Attachment05_PastPerformanceQuestionnaire_0003.docx
DOCX document 39 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Janitorial Services - Hot Springs National Park
- Solicitation number
- 140P6224Q0035
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for the National Park Service's consideration of a company for a project opportunity. The PPQ requests information from the project owner/evaluator on the company's past performance, including their relationship with the client, overall management, quality control, ability to meet schedule, and whether the customer was satisfied with the final product and services. The PPQ also asks if any cure notices, show cause letters, or terminations were issued, and if the evaluator would award another contract to the company. The questionnaire includes an overall performance rating.
The document also includes details on a related federal contract opportunity for janitorial services at Hot Springs National Park. This is a total small business set-aside with a base year and two option years. Quotes are due by August 12, 2024 and will be evaluated on price, prior experience, and past performance. A site visit is scheduled for July 26, 2024. The contract will be firm-fixed price.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P6224Q0035_Amd_0005.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P6224Q0035_Amd_0004.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P6224Q0035_Amd_0003.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P6224Q0035_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P6224Q0035_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment04_PriceSchedule-Revised_0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment03_WageDetermination.pdf | ||
| Attachment02_PriceSchedule.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment01_StatementOfWork.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Department of Interior Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service is considering the company listed below in Section A for a project opportunity - Your comments would be appreciated regarding this company’s past performance.
Instructions:
1) The offeror is to complete only the information in Section A, then send the entire past performance questionnaire to project owner/evaluator for completion.
2) The project owner/evaluator (or reference) is to complete Section B, then send the entire past performance questionnaire back to the offeror to be provided with their complete proposal package, which will then be reviewed for evaluation.
3) The past performance questionnaire must be received by the contracting point of contact by the date and time specified in the solicitation (or any amendments). Please note that for electronic submissions, offerors should consider and account for potential delays in transmissions between when an electronic submission is submitted and when an electronic submission is received. Late past performance questionnaires will not be accepted.
4) One past performance questionnaire is to be used for each past performance project submitted. The offeror must submit three past performance questionnaires for this solicitation.
Section A
Project Title:
Location:
Description:
| Company Name: |
| Unique Entity ID/Cage Code: |
| Owner/Project Manager Name: |
| Email Address: |
| Start Date: |
| Completion Date: |
| Initial Amount: |
| Final Amount: |
Section B
Evaluator
| Evaluator Name: |
| Company/Agency Name: |
| Address: |
| POC Email: |
Position Held or Function in Relation to Project:
Ratings Overview
Rating: If the rating is Marginal or Unacceptable, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.
| “O” |
| Outstanding |
| Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements. |
| “A” |
| Above Average |
| Performance exceeded the contract requirements. |
| “S” |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance met the contract requirements. |
| “M” |
| Marginal |
| Performance met the minimum contract requirements but |
Some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory.
| “U” |
| Unacceptable |
| Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements. |
Questionnaire
Please select the appropriate rating and provide supporting information for the following questions.
| 1. The relationship between the company and client’s/customer’s contract team: |
| O |
A S M U
2. Overall management, integrity, reasonableness, and cooperative conduct:
O A S M U
3. Quality control:
O
A S M U
4. Ability to meet the performance schedule:
O
A S M U
5. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or terminations been issued? If yes, please explain:
Yes
No
6. Would you award another contract to the company being evaluated? If no, please explain:
7. Was the customer satisfied with the final product and services? If no, please explain:
9. Overall Rating
O
A S M U
10. Comments
Evaluator Signature
Name
Date:
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .