2.04 Attachment 3 - OPPD.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Combat Technical Rescue (CTR) EOD Rigging & Ordnance Extrication (ROE) Training Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N00244-25-R-0032
About this file
The document is an Offeror's Past Performance Data form for Solicitation N00024-25-R-0032, related to a Combat Technical Rescue (CTR) EOD Rigging & Ordnance Extrication (ROE) Training contract. The solicitation is a total Small Business set-aside issued by NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center San Diego for EODGRU ONE and TWO, seeking a commercial firm-fixed-price (FFP) indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract for training courses of instruction.
The past performance data form is designed to capture detailed qualitative ratings from previous contract performance, focusing on four key evaluation areas: quality of contract requirements, timeliness, contractor responsiveness, and additional observations. The contract will have a one-year base period with four one-year option periods, totaling potentially five years. The procurement will be conducted using a best value tradeoff source selection process, with the NAICS code 611519 for "Other Technical and Trade Schools". Offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database prior to contract award.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2.04 N00244-25-R-0032-0001.pdf | ||
| 2.01 Attachment 6 - EOD ROE Response to Questions 4-8-25.pdf | ||
| 2.04 Attachment 1 ELIN 2-12-25.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2.04 N00244-25-R-0032.pdf | ||
| 2.04 Attachment 5 EOD R.A.E Kit List.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| 2.04 Attachment 4 Cross Reference Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2.04 Attachment 2 QASP ROE.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2.04 Exhibit A - DD Form 1423 - CDRL.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE DATA
Solicitation N00024-25-R-0032 ROE
Complete and return no later than the solicitation closing date to:
NAVSUP FLC San Diego Attn: Christine Jordan, Code 240 Phone: (619) 556-6121 Email: christine.jordan@navy.mil
On behalf of:
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |
| _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | ||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Description of Effort: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the NAVSUP FLC San Diego to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed by :
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | ||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | ||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUALITY RATING TABLE
Quality:
1. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
a. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
b. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
c. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
2. Quality/Timeliness.
a. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
b. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
3. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
a. respond to customer concerns
b. isolate and resolve problems
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
c. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
4. Additional Observations/Information
a. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
b. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
c. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
d. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .