Attachment_E_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 20 KB Posted

Attached to
GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT RESIDENT ASSESSMENT
Solicitation number
17-250-SOL-00119
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_006.pdf PDF
Amendment_005.pdf PDF
Amendment_004.pdf PDF
Attachment_A_-_Statement_of_Work_Revised.docx DOCX document
Amendment_003.pdf PDF
RFP_17-250-SOL-00119.EDIT.7.11.17.docx DOCX document
Amendment_002.pdf PDF
Attachment_A_-_Statement_of_Work_Revised.docx DOCX document
SF-30_Amendment_001.pdf PDF
Attachment_E_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(Revised).docx DOCX document
Attachment_A1_-_SOW_Appendices.pdf PDF
Attachment_D_-_Disclosure_of_Lobbying.docx DOCX document
Attachment_B_-_Billing_Instructions.docx DOCX document
RFP_17-250-SOL-00119.6.21.17.pdf PDF
Attachment_A_-_Statement_of_Work.docx DOCX document
Attachment_C_-_CPARS_Information_Sheet.docx DOCX document
SF-33.17-250-SOL-00119.pdf PDF
Sources_Sought.pdf PDF
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT E – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE LETTER

Date:

Dear Client:

We are currently responding to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Solicitation No. RFP #17-250-SOL-00119, entitled “THE GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT RESIDENT ASSESSMENT”. The Government is placing increased emphasis in its acquisition process on past performance as a source selection factor and is requiring that clients of firms responding to HRSA solicitations be identified and their participation in the evaluation process be requested.

Therefore, enclosed is a past performance questionnaire for your completion. We are requesting that you complete the questionnaire and send it directly to HRSA at the following address:

Email: psenerchia@hrsa.gov

RFP #17-250-SOL-00119

Since this information will be used as one of the evaluation factors for contract award, we are requesting that you complete this questionnaire and return it to the HRSA Contract Specialist, Philip Senerchia, at the above email address no later than June 28, 2017 at 2:00 pm, EDT.

We thank you for your prompt response in this matter.

Sincerely, (To be signed by Offeror)

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

FOR: ________________________________________________________________________

Name of Company

PLEASE RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY TO:

Email: psenerchia@hrsa.gov

PLEASE FILL IN THE FOLLOWING:

Your Name: ____________________________ Your Agency:________________________ Address:___________________________________________________________________ Phone Number:_________________________ Fax :________________________________ Signature of Person Completing Survey:___________________________________________ Contract Number/Solicitation Number: ____________________________________________

YOUR ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT (circle one)

Project Officer Contracting Officer Contract Specialist

Approximate Percentage of Work Competed by Subcontractors: ______ % General Description or work or Title of Contract: _____________________________________________

RATINGS

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible.

Standard Contractor Performance Report

Contract Type:
Contract Number/Order Number:

Contractor Name:

Contract Award Date:
Contract Expiration Date:
Contract Value:

Supplies or Services:

Ratings

Summarize contractor performance and check the number which corresponds to the rating for each rating category (See attached Rating Guidelines).

Quality of Product or Service Unsatisfactory Poor Fair Good Excellent Outstanding

Government Comments for Quality of Product or Service (2000 characters maximum):

Cost Control (Rating and Comments for Cost Control are not required if contract type is Fixed-Price) Unsatisfactory Poor Fair Good Excellent Outstanding

Government Comments for Cost Control (2000 characters maximum):

Timeliness of Performance Unsatisfactory Poor Fair Good Excellent Outstanding

Government Comments for Timeliness of Performance (2000 characters maximum):

Business Relations Unsatisfactory Poor Fair Good Excellent Outstanding

Government Comments for Business Relations (2000 characters maximum):

Additional Info

Subcontracts

Are subcontracts involved? __Yes __No (Check one) Comment on subcontracts (2000 characters maximum):

Customer Satisfaction

Is/was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction? _Yes _No (Check one)

Would you recommend the selection of this firm again? _Yes _No (Check one) –

Comments on Customer Satisfaction (2000 characters maximum):

Admin Info

Project Officer/COR Name:

Phone:

Fax:

E-mail Address:

Contracting Officer:

Name:

Phone:

Fax:

E-mail Address:

Rating Guidelines

Quality of Product or Service

Unsatisfactory
Non-conformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards containing similar requirements.
Poor
Overall compliance requires significant Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Fair
Overall compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Good
There are no, or very minimal, quality problems, and the Contractor has met the contract requirements.
Excellent
There are no quality issues, and the Contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the Government.
Outstanding
The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that was significantly in excess of anticipated achievements and is commendable as an example for others, so that it justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent".

Cost Control

Unsatisfactory
Ability to manage cost issues is jeopardizing performance of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, this level of ability to manage cost issues constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards.
Poor
Ability to manage cost issues requires significant Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Fair
Ability to control cost issues requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Good
There are no, or very minimal, cost management issues and the Contractor has met the contract requirements.
Excellent
There are no cost management issues and the Contractor has exceeded the contract requirements, achieving cost savings to the Government.
Outstanding
The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where the contractor achieved cost savings and performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent".

Timeliness of Performance

Unsatisfactory
Delays are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards.
Poor
Delays require significant Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Fair
Delays require minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Good
There are no, or minimal, delays that impact achievement of contract requirements.
Excellent
There are no delays and the contractor has exceeded the agreed upon time schedule.
Outstanding
The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent".

Business Relations

Unsatisfactory
Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues is not effective. If not substantially mitigated or corrected it should constitute a significant impediment in considerations for future awards.
Poor
Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues is marginally effective.
Fair
Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues is somewhat effective.
Good
Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues is consistently effective.
Excellent
Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues exceeds Government expectation.
Outstanding
The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent".

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .