included as

Attachment 2, Exhibit. A photographic log documenting identified ACM, assumed ACM and lead-containing paint (LCP) during the inspection is provided as Attachment 3, Photographic Log

TABLE 4.1 – Asbestos Containing Materials – Oxbow Restroom

Sample

ID

Location(s)

(FS/EA)

Material

Description Condition Friable1

Estimated

Quantity

Asbestos

Content Recommendation Cost Est.

3A-C EA2, EA4

Light gray, chalky, thin bead, on windows

Fair No 8-SF 2%

Chrysotile

Periodic inspection. Abate if future renovation/ demolition

$12.00 per

SF

428/534

TTABLE 4.1 – Asbestos Containing Materials – Oxbow Restroom

ID

Location(s)

(FS/EA)

Material

Description Condition Friable1

Estimated

Quantity

Asbestos

Content Recommendation Cost Est.

9A-C

EA2, EA4,

FS1-2

Black bituminous compound between columns and masonry walls

Fair No 36-SF 3%

Chrysotile

Periodic inspection. Abate if future renovation/ demolition

$17.50 per

SF

ASSUMED EA5

Membrane Roof system Fair Yes 200 SF ASSUMED

Abate if future renovation/ demolition

$5.00 per

SF

ASSUMED EA5

Roof Flashing system Fair Yes 200 SF ASSUMED

Abate if future renovation/ demolition

$14.00 per

SF

ASSUMED EA1 Fire rated doors Fair No 3 ASSUMED

Abate if future renovation/ demolition

$67.16 per unit

Table 4.2 provides a summary of bulk materials sampling.

TABLE 4.2 – Summary of Building Materials Sampling Results – Oxbow Restroom

Sample

ID

Location(s)

(FS/EA)

Material Description Condition Friable1

Estimated

Quantity

Asbestos

Content

1A-C EA1-4 Brick, to exterior walls NA NA NA ND

2A-C EA1-4

Brick mortar, cementitious mortar, associated w/HA-01

NA NA NA ND

3A-C EA2, EA4

Window glaze, light Gray, chalky, thin bead, on windows Fair No 8-SF

2%

Chrysotile

4A-C EA1

Exterior caulk, light gray/beige, on door frames

NA NA NA ND

5A-C EA1-4 Concrete walkway NA NA NA ND

6A-C FS1-4 Concrete floor substrate NA NA NA ND

7A-C FS1-4 Block of interior walls NA NA NA ND

8A-C FS1-4

Block mortar, cementitious mortar, associated with HA-07

NA NA NA ND

429/534

TTABLE 4.2 – Summary of Building Materials Sampling Results – Oxbow Restroom

ID

Location(s)

(FS/EA)

Material Description Condition Friable1

Estimated

Quantity

Asbestos

Content

9A-C

EA2, EA4,

FS1-2

Expansion joint, black bituminous compound between columns and masonry walls

Fair No 36-SF 3%

Chrysotile

10A-C EA5 Roofing material, asphalt shingling NA NA NA ND

11A-C EA1-4

Beige, semi-flexible caulk on window framing and various fascia/soffit seams

NA NA NA ND

12A-C FS1-2

Off-white exterior caulk, semi-flexible, on bathroom fixtures

NA NA NA ND

13A-C FS1-4

Gray exterior caulk, brittle, on exterior fascia

NA NA NA ND

14A-C EA1-4

Beige exterior caulk, brittle, on exterior fascia/soffit Fair No 6-SF

<1%

Chrysotile

15A-C EA5

Dark brown roofing material mastic/sealant, on metal edging along roof membrane

NA NA NA ND

16A-C FS3

White interior caulk, semi-flexible, on ceiling/wall panels in utility room

NA NA NA ND

Assumed EA5 Membrane/built-up roofing Fair Yes 200-SF ND

Assumed FS1-3 Metal fire-doors Fair No 3 each ND

430/534

55.0 SUSPECT LEAD-BASED PAINT SAMPLING

BLN representative Mr. Tony Rich conducted the lead-containing paint (LCP) sampling of the property building on May

15, 2023. The sampling included physical sampling of paint coatings and associated layers that were deemed representative of predominant paint coatings, building components, and substrates observed.

Seven (7) paint chip samples were collected and submitted to EMSL for lead analysis. Bulk samples were analyzed using the Environmental Protection Agency's Test Method SW 846 -7420 and 3050B using Flame Atomic Absorption

Spectroscopy (AAS) to determine lead concentration in percent (%) by weight. Copies of the laboratory analytical report and chain-of-custody forms are provided as Attachment 1. A photographic log documenting LCP identified during the inspection is provided as Attachment 3.

The condition of a painted surface is classified as either good, fair, fair/poor, or poor. Painted surfaces classified as being in poor condition should be prioritized for immediate maintenance. Those classified as fair/poor should be viewed as near-term priorities. Materials in fair condition should be periodically evaluated (biannually) for worsening of the condition and potential re-prioritization of maintenance activity as conditions worsen. Painted surfaces classified as being in good condition do not require maintenance in the near term but would still need to be managed during renovation activities. A cost estimate range is provided for painted surfaces classified as poor and fair/poor.

Table 5.1 provides a summary of the LCP sampling:

TABLE 5.1 – Summary of Paint Sampling Results - – Oxbow Restroom

Sample

ID

Sample

Description

Location

(FS/EA)

Sample

Substrate Condition Color

Lead

Content

Recommendation Cost Est.

L-01 Fascia/soffit Exterior Wood Fair/poor Brown .23%

Paint Scrape &

Encapsulation $5-

15 per SF

$6,750.00-

$20,250.00

L-02 Column supports Exterior Wood Poor Brown .014%

Paint Scrape &

Encapsulation $5-

15 per SF

$4,100.00-

$12,300.00

L-03 Upper wall panels Interior Wood Good White .042%

Periodic

Inspections to check condition-

Abate if future renovation/ demolition

NA

L-04 Lower block walls Interior Concrete Good

Crea m .038%

Periodic

Inspections to check condition-

Abate if future renovation/ demolition

NA

431/534

TTABLE 5.1 – Summary of Paint Sampling Results - – Oxbow Restroom

ID

Sample

Description

Location

(FS/EA)

Sample

Substrate Condition Color

Lead

Content

Recommendation Cost Est.

L-05 Floor Interior Concrete Poor Gray <.008% NA NA

L-06 Floor Interior Concrete Poor Brown <.008% NA NA

L-07 Wall trim Interior Wood Good

Peach

/Salm on

.05%

Periodic

Inspections to check condition-

Abate if future renovation/ demolition

NA

432/534

66.0 OTHER HAZARDOUS AND/OR REGULATED MATERIALS

In addition to inspecting the structure(s) for ACMs pursuant to the NESHAP for Asbestos, 40 CFR 61 Subpart M, BLN was responsible for a visual, non-intrusive inspection of hazardous and/or regulated materials, which did not involve testing. BLN has attempted to accurately quantify the number of hazardous and/or regulated materials that may require decontamination or disposal prior to demolition. Further inspecting, testing, sampling, and/or remediation of any conditions inspected or noted in this report, including actual quantities, remain the sole responsibility of others. Potential hazardous and/or regulated materials addressed by the inspection include, but are not limited to, the following:

(1) Refrigerants and related chemicals (40 CFR 82);

(2) Solid wastes which exhibit any of the characteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity (40 CFR

261.20 – 261.24);

(3) Hazardous wastes (40 CFR 261.31, 261.32) and discarded commercial chemical products (40 CFR 261.33 &

Part 111, Public Act 451 of 1994, as amended);

(4) Universal wastes, including batteries, pesticides, mercury-containing products, and certain household wastes

(40 CFR 273);

(5) PCB-containing products (40 CFR 761);

(6) Scrap tires (Part 169, Public Act 451 of 1994, as amended);

(7) Medical wastes (Part 138, Public Act 368 or 1978, as amended) and controlled substances;

(8) Used oil (Part 167, Public Act 451 of 1994, as amended); and

(9) Liquid industrial by-product (Part 121, Public Act 451 of 1994, as amended).

Table 6.1 below summarizes other regulated materials (ORM) that were observed at the Site by BLN field staff the day of the inspection. ORM should be disposed of properly when they have reached the end of their useful life or are no longer needed. Licensed waste disposal companies can provide lab pack services and direct waste streams for appropriate final disposition.

TABLE 6.1 – Other Regulated Materials

Location

(FS/EA)

Hazardous

Concern Description

Estimated

Quantity

Cost

Est.

FS3 CFCs and HCFCs Fire extinguisher 1 $22.40

FS3 Hazardous waste Cleaners – 1gal hand soap bottles 2 $3.58

FS3 Hazardous waste Cleaners – 32oz disinfectant bottles 15 $26.85

FS3 Hazardous waste Cleaners – 1-gallon disinfectant bottles 2 $3.58

FS3 Hazardous waste Cleaners – 20oz spray can deodorizer 1 $1.79

FS3 Hazardous waste Water Tank 1 $50.00

433/534

77.0 MOLD OBSERVATIONS

BLN staff observed accessible areas of the structure for visual evidence of mold. BLN did observe readily visible mold in connection to the structure.

TABLE 7.1 – Mold Observations

Location (FS/EA) Substrate Description

Evidence of

Water

Infiltration

Estimated Area of

Visible Mold

FS3 Block wall, concrete floor Possible slime mold

Active water leak

20-SF

434/534

88.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

8.1 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

The results of laboratory testing during the pre-renovation asbestos survey conducted at the property indicate that

Four (4) of the materials sampled was found to contain asbestos. ACBMs should be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovation activities that would disturb these materials. If any additional materials are discovered during renovation/demolition activities, such materials must be assumed to contain asbestos until sampling and analysis proves otherwise. Building materials confirmed to be ACM through laboratory analysis are prioritized for abatement in Table 8.1.1 below.

TABLE 8.1.1 – ACM Risk and Abatement Priority

Priority Ranking Sample ID Location(s)

(FS/EA)

Material Description Condition

1 3A-C EA2, EA4

Light gray, chalky, thin bead, on windows Fair

2 9A-C EA2, EA4, FS1-2

Black bituminous compound between columns and masonry walls Fair

8.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT

Seven (7) composite samples of paint, taken from interior and exterior areas of the buildings, were collected and submitted for analysis by Flame AAS. The results of laboratory testing during the limited lead-containing paint sampling conducted at the property indicate that five (5) samples contained levels of lead greater than the method detection limits.

The presence of lead-containing paint requires, under OSHA Lead in Construction Standard 1926.62 requirements, that the contractor performing renovation, surface preparation, and other activities that impact or potentially impact the lead- coated components, evaluate potential worker exposures to airborne lead. This evaluation can be based, for the specific activities denoted in 1926.62, on objective data obtained by the contractor on other, similar, worksites within the prior calendar year. In addition, lead-containing paint and lead-coated waste and construction debris must be evaluated and, on a case-by-case basis depending on this evaluation, quantitative analysis be performed on these waste steams to ensure compliance with EPA waste disposal regulations.

The presence of lead-containing paint (LCP) and/or lead-based paint (LBP) does not, in itself, trigger regulatory compliance actions. However, when these materials are disturbed, the requirements of OSHA (1926.1101) and EPA may become operative. Appropriate actions in terms of removal methods, emissions control, worker protection, and waste disposal should be considered by the general contractor and applicable subcontractors while completing renovation activities. Painted surfaces confirmed to contain lead through laboratory analysis are priority ranked for abatement in Table 8.2.1 below.

435/534

TTABLE 8.2.1 – Lead Risk and Abatement Priority

Priority

Ranking

Sample

ID

Sample

Description

Location

(FS/EA)

Condition Color

Friction/

Impact

Lead

Content

1 L-02 Column supports Exterior Poor Brown No .014%

1 L-03 Upper wall panels Interior Good White No .042%

1 L-04 Lower block walls Interior Good Cream No .038%

1 L-07 Wall trim Interior Good Peach/Sa lmon No .05%

2 L-01 Fascia/soffit Exterior Fair/poor Brown No .23%

Painted surfaces designated as being in poor condition and located inside the building are perceived to pose a greater risk of exposure than those in better condition and/or located in exterior areas. Additionally, painted surfaces determined to be friction/impact1 surfaces pose a greater risk of exposure and should be prioritized for maintenance.

Finally, the percentage of lead in paint is considered when determining possible risk. Actions and materials that generate inhalable/edible lead-based-paint dust result in the most risk.

8.3 OTHER REGULATED MATERIALS

Regulated materials and universal wastes were identified throughout the buildings included: Chlorofluorocarbons

(CFCs) containing equipment; capacitors and ballasts; and used oils. Additionally, Universal Wastes including intact fluorescent lamps; intact high intensity discharge lamps, batteries, mercury containing devices and electronics (cathode ray tubes) were identified.

Removal and disposal of the identified regulated materials and universal wastes shall be in accordance with federal, state and local requirements as per the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Contractors that remove the materials listed below should ensure that proper manifests, disposal and/or recovery is documented and provided to the Owner.

8.4 MOLD OBSERVATIONS

BLN staff observed accessible areas of the structure for visual evidence of mold. BLN observed possible slime mold in connection to a water leak in FS3. It is recommended that a comprehensive mold/microbial inspection be conducted to evaluate potential mold/microbial conditions that may be present and affect indoor air quality, particularly in interstitial spaces such as wall cavities, ceiling voids, etc.

1 As defined by EPA, the term 'friction surface' means an interior or exterior surface that is subject to abrasion or friction, including certain window, floor, and stair surfaces."(6) Impact surface. The term 'impact surface' means an interior or exterior surface that is subject to damage by repeated impacts, for example, certain parts of door frames.

436/534

99.0 LIMITATIONS

The conclusions of this report are based solely upon observations made during this evaluation. This report is intended to present a professional opinion of potential asbestos containing materials that may or may not be present at the project property. Our opinions should not be construed as relating to health and safety issues directly. Should additional information become available, this information should be reviewed, and the conclusions herein modified as appropriate.

In addition, this report should not be construed as verification of compliance by the present owners or operators of the

Site with federal, state, or local laws and regulations. BLN, LLC is responsible to perform our services in a professional manner, consistent with typical industry practice. The conclusions drawn based on this evaluation are deemed as appropriate by BLN, LLC in the exercise of professional judgment.

Our observations did not indicate conditions existing beyond those discussed, although it is possible, limitation of scope or the standard practice precluded recognition of asbestos containing materials present at the site, such as inaccessible and/or confined spaces of the structure. BLN, LLC does not enter confined spaces as part of the inspection survey process. Confined spaces include crawlspaces and attics or any other such space where there is limited ingress and egress.

BLN, LLC reserves the right to determine when and where a confined space may be present and use professional judgment when deciding upon entry. We cannot be held liable for materials that may be present in these spaces and unable to be reported as part of our inspection process. The presence of confined spaces will be reported as applicable, and all limitations expressed herein will apply. There were no confined spaces.

We cannot be held liable for consequential damages, if it is determined in the future that contamination of some type is present at the site. This report should not be considered as a recommendation to purchase, sell, or develop the Site, and the opinions expressed herein are not legal opinions. To evaluate the information contained in this report, the reader must understand the limitations associated with this assessment. Specifically, the services for this project have been performed in general conformance with the contract negotiated between MDOT and BLN. This report was prepared for the benefit and exclusive use of MDOT, its agents and assigns. Any third-party use of this report or reliance upon the information and opinions therein is the sole responsibility of the third party. BLN has no responsibility for any damages that may be suffered by a third party because of any decision made or action taken by a third party based on this report.

437/534

AATTACHMENT 1 –LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS

438/534

439/534

440/534

441/534

442/534

443/534

444/534

445/534

OrderID: 042312035

446/534

OrderID: 042312035

447/534

Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID Analyzed Weight Lead

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

4140 Litt Drive, Hillside, IL 60162 Phone/Fax: (773) 313-0099 / (773) 313-0139 http://www.EMSL.com chicagolab@emsl.com

Attn: Craig Willey Beam, Longest & Neff, LLC 51151 W. Pontiac Trail Wixom, MI 48393

Received: 5/17/2023 08:20 AM

Oxbow Restroom (Lead)

Fax:

Phone: (313) 408-4893

Project:

5/15/2023Collected:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

262304255 CustomerID: BLNL75 CustomerPO: 230022 ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

0.2535 Site: Ext Desc: Brown on Wood - Fascia/soffit

262304255-0001L-01 0.23 % wt5/18/2023 g5/15/2023

0.2532 Site: Ext Desc: Brown on Wood - Column supports

262304255-0002L-02 0.014 % wt5/18/2023 g5/15/2023

0.2594 Site: Int Desc: White on Wood - Upper wall panels

262304255-0003L-03 0.042 % wt5/18/2023 g5/15/2023

0.2568 Site: Int Desc: Cream on Concrete - Lower block walls

262304255-0004L-04 0.038 % wt5/18/2023 g5/15/2023

0.2529 Site: Int Desc: Grey on Concrete - Floor

262304255-0005L-05 <0.0080 % wt5/18/2023 g5/15/2023

0.2550 Site: Int Desc: Brown on concrete - Floor

262304255-0006L-06 <0.0080 % wt5/18/2023 g5/15/2023

0.2566 Site: Int Desc: Peach/salmon on Wood - Wall trim

262304255-0007L-07 0.050 % wt5/18/2023 g5/15/2023

Lisa Odeshoo, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 5/18/2023 12:42:39 PM

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. The report reflects the samples as received.

Results are generated from the field sampling data (sampling volumes and areas, locations, etc.) provided by the client on the Chain of Custody. Samples are within quality control criteria and met method specifications unless otherwise noted.

* Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.008% wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. "<" (less than) result signifies the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. Definitions of modifications are available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Hillside, IL AIHA LAP, LLC-ELLAP Accredited #102992

Initial report from 05/18/2023 12:42:39

448/534

OrderID: 262304255

449/534

AATTACHMENT 2 – EXHIBIT

450/534

Exhibit 1 Structure Sketch

451/534

AATTACHMENT 3 – PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG

452/534

453/534

Photo 8:

454/534

455/534

{"type":"Form","isBackSide":false,"languages":["en-us"],"usedOnDeviceOCR":false}