2.2.1 Attachment 6 - Past Peformance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 79 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Glazier Services BPA - Nationwide
- Solicitation number
- 70US0926Q70092729
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed for vendors responding to the Glazier Services BPA solicitation issued by the Department of Homeland Security US Secret Service. The questionnaire is an evaluation tool used to assess contractor qualifications based on prior experience and performance history relevant to providing glazier services on a nationwide basis. As a template document, it establishes the framework and questions that prospective bidders must complete to demonstrate their capability to perform glass and glazing contracting work under the five-year firm-fixed price Blanket Purchase Agreement being solicited under NAICS code 238150.
The questionnaire serves as part of the overall evaluation criteria for the RFQ (Solicitation Number 70US0926Q70092729) and allows the Government to evaluate vendors' relevant past performance, organizational experience, quality of work, and references before award of the BPA contract. Completion of this questionnaire is a required submission element for vendors seeking to qualify for this nationwide glazier services opportunity.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2.1 Attachment 3 - Scenario 2.pdf | ||
| 2.2.1 Attachment 2 - Scenario 1.pdf | ||
| 2.2.1 Attachment 4 - Scenario 3.pdf | ||
| 2.2.1 RFQ SAM v2.pdf | ||
| 2.2.1 Attachment 5 - Scenario 4.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Offeror’s Name:
Client/Customer Company Name:
Questionnaire Respondent Name & Title:
Respondent’s Phone Number:
E-mail Address
Project/Task Order/Contract/ Name:
Contracting Officer’s (CO) Name:
CO’s Phone Number:
E-Mail Address:
Contract/TO Period of Performance:
EVALUATION
Below are listed specific questions relating to the Contractor’s performance in the areas of quality, timeliness, cost control, business relations and customer satisfaction. Please rate the Contractor for each question on a Risk scale from Low to High. Indicate your rating by shading/highlighting your selected rating for each question. A “Comment” section is provided below each question. Please type response in the “Comment” section to support the rating given. Please email the completed questionnaire to the IRS Procurement contact listed below:
| IRS Procurement Contact: |
| Jade.gaston@usss.dhs.gov and Taylor.haire@usss.dhs.gov |
| Return Questionnaire no later than: |
| xx July 2026 at 1:00 PM EDT |
Low (L)– Based on the offeror's past performance and systemic improvement record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Moderate (M) – Based on the offeror's past performance and systemic improvement record, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
High (H)– Based on the offeror's past performance and systemic improvement record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
1. How well did the Contractor identify and mitigate issues timely and accurately to make informed, proactive and corrective decisions?
| LOW |
| MODERATE |
| HIGH |
Comments:
2. How well did the contractor prepare technical documents and reports within budget, schedule, and in accordance with project requirements?
| LOW |
| MODERATE |
| HIGH |
Comments:
3. How well did the contractor perform with minimal Government oversight?
| LOW |
| MODERATE |
| HIGH |
Comments:
4. How well did the Contract manage multiple projects within your contract/task order?
| LOW |
| MODERATE |
| HIGH |
Comments:
5. How well did the Contract utilize innovative technologies in the performance of this work effort?
| LOW |
| MODERATE |
| HIGH |
Comments:
6. How well did the Contractor manage cost and schedule when changes in legislative or system requirements occurred?
| LOW |
| MODERATE |
| HIGH |
Comments:
7. How well did the Contractor provide clear visibility into cost, schedule, performance, and risks?
| LOW |
| MODERATE |
| HIGH |
Comments:
8. How well did the contractor successfully deal with stakeholders and effectively mitigate stakeholder concerns and conflicts?
| LOW |
| MODERATE |
| HIGH |
Comments:
9. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to provide sufficient personnel resources for this effort?
| LOW |
| MODERATE |
| HIGH |
Comments:
10. How well did the Contractor provide the right labor mix and skill level of people to meet your requirement?
| LOW |
| MODERATE |
| HIGH |
Comments:
11. Did the Contractor have clear and concise lines of communication with all parties?
| LOW |
| MODERATE |
| HIGH |
Comments:
12. How well did the contractor effectively manage its subcontractors?
| LOW |
| MODERATE |
| HIGH |
Comments:
Contractor Past
Performance Questionnaire
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .