Attachment_9_-_PPQ.doc
DOC document 69 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Onsite Pathology Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 15-223-SOL-00068
About this file
Attachment 9 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF_30.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1-Pathology_PWS.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_6_-_Conflict_of_Interest.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_5_-_Data_Disclosure.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_7_-_Pricing_Schedule.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_8_-_SAMPLE_CLIENT__LETTER.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_12_-_Non-SCA_Exempt_Incumbent_Employees_Length_of_Service_Information.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_2_-_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3_-_FORM_FDA_3391.pdf | ||
| FDA-15-223-SOL-00068.pdf | ||
| Attachment_10_-_Question_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_4_-_FORM_FDA_3398.pdf | ||
| Attachment_11_-_Mock_Protocol.pdf | ||
| Appendices1-5.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
15-223-SOL-00068
On-Site Pathology Services
Attachment #9, PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE Part I. Contract Identification: (to be completed by Offeror) A. Offeror Information
Name:
Address:
Representative:
Telephone Number:
E-Mail Address:
B. Offeror’s Subcontractor Information (if past performance reference is for the Offeror’s subcontractor and not the Offeror itself) Name:
Telephone Number:
E-Mail Address:
C. Agency or Company (Client) Information Agency/Company Name:
Telephone Number:
E-Mail Address:
D. Contract for which this questionnaire was submitted:
Contract Number:
Role of Offeror/Subcontractor in the Contract (i.e., prime, sub):
Location of Work:
Description of Work:
Relevance of the referenced contract to the current requirement:
Problems Encountered in Performance and Corrective Actions Taken:
Part II. Evaluation (to be completed by Client) A.
Contract Information:
Agency/Company Name:
Representative/Evaluator:
Telephone Number:
E-Mail Address:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Period of Performance:
Original Contract Amount:
Final Contract Amount:
Description of Work Performed and the Contractor’s Association (or Major Subcontractor Association, if past performance reference is for the Offeror’s subcontractor and not the Offeror itself) with the Project (Prime, Subcontractor, etc): __________________________________________________________________
Reason for difference (if any) between original contract amount and final contract amount:
B. Contractor Performance Ratings:
Please rate the Contractor’s performance by utilizing the ratings defined below; it is imperative that ratings be accompanied by supporting narrative (comments):
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Outstanding |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Above Average |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet significant contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
1.
Timeliness of Performance
a. To what extent did the contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)
Outstanding
Above Average
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Comments: __________________________________________________________________
b. To what extent did the contractor submit required reports and documentation in a timely manner? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)
2.
Quality of Work
a. To what extent were the contractor’s reports and documentation accurate and complete? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)
b. To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from Company/Government counterparts? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)
c. Did the contractor provide a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, and specifications? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)
3.
Business Relations
a. To what extent did the contractor commit adequate resources to the contract in a timely fashion in order to meet the requirements and to successfully solve problems? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)
b. To what extent did the contractor respond positively and promptly to technical directions, contract modifications, etc.? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)
c. To what extent was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction and concerned for its customer’s interests? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)
d. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)
( )Yes ( )No
( )Default ( )Convenience
If yes, explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedule):
4. Cost Control
a. How well did the firm conform to the project budget? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)
b. How effective was the Contractor in forecasting and controlling project cost? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)
5.
Management of Key Personnel
a. Did the contractor use personnel with the appropriate skills and expertise to fulfill the requirements of the contract? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)
b. Did the contractor retain the necessary skilled personnel and maintain a low turnover rate? (Ratings Must Be Supported by Comments)
6.
General
a. Were you satisfied overall with the Contractor’s performance?
( )Yes ( ) No Comments: __________________________________________________________________
b. Would you do business with this contractor again?
( )Yes ( ) No
C. Evaluator Information:
Name (please print):
Title:
Work phone number (including area code): _______________________________
FAX number (including area code):
E-Mail address:
Signature:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .