Questions_and_Answers_0001.pdf
PDF 183 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Split Rail Fence Materials Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P6425Q0114
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers amendment for a solicitation (#140P6425Q0114) for Split Rail Fence Materials at Zion. The amendment provides clarification on three key questions: (1) the desire is for split posts, not round posts, (2) split posts do not require debarking, and (3) Eastern Red Cedar is an acceptable material for the fence materials. The document includes a tabular format with question numbers, specific inquiries, and corresponding responses, with space for additional questions left blank.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P6425Q0114_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Revised_Specifications_0001.pdf | ||
| Specifications.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P6425Q0114.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation #: 140P6425Q0114
Amendment #: P0001
Split Rail Fence Materials – ZION
Questions and Answers listed below:
QUESTIONS:
Question # Question Answer/Response
1. Are you wanting a round post or a post that has been split? Split
2. If you are needing Round post do they have to be debarked.
N/A. Split posts are desired. No debarking required.
3. Is Eastern Red Cedar acceptable? Yes 4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .