2-0742-071326 Development of 342 Main Street.pdf

Request for Proposals

For Development of 342 Main Street, Nashua NH 03060

RFP0742-071326

June 2026

Overview

The City of Nashua (the “City”) is seeking Request for Proposals (“RFP”) from Real Estate Developers to purchase and develop 342 Main Street Nashua, NH 03060, Parcel ID 0009-00027, (“the property”). The property consists of 0.229 Acres of vacant land with asphalt parking lot.

Currently, the property is zoned D3MU. The City considers this property to be in a premium location that offers unique residential, mixed-use or commercial development opportunities because of its proximity to

Downtown Nashua.

Local Context and Market:

The property, located on Downtown Nashua’s Main Street, a thriving restaurant scene, large recreational amenities such as Mine Falls Park, the Historic Millyard and relatively new completed Broad Street

Parkway. The site is close to a new market-rate multi-family housing development on High Street, known as High Street Flats, and a new Affordable housing project at 249 Main Street with 55 units. Property value in the greater metro area has increased by almost 5% over the last three years.

In addition, the City has recently developed the Nashua River waterfront and the Performing Arts Center all within a mile of said property. The City of Nashua also boasts five Business Districts comprising of professional services, retail and high tech manufacturing industries. These employers attract a vast majority of talents that live or work in the City. Nashua also has a public transit system that is easily accessible across the City. In 2024, the City earned WalletHUB’s designation of Best Place to Live because of employment, dining, entertainment and educational opportunity.

The selected Developer will demonstrate its experience in maintaining the historical nature of similar properties they have previously acquired and developed. The Developer should have familiarity with laws and practices applicable to municipal real estate matters including relevant local land use and zoning.

The City is willing to work with a prospective Developer of the property to develop a mutually suitable vision and proposal. The City, however, will closely look at submitted proposals and prioritize them according to their potential to maintain the nature of Main Street, market demand and highest economic benefit to the City.

Description of Property

Please see attached Assessing Property Record Card (Attachment A)

Neighborhood Characteristics

The neighborhood of the property is located in the southern area of the downtown district in the City along Main Street, bounded by the Enterprise Rent-a-Car business to the north. The neighborhood is defined by multi-family and mixed-use development and zoning is classified as a “D3MU”, which allows for flexible development and use programming. More importantly, the property is situated walking distance from the downtown and the grocery store making it an attractive infill development site. The property’s neighborhood life cycle is in a stable stage.

Ownership

The property is currently owned in fee by the City. The property will be transferred by the City via a quit claim deed to the prospective Developer.

Land Tour and Briefing

It is strongly suggested that interested proposers have a representative present at a briefing session/site visit on the date and time cited herein. Failure to attend the briefing will not be an excuse for not submitting all of the required information.

Zoning and Permitting

The property is located in the D3MU, which allows for flexible development conditions. Further information about applicable zoning requirements can be found at https://www.nashuanh.gov/296/Land-

Use-Code. Prospective Developers are responsible for examining all aspects of the property themselves, including applicable federal, state, and local zoning regulations. Prospective Developers are responsible for determining zoning permitted uses and restrictions affecting the property.

Available Utilities, Environmental and Subsurface Conditions

Prospective Developers are responsible for determining the adequacy and availability of utilities which exist within or serve the property, subsurface conditions that exist on the property (including active and inactive utilities whether documented or not), and environmental conditions or hazardous materials.

Title Information, Easements, Encumbrances, and Restrictions

The City of Nashua is the owner of the property, which it acquired through a tax collector’s deed at Book

9051, Page 659 of the Hillsborough Country Registry of Deeds. Prospective Developers are responsible for examining the title to the property at their own expense and prior to submitting a response.

Prospective Developers are responsible for determining the existence of any encumbrances affecting the property.

Condition of the Property

The property is being sold in “as is where is” condition. It is the Selected Developer’s responsibility to identify, assess, and remediate any contamination as necessary for its proposed development project and otherwise as required by applicable laws, ordinances, codes, orders, rules and regulations, and the

Selected Developer’s will be required to indemnify and hold the City harmless, from and against any and all environmental liabilities arising from its failure to perform such remediation and other environmental matters.

Prospective Developers may do limited inspection and investigation of the property, to the extent it does not cause material damage to the land/property. Any such inspection of the property shall be subject to one (1) or more access agreements to be negotiated by the City and the potential Developer, which shall contain provisions, among others, specifying the scope of permitted investigations, establishing procedures for notice prior to entry upon the property, and providing for insurance and indemnification requirements while also returning the structure back to its current state. Invasive testing of the property shall be subject to City prior written consent, in its sole and absolute discretion.

If not conducted prior to the submittal of a proposal, the Prospective Developer, at the Developer’s expense, may complete an investigation of the property, including environmental investigation. Any site investigation, including without limitation, environmental investigation, if conducted, must be completed within the Due Diligence Period. The Selected Respondent shall waive its rights to conduct or complete such investigation if it is not completed within the Due Diligence Period. If requested to do so in writing, the Selected Respondent shall submit all investigatory test results and reports obtained to the City and/or its consultants.

Representations

The City makes all of the above information available to prospective developers solely to facilitate interested Developer’s independent investigations, examinations, due diligence reviews and analyses of https://www.nashuanh.gov/296/Land-Use-Code the property. The City makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, completeness, currency, and/or correctness of any of the information contained in or furnished pursuant to this RFP.

Minimum Bid Price

There is no minimum bid price, but the City has had an appraisal completed on the property in 2026. The

City will consider other factors that provide value to the City, such as a development that clearly demonstrates the ability to create a uniform approach across adjacent parcels in a manner that facilitates an optimum value to the City. In that value determination, the City may also consider committed due diligence funds for offsite issues.

A letter contained in the sealed envelope, outlining and committing to these facts, is required for alternate consideration of value.

General Conditions

A. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals when, in its sole opinion, it is in the best interest of the City to do so. The City also reserves the right to waive minor discrepancies, to permit a

Proposer to clarify such discrepancies, and to conduct interviews with all qualified Proposers in any manner necessary to serve the best interests of the City. The City further reserves the right to designate a Developer of Record based on written proposals received, without interviews, and to reject any and all proposals if deemed in the City’s best interest to do so.

B. The City assumes no liability for the payment of costs and expenses incurred by any party in responding to this invitation for proposal. All proposals become the sole property of the City of Nashua. This invitation for proposal is not a contract and alone shall not be interpreted as such but rather serves as an instrument through which qualifications are solicited.

C. The City makes no representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy and/or completeness of the information provided in this RFP.

D. Each Proposer shall be responsible for investigating the condition of the property and the City’s title.

The Mayor, Board of Aldermen, and the City’s employees, agents, representatives and contractors make no warranty or representation whatsoever as to the condition of the property or its suitability for any particular purpose, or the title thereto.

E. The Proposer should understand that under the New Hampshire Right-to-Know Law (RSA 91-A), all documents submitted in response to this request, including financial information, are considered public information and will be made available to the public upon request, unless specifically exempted under the law.

Communications

All inquiries about this RFP, including requests for clarification or any additional information, must be submitted in writing to the email address and contact as cited below.

No requests or questions will be accepted after the deadline as cited below. The Proposer must provide the name, address, telephone number, and email address of the person to whom such additional information should be sent.

Responses to questions shall be issued in writing as an Addendum(s) to this RFP. No oral communications may be relied upon.

Access to City Records

Proposers seeking a copy of the Nashua Zoning Ordinance may obtain it at the City of Nashua’s official municipal website at this link: https://www.nashuanh.gov/296/Land-Use-Code

Requests for specific information about the property should be directed in writing to the below email address for questions not to individual City departments. The City does not attest or certify to the accuracy of available data.

Project and Development Objectives

The property has been vacant for many years and is very visible as one enters the downtown. The City views this parcel as a key welcoming opportunity to the downtown’s economy critical for the region and municipality’s success. Specifically, the City views the property as a location for uses that support mixed-use development and economic ripple effects toward expanding the economic vibrancy of the downtown.

Economic ripple effect should deliver new expenditures into the region from visitors outside the region.

As economic ripple impact is crucial, so is the ability to generate tax revenue from the highest and best use of the site. Proposals which expand taxation opportunities are considered more favorable. Proposals that incorporate the historic nature of the structure into their proposals will be looked upon more favorably. Partnerships with the City, in this regard, are considered as supportive of this objective.

The proposals must be supported by a company that has proven experience to proceed to completion of a viable project. Projects which create high‐traffic trip‐generating retail, at peak periods, and does not generate new visitors nor investment in the community, are not considered as positive for this site.

While the revenue associated with a sale of the Land is important, more important is the long term viability of the site to support the local economy; therefore, the City favors proposals that meet the above guidance and long‐term economic benefits versus the high‐bidder proposal.

Acceptable Project Types

The City has a strong preference for development proposals that exceed the requirements below:

A) Development of the parcel, and, if possible, adjacent parcels, to form an economic gateway to the

City in a form and manner that meets zoning and the below objectives.

B) A Project that maximizes density and tax revenue.

C) Mixed-Use structures.

Development Objectives

The prevailing proposal must take into consideration the City’s development objectives, which include:

1. Maximize Development Potential

The Prospective Developer shall make all efforts to expand development beyond the subject parcel by including neighboring properties to expand the favorable economic impacts of the proposal to the greatest extent possible. Proposals which incorporate abutting parcels and have agreements with those land owners for a complete development of the area, are more favorable.

2. Coordination with Public Properties

The City will work with the proposer to facilitate access to adjoining parcels for any properties that are within the public domain. Proposals that clearly articulate the requirements for additional properties within the public domain, shall be considered more favorable.

3. Taxation Return to City

The City favors uses that provide the greatest return for real estate taxes. Proposals that maximize the development potential as cited above and create a high value taxable project, while providing additional taxation benefits, are more favorable.

4. Community Entrance Identity, i.e. “Gateway”

The City views the site as a key welcoming opportunity to the economy of the downtown, and municipality as a whole. The location of the site as gateway to the downtown is a focal point, which warrants a proposal that takes full advantage of this locational benefit. Proposals which provide the highest economic benefit to meet this objective are more favorable.

5. Main Street Character

The City favors proposals that recognizes and attempts to maintain the nature/aspects of the site on Main Street. Proposals that outline a vision where attempting to preserve the character significant improved areas of the site will be looked upon more favorable.

6. Ripple Effect and Importing Dollars

Proposals that expand the economic capacity by delivering new visitors to the community, are more favorable. Proposals that can show an economic ripple effect investment from outside the

City, are considered more favorable.

7. Mitigate Impacts

Proposals which demonstrate an effort to fit into the current built environment and do not overburden the existing infrastructure that service the site including, but not limited to proposals that do not substantially generate new traffic movements, predominantly within peak AM and PM periods, are considered more favorable.

8. Complement & Enhance neighborhood Architecture

Proposals which complement or enhance the neighborhood architecture will be considered more favorable.

9. Schedule

Proposals which demonstrate a development schedule which facilitates an expeditious development and a history of on-schedule projects are considered more favorable. Consideration shall be given to the scale and complexity of the development proposals, when compared to each other, and the above criteria.

10. Financial Capacity

Proposals for uses that a Prospective Developer can demonstrate capacity to execute will be viewed more favorable

Instructions to Proposers

Proposal Submission Requirements

Proposers must submit a complete proposal in order to be considered responsive to this RFP. Failure to complete the enclosed forms, to answer any questions, or to provide the required documentation will be deemed non‐responsive, and will result in rejection of the proposal, unless the City determines that such failure constitutes a minor informality.

A complete proposal shall include all of the following documents and shall be organized in the following manner:

a. Responses to this RFP shall be submitted on 8.5 inch by 11 inch sheets.

b. If submitting a paper proposal, responses shall be bound. Tab dividers must match the tab letter designations in the RFP, and should appear in the order given in the RFP.

c. Pages will use one inch minimum margins and font size shall be eleven points

(minimum).

d. There is no page limit, however it is noted that relevance and brevity shall be considered during evaluation of the submittals.

e. Proposals submitted electronically via Bonfire are preferred. If you choose to submit a paper response, then one hardcopie and an electronic copy on a USB device shall be submitted.

Proposal Format

Cover Letter with the following tabbed exhibits:

If the development proposed is by a separate developer then attached to the cover letter shall be a letter from the prospective developer indicating that there is an agreement in place to facilitate the use of the property in a larger development proposal than the property itself.

Cover Letter Outlining Development Proposal: Stating project goals, approach to meeting development objectives.

Tab A. Proposal Narrative/Overview

Tab B. Price Proposal (in a separate sealed envelope when submitting a paper submission) As indicated above, the proposer may provide an alternate means for alternate valuation, based on criteria above. In Tab B please reference the sealed envelope if not providing an alternative proposal.

Tab C. Comparable Experience Statement Outlining past experience with similar projects.

Tab D. Proposer’s Qualifications Statement

A summary of the Developer’s organization and experience; resumes of principals; a list of references for at least three recently completed projects; a financial statement; and a disclosure of any liens, foreclosures, bankruptcies, or other actions that would interfere with construction financing or delay the timely progress of the project.

Developers with prior experience acquiring and redeveloping municipally owned Land must identify the project(s) and provide one or more references from the city or town from which the Land was purchased. A written narrative should be provided to demonstrate the ability to perform as proposed along with prior experience relevant to the proposal. The resumes and relevant experience of the development team members for similar projects should also be included.

Tab E. Technical Proposal

A conceptual site plan and building elevations of the Project proposed by the Developer, including preliminary specifications, amenities and finishes, landscaping plans, and parking plans, project amenities, and other planned improvements to the Land, sufficient to clearly communicate the development proposal. The proposal should be sufficiently detailed to enable the City to understand the Proposer’s plan for the property. A narrative should be included describing any proposed improvements that are not easily depicted on drawings. Sufficient information should be presented on the volume and type of traffic generated and any off‐site improvements needed within public streets.

The technical proposal shall account for the Proposal’s Evaluation Criteria and all applicable provisions of this RFP that apply to the Development Team and the responsibilities of the Developer of Record.

The site plan may include parcels outside of the subject property. If additional properties are intended to become part of the proposals, then a letter certifying that there is a valid agreement between the land owner and proposer for the sale of the Land must be included. For developments/improvements that are within the public domain, a letter to the City requesting access to the Land must be included.

Tab F. Proposed Project Schedule & Project Budget including Sources and Uses of funds

The Proposer shall submit a Project Schedule that accounts for all major milestones for the Project, e.g., execution of Disposition Agreement, financing, permitting, design, closing, construction, marketing and sales, so that the Project shall be commenced and completed, and the use occupied as soon as possible.

Tab G. A Financial Qualifications Statement

Which may include the following:

◼ Balance Sheet or Personal Financial Statement for the company or principals.

◼ Copy of 2017 and/or 2018 Tax Return

◼ Copy of bank or brokerage statement for company or principals

◼ Commitment letter or line of credit from a lender

Tab H. A Statement and Certification as to Payment of Taxes by Legal Entity Proposing To

Purchase Property

Expectation Proposed Owner/Developer upon Selection

Purchase and Sale Agreement

Not later than ninety (90) days from the date that the selected Proposer receives notice from the City that the proposal has been accepted, the Proposer must execute a Purchase and Sale with the City. At the time the Purchase and Sale Agreement is executed, an additional deposit of ten percent (10%) of the purchase price, in the form of a certified check or money order, shall be payable to the City.

The Purchase and Sale Agreement shall incorporate, at minimum, the terms and conditions cited in the document provided and any items negotiated by the successful Proposer and the City’s designated representative, provided such negotiated items are not inconsistent with this RFP. If the parties fail to execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement within sixty (60) days of notice of award, the City may select the next most beneficial offer. However, for good cause and when it is in the City’s best interests to do so, the

60‐day period for executing the Purchase and Sale Agreement may be extended, subject to written approval by the City. Closing shall occur within thirty (30) days of receipt of all permits, including the expiration of any associated appeal periods. However, the closing shall not occur unless and until the

Proposer has obtained suitable financing, in an amount and form adequate, in the City’s judgment, to complete the Project.

Proposal Evaluation Process & Review Criteria

All proposals received by the deadline will be considered in accordance with this RFP and City purchasing ordinances and policies by the City. Only those proposals which satisfy the minimum criteria will be reviewed and ranked under the “Competitive Evaluation Criteria” below.

Final designation of the Prospective Developer of Record will be made by the City, considering the criteria set forth below. Interviews with Proposers meeting the minimum evaluation criteria (or some subset of such Proposers selected by the Mayor and/or the Disposition Committee) may be conducted at the discretion of the City, and the City reserves the right to retain any consultants to assist with reviewing the proposals.

Following the proposal review process, interviews and reference checks and receipt of any additional information requested of the Proposers, the City will identify the most beneficial proposal from submitted proposals. The City will notify all Proposers in writing of the decision.

Minimum Criteria for Responsible and Responsive Proposals

Proposals must meet the following minimum criteria to be considered responsible and responsive to this

RFP:

The Proposal must be complete and conform to all submission requirements set forth in this RFP and any

Addendum to this RFP issued before the submission deadline. Failure to provide the requested information in the proposal will result in the determination that the proposal does not meet the minimum criteria.

Competitive Evaluation Criteria

Proposals meeting the minimum criteria for submission will be judged on the following competitive evaluation criteria:

A. Concurrence with Development Objectives

1. Highly Acceptable: A proposal that in the judgment of the evaluators meets and exceeds all of the development objectives, as cited and provides specific verifiable information that demonstrates a consistency with those objectives in a manner that is supported by the proposed use and detailed supporting documentation.

2. Acceptable Rating: A proposal that in the judgment of the evaluators meets the majority of the development objectives as cited and provides information that demonstrates a consistency with those objectives in a manner that is supported by the proposed use and supporting documentation.

3. Unacceptable Rating: A proposal that in the judgment of the evaluators does not meet the majority of the development objectives as cited and lacks information that demonstrates a consistency with those objectives in a manner that is supported by the proposed use.

B. Proposer’s Experience and Competency

1. Highly Acceptable: A proposal that identifies a Project Team with five (5) years or more experience in development consistent with the nature of the proposed Project, and, capable of completing the Project successfully and expeditiously, as demonstrated by the Proposer’s track record in developing several high‐quality developments, including but not limited to, properties of similar scope and size; possess the necessary licenses and qualifications to perform the work; highly favorable references for the Proposer and all members of the Project Team; and established working relationships between the Proposer and other members of the Project Team.

2. Acceptable Rating: A proposal that identifies a Project Team capable of completing the Project successfully and in a timely manner, as evidenced by the Proposer’s previous experience and strength of the Proposer’s references; demonstrates successful experience new construction for projects of a similar scope and size; and evidence of working relationships between the Proposer and other members of the

Project Team.

3. Unacceptable Rating: A proposal with insufficient evidence of a Project Team with capacity to complete the Project successfully and in a timely manner, in the opinion of the evaluators; no experience with similar projects; or a proposal that does not include enough information for the evaluators to make a rating decision.

C. Financial Capacity

1. Highly Acceptable: A proposal that in the judgment of the evaluators identifies a Project Team with exceptional financial capacity to undertake the Project, proven by prior experience financing real estate development, including securing any necessary interim financing, ability to provide equity contribution, and ability to secure financing as evidenced by letter(s) from prospective lender(s) and other supporting material and provides a financial Pro forma outlining the total development costs, cash flow, sources of financing in sufficient detail to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposal.

2. Acceptable Rating: A proposal that in the judgment of the evaluators identifies a Project Team with reasonable financial capacity to undertake the Project.

3. Unacceptable Rating: A proposal that in the judgment of the evaluators fails to identify a Project Team with reasonable financial capacity to undertake the Project; or a proposal that does not include enough information for the evaluators to make a rating decision.

D. Proposed Development Schedule

1. Highly Acceptable: A proposal that in the judgment of the evaluators identifies a Project Team with very detailed, short and achievable development schedule identifying all milestones, including but not limited to, pre‐development assessment, permitting, construction phase, and final completion of the

Project in 2 years or less from the date of award.

2. Acceptable Rating: A proposal that in the judgment of the evaluators identifies a Project Team with reasonably achievable development schedule and includes all of the major milestones such that the

Project is completed within 3 years from the date of award.

3. Unacceptable Rating: A proposal that in the judgment of the evaluators fails to identify a Project

Team with a reasonable understanding of the various key milestones from start to finish; a Project

Schedule that is in excess of 3 years from date of award or an impractical development schedule.

E. Proposed Price/Tax Revenue Generation

1. Highly Acceptable: A proposal that in the judgment of the evaluators identifies a Project with the most beneficial technical proposal and a price proposal that meets the City’s expectations which generates the maximum tax revenue for the City.

2. Acceptable Rating: A proposal that includes the minimum bid price and in the judgment of the evaluators will generate tax revenue for the City.

3. Unacceptable Rating: A proposal that in the judgment of the evaluators fails to generate any increased tax revenue for the City

Overall Rating

After evaluating a proposal using the above criteria, the evaluators will provide an overall ranking for the proposal, as compared to other proposals. The evaluators will consider the Price Proposal in determining the reasonableness and advantageousness of the Proposer’s offer.

However, it is possible that a Proposer with a highly beneficial technical proposal will be designated the

Developer of Record even if the Proposer’s price proposal/tax revenue is not the highest proposal received. A proposal that achieves “Highly Acceptable ” and/or “Acceptable” ratings in most categories will not necessarily be disqualified simply because it received an “Unacceptable” rating in one category if, in the judgment of the evaluators, the proposal on the whole warrants a “Highly Acceptable” or

“Acceptable” rating.

However, any notice of award will be contingent upon the project proponent curing any “Unacceptable” rating prior to execution of the Purchase and Sale Agreement.

INFORMATION FOR PROPOSERS:

The City is now accepting submittals electronically via Bonfire. Please review the electronic documents linked here, Bonfire Vendor Registration and Bonfire Vendor Submission for more information. We strongly recommend that you give yourself sufficient time and at least one (1) business day before due date to begin the uploading process and finalize your submission. Copies are also available on the City’s website in the Purchasing section within the Bids section. If a vendor chooses to submit their proposal outside of

Bonfire, the following are alternate options:

If a vendor chooses to submit their proposal outside of Bonfire, the following are alternate options:

Paper: Submission one (1) copy and one digital copy on a USB drive in sealed envelope(s) or package(s) clearly marked "RFP0742-071326" Proposals must be submitted in the format provided and address the item(s) specified in the RFP package.

Regardless of the method of submission, proposals must be received no later than 3:00pm on Thursday, July 13, 2023 in the Purchasing Department; City Hall, 229 Main Street, Room 11, Nashua, NH 03061.

Postmarks or other timestamps will not be accepted in lieu of actual delivery. Vendors can use whatever delivery mechanism it chooses as long as it remains clear that the vendor is responsible for submissions prior to the date and time.

The time of receipt shall be considered when a proposal has been officially documented by the Purchasing

Department, in accordance with its established policies, as having been received at the location designated https://nashuanh.bonfirehub.com/portal/?tab=openOpportunities https://www.nashuanh.gov/DocumentCenter/View/28837/Bonfire-Process-Overview---Vendor-Registration https://www.nashuanh.gov/DocumentCenter/View/28838/Bonfire-Process-Overview---Vendor-Submission above. The City accepts no responsibility for mislabeled mail. Any and all damage that may occur due to shipping shall be the vendor’s responsibility.

Further details are available on the City's web site, www.nashuanh.gov, under Services; Bid Opportunities;

Current Bids and on the Bonfire website; (Refer to Document RFPClick here to enter text.).Proposal will be opened in public on the due date and time.

Please note paper copies of proposal documents are not available in the City’s Purchasing Office.

Complete specifications and related documentation are available on our website, www.nashuanh.gov, under

Services, Bid Opportunities, Current Bids; and on the Bonfire website. Refer to Document RFP 0742-

071326 and related documents.

Please note paper copies of proposal documents will not be available. No proposal documents are available at the Central Purchasing Office.

The City assumes no liability for the payment of costs and expenses incurred by any party in responding to this invitation for proposal. All proposals become the sole property of the City of Nashua. This invitation for proposal is not a contract and alone shall not be interpreted as such but rather serves as an instrument through which qualifications are solicited.

The timeline for this project is as follows:

Projected Timeline Date

Pre-Proposal Meeting/Site Walk

342 Main Street Nashua NH Thursday, June 18, 2026, 3:30pm

Deadline for Questions Friday, June 26, 2026, 10:00am

Question Answers Posted Wednesday, July 01, 2026, 4:00pm

Proposals Due Monday, July 13, 2026, 3:00pm

Interviews tbd

There will be a recommended pre-submittal meeting on Thursday, June 18, 2026, at 3:30 am at 342 Main

Street Nashua NH. Attendance to this meeting is recommended for all wishing to submit a proposal for this project however, Developers who do not attend may submit questions in writing per the dates specified in this RFP.

Developers are encouraged to submit questions via email or via Bonfire; however, the City assumes no liability for assuring accurate and complete email transmission/receipt and is not responsible to acknowledge receipt. Inquiries must be submitted in writing, citing the RFP title/number, Page, Section, and must be received no later than Friday, June 26, 2026, 10:00am to:

City of Nashua

229 Main Street, Nashua, NH 03060

Amy Girard, Purchasing Manager girarda@nashuanh.gov

The City will consider all timely-received questions and requests for change and, if reasonable and appropriate, will issue an addendum to clarify or modify this RFP. Answers to vendor submitted questions and other addenda will be posted on the City of Nashua website www.nashuanh.gov, under Services; Bid http://www.nashuanh.gov/ mailto:girarda@nashuanh.gov http://www.nashuanh.gov/

Opportunities; Current Bids; (Refer to (RFP0742-071326 342 Main Street) and on Bonfire no later than

Wednesday, July 01, 2026, 4:00pm.

The successful Vendor will be required to provide the City with certificates of insurance for coverage as listed below and endorsements affecting coverage required by the contract within ten (10) calendar days after the City issues the notice of award. The City requires thirty (30) calendar days written notice of cancellation or material change in coverage. The certificate and endorsements for each insurance policy must be signed by a person authorized by the insurer and who is licensed by the State of New Hampshire.

General Liability, Employer’s Liability and Auto Liability policies must name the City of Nashua as an additional insured and reflect on the certificate of insurance:

• General Liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate

• $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit Automobile Liability (coverage must include all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles)

• Workers' Compensation Coverage in compliance with the State of New Hampshire statutes, $100,000/$500,000/$100,000

It is the responsibility of the Vendor to submit to the City certificates of insurance for the Vendor and all other subcontractors prior to the start of the project. It is the responsibility of the Vendor to provide the City with updated certificates of insurance for the Vendor and all subcontractors 10 days prior to the expiration of coverage. The City may, at any time, order the Vendor to stop work, suspend the contract or terminate the contract for non-compliance. All subcontractors are subject to the same insurance requirements as the

Vendor.

The City hereby notifies all Vendors that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to submit proposals in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability in consideration for an award.

Pursuant to NRO 5-71 (A), the City of Nashua supports the concept of purchasing products which are biodegradable, can be or have been recycled, or are environmentally sounds. Due consideration will be given to the purchase of such products. If you are proposing any such products which qualify, please so indicate in a cover sheet by item number and description. We are also conscious of energy use and encourage Vendors to propose products that are energy efficient.

All proposals are binding for ninety (90) days following the deadline for proposals, or until the effective date of any binding resulting contract, whichever is later.

The City assumes no liability for assuring accurate/complete email transmission/receipt and is not responsible to acknowledge receipt.

Proposals must be submitted in the format provided and address the items specified in this request. The

City may reject any or all of the proposals on any basis and without disclosure of a reason. The failure to make such a disclosure shall not result in accrual of any right, claim or cause of action by any unsuccessful proposer against The City. The City reserves the right to waive any irregularities when the public interest will be served thereby. The City also reserves the right to negotiate any change or amendment in any proposal without soliciting further requests for proposals if the action is necessary for the best interest of

The City.

Pursuant to NRO 5-78 (F), the Purchasing Manager shall not solicit a bid from a contractor who is in default on the payment of taxes, licenses or other monies due the City. Therefore, this bid request is void as to anyone who is in default on said payments.

Sincerely, Liz Hannum

Economic Development Director

City of Nashua, NH

Amy Girard

Purchasing Manager

City of Nashua, NH