Attachment 3 - Evaluation Criteria.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LCMS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 15A00024Q00000091
About this file
This document is the Evaluation Criteria attachment for a Request for Quote (RFQ) issued by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) for the procurement of a liquid chromatograph mass spectrometer (LCMS) system. The RFQ will be awarded on a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) basis. Technical capability and past performance will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis, and only the lowest priced quote that meets the minimum technical requirements will be reviewed. The price evaluation will assess the reasonableness of the proposed price. The RFQ has a closing date of July 19, 2024 and responses must be valid for 30 calendar days. The associated NAICS code is 334516 - analytical laboratory instrument manufacturing.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 2 - Instructions (15A00024Q00000091 0001).docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 - Minimum Technical Requirements (15A00024Q00000091 0001).docx | DOCX document | |
| 15A00024Q00000091 0001- 1449.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Evaluation Criteria (15A00024Q00000091 0001).docx | DOCX document | |
| 15A00024Q00000091 - 1449.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Minimum Technical Requirements.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2 - Instructions.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3 – EVALUATION CRITERIA
15A00024Q00000091
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
The Government will award a Contract resulting from this Request for Quote (RFQ) to the offeror whose Quote is Lowest Price Technically Acceptable. The ATF will award a contract to the lowest priced contractor whose quote meets or exceeds the Minimum Technical Requirements.
Only the lowest priced quote will be reviewed for technical acceptability. If it’s found to be technically acceptable, award will be made to that offeror without further evaluation of the other quotes received. If the quote is technically unacceptable, then the next lowest priced quote will be evaluated for technical acceptability until a technically acceptable quote is found.
Non-Price Factors:
· Factor 1: Technical Capability
The Government will evaluate the Technical Acceptability of the quote by verifying the offeror provided a product description verifying it meets the Minimum Technical Requirements.
· Factor 2: Past Performance
· The Government may seek relevant performance information on all responsive and otherwise Technically Acceptable Offerors through sources such as Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), or other government data bases and other sources that are available. The government shall not be limited in its search for performance data. The offeror shall not submit performance data for this factor. When performance is evaluated, the outcome is either Acceptable or Unacceptable. Unacceptable performance will disqualify an offeror from award.
Price Factor:
· Factor 3: Price
If more than one quote is received, competition will determine price reasonableness and a price evaluation will not be completed.
If one quote is received, price evaluation will proceed. The purpose of the price evaluation is to provide an assessment of the reasonableness of the submitted price in relation to the solicitation requirements.
Price will be evaluated based upon the following:
· Material – Will be compared to commercially available pricing.
· Labor – Will evaluate labor categories, hours, and rates to verify they match the complexity of the requirement and meet market value for similar labor rates.
· Travel – Will be evaluated based on market pricing and GSA rates.
The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror's initial offer should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest; accept other than the lowest offer; and waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received.
A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.
EVALUATION PROCEDURES
Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating
Offeror’s Technical Capability and Past Performance will be rated using an Acceptable/Unacceptable rating system.
Technical Capability
| Adjectival Rating |
| Description |
| Acceptable |
| Quote meets the requirements of the solicitation. |
| Unacceptable |
| Quote does not meet the requirements of the solicitation. |
Past Performance
| Adjective |
| Definition / Description |
| Acceptable |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. |
| Unacceptable |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
Price Analysis
If more than one quote is received, competition will determine price reasonableness.
If only one quote is received, the price evaluation is to provide an assessment of the reasonableness of the proposed price in relation to the solicitation requirements.
Price Evaluation: The total price will be evaluated by the Contracting Officer.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .