Final_-_Attachment_III_-_Evaluation_Criteria.docx

18-02103 Attachment III – Evaluation Criteria

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

Factor 1 is a GO/ NO factor, failure to receive a GO on factor 1 will result in your proposal being eliminated and will not receive further consideration for an award.

Factor 1: In-kind Delivery GO/NO:

The offeror shall demonstrate its ability to deliver 100% of orders under the new MOU given a four-day lead time for Tuesday deliveries and a three-day lead time for Thursday deliveries for In-kind helium in accordance with FAR 8.5.

Subfactor 1A: Technical Capability ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE:

Offeror shall submit no more than ten (10) single sided pages demonstrating their understanding of the requirement which shall include all aspects of the job as described in the statement of work. Simply restating the statement of work is not sufficient to demonstrate technical capability.

The offeror shall demonstrate their current dewar fleet, as well as any plans and timeframe to purchase additional dewars needed to fulfil this requirement. The offeror shall demonstrate their ability to have a complete dewar fleet and make delivery in June 2018. The offeror shall demonstrate their ability to meet the delivery needs as outlined in the statement of work.

Factor 2: Price

The offeror shall provide pricing for each of the following CLINS. For CLINS 0001-0003 assume an anticipated need of 20,000 liters. For all other CLINS assume an anticipated need of 80,000 liters.

CLIN 0001: The Contractor shall furnish the necessary personnel, material, equipment, services, and facilities to supply liquid helium in 30, 60, 100, and 250-liter contractor-owned dewars in accordance with the statement of work.

CLIN 0002: Dewar rental fee in accordance with the statement of work.

CLIN 0003: Emergency delivery fees

Offerors pricing will be evaluated for reasonableness, realism, technical acceptability and ranked according to price, from lowest to highest inclusive of all option pricing. The Government may use various price analysis techniques and procedures to make a price reasonableness determination.

The price proposal shall describe how pricing was determined; should include, but not be limited to, the following:

1. Salary/wage information with associated payroll expenses, for personnel to be used in performance of the contract;

2. Cost for equipment, supplies, and consumable materials;

3. A breakout of related support costs, such as equipment maintenance, rental, transportation, etc.

4. Overhead costs;

5. General Administrative expenses

6. Profit

BASIS FOR AWARD:

Simplified acquisition procedures will be utilized. This is a competitive best value source selection utilizing Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2 for award of this agreement. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

1. By submission of an offer, the Offeror accepts all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certification and technical requirements related to this agreement.

2. The Government intends to award one (1) firm fixed price contract without discussions with respective Offerors. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

3. Evaluation Criteria: Acceptable/Unacceptable. Offeror must submit a detailed cost breakdown of all CLINS outlined in Attachment I.

4. Offerors must be acceptable in criteria one (1) and two (2) to be found technically acceptable for award.