Attachment_9_-_PPQ.doc

DOC document 69 KB Posted

Attached to
Onsite Pathology Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
15-223-SOL-00068
Issued by
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration

About this file

Attachment 9 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Onsite Pathology Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
SF_30.pdf PDF
Attachment_1-Pathology_PWS.doc DOC document
Attachment_6_-_Conflict_of_Interest.doc DOC document
Attachment_5_-_Data_Disclosure.doc DOC document
Attachment_7_-_Pricing_Schedule.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_8_-_SAMPLE_CLIENT__LETTER.doc DOC document
Attachment_12_-_Non-SCA_Exempt_Incumbent_Employees_Length_of_Service_Information.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_2_-_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_FORM_FDA_3391.pdf PDF
FDA-15-223-SOL-00068.pdf PDF
Attachment_10_-_Question_Form.doc DOC document
Attachment_4_-_FORM_FDA_3398.pdf PDF
Attachment_11_-_Mock_Protocol.pdf PDF
Appendices1-5.pdf PDF
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

15-223-SOL-00068

On-Site Pathology Services

Attachment #9, PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE Part I. Contract Identification: (to be completed by Offeror) A. Offeror Information

Name:

Address:

Representative:

Telephone Number:

E-Mail Address:

B. Offeror’s Subcontractor Information (if past performance reference is for the Offeror’s subcontractor and not the Offeror itself) Name:

Telephone Number:

E-Mail Address:

C. Agency or Company (Client) Information Agency/Company Name:

Telephone Number:

E-Mail Address:

D. Contract for which this questionnaire was submitted:

Contract Number:

Role of Offeror/Subcontractor in the Contract (i.e., prime, sub):

Location of Work:

Description of Work:

Relevance of the referenced contract to the current requirement:

Problems Encountered in Performance and Corrective Actions Taken:

Part II. Evaluation (to be completed by Client) A.

Contract Information:

Agency/Company Name:

Representative/Evaluator:

Telephone Number:

E-Mail Address:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Period of Performance:

Original Contract Amount:

Final Contract Amount:

Description of Work Performed and the Contractor’s Association (or Major Subcontractor Association, if past performance reference is for the Offeror’s subcontractor and not the Offeror itself) with the Project (Prime, Subcontractor, etc): __________________________________________________________________

Reason for difference (if any) between original contract amount and final contract amount:

B. Contractor Performance Ratings:

Please rate the Contractor’s performance by utilizing the ratings defined below; it is imperative that ratings be accompanied by supporting narrative (comments):

Rating
Definition
Outstanding
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Above Average
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet significant contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

1.

Timeliness of Performance

a. To what extent did the contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)

Outstanding

Above Average

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Comments: __________________________________________________________________

b. To what extent did the contractor submit required reports and documentation in a timely manner? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)

2.

Quality of Work

a. To what extent were the contractor’s reports and documentation accurate and complete? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)

b. To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from Company/Government counterparts? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)

c. Did the contractor provide a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, and specifications? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)

3.

Business Relations

a. To what extent did the contractor commit adequate resources to the contract in a timely fashion in order to meet the requirements and to successfully solve problems? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)

b. To what extent did the contractor respond positively and promptly to technical directions, contract modifications, etc.? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)

c. To what extent was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction and concerned for its customer’s interests? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)

d. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)

( )Yes ( )No

( )Default ( )Convenience

If yes, explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedule):

4. Cost Control

a. How well did the firm conform to the project budget? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)

b. How effective was the Contractor in forecasting and controlling project cost? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)

5.

Management of Key Personnel

a. Did the contractor use personnel with the appropriate skills and expertise to fulfill the requirements of the contract? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)

b. Did the contractor retain the necessary skilled personnel and maintain a low turnover rate? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)

6.

General

a. Were you satisfied overall with the Contractor’s performance?

( )Yes ( ) No Comments: __________________________________________________________________

b. Would you do business with this contractor again?

( )Yes ( ) No

C. Evaluator Information:

Name (please print):

Title:

Work phone number (including area code): _______________________________

FAX number (including area code):

E-Mail address:

Signature:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .