1605C5-25-Q-00033 - PPQ.doc
DOC document 62 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Industrial Building Construction Data & Price Updates Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1605C5-25-Q-00033
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Request for Quote (RFQ) 1605C5-25-Q-00033, issued by the Department of Labor (DOL) for Industrial Building Construction Data & Price Updates. The solicitation covers a base period from September 8, 2025 to May 31, 2026, with four additional option periods extending through May 31, 2030. The questionnaire is designed to collect detailed performance feedback from previous contractors, evaluating their performance across four key areas: quality of goods/services, contract performance, timeliness of performance, and personnel management/subcontractors. The form uses an adjectival rating system ranging from Outstanding to Unsatisfactory, allowing evaluators to provide specific ratings and comments on a vendor's past performance, which will be used as part of the DOL's evaluation criteria for the contract award.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_1605C5-25-Q-00033.pdf | ||
| 1605C5-25-Q-00033 RFQ Question and Answer.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1605C5-25-Q-00033
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REF: RFQ # 1605C5-25-Q-00033– Industrial Building Construction Data & Price Updates
PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS
The company who has provided you with this form plans to submit a proposal to the Department of Labor (DOL) in response to a Request for Quote (RFQ) for Industrial Building Construction Data & Price Updates. Past Performance is an important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition, so your input is very important.
Please provide an honest assessment and return the questionnaire to the DOL Contracting Office via email to Rachael Vargas (Vargas.Rachael.N@dol.gov), and DeCarlo Coleman coleman.decarlo@dol.gov) by the time specified in the RFQ.
PART ONE: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. VENDOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS
2. CUSTOMER AGENCY
3. CONTRACT NUMBER:
2a. EVALUATOR
4. CONTRACT VALUE: $______________________
NAME:
5. CONTRACT AWARD DATE: ________________
TITLE:
6. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: ___________
PHONE NO:
7. CONTRACT TYPE (Circle All That Apply): FP
CPFF
CPAF OTHER
8. COMPLEXITY OF WORK (Circle One Response): DIFFICULT ROUTINE
9. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
PART TWO: VENDOR PERFORMANCE RATING
On the following pages, please summarize the vendor’s performance. Each section has a set of questions with five possible adjectival ratings. Determine the adjectival rating that most nearly represents your experience with this vendor and indicate your assessment by placing an “X” under the appropriate heading. These sections are:
A. QUALITY OF SERVICE
B. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
C. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
D. PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT / SUBCONTRACTORS
Also, it is very important (and beneficial to our evaluation) if you submit examples and/or comments as to why they were rated as such in the sections herein.
Adjectival ratings are defined below and should be used as a reference in assessing performance:
| Outstanding |
| Contractor’s performance significantly exceeded most or all contract requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. |
| Acceptable |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Neutral |
| In the case of a vendor without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the vendor may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problems(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| A |
| QUALITY OF GOODS/SERVICES |
| O |
| A |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| 1 |
| Rate the overall quality of the services received. |
| 2 |
| Company’s handling of issues or problems. |
COMMENTS:
| B |
| CONTRACT PERFORMANCE |
| O |
| A |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| 1 |
| Was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from counterparts? |
| 2 |
| How effective has the contractor been in understanding and responding to additional user requirements? |
| C |
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| O |
| A |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| 1 |
| Were the services provided according to contract requirements? |
| 2 |
| Were schedules/timelines adhered to? Were all task completed/provided on-time? |
| 3 |
| Was the contractor responsive to technical direction? |
| D |
| PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT / SUBCONTRACTORS |
| O |
| A |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| 1 |
| Rate the overall quality of the personnel management. |
| 2 |
| Company’s handling of issues or problems. |
PART THREE: VENDOR PERFORMANCE RATING
1.
Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience?
YES
If so, by Default
Convenience ____
NO
If yes, please explain (e.g. inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules - also include contract number, name, address, and phone number of Terminating Contracting Officer - TCO).
2.
What was the contractor’s greatest strength in the performance of the contract?
3.
What was the contractor’s greatest weakness in the performance of the contract?
4.
Would you award another contract to this contractor?
YES
No
WHY?
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
PART FOUR: EVALUATOR’S CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS FORM IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR
TITLE OF EVALUATOR
DATE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .