B08_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 161 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P5425R0019
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire for National Park Service Solicitation Number 140P5425R0019 to replace the wastewater treatment plant at Dry Tortugas National Park. The questionnaire is designed to collect reference information from previous clients about a contractor's performance on similar projects. The completed questionnaire must be submitted directly to Contracting Officer William Vazquez at william_vazquez@nps.gov by 1:00 p.m. ET on August 20, 2025, and must come from a corporate or government email account.
The questionnaire contains two main sections: contract information and performance evaluation. The contract information section requests details about the reference contract including contract number, value, period of performance, description of work, and contact information for the person completing the evaluation. The evaluation section uses a five-point rating scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, plus Not Applicable) to assess contractor performance across multiple criteria including overall performance, timeliness in providing products, ability to resolve issues, quality of work/shipments, and an overall rating considering requirements, schedule, and price. Each evaluation category includes space for detailed comments and explanatory narratives to support the ratings provided.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P5425R0019_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Questions_and_Answers_0001.pdf | ||
| Inadvertent_Discovery_Plan_0001.pdf | ||
| A06_Specifications.pdf | ||
| A06_Drawings.pdf | ||
| B03_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| A06_DRTO_Existing_Utilities.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5425R0019.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation# 140P5425R0019
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to william_vazquez@nps.gov
Currently, we are preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, ConOps East, South MABO, Solicitation Number: 140P5425R0019 to Replace the Wastewater Treatment Plant at Dry Tortugas National Park. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer, e-mail: william_vazquez@nps.gov
Questionnaire is due to William Vazquez no later than 1:00 p.m. ET on August 20, 2025. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.
NAME OF CONTRACTOR:
Phone:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance: ________________________________________________________
4. Brief description of items provided: ______________________________________________
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Company: __________________________________________________________
Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor using guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used to assess Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation.
Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Issues
Question 4. Quality of Work
The Contractor’s ability to meet task requirements and the work’s overall quality.
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
| Evaluation Definitions |
| The following definitions should be used to assess Contractor performance. |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| N/A |
| N/A |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .