17.3 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.DOCX

DOCX document 57 KB Posted

Attached to
WAPA Tower Inspection and Maintenance Services
Solicitation number
89503120QWA000127
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
1. Sol_89503120QWA000127 SF1449.pdf PDF
4. Sol_89503120QWA000127_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
2. Sol_89503120QWA000127_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
3. Sol_89503120QWA000127_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
5. BID SCHEDULE Amendment 3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
05.1 WAPA TOWER INSPECTION PLAN Revised 7-30-20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Sol_89503120QWA000127_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
05.1 WAPA TOWER INSPECTION PLAN.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Sol_89503120QWA000127.pdf PDF
17.2 BID SCHEDULE.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IPP Payment Requirements.docx DOCX document
17.1 DOL Wage Determination ALL.pdf PDF
05. PWS FINAL.docx DOCX document
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Customer Service Region P.O. Box 6457 Phoenix, AZ 85005-6457

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation No.: 89503120QWA000127

SECTION I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

CONTRACTOR NAME:
CONTRACT NO:

CONTRACTOR ADDRESS:

CONTRACT TYPE:

|_| FIRM-FIXED-PRICE

|_| COST REIMBURSEMENT

|_| OTHER: (specify)

|_| ACTIVE |_| COMPLETED

|_| ROUTINE |_| COMPLEX

DATES OF PERFORMANCE:

AWARD AMOUNT: $

TOTAL WITH MODS: $

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

SECTION II. AGENCY (REQUESTOR) IDENTIFICATION

AGENCY (CUSTOMER) NAME: WAPA –DSW Phoenix, AZ

POC NAME AND TITLE: Jeannine Veitz, Contract Specialist PHONE: 602-605-2999 EMAIL: jveitz@wapa.gov

SECTION III. PAST PERFORMANCE RATING

Rating Scale:E = Excellent. Considerably surpassed requirements/expectations.
G = Good. Surpassed requirements/expectations.
S = Satisfactory. Met requirements/expectations
M = Marginal. Met some requirements/expectations

U = Unsatisfactory. Did not meet requirements/expectations

2. QUALITY:
(Circle applicable rating)
a. Conformance with contract requirements
E G S M U
b. Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)
E G S M U
c. General oversight by project manager and superintendent
E G S M U
d. Coordination with and control of subcontractors
E G S M U
e. Compliance with Davis-Bacon or other wage rate and labor usage requirements
E G S M U
f. Avoidance of accidents/safety violations
E G S M U

3. TIMELINESS:

(Circle applicable rating)

a. Adherence to project delivery schedules
E G S M U
b. Submission of change proposals
E G S M U
c. Response to technical direction and change orders
E G S M U
d. Response to correction of identified problems
E G S M U
e. Submission of timely/accurate/complete billings
E G S M U
f. Submission of materials/other submittals
E G S M U
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS:
(Circle applicable rating)
a. Flexibility and cooperativeness in resolving problems
E G S M U
b. Tenacity and innovativeness in resolving problems
E G S M U
c. Relationships with subcontractors, including prompt payment
E G S M U
d. End user was satisfied with services performed
E G S M U

SECTION IV. COMMENTS FOR M = MARGINAL AND U = UNSATISFACTORY RATINGS

Item No.
Comment
PRINTED NAME: __________________________________
DATE:_______________

SIGNATURE: ______________________________________

WAPA–DSW Solicitation No. Page 2 of 2 image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .