Evaluation_Criteria.docx

18-01897 Attachment III – Evaluation Criteria

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

Factor 1: Qualifications: ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE:

The offeror shall submit no more than 20 pages detailing the following information:

1. Documentation detailing verification of employment and individual’s GSA inspection certifications, as well as a “current” QEI credential are required.

2. The offeror shall demonstrate its CURRENT Experience Modification Rating (EMR) is 1.0 or less by submitting documentation from NCCI or its state rating agency, as appropriate.

3. The offeror shall submit a detailed scope of work narrative demonstrating their understanding of the requirement of Elevator Inspection, which shall include all aspects of the job as described in the Statement of Work.

Factor 2: Experience: ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE:

The offeror shall provide at least two projects detailing the following:

1. The offeror shall submit documentation detailing that they have Elevator Inspection experience within the last three (3) years with a project cost of $15,000.00 or greater.

Factor 3: Price

Price will be evaluated based on the offerors proposed price for items 001 and 002 on the attached bid sheet. For item 002, assume a quantity of two (2) unscheduled inspections for pricing and evaluation purposes.

BASIS FOR AWARD: LPTA

Simplified acquisition procedures will be utilized. This is a competitive best value source selection utilizing Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2 for award of this agreement. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

1. By submission of an offer, the Offeror accepts all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certification and technical requirements related to this agreement.

2. The Government intends to award one (1) firm fixed price contract without discussions with respective Offerors. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

3. Evaluation Criteria: Acceptable/Unacceptable. Offeror must submit a detailed cost breakdown of all CLINS outlined in Attachment I.

4. Offerors must be acceptable in criteria one (1) and two (2) to be found technically acceptable for award.